Polyaxial locking plates in treating distal humeral fractures: a comparative randomized trial for clinical outcome

Moritz Crönlein, Martin Lucke, Marc Beirer, Dominik Pförringer, Chlodwig Kirchhoff, Peter Biberthaler, Karl F Braun, Sebastian Siebenlist, Moritz Crönlein, Martin Lucke, Marc Beirer, Dominik Pförringer, Chlodwig Kirchhoff, Peter Biberthaler, Karl F Braun, Sebastian Siebenlist

Abstract

Background: Management of distal humeral fractures remains to be one of the most challenging aspects in trauma surgery. Low profile plating systems with variable angle screw fixation represent a crucial advancement to the established angular stable locking plates with considerable attention in current research. The aim of the prospective randomized trial was to review the preliminary results and patients' outcome following treatment with these newly developed implants and to rule out potential differences in fracture treatment of two different plating systems.

Methods: Twenty patients with distal humeral fractures (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) were included in the current study since 2014. After completing the randomization plan, patients were distributed into two groups for different variable angle locking plates (DePuy Synthes® VA-LCP vs. Medartis® Aptus Elbow). Functional elbow scoring (ROM, MEPS, QuickDASH) served as primary outcome parameter, while radiological fracture consolidation served as secondary outcome parameter. Follow-ups were conducted 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.

Results: Seventeen of 20 patients (85%) concluded all follow-up examinations. Postoperative elbow extension deficiencies showed significant differences between the two groups in all follow-up examinations with a mean of Ø 18 +/- 7.4 degrees in the DePuy Synthes® VA-LCP group compared to a mean of Ø 6.5 +/- 7.5 degrees in the Medartis® Aptus Elbow group (p = 0.002) 12 months postoperatively. Functional scoring showed a disparate pattern. The Medartis® Aptus Elbow group achieved significantly better MEP scores during follow-up. However, the analysis of the QuickDash revealed better results of the DePuy Synthes® VA-LCP group in the first half and better results of the Medartis® Aptus Elbow group in the second half of the follow-up examination instead.

Conclusions: Considering the complexity of distal humeral fractures, the usage of anatomically preshaped low profile variable angle locking plates for operative treatment leads to good clinical results. Even though there might be some advances of the Medartis® Aptus Elbow plating system concerning postoperative ROM and elbow function, a consistent difference in the overall clinical outcome between the two plating systems could not be detected.

Trial registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03272490 Retrospectively Registered 1. September 2017.

Keywords: Anatomical preshaped; Distal humeral fracture; Locking plate; Outcome; Polyaxial.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethics Committee of the medical faculty, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany; study number: 253/14). Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

Marc Beirer, MD, is a member of the Editorial Board of BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

The authors declare that there are no financial or personal conflicts of interests that could have influenced this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the progress through the phase of the prospective randomized trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of the extension deficits. Comparison of extension deficits (Mean Value and Standard Deviation) following distal humeral plating (DePuy Synthes® vs. Medartis® Aptus Elbow) 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively are presented in this figure. At all times of follow-up evaluation, the extension deficits showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ORIF of a distal humerus fracture (AO 13-C3) with the Medartis® Aptus Elbow System. Radiographs of a 55-year-old female patient with a AO type 13-C3 fracture resulting from a bicycle accident: preoperative x-rays (a), postoperative results, 6 weeks (b), 12 weeks (c) and 6 months (d) following Medartis® Aptus Elbow plating. Implant removal could be obtained after fracture consolidation (e)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
ORIF of a distal humerus fracture (AO 13-C3) with the DePuy Synthes® VA-LCP System. Radiographs and CT Scans of a 82-year-old female patient with a AO type 13-C3 fracture resulting from a fall. Preoperative x-rays and CT Scans (a), postoperative results, 6 weeks (b) and 12 months (c) following DePuy Synthes® VA-LCP plating

References

    1. Bonnaire F, Bula P. Distale Humerusfrakturen. Trauma Berufskr. 2010;12(S2):96–103. doi: 10.1007/s10039-010-1614-y.
    1. Charissoux JL, Vergnenegre G, Pelissier M, Fabre T, Mansat P. Sofcot: epidemiology of distal humerus fractures in the elderly. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(7):765–769. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.002.
    1. Pidhorz L, Alligand-Perrin P, De Keating E, Fabre T, Mansat P. Societe francaise de chirurgie orthopedique et t: distal humerus fracture in the elderly: does conservative treatment still have a role? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(8):903–907. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.10.001.
    1. Ring D, Waters P. Operative fixation of Monteggia fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(5):734–739. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199605000-00013.
    1. Zogbi DR, Terrivel AM, Mouraria GG, Mongon ML, Kikuta FK, Filho AZ. Fracture of distal humerus: MIPO technique with visualization of the radial nerve. Acta Ortop Bras. 2014;22(6):300–303. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522014220601003.
    1. Jung SW, Kang SH, Jeong M, Lim HS. Triangular fixation technique for Bicolumn restoration in treatment of distal Humerus Intercondylar fracture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8(1):9–18. doi: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.1.9.
    1. Munde SL, Bhatti MJ, Siwach RC, Gulia A, Kundu ZS, Bansal S, Middha S, Kamra HT. Double tension band Osteosynthesis in inter-Condylar humeral fractures. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(12):RC08–RC11.
    1. Park JS, Kim YT, Choi SJ. Crisscross-type screw fixation for transcondylar fractures of distal humerus in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2116-3.
    1. Pooley J, Salvador Carreno J. Total elbow joint replacement for fractures in the elderly--functional and radiological outcomes. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 5):S37–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.011.
    1. Schmidt-Horlohe K, Siebenlist S, Stockle U, Hoffmann R. Distal humeri fractures. Z Orthop Unfall. 2011;149(1):95–108. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270744.
    1. Amir S, Jannis S, Daniel R. Distal humerus fractures: a review of current therapy concepts. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9(2):199–206. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9341-z.
    1. Korner J, Diederichs G, Arzdorf M, Lill H, Josten C, Schneider E, Linke B. A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(5):286–293. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200405000-00004.
    1. El-Zayat BF, Efe T, Ruchholtz S, Khatib S, Timmesfeld N, Krüger A, Zettl R. Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures – a biomechanical comparison of the non-contact-bridging- (NCB) and the PERILOC-plate. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15(369):369-76.
    1. Yenna ZC, Bhadra AK, Ojike NI, Burden RL, Voor MJ, Roberts CS. Polyaxial screws in locked plating of Tibial Pilon fractures. Orthopedics. 2015;38(8):e663–e667. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150804-51.
    1. Mehling I, Scheifl R, Mehler D, Klitscher D, Hely H, Rommens PM. Are there any differences in various polyaxial locking systems? A mechanical study of different locking screws in multidirectional angular stable distal radius plates. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2013;58(2):187–194. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2012-0105.
    1. van Olden GDJ. VA-LCP anterior clavicle plate: the anatomically precontoured fixation system with angular stability for clavicle shaft. Musculoskelet Surg. 2014;98(3):217–223. doi: 10.1007/s12306-013-0302-z.
    1. Crönlein M, Zyskowski M, Beirer M, Imhoff FB, Pforringer D, Sandmann GH, Kirchhoff C, Biberthaler P, Siebenlist S. Using an anatomically preshaped low-profile locking plate system leads to reliable results in comminuted radial head fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(6):789-95.
    1. Hanschen M, Aschenbrenner IM, Fehske K, Kirchhoff S, Keil L, Holzapfel BM, Winkler S, Fuechtmeier B, Neugebauer R, Luehrs S, et al. Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial. Int Orthop. 2014;38(4):857–863. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2210-0.
    1. Greiner S, Haas NP, Bail HJ. Outcome after open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for supra-intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus: preliminary results with the LCP distal humerus system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(7):723–729. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0428-2.
    1. Chen H, Li D, Zhang J, Xiong X. Comparison of treatments in patients with distal humerus intercondylar fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2017;49(7):1–13.
    1. O'Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(1 Suppl S):186S–194S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.033.
    1. Begue T. Articular fractures of the distal humerus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl):S55–S63. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.11.002.
    1. Leigey DF, Farrell DJ, Siska PA, Tarkin IS. Bicolumnar 90-90 plating of low-energy distal humeral fractures in the elderly patient. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2014;5(3):122–126. doi: 10.1177/2151458514526882.
    1. Abzug JM, Dantuluri PK. Use of orthogonal or parallel plating techniques to treat distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin. 2010;26(3):411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.05.008.
    1. Govindasamy R, Shekhawat V, Banshiwal RC, Verma RK. Clinico-radiological outcome analysis of parallel plating with perpendicular plating in distal humeral intra-articular fractures: prospective randomised study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(2):RC13–RC16.
    1. Gerich TG. Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus : aspects of fracture treatment in geriatric patients. Orthopade. 2014;43(4):347–352. doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2162-5.
    1. Stoffel K, Cunneen S, Morgan R, Nicholls R, Stachowiak G. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(6):778–784. doi: 10.1002/jor.20528.
    1. Arnander M, Reeves A, MacLeod IA, Pinto T, Khaleel A. A biomechanical comparison of plate configuration in distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(5):332–336. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31816edbce.
    1. Kudo T, Hara A, Iwase H, Ichihara S, Nagao M, Maruyama Y, Kaneko K. Biomechanical properties of orthogonal plate configuration versus parallel plate configuration using the same locking plate system for intra-articular distal humeral fractures under radial or ulnar column axial load. Injury. 2016; 47(10):2071-6.
    1. Tidwell JE, Roush EP, Ondeck CL, Kunselman AR, Reid JS, Lewis GS. The biomechanical cost of variable angle locking screws. Injury. 2016;47(8):1624–1630. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.001.
    1. Fan D, Wang W, Hildebrand KA, Fan CY. Open arthrolysis for elbow stiffness increases carrying angle but has no impact on functional recovery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1205-6.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅