Supervised exercise therapy versus usual care for patellofemoral pain syndrome: an open label randomised controlled trial

R van Linschoten, M van Middelkoop, M Y Berger, E M Heintjes, J A N Verhaar, S P Willemsen, B W Koes, S M Bierma-Zeinstra, R van Linschoten, M van Middelkoop, M Y Berger, E M Heintjes, J A N Verhaar, S P Willemsen, B W Koes, S M Bierma-Zeinstra

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of supervised exercise therapy compared with usual care with respect to recovery, pain, and function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Design: Open label randomised controlled trial.

Setting: General practice and sport physician practice.

Participants: Patients with a new episode of patellofemoral pain syndrome recruited by their general practitioner or sport physician.

Interventions: The intervention group received a standardised exercise programme for 6 weeks tailored to individual performance and supervised by a physical therapist, and were instructed to practise the tailored exercises at home for 3 months. The control group were assigned usual care, which comprised a "wait and see" approach of rest during periods of pain and refraining from pain provoking activities. Both the intervention group and the control group received written information about patellofemoral pain syndrome and general instructions for home exercises.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were self reported recovery (7 point Likert scale), pain at rest and pain on activity (0-10 point numerical rating scale), and function (0-100 point Kujala patellofemoral score) at 3 months and 12 months follow-up.

Results: A total of 131 participants were included in the study: 65 in the intervention group and 66 in the control group. After 3 months, the intervention group showed better outcomes than the control group with regard to pain at rest (adjusted difference -1.07, 95% confidence interval -1.92 to -0.22; effect size 0.47), pain on activity (-1.00, -1.91 to -0.08; 0.45), and function (4.92, 0.14 to 9.72; 0.34). At 12 months, the intervention group continued to show better outcomes than the control group with regard to pain (adjusted difference in pain at rest -1.29, -2.16 to -0.42; effect size 0.56; pain on activity -1.19, -2.22 to -0.16; effect size 0.54), but not function (4.52, -0.73 to 9.76). A higher proportion of patients in the exercise group than in the control group reported recovery (41.9% v 35.0% at 3 months and 62.1% v 50.8% at 12 months), although the differences in self reported recovery between the two groups were not statistically significant. Predefined subgroup analyses revealed that patients recruited by sport physicians (n=30) did not benefit from the intervention, whereas those recruited by general practitioners (n=101) showed significant and clinically relevant differences in pain and function in favour of the intervention group.

Conclusion: Supervised exercise therapy resulted in less pain and better function at short term and long term follow-up compared with usual care in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in general practice. Exercise therapy did not produce a significant difference in the rate of self reported recovery.

Trial registration: ISRCTN83938749.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787457/bin/vanr644393.f1_default.jpg
Fig 1 Flow chart of the recruitment, inclusion, assignment, and subsequent follow-up of the study patients. #=physical therapy additional to intervention

References

    1. Thomee R, Augustsson J, Karlsson J. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review of current issues. Sports Med 1999;28:245-62.
    1. Sanchis-Alfonso V. Anterior knee pain and patellar instability. Springer Verlag, 2006.
    1. Witvrouw E, Werner S, Mikkelsen C, Van Tiggelen D, Vanden Berghe L, Cerulli G. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for non-operative treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005;13:122-30.
    1. Van der Velden J. Een nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Basisrapport: morbiditeit in de huisartspraktijk. Utrecht: NIVEL, 1991.
    1. Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med 2002;36:95-101.
    1. Dixit S, DiFiori JP, Burton M, Mines B. Management of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2007;75:194-202.
    1. Den Hertog PC, van Kampen LTB, Ooijendijk WTM, Schmikli SL, Schoots W, Vriend I. Ongevallen en Bewegen in Nederland: Kerncijfers 2000-2001 voor beleid en onderzoek. Stichting Consument en Veiligheid, 2003.
    1. Nimon G, Murray D, Sandow M, Goodfellow J. Natural history of anterior knee pain: a 14- to 20-year follow-up of nonoperative management. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:118-22.
    1. Cirkel JW, Klaassen WRC, Kunst JA, Aarns TEM, Plag EC, Goudswaard AN, et al. Niet-Traumatische knieproblemen bij kinderen en adolescenten; NHG-Standaard. Huisarts Wet 1998;41:246-51.
    1. Cutbill JW, Ladly KO, Bray RC, Thorne P, Verhoef M. Anterior knee pain: a review. Clin J Sport Med 1997;7:40-5.
    1. McConnell J. The physical therapist’s approach to patellofemoral disorders. Clin Sports Med 2002;21:363-87.
    1. Heintjes E, Berger MY, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Bernsen RM, Verhaar JA, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003(4):CD003472.
    1. Van Linschoten R, van Middelkoop M, Berger MY, Heintjes EM, Koopmanschap MA, Verhaar JA, et al. The PEX study—exercise therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome: design of a randomized clinical trial in general practice and sports medicine [ISRCTN83938749]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:31.
    1. Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J. Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:592-603.
    1. Nijs J, Van Geel C, Van der auwera C, Van de Velde B. Diagnostic value of five clinical tests in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Man Ther 2006;11:69-77.
    1. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 1993;9:159-63.
    1. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978;37:378-81.
    1. Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, Green S. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:815-22.
    1. Clark DI, Downing N, Mitchell J, Coulson L, Syzpryt EP, Doherty M. Physiotherapy for anterior knee pain: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:700-4.
    1. Hartung J, Knapp G, Sinha BK. Statistical meta-analysis with application. Wiley, 2008.
    1. Dehaven KE, Dolan WA, Mayer PJ. Chondromalacia patellae in athletes. Clinical presentation and conservative management. Am J Sports Med 1979;7:5-11.
    1. Whitelaw GP Jr, Rullo DJ, Markowitz HD, Marandola MS, DeWaele MJ. A conservative approach to anterior knee pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989:234-7.
    1. Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, Peers K, Vanderstraeten G. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises for patellofemoral pain. A prospective, randomized study. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:687-94.
    1. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, Willems TM, Cambier D. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises in patellofemoral pain: a 5-year prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med 2004;32:1122-30.
    1. Bizzini M, Childs JD, Piva SR, Delitto A. Systematic review of the quality of randomized controlled trials for patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003;33:4-20.
    1. Timm KE. Randomized controlled trial of Protonics on patellar pain, position, and function. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:665-70.
    1. Lun VM, Wiley JP, Meeuwisse WH, Yanagawa TL. Effectiveness of patellar bracing for treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin J Sport Med 2005;15:235-40.
    1. Crossley K, Bennell K, Green S, Cowan S, McConnell J. Physical therapy for patellofemoral pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 2002;30:857-65.
    1. Collins N, Crossley K, Beller E, Darnell R, McPoil T, Vicenzino B. Foot orthoses and physiotherapy in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2008;337:a1735.
    1. Gobelet C, Frey M, Bonard A. Muscle training techniques and retropatellar chondropathy. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 1992;59:23-7.
    1. Stiene HA, Brosky T, Reinking MF, Nyland J, Mason MB. A comparison of closed kinetic chain and isokinetic joint isolation exercise in patients with patellofemoral dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996;24:136-41.
    1. Dursun N, Dursun E, Kilic Z. Electromyographic biofeedback-controlled exercise versus conservative care for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1692-5.
    1. Mayo E. Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company: the social problems of an industrial civilisation. Routledge, 1949.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅