The RADAR study: week 48 safety and efficacy of RAltegravir combined with boosted DARunavir compared to tenofovir/emtricitabine combined with boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive patients. Impact on bone health

Roger J Bedimo, Henning Drechsler, Mamta Jain, James Cutrell, Song Zhang, Xilong Li, Irfan Farukhi, Rosinda Castanon, Pablo Tebas, Naim M Maalouf, Roger J Bedimo, Henning Drechsler, Mamta Jain, James Cutrell, Song Zhang, Xilong Li, Irfan Farukhi, Rosinda Castanon, Pablo Tebas, Naim M Maalouf

Abstract

Background: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression.

Methods: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r). Virologic efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at baseline and week 48, and bone turnover markers (BTM) assessed at weeks 0, 16 and 48.

Results: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 62.5% of RAL subjects and 83.7% of TDF/FTC subjects were responders (VL<48 copies/mL) at week 48 (p = 0.045; chi-square test). The proportions of patients achieving VL<200 copies/mL were similar: 72.5% and 86.0% (p = 0.175). Premature treatment discontinuation was the main cause for failure. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Changes from baseline in RAL vs. TDF/FTC for CD4+ (+199 vs. +216 cells/µL, p = 0.63), total cholesterol/HDL (-0.25 vs. -0.71 mg/dL (p = 0.270), and eGFR (-4.4 vs. -7.9 ml/min, p = 0.44) were comparable between groups. Changes in subtotal BMD to week 48 were: +9.2 with RAL vs. -7 g/cm2 with TDF/FTC (p = 0.002). Mean CTX changes were +0.04 vs. +0.24 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and mean P1NP changes were +3.59 vs. +30.09 ng/mL (p = 0.023). BTM changes at week 16 predicted change in BMD by week 48 (R = -0.394, p = 0.003 for CTX; and R = -0.477, p<0.001 for P1NP).

Conclusion: The NRTI-sparing regimen RAL+DRV/r did not achieve similar week 48 virologic efficacy compared with TDF/FTC+DRV/r, but was better with regard to markers of bone health.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00677300.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00677300.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Roger Bedimo has received research grants from Merck & Co, Janssen Therapeutics, and Bristol Myers Squibb. He’s also on ad-hoc scientific advisory boards for Janssen Therapeutics, ViiV Health Care, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Pablo Tebas is consultant for Merck & Co. and Gilead, speaker for Janssen Therapeutics and is on the adjudication committee for GSK. This specific study was funded by grants from Merck & Co, and Janssen Therapeutics to the VA North Texas Health Care System for Roger Bedimo. Raltegravir is a drug produced by Merck & Co. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Figure 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Figure 1. CONSORT Flow Diagram.
Figure 2. Proportion of subjects with plasma…
Figure 2. Proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA
Figure 3. Changes in bone turnover markers…
Figure 3. Changes in bone turnover markers from baseline to week 48 (number of patients indicated).
Top: Serum Terminal Telopeptide (CTX). †p

Figure 4. Correlation between early changes in…

Figure 4. Correlation between early changes in bone turnover markers (week 16 vs. week 0)…

Figure 4. Correlation between early changes in bone turnover markers (week 16 vs. week 0) and change in BMD by week 48.
Figure 4A: Correlation for serum P1NP. Figure 4B: Correlation for serum CTX.
Figure 4. Correlation between early changes in…
Figure 4. Correlation between early changes in bone turnover markers (week 16 vs. week 0) and change in BMD by week 48.
Figure 4A: Correlation for serum P1NP. Figure 4B: Correlation for serum CTX.

References

    1. Bedimo R, Maalouf NM, Zhang S, Drechsler H, Tebas P (2012) Osteoporotic fracture risk associated with cumulative exposure to tenofovir and other antiretroviral agents. AIDS 26: 825–831.
    1. D:A:D Study Group, Sabin CA, Worm SW, Weber R, Reiss P, et al (2008) Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients enrolled in the D:A:D study: a multi-cohort collaboration. Lancet 371: 1417–1426.
    1. SMART/INSIGHT Study Group, D:A:D Study Group (2008) Use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and risk of myocardial infarction in HIV-infected patients. AIDS 22: F17–24.
    1. Sax PE, Tierney C, Collier AC, Fischl MA, Mollan K, et al. (2009) Abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine for initial HIV-1 therapy. N Engl J Med 361: 2230–2240.
    1. Riddler SA, Haubrich R, DiRienzo AG, Peeples L, Powderly WG, et al. (2008) Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med 358: 2095–2106.
    1. Lennox JL, DeJesus E, Lazzarin A, Pollard RB, Madruga JV, et al. (2009) Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374: 796–806.
    1. Reynes J, Trinh R, Pulido F, Soto-Malave R, Gathe J, et al. (2013) Lopinavir/ritonavir combined with raltegravir or tenofovir/emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: 96-week results of the PROGRESS study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 29: 256–265.
    1. Reynes J, Lawal A, Pulido F, Soto-Malave R, Gathe J, et al. (2011) Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive subjects: the progress study, 48-week results. HIV Clin Trials 12: 255–267.
    1. Kozal MJ, Lupo S, DeJesus E, Molina JM, McDonald C, et al. (2012) A nucleoside- and ritonavir-sparing regimen containing atazanavir plus raltegravir in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-infected patients: SPARTAN study results. HIV Clin Trials 13: 119–130.
    1. Taiwo B, Zheng L, Gallien S, Matining RM, Kuritzkes DR, et al. (2011) Efficacy of a nucleoside-sparing regimen of darunavir/ritonavir plus raltegravir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients (ACTG A5262). Aids 25: 2113–2122.
    1. Cazanave C, Dupon M, Lavignolle-Aurillac V, Barthe N, Lawson-Ayayi S, et al. (2008) Reduced bone mineral density in HIV-infected patients: prevalence and associated factors. Aids 22: 395–402.
    1. Brown TT, Qaqish RB (2006) Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis: a meta-analytic review. Aids 20: 2165–2174.
    1. Tebas P, Powderly WG, Claxton S, Marin D, Tantisiriwat W, et al. (2000) Accelerated bone mineral loss in HIV-infected patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. Aids 14: F63–67.
    1. McDermott AY, Terrin N, Wanke C, Skinner S, Tchetgen E, et al. (2005) CD4+ cell count, viral load, and highly active antiretroviral therapy use are independent predictors of body composition alterations in HIV-infected adults: a longitudinal study. Clin Infect Dis 41: 1662–1670.
    1. Ofotokun I, Weitzmann N, Vunnava A, Sheth A, Villinger F, et al... (2011) HAART-induced Immune Reconstitution: A Driving Force Behind Bone Resorption in HIV/AIDS. 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, MA.
    1. van Vonderen MG, Mallon P, Murray B, Doran P, van Agtmael MA, et al... (2011) Changes in Bone Biomarkers in ARV-naïve HIV+ Men Randomized to NVP/LPV/r or AZT/3TC/LPV/r Help Explain Limited Loss of Bone Mineral Density over the First 12 Months after ART Initiation. 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, MA.
    1. Stellbrink HJ, Orkin C, Arribas JR, Compston J, Gerstoft J, et al. (2010) Comparison of changes in bone density and turnover with abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine in HIV-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT study. Clin Infect Dis 51: 963–972.
    1. Martin A, Bloch M, Amin J, Baker D, Cooper DA, et al. (2009) Simplification of antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir-emtricitabine or abacavir-Lamivudine: a randomized, 96-week trial. Clin Infect Dis 49: 1591–1601.
    1. Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Pozniak AL, DeJesus E, Suleiman JM, et al. (2004) Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial. JAMA 292: 191–201.
    1. McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES, Tierney C, Jahed NC, et al. (2011) Bone Mineral Density and Fractures in Antiretroviral-Naive Persons Randomized to Receive Abacavir-Lamivudine or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate-Emtricitabine Along With Efavirenz or Atazanavir-Ritonavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a Substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis 203: 1791–1801.
    1. Food and Drug Administration (2002) FDA Guidance for Industry. Antiretroviral drugs using plasma HIV RNA measurements–clinical considerations for accelerated and traditional approval, prepared by the Division of Antiviral Drug Products: Office of Drug Evaluation IV in the Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Appendix B, October 2002.
    1. Tungsiripat M, Kitch D, Glesby MJ, Gupta SK, Mellors JW, et al. (2010) A pilot study to determine the impact on dyslipidemia of adding tenofovir to stable background antiretroviral therapy: ACTG 5206. AIDS 24: 1781–1784.
    1. Cotter AG, Vrouenraets SM, Brady JJ, Wit FW, Fux CA, et al. (2013) Impact of switching from zidovudine to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on bone mineral density and markers of bone metabolism in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected patients; a substudy of the PREPARE study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 1659–1666.
    1. Foca E, Motta D, Borderi M, Gotti D, Albini L, et al. (2012) Prospective evaluation of bone markers, parathormone and 1,25-(OH)(2) vitamin D in HIV-positive patients after the initiation of tenofovir/emtricitabine with atazanavir/ritonavir or efavirenz. BMC Infect Dis 12: 38.
    1. Yin MT, Shane E (2006) Low bone-mineral density in patients with HIV: pathogenesis and clinical significance. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 13: 497–502.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅