A randomized phase 2 clinical trial of phentolamine mesylate eye drops in patients with severe night vision disturbances

Jay Pepose, Mitchell Brigell, Eliot Lazar, Curtis Heisel, Jonah Yousif, Kavon Rahmani, Ajay Kolli, Min Hwang, Cara Mitrano, Audrey Lazar, Konstantinos Charizanis, Mina Sooch, Marguerite McDonald, Jay Pepose, Mitchell Brigell, Eliot Lazar, Curtis Heisel, Jonah Yousif, Kavon Rahmani, Ajay Kolli, Min Hwang, Cara Mitrano, Audrey Lazar, Konstantinos Charizanis, Mina Sooch, Marguerite McDonald

Abstract

Purpose: Dim light vision disturbances (DLD) comprise a wide range of symptoms affecting the quality of vision at low illumination including glare, halos, and starbursts. This exploratory study investigated 1.0% phentolamine mesylate ophthalmic solution (PMOS) as a treatment to improve vision and image quality for patients with DLD.

Methods: In this placebo-controlled, randomized, double-masked clinical trial, 24 adult patients with severe DLD were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either one dose of PMOS or placebo. Subjects were eligible if they reported experiencing severe night vision difficulty that was not eliminated by distance spectacle correction and scored ≥0.3 log units below the normal range of contrast sensitivity assessed under mesopic conditions with glare at ≥2 spatial frequencies. Key efficacy outcomes were change from baseline in pupil diameter, contrast sensitivity, and visual acuity. Safety measures including intraocular pressure, conjunctival hyperemia, and systemic effects were also assessed.

Results: Eight subjects were randomized to placebo (63% female; mean age 47 years) and 16 were randomized to PMOS (75% female; mean age 42 years). Mean (SD) pupil diameter of PMOS-treated subjects decreased significantly - 1.3 mm (0 to - 2.8 mm) with p < 0.0001. Mean contrast sensitivity with glare in PMOS-treated subjects improved significantly post-treatment at spatial frequencies 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (p ≤ 0.03). PMOS also demonstrated improvements in the numbers of letters read for mesopic and photopic, high- and low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA). Importantly, a statistically greater proportion of PMOS-treated eyes registered mesopic LCVA 5 letter (69% vs. 31%, p = 0.029) and 10 letter (34% vs. 6%, p = 0.04) improvement, with a trend at 15 letters (19% vs. 0%, p = 0.16). PMOS was well tolerated with the only reported side effect being a mild increase in conjunctival hyperemia.

Conclusion: PMOS was well tolerated and effectively reduced pupil size with improvements in contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in adults with severe DLD. Future Phase 3 studies should be conducted to further evaluate its potential to treat DLD.

Trial registration: The trial registration number is NCT04004507 (02/07/2019). Retrospectively registered.

Keywords: DLD; Dim Light Disturbance; Glare; Halos; NVD; Night Vision Disturbance; Phentolamine; Photic Phenomenon; Starburst.

Conflict of interest statement

JSP, MB, CH, JY, KR, AK, MH, CM, AL, KC, and MS are or were employees, directors/officers, or consultants for Ocuphire Pharma. JP, EL, and MM are on the medical advisory board for Ocuphire Pharma. MM was the principal investigator for this clinical trial funded by Ocularis Pharma (now Ocuphire Pharma). JSP reports personal fees from Acufocus, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Keeler, MG Therapeutics, Mimetogen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Ocunexis Therapeutics, Okogen, Stuart Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharma, Thea Pharma, TearLab, and Ocuphire. MM reports personal fees from Allergan, Alcon, Bausch and Lomb, Eyevance, Novartis, Tarsus, Visus, Aperta, Ocusoft, OCULUS USA, DOMPE, BioTissue, BlephEx, Akorn, Quidel, ORCA Surgical, TearLab, J&J Vision, TearCare, NuLids, Ocuphire, STROMA, Hellas LTD, Sun Pharma, Avedro, Omeros, Scope, and Sight Sciences. The authors indicated that they have no other conflicts of interest with regard to the content of this article.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean contrast sensitivities with glare before and after treatment. Grey background identifies the ‘normal’ contrast sensitivity range
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percent of eyes with improvement in contrast sensitivity with glare of two or more patches (≥0.3 log units) by treatment group
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percent of eyes with ≥ 10 letter improvement by visual acuity measurements by treatment group
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percent of eyes with ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letter improvement in Mesopic Low Contrast Visual Acuity (mLCVA) by treatment group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Percent of eyes (Baseline PD ≥ 6 mm) ≥ 5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 letter improvement in Mesopic Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA) by treatment group
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Improvement in mean total and higher-order wavefront aberrations by treatment group

References

    1. Bidgoli S, Alio JL. Night Vision Disturbances Following Refractive Surgery: Causes, Prevention, and Treatment. In: Alio JL, Azar DT, editors. Management of Complications in Refractive Surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 163–174.
    1. Alio JL, Azar DT. Management of complications in refractive surgery. Springer; 2018.
    1. Romero-Jiménez M, Santodomingo-Rubido J, Wolffsohn JS. Keratoconus: A Review. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33(4):157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2010.04.006.
    1. Tuan KA. Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(4):577–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.002.
    1. Seiler TG, Wegner A, Senfft T, Seiler T. Dissatisfaction After Trifocal IOL Implantation and Its Improvement by Selective Wavefront-Guided LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(6):346–352. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190510-02.
    1. McCormick GJ, Porter J, Cox IG, MacRae S. Higher-order aberrations in eyes with irregular corneas after laser refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(10):1699–1709. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.04.022.
    1. Martínez CE, Applegate RA, Klyce SD, McDonald MB, Medina JP, Howland HC. Effect of pupillary dilation on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(8):1053–1062. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.8.1053.
    1. Yu Y, Koss MC. Α1A-adrenoceptors mediate sympathetically evoked pupillary dilation in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300(2):521–525. doi: 10.1124/jpet.300.2.521.
    1. Poinoosawmy D, Nagasubramanian S, Brown NA. Effect of pilocarpine on visual acuity and on the dimensions of the cornea and anterior chamber. Br J Ophthalmol. 1976;60(10):676–679. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.10.676.
    1. Brown SM, Khanani AM, McCartney DL. The effect of daily use of brimonidine tartrate on the dark-adapted pupil diameter. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(1):149–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.02.017.
    1. Al-Khersan H, Flynn HW, Jr, Townsend JH. Retinal detachments associated with topical pilocarpine use for presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;21(242):52–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.05.011.
    1. Amarikwa L, Michalak SM, Caul S, Mruthyunjaya P, Rahimy E. Vitreofoveal Traction Associated With Pilocarpine for Presbyopia. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53(7):410–411. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20220629-01.
    1. Waring GO, 4th, Price FW, Jr, Wirta D, McCabe C, Moshirfar M, Guo Q, Gore A, Liu H, Safyan E, Robinson MR. Safety and Efficacy of AGN-190584 in Individuals With Presbyopia: The GEMINI 1 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140(4):363–371. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0059.
    1. Owsley C. Contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2003;16(2):171–177. doi: 10.1016/s0896-1549(03)00003-8.
    1. Koefoed VF, Baste V, Roumes C, Høvding G. Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(2):154–161. doi: 10.1111/aos.12487.
    1. Anderson SJ, Holliday IE. Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt J Br Coll Ophthalmic Opt Optom. 1995;15(6):545–551. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.9500070t.x.
    1. Owsley C, Swain T, Liu R, McGwin G, Kwon MY. Association of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity in older drivers with risk of motor vehicle collision using naturalistic driving data. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-1331-7.
    1. Owsley C, Sloane ME. Contrast Sensitivity, Acuity, and the Perception of “real-World” Targets. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71(10):791–796. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.10.791.
    1. Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity: determining the visual quality and function of cataract, intraocular lenses and refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(1):19–26. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000192520.48411.fa.
    1. West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Muñoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Turano K. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life?: the see project. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):774–780. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.774.
    1. National Research Council (US) Committee on Vision. Emergent Techniques for Assessment of Visual Performance. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1985. Contrast Sensitivity Function.
    1. Xu R, Wang H, Thibos LN, Bradley A. Interaction of aberrations, diffraction, and quantal fluctuations determine the impact of pupil size on visual quality. J Opt Soc Am A. 2017;34(4):481. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.34.000481.
    1. Xu R, Kollbaum P, Thibos L, Lopez-Gil N, Bradley A. Reducing Starbursts in Highly Aberrated Eyes with Pupil Miosis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2018;38(1):26–36. doi: 10.1111/opo.12420.
    1. Edwards JD, Burka JM, Bower KS, Stutzman RD, Sediq DA, Rabin JC. Effect of brimonidine tartrate 0.15% on night-vision difficulty and contrast testing after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(9):1538–1541. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.029.
    1. Jayaram, H. Intraocular pressure reduction in glaucoma: does every mmhg count?. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2020, 10 (4), 255. .
    1. Pepose JS, Hartman PJ, DuBiner HB, Abrams MA, Smyth-Medina RJ, Moroi SE, Meyer AR, Sooch MP, Jaber RM, Charizanis K, Klapman SA, Amin AT, Yousif JE, Lazar ES, Karpecki PM, Slonim CB, McDonald MB. Phentolamine mesylate ophthalmic solution provides lasting pupil modulation and improves near visual acuity in presbyopic glaucoma patients in a randomized phase 2b clinical trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:79–91. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S278169.
    1. Pesudovs K. The Usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(1):11–16. doi: 10.1136/bjo.88.1.11.
    1. Lin L, van de Pol C, Vilupuru S, Pepose JS. Contrast sensitivity in patients with emmetropic presbyopia before and after small-aperture inlay implantation. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(6):386–393. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160217-04.
    1. Hong YT, Kim SW, Kim EK, Kim T. Contrast sensitivity measurement with 2 contrast sensitivity tests in normal eyes and eyes with cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(4):547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.048.
    1. Karpecki PM, Foster SA, Montaquila SM, Kannarr SR, Slonim CB, Meyer AR, Sooch MP, Jaber RM, Charizanis K, Yousif JE, Klapman SA, Amin AT, McDonald MB, Horn GD, Lazar ES, Pepose JS. Phentolamine eye drops reverse pharmacologically induced mydriasis in a randomized phase 2b trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(3):234–242. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001656.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅