Effect of tobacco smoking on survival of men and women by social position: a 28 year cohort study

Laurence Gruer, Carole L Hart, David S Gordon, Graham C M Watt, Laurence Gruer, Carole L Hart, David S Gordon, Graham C M Watt

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of tobacco smoking on the survival of men and women in different social positions.

Design: A cohort observational study.

Setting: Renfrew and Paisley, two towns in west central Scotland.

Participants: 8353 women and 7049 men aged 45-64 years recruited in 1972-6 (almost 80% of the population in this age group). The cohort was divided into 24 groups by sex (male, female), smoking status (current, former, or never smokers), and social class (classes I + II, III non-manual, III manual, and IV + V) or deprivation category of place of residence.

Main outcome measure: Relative mortality (adjusted for age and other risk factors) in the different groups; Kaplan-Meier survival curves and survival rates at 28 years.

Results: Of those with complete data, 4387/7988 women and 4891/6967 men died over the 28 years. Compared with women in social classes I + II who had never smoked (the group with lowest mortality), the adjusted relative mortality of smoking groups ranged from 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.3) to 4.2 (3.3 to 5.5). Former smokers' mortalities were closer to those of never smokers than those of smokers. By social class (highest first), age adjusted survival rates after 28 years were 65%, 57%, 53%, and 56% for female never smokers; 41%, 42%, 33%, and 35% for female current smokers; 53%, 47%, 38%, and 36% for male never smokers; and 24%, 24%, 19%, and 18% for male current smokers. Analysis by deprivation category gave similar results.

Conclusions: Among both women and men, never smokers had much better survival rates than smokers in all social positions. Smoking itself was a greater source of health inequality than social position and nullified women's survival advantage over men. This suggests the scope for reducing health inequalities related to social position in this and similar populations is limited unless many smokers in lower social positions stop smoking.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787455/bin/grul553594.f1.jpg
Fig 1 Age adjusted, relative, all cause mortality in the first and second 14 years of follow-up of women and men aged 45-64 years and who never smoked or currently smoked at recruitment categorised by social class (with women in social classes I and II who never smoked as the reference group)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787455/bin/grul553594.f2.jpg
Fig 2 Age adjusted, relative, all cause mortality in the first and second 14 years of follow-up of men aged 45-64 years at recruitment categorised by social class and smoking status (with women in social classes I and II who never smoked as the reference group)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787455/bin/grul553594.f3.jpg
Fig 3 Age adjusted survival over 28 years of follow-up of women and men aged 45-64 years and who never smoked or currently smoked at recruitment in social classes I + II and IV + V

References

    1. Doll R, Peto R. Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years observations on male British doctors. BMJ 2004;328:1519-33.
    1. Commission on Social Inequalities in Health. Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.
    1. Jarvis M, Wardle J. Social patterning of individual health behaviours: the case of cigarette smoking. In: Marmot M, Wilkinson R, eds. Social determinants of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
    1. Gordon D, Shaw M, Dorling D, Davey Smith G, eds. Inequalities in health. Bristol: Policy Press, 1999.
    1. Hawthorne VM, Watt GCM, Hart CL, Hole DJ, Smith GD, Gillis CR. Cardiorespiratory disease in men and women in urban Scotland: baseline characteristics of the Renfrew/Paisley (Midspan) study population. Scot Med J 1995;40:102-7.
    1. General Register Office. Classification of occupations 1966. London: HMSO, 1966.
    1. Carstairs V, Morris R. Deprivation and health in Scotland. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1991.
    1. Hole DJ, Watt GCM, Davey Smith G, Hart CL, Gillis CR, Hawthorne VM. Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study. BMJ 1996;313:711-5.
    1. Davey Smith G, Hart CL, Watt G, Hole D, Hawthorne VM. Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors and mortality: the Renfrew and Paisley study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:399-405.
    1. Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Davey Smith G, Hart CL. The health impact of smoking in manual and non-manual social class men and women: a test of the Blaxter hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1851-6.
    1. Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Davey Smith G, Hart CL, Hole DJ, Phillips AN. The influence of gender, social circumstances and smoking on survival: the Renfrew and Paisley study. Public Health 2000;114:117-22.
    1. Scottish Government. Scottish household survey annual report 2007 web tables—health and caring (Table 10.4.5). ().
    1. Uren Z, Fitzpatrick J, Reid A, Goldblatt P. Geographic variation in mortality by social class and alternative social classifications. In: Geographic variations in health. London: Stationery Office, 2001. (DS No 16.)
    1. Hanlon P, Lawdor R, Buchanan D, Redpath A, Walsh D, Wood R, et al. Why is mortality in Scotland higher than England and Wales? Decreasing influence of socioeconomic deprivation between 1981 and 2001 supports the existence of a “Scottish effect.” J Public Health 2005;27:199-204.
    1. Walsh D, Taulbut M, Hanlon P. The aftershock of deindustrialisation. Trends in mortality in Scotland and other parts of post-industrial Europe. Glasgow: Glasgow Centre for Population Health, 2008. ()
    1. Law M, Morris J. Why is mortality higher in poorer areas and in more northern areas in England and Wales? J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:344-52.
    1. Jha P, Peto R, Zatonski W, Boreham J, Jarvis M, Lopez A. Social inequalities in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland and North America. Lancet 2006;368:367-70.
    1. General Register Office for Scotland. Scotland’s population in 2006. The Registrar General’s annual review of demographic trends. Edinburgh: National Statistics, 2007. ()
    1. Review of the Registrar General on deaths in England and Wales 2004. London: National Statistics, 2006. ()
    1. Peto R, Darby S, Deo H, Silcocks P, Whitley E, Doll R. Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case control studies. BMJ 2000;321:323-9.
    1. Scottish Executive. A breath of fresh air for Scotland. Tobacco control action plan. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2004. ()
    1. Scottish Government. Equally well: report of the ministerial working group on health inequalities. Edinburgh: Scottish Government, 2008. ()
    1. Department of Health. Health inequalities: progress and next steps. London: DH, 2008. ()
    1. Office for National Statistics. Smoking and drinking among adults 2006. London: ONS, 2008. ()
    1. Taulbut M, Gordon D, McKenzie K. Tobacco smoking in Scotland. An epidemiological briefing. Edinburgh: Scottish Public Health Observatory, 2008. ()

Source: PubMed

3
订阅