Instantaneous wave-free ratio guided multivessel revascularisation during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: study protocol of the randomised controlled iMODERN trial

Casper W H Beijnink, Troels Thim, Dirk Jan van der Heijden, Igor Klem, Rasha Al-Lamee, Jacqueline L Vos, Yvonne Koop, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Marcel A M Beijk, Raymond J Kim, Justin Davies, Luis Raposo, Sérgio B Baptista, Javier Escaned, Jan J Piek, Michael Maeng, Niels van Royen, Robin Nijveldt, Casper W H Beijnink, Troels Thim, Dirk Jan van der Heijden, Igor Klem, Rasha Al-Lamee, Jacqueline L Vos, Yvonne Koop, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Marcel A M Beijk, Raymond J Kim, Justin Davies, Luis Raposo, Sérgio B Baptista, Javier Escaned, Jan J Piek, Michael Maeng, Niels van Royen, Robin Nijveldt

Abstract

Introduction: Recent randomised clinical trials showed benefit of non-culprit lesion revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, it remains unclear whether revascularisation should be performed at the index procedure or at a later stage.

Methods and analysis: The instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) Guided Multivessel Revascularisation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled prospective open-label trial with blinded evaluation of endpoints. After successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), eligible STEMI patients with residual non-culprit lesions are randomised, to instantaneous wave-free ratio guided treatment of non-culprit lesions during the index procedure versus deferred cardiac MR-guided management within 4 days to 6 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is the combined occurrence of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction and hospitalisation for heart failure at 12 months follow-up. Clinical follow-up includes questionnaires at 3 months and outpatient visits at 6 months and 12 months after primary PCI. Furthermore, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination: Permission to conduct this trial has been granted by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Centres (loc. VUmc, ID NL60107.029.16). The primary results of this trial will be shared in a main article and subgroup analyses or spin-off studies will be shared in secondary papers.

Trial registration number: NCT03298659.

Keywords: coronary heart disease; coronary intervention; ischaemic heart disease; magnetic resonance imaging; myocardial infarction.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The study flow chart. An overview of the randomisation process, the study procedures, and patient follow-up. CMR, cardiac MR; iFR, instantaneous wave-free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Direct lesion assessment. Angiographic images from a patient in the iFR-guided index procedure revascularisation arm. (A) Shows the culprit vessel, the RCA, that was treated by pPCI with 2x DES implantation at the black arrows. (D) Shows two non-culprit lesions for which the iFR value was measured (B and E). Both lesions were positive for ischemia (iFR D1=0.50, iFR LAD=0.84), and treated with additional PCI during the index procedure, after which total restoration of flow is seen on (C, F). D1, first diagonal branch; DES, drug-eluting stent; iFR, instantaneous wave-free ratio; LAD, left anterior descending artery; pPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; RCA, right coronary artery.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Typical example of a patient from the CMR-guided complete revascularisation arm. (A) The dotted arrow indicates thrombus and occlusion of the RCA. (B) A non-culprit lesion of 70%–80% in the prox and mid LAD (solid line); (C, D) stress perfusion CMR was performed 4 weeks after primary PCI, demonstrating two perfusion defects, of which the solid line indicates ischemia from the non-culprit LAD lesion (C), without any late gadolinium enhancement and a perfusion defect in the RCA territory caused by the subendocardial infarct (D, dotted line). CMR, cardiac MR; LV, left ventricle; LAD, left anterior descending artery; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; P, papillary muscle; RCA, right coronary artery; RV, right ventricle.

References

    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. . 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Park D-W, Clare RM, Schulte PJ, et al. . Extent, location, and clinical significance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2014;312:2019–27. 10.1001/jama.2014.15095
    1. Sorajja P, Gersh BJ, Cox DA, et al. . Impact of multivessel disease on reperfusion success and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1709–16. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm184
    1. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. . Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012;367:991–1001. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361
    1. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. . Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395–407. 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922
    1. Wald DS, Morris JK, Wald NJ, et al. . Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1115–23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1305520
    1. Gershlick AH, Khan JN, Kelly DJ, et al. . Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:963–72. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.038
    1. Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, et al. . Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2015;386:665–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60648-1
    1. Smits PC, Abdel-Wahab M, Neumann F-J, et al. . Fractional flow reserve-guided multivessel angioplasty in myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1234–44. 10.1056/NEJMoa1701067
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. . Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the advise (adenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1392–402. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003
    1. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, et al. . Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the academic research Consortium-2 consensus document. Circulation 2018;137:2635–50. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289
    1. Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al. . Complete revascularization with multivessel PCI for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1411–21. 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775
    1. Joshi NV, Toor I, Shah ASV, et al. . Systemic atherosclerotic inflammation following acute myocardial infarction: myocardial infarction begets myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2015;4:e001956. 10.1161/JAHA.115.001956
    1. Han Y, Jing J, Tu S, et al. . St elevation acute myocardial infarction accelerates non-culprit coronary lesion atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;30:253–61. 10.1007/s10554-013-0354-z
    1. Kubo T, Imanishi T, Kashiwagi M, et al. . Multiple coronary lesion instability in patients with acute myocardial infarction as determined by optical coherence tomography. Am J Cardiol 2010;105:318–22. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.032
    1. Dutta P, Courties G, Wei Y, et al. . Myocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis. Nature 2012;487:325–9. 10.1038/nature11260
    1. Tovar Forero MN, Scarparo P, den Dekker W, et al. . Revascularization strategies in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol 2020;125:1486–91. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.050
    1. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. . Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213–24. 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
    1. Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi H-M, et al. . Use of the instantaneous Wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1824–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445
    1. Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, et al. . Instantaneous Wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1813–23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540
    1. van der Hoeven NW, Janssens GN, de Waard GA, et al. . Temporal changes in coronary hyperemic and resting hemodynamic indices in Nonculprit vessels of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol 2019;4:736–44. 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2138
    1. Escaned J, Ryan N, Mejía-Rentería H, et al. . Safety of the deferral of coronary revascularization on the basis of instantaneous Wave-Free ratio and fractional flow reserve measurements in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:1437–49. 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.029
    1. Thim T, Götberg M, Fröbert O, et al. . Nonculprit Stenosis Evaluation Using Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:2528–35. 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.021
    1. Ge Y, Pandya A, Steel K, et al. . Cost-Effectiveness analysis of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for stable chest pain syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:1505–17. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.029
    1. Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, et al. . Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2019;380:2418–28. 10.1056/NEJMoa1716734
    1. Erne P, Schoenenberger AW, Burckhardt D, et al. . Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2007;297:1985–91. 10.1001/jama.297.18.1985
    1. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC, et al. . MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2008;29:480–9. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617
    1. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. . Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379:453–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4
    1. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. . Contrast-Enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361:374–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12389-6

Source: PubMed

3
订阅