Cesarean section in Shanghai: women's or healthcare provider's preferences?

Wei Deng, Reija Klemetti, Qian Long, Zhuochun Wu, Chenggang Duan, Wei-Hong Zhang, Carine Ronsmans, Yu Zhang, Elina Hemminki, Wei Deng, Reija Klemetti, Qian Long, Zhuochun Wu, Chenggang Duan, Wei-Hong Zhang, Carine Ronsmans, Yu Zhang, Elina Hemminki

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section (CS) rate has increased rapidly over the past two decades in China mainly driven by non-medical factors. This study was to compare recalled preferences for CS among first-time mothers in early and late pregnancy with actual delivery mode; to explore factors related to CS preference and CS performed without medical indications; and to consider the role of healthcare providers in delivery mode preferences.

Methods: An anonymous questionnaire survey, combined with data on CS indications taken from the patient record, was conducted among 272 first-time mothers having their first postnatal check-up in one university affiliated obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai, China, between September 2006 and January 2007. Logistic regression was used to study factors related to the recalled preference for CS and CS performed without medical indication, adjusting for maternal age, education and income.

Results: The CS rate was 57% (151/263) among all women, 17% with medical indications and 40% without medical indications. For women without medical indications for CS (n = 215), there was no significant difference between women's preference for CS in early (25%) and late pregnancy (28%); 48% of women actually had CS. Women recalled preferring a vaginal delivery but who had CS were more likely to have had a CS suggested by a prenatal care doctor [OR (95% CI): 20 (3.88-107.1)] or by a delivery obstetrician [OR (95% CI): 26 (6.26-105.8)]. Among women recalled preferring and having CS, a suggestion from the prenatal care doctor to have CS was very common.

Conclusions: In the primiparous women without a medical indication for CS, women recall of a provider suggestion for CS was a strong predictor of CS both among women who recalled a preference for CS and among women who recalled a preference for vaginal delivery. Public health education needs strengthening, including discussion of the risks associated with CS and psychological and social support given to women to help them prepare for and cope with childbirth.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Women’s preference for cesarean section during pregnancy and actual delivery mode by clinical indication for cesarean section, as reported in the first postnatal visit (%).

References

    1. Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth. 2011;38(2):99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x.
    1. Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, Wagner M. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21(2):98–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x.
    1. Feng XL, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C. Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(1):30–39. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.090399.
    1. Han H, Qin M, Xu HQ. The rate of cesarean section and its effect factors in Shanghai. Mater Child Health Care China. 2010;25(22):3077–3080.
    1. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, Attygalle DE, Shrestha N, Mori R, Nguyen DH, Hoang TB, Ratheavy T, Chuyun K, Cheang K, Festin M, Udomprasertgul V, Germar MJ, Yanqiu G, Roy M, Crroli G, Ba-Thike K, Filatova E, Villar J, World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group Method of delivery and pregnancy out comes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–2008. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490–499. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61870-5.
    1. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obster Gynecol. 2004;103(5 pt 1):907–912. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124568.71597.ce.
    1. Finger C. Caesarean section rates skyrocket in Brazil. Many women are opting for caesareans in the belief that it is a practical solution. Lancet. 2003;362(9382):628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14204-3.
    1. Zupancic JA. The economics of elective cesarean section. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35(3):591–599. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.07.001.
    1. Bogg L, Huang K, Long Q, Shen Y, Hemminki E. Dramatic increase of caesarean deliveries in the midst of health reforms in rural China. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1544–1549. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.026.
    1. Gong SY, Du YK. The safety and economic impact of caesarean section. Foreign Med Sci (section of social medicine) 2004;21(1):17–21.
    1. Hemminki E, Klemetti R, Gissler M. Cesarean section rates among health professionals in Finland, 1990–2006. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(10):1138–1144. doi: 10.1080/00016340903214957.
    1. Tang S, Li X, Wu Z. Rising cesarean delivery rate in primiparous women in urban China: evidence from three nationwide household health surveys. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(6):1527–1532. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.044.
    1. Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82:399–409. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00217-0.
    1. Hsu KH, Liao PJ, Hwang CJ. Factors affecting Taiwanese women’s choice of cesarean section. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(1):201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.030.
    1. Li XY, Wu ZC, Wang T, Xu L, Gao J. Caesarean section rate and its influence factors in China. Chin J Public Health. 2006;22(1):1–2.
    1. Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y, Raven J, Wu Z, Tang S, Hemminki E. Caesarean sections in rural China - an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(1):65.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.032.
    1. Fu L, Cui M, Chen J. Analysis of the factors affecting cesarean section rates and indications. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2003;19:405–407.
    1. Lin Y, Wen A, Zhang X. Analysis on the 10-year changes of rates and indications of cesarean section. Guangdong Med J. 2000;21:477–478.
    1. Zhang J, Liu Y, Meikle S, Zheng J, Sun W, Li Z. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1077–1082. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816e349e.
    1. Lee LY, Holroyd E, Ng CY. Exploring factors influencing Chinese women's decision to have elective caesarean surgery. Midwifery. 2001;17(4):314–322. doi: 10.1054/midw.2001.0274.
    1. Long Q, Klemetti R, Wang Y, Tao F, Yan H, Hemminki E. High caesarean section rate in rural China: is it related to health insurance (New Co-operative medical Scheme)? Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(4):733–737. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.054.
    1. Shen Y, Lin JH, Lin QD, Zhang WY. Influencing factors of cesarean section rate in some areas of China and analysis of operation. J Pract Obstet Gynecol. 2011;27(3):183–187.
    1. Meng Q, Xu L, Zhang Y, Qian J, Cai M, Xin Y, Gao J, Xu K, Boerma JT, Barber SL. Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):805–814. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60278-5.
    1. Quinlivan JA, Petersen RW, Nichols CN. Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients—results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39(2):207–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03375.x.
    1. Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu NH, Bonotti AM, Gibbons L, Sanchez AJ, Belizan JM. Women’s preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG. 2011;118(4):391–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x.
    1. Pang MW, Lee TS, Leung AK, Leung TY, Lau TK, Leung TN. A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women. BJOG. 2007;114(5):623–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01267.x.
    1. Saisto T, Salmela-Aro K, Numi JE, Könönen T, Halmesmaäki E. A randomized controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(5 pt 1):820–826. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01552-6.
    1. Nerum H, Halvorsen L, Sorlie T, Oian P. Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling? Birth. 2006;33(3):221–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00107.x.
    1. Eggleston K, Li L, Meng Q, Lindelow M, Wagstaff A. Health services delivery in China: a literature review. Health Econ. 2008;17:149–165. doi: 10.1002/hec.1306.
    1. Guo S, Padmadas SS, Zhao F, Brown JJ, Stones W. Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(10):755–762. doi: 10.2471/BLT.06.035808.
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅