Treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers with adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cell injections: Safety and evidence of efficacy at 1 year

Michael H Carstens, Francisco J Quintana, Santos T Calderwood, Juan P Sevilla, Arlen B Ríos, Carlos M Rivera, Dorian W Calero, María L Zelaya, Nelson Garcia, Kenneth A Bertram, Joseph Rigdon, Severiano Dos-Anjos, Diego Correa, Michael H Carstens, Francisco J Quintana, Santos T Calderwood, Juan P Sevilla, Arlen B Ríos, Carlos M Rivera, Dorian W Calero, María L Zelaya, Nelson Garcia, Kenneth A Bertram, Joseph Rigdon, Severiano Dos-Anjos, Diego Correa

Abstract

Diabetes affects multiple systems in complex manners. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a result of diabetes-induced microarterial vessel disease and peripheral neuropathy. The presence of arteriosclerosis-induced macroarterial disease can further complicate DFU pathophysiology. Recent studies suggest that mesenchymal stromal cell therapies can enhance tissue regeneration. This phase I study was designed to determine the safety and explore the efficacy of local injections of autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells to treat nonhealing DFUs greater than 3 cm in diameter. Sixty-three patients with type 2 diabetes with chronic DFU-all amputation candidates-were treated with 30 × 106 SVF cells injected in the ulcer bed and periphery and along the pedal arteries. Patients were seen at 6 and 12 months to evaluate ulcer closure. Doppler ultrasounds were performed in a subset of subjects to determine vascular structural parameters. No intervention-related serious adverse events were reported. At 6 months, 51 subjects had 100% DFU closure, and 8 subjects had ≥75% closure. Three subjects had early amputations, and one subject died. At 12 months, 50 subjects had 100% DFU healing and 4 subjects had ≥85% healing. Five subjects died between the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. No deaths were intervention related. Doppler studies in 11 subjects revealed increases in peak systolic velocity and pulsatility index in 33 of 33 arteries, consistent with enhanced distal arterial runoff. These results indicate that SVF can be safely used to treat chronic DFU, with evidence of efficacy (wound healing) and mechanisms of action that include vascular repair and/or angiogenesis.

Keywords: angiogenesis; diabetes complications; diabetic ulcers; microangiopathy; stromal vascular fraction.

Conflict of interest statement

M.H.C. is a paid consultant for the GID Bio Inc., in which he holds stock options. S.D.‐A. has been a paid consultant for GID Bio Inc., but not at the moment of manuscript submission. D.C. was a paid consultant of Lipogems USA, LLC, at the time of execution of the study. The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

© 2021 The Authors. STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary of the study and graphical scheme showing sites of injection. A, Schematic representation of the sites of injection of the stromal vascular fraction cells, corresponding to the margins and bed of the ulcer and the vascular territories of the tibialis anterioris, dorsalis pedis, and tibialis posterioris. For these vascular structures, the injections run from proximal to distal. Created with BioRender.com. B, CONSORT diagram showing the flow of the study. *These three patients were amputated by nontreating surgeon based on previously scheduled surgery, leaving not time to evaluate the effect of the therapy. **The five patients who passed away between 6 and 12 months had 100% closure of their ulcers by the 6‐month follow‐up, so they were included in the final analysis. C, Demographics information of study participants and summary of findings
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Ulcer characteristics and responses. Frequency distribution of diabetic foot ulcer based on size (cm2) (A) and time (weeks) to an observable response and final closure (B). C, Spearman rank correlation test evidencing lack of correlation between ulcer size and time to an observable response and final closure
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Pre‐ and postprocedure images of the ulcers. Graphical demonstration of closure of diabetic foot ulcer, presenting 3 of the 52 cases with 100% closure and 3 of the 7 cases with incomplete (85%‐95%) closure. The remaining cases showed comparable results
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Peak systolic velocity and pulsatility index. Peak systolic velocity (A) and pulsatility index (B) assessed in tibialis anterior, dorsalis pedis, and tibialis posterior by Doppler spectral color ultrasound, comparing pre‐ and postinjection results, and evidencing statistically significant differences in all arteries examined. PSV, peak systolic velocity

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation . IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Foundation; 2019. .
    1. Schaper NC, Apelqvist J, Bakker K. The international consensus and practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot. Curr Diab Rep. 2003;3:475‐479.
    1. Weledji EP, Fokam P. Treatment of the diabetic foot ‐ to amputate or not? BMC Surg. 2014;14:83‐86.
    1. Armstrong DG, Cohen K, Courric S, Bharara M, Marston W. Diabetic foot ulcers and vascular insufficiency: our population has changed, but our methods have not. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:1591‐1595.
    1. Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AKG, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons NB. Burden of diabetic foot ulcers for medicare and private insurers. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:651‐658.
    1. Moulik PK, Mtonga R, Gill GV. Amputation and mortality in new‐onset diabetic foot ulcers stratified by etiology. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:491‐494.
    1. Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, et al. Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetolgia. 2008;51:747‐755.
    1. An T, Chen Y, Tu Y, Lin P. Mesenchymal stromal cell‐derived extracellular vesicles in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: application and challenges. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2020; 10.1007/s12015-020-10014-9. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Nazari‐Shafti TZ, Neuber S, Duran AG, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells and derived extracellular vesicles: translational strategies to increase their proangiogenic potential for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2020;9:1558‐1569.
    1. Franz RW, Shah KJ, Pin RH, Hankins T, Hartman JF, Wright ML. Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell implantation therapy is an effective limb salvage strategy for patients with severe peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:673‐680.
    1. Das AK, Bin Abdullah BJJ, Dhillon SS, et al. Intra‐arterial allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for critical limb ischemia are safe and efficacious: report of a phase I study. World J Surg. 2013;37:915‐922.
    1. Bura A, Planat‐Benard V, Bourin P, et al. Phase I trial: the use of autologous cultured adipose‐derived stroma/stem cells to treat patients with non‐revascularizable critical limb ischemia. Cytotherapy. 2014;16:245‐257.
    1. Lopes L, Setia O, Aurshina A, et al. Stem cell therapy for diabetic foot ulcers: a review of preclinical and clinical research. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:188.
    1. Nguyen A, Guo J, Banyard DA, et al. Stromal vascular fraction: a regenerative reality? Part 1: current concepts and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:170‐179.
    1. Guo J, Nguyen A, Banyard DA, et al. Stromal vascular fraction: a regenerative reality? Part 2: mechanisms of regenerative action. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:180‐188.
    1. Carstens MH, Gómez A, Cortés R, et al. Non‐reconstructable peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremity in ten patients treated with adipose‐derived stromal vascular fraction cells. Stem Cell Res. 2017;18:14‐21.
    1. Bourin P, Bunnell BA, Casteilla L, et al. Stomal cells from the adipose‐derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose‐derived stromal/stem cells: a joint statement of the International Federation of Adipose Therapeutics and Science (IFATS) and the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT). Cytotherapy. 2015;15:641‐648.
    1. Brown JC, Shang H, Li Y, Yang N, Patel N, Katz AJ. Isolation of adipose‐derived stromal vascular fraction using a novel point‐of‐care device: cell characterization and review of the literature. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23:125‐135.
    1. Carstens MH, Zelaya M, Calero D, Rivera C, Correa D. Adipose‐derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells for the treatment of non‐reconstructable peripheral vascular disease in patients with critical limb ischemia: a 6‐year follow‐up showing durable effects. Stem Cell Res. 2020;49:102071.
    1. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. .
    1. Han SK, Kim HR, Kim WK. The treatment of diabetic ulcers with unprocessed lipoaspirate cells: a pilot study. Wound Repair Regen. 2010;18:342‐348.
    1. Zimmerlin L, Donnenberg VS, Pfeifer ME, et al. Stromal vascular progenitors in adult human adipose tissue. Cytometry A. 2010;77:22‐30.
    1. Zakhari JS, Zabonick J, Gettler B, Williams SK. Vasculogenic and angiogenic potential of adipose stromal vascular fraction cell populations in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2018;54:32‐40.
    1. Jin E, Chae DS, Son M, Kim SW. Angiogenic characteristics of human stromal vascular fraction in ischemic hindlimb. Int J Cardiol. 2017;234:38‐47.
    1. Bi H, Li H, Zhang C, et al. Stromal vascular fraction promotes migration of fibroblasts and angiogenesis through regulation of extracellular matrix in the skin wound healing process. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:302.
    1. Riaz M, Miyan Z, Zaidi SI, et al. Characteristics of a large cohort of patients with diabetes having at‐risk feet and outcomes in patients with foot ulceration referred to a tertiary care diabetes unit. Int Wound J. 2014;13:594‐599.
    1. Jeffcoate WJ, Chipchase SY, Ince P, Game FL. Assessing the outcome of the management of diabetic foot ulcers using ulcer‐related and person‐related measures. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1784‐1787.
    1. Reiber GE, Smith DG, Carter J, et al. A comparison of diabetic foot ulcer patients managed in VHA and non‐VHA settings. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38:309‐317.
    1. Holm JS, Toyserkani NM, Sorensen JA. Adipose‐derived stem cells for treatment of chronic ulcers: current status. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:142.
    1. Clifford PC, Skidmore R, Bird DR, Woodcock JP, Baird RN. The role of the pulsatility index in the assessment of lower limb ischaemia. J Med Eng Technol. 1981;5:237‐241.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅