Cost-effectiveness of conditional cash transfers to retain women in the continuum of care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period: protocol for an economic evaluation of the Afya trial in Kenya

Neha Batura, Jolene Skordis, Tom Palmer, Aloyce Odiambo, Andrew Copas, Fedra Vanhuyse, Sarah Dickin, Alie Eleveld, Alex Mwaki, Caroline Ochieng, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Neha Batura, Jolene Skordis, Tom Palmer, Aloyce Odiambo, Andrew Copas, Fedra Vanhuyse, Sarah Dickin, Alie Eleveld, Alex Mwaki, Caroline Ochieng, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli

Abstract

Introduction: A wealth of evidence from a range of country settings indicates that antenatal care, facility delivery and postnatal care can reduce maternal and child mortality and morbidity in high-burden settings. However, the utilisation of these services by pregnant women, particularly in low/middle-income country settings, is well below that recommended by the WHO. The Afya trial aims to assess the impact, cost-effectiveness and scalability of conditional cash transfers to promote increased utilisation of these services in rural Kenya and thus retain women in the continuum of care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. This protocol describes the planned economic evaluation of the Afya trial.

Methods and analysis: The economic evaluation will be conducted from the provider perspective as a within-trial analysis to evaluate the incremental costs and health outcomes of the cash transfer programme compared with the status quo. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be presented along with a cost-consequence analysis where the incremental costs and all statistically significant outcomes will be listed separately. Sensitivity analyses will be undertaken to explore uncertainty and to ensure that results are robust. A fiscal space assessment will explore the affordability of the intervention. In addition, an analysis of equity impact of the intervention will be conducted.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has received ethics approval from the Maseno University Ethics Review Committee, REF MSU/DRPI/MUERC/00294/16. The results of the economic evaluation will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant international conference.

Trial registration number: NCT03021070.

Keywords: antenatal care; child immunization; conditional cash transfers; cost effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; facility delivery; maternal and child health; postnatal care; priority setting.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. WHO PMNCH fact sheet: RMNCH continuum of care reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health, 2011. Available: [Accessed 12 Jun 2018].
    1. Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, et al. . Antenatal Care: Opportunities for Africa’s Newborns. New York: World Health Organiation, 2010.
    1. Ӧ T, Pena‐Rosas JP, Lawrie T, et al. . Who recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience-going beyond survival. BJOG 2017;124:860–2. 10.1111/1471-0528.14599
    1. Warren CDP, Toure L, Mongi P. Postnatal care. Opportunities for Africa’s Newborns. Cape Town, South Africa: Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health, 2006.
    1. Do M, Hotchkiss D. Relationships between antenatal and postnatal care and post-partum modern contraceptive use: evidence from population surveys in Kenya and Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res 2013;13:6 10.1186/1472-6963-13-6
    1. Moyer CA, Mustafa A. Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health 2013;10:40 10.1186/1742-4755-10-40
    1. Pell C, Meñaca A, Were F, et al. . Factors affecting antenatal care attendance: results from qualitative studies in Ghana, Kenya and Malawi. PLoS One 2013;8:e53747 10.1371/journal.pone.0053747
    1. Chapman RR. Endangering safe motherhood in Mozambique: prenatal care as pregnancy risk. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:355–74. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00363-5
    1. Achat H, Mcintyre P, Burgess M. Health care incentives in immunisation. Aust N Z J Public Health 1999;23:285–8. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.1999.tb01257.x
    1. Malotte CK, Rhodes F, Mais KE. Tuberculosis screening and compliance with return for skin test reading among active drug users. Am J Public Health 1998;88:792–6. 10.2105/AJPH.88.5.792
    1. Post EP, Cruz M, Harman J. Incentive payments for attendance at appointments for depression among low-income African Americans. Psychiatric Services 2006;57:414–6. 10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.414
    1. Seal K, et al. A randomized controlled trial of monetary incentives vs. outreach to enhance adherence to the hepatitis B vaccine series among injection drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003;71:127–31. 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00074-7
    1. Beith A, Eichler R, Weil D. Performance-Based incentives for health: a way to improve tuberculosis detection and treatment completion? SSRN Electronic Journal. 2007 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1003247.
    1. Hill JP, Ramachandran G. A simple scheme to improve compliance in patients taking tuberculosis medication. Trop Doct 1992;22:161–3. 10.1177/004947559202200406
    1. Pettifor A, MacPhail C, Nguyen N, et al. . Can money prevent the spread of HIV? A review of cash payments for HIV prevention. AIDS Behav 2012;16:1729–38. 10.1007/s10461-012-0240-z
    1. Bassett IV, Wilson D, Taaffe J, et al. . Financial incentives to improve progression through the HIV treatment cascade. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2015;10:451–63. 10.1097/COH.0000000000000196
    1. Gertler P. Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA’s Control Randomized Experiment. Am Econ Rev 2004;94:336–41. 10.1257/0002828041302109
    1. Davis B, Gaarder M, Handa S, et al. . Evaluating the impact of cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa, 2012.
    1. Kahn C, Iraguha M, Baganizi M, et al. . Cash transfers to increase antenatal care utilization in Kisoro, Uganda: a pilot study. Afr J Reprod Health 2015;19:144–50.
    1. Okoli U, Morris L, Oshin A, et al. . Conditional cash transfer schemes in Nigeria: potential gains for maternal and child health service uptake in a national pilot programme. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:408 10.1186/s12884-014-0408-9
    1. Glassman A, Duran D, Fleisher L, et al. . Impact of conditional cash transfers on maternal and newborn health. J Health Popul Nutr 2013;31:S48–66.
    1. Chung H. Are cash transfer programs effective in improving maternal and child health in sub-Saharan Africa? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The Journal of Global Health 2017.
    1. Ochieng CA, Haghparast-Bidgoli H, Batura N, et al. . Conditional cash transfers to retain rural Kenyan women in the continuum of care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019;20:152 10.1186/s13063-019-3224-8
    1. Hunter BM, Harrison S, Portela A, et al. . The effects of cash transfers and vouchers on the use and quality of maternity care services: a systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12:e0173068 10.1371/journal.pone.0173068
    1. Hatt L, Nguyen H, Sloan N, et al. . Economic evaluation of demand-side financing (DSF) for maternal health in Bangladesh. Review, analysis and assessment of issues related to health care financing and health economics in Bangladesh Bethesda: Abt Associates Inc, 2010.
    1. Mayora C, Ekirapa-Kiracho E, Bishai D, et al. . Incremental cost of increasing access to maternal health care services: perspectives from a demand and supply side intervention in eastern Uganda. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2014;12 10.1186/1478-7547-12-14
    1. Alfonso YN, Bishai D, Bua J, et al. . Cost-Effectiveness analysis of a voucher scheme combined with obstetrical quality improvements: Quasi experimental results from Uganda. Health Policy Plan 2015;30:88–99. 10.1093/heapol/czt100
    1. Cunha JM, De Giorgi G, Jayachandran S. The price effects of cash versus in-kind transfers. Rev Econ Stud 2019;86:240–81. 10.1093/restud/rdy018
    1. International PA. Population dynamics, environment, and sustainable development in Siaya county In: International PA. ed, 2014.
    1. KNBo S. Nyanza Province multiple indicator cluster survey 2011 final report. Nairobi, kenya: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2013.
    1. Mwangi W, Gachuno O, Desai M, et al. . Uptake of skilled attendance along the continuum of care in rural Western Kenya: selected analysis from global health Initiative survey-2012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:175 10.1186/s12884-018-1803-4
    1. Indicators O. Health at a glance 2015: OECD, 2015.
    1. Mo H. Master health facility list. Kenya: Ministry of Heakth, 2017.
    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. . Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes: Oxford university press, 2015.
    1. Conteh L, Walker D. Cost and unit cost calculations using step-down accounting. Health Policy Plan 2004;19:127–35. 10.1093/heapol/czh015
    1. Batura N, Pulkki-Brännström A-M, Agrawal P, et al. . Collecting and analysing cost data for complex public health trials: reflections on practice. Glob Health Action 2014;7:23257 10.3402/gha.v7.23257
    1. Fenwick E, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ 2001;10:779–87. 10.1002/hec.635
    1. NICE How NICE measures value for money in relation to public health interventions, 2013.
    1. McIntyre D, Ataguba JE. How to do (or not to do)… a benefit incidence analysis. Health Policy Plan 2011;26:174–82. 10.1093/heapol/czq031
    1. Bourguignon F, Chakravarty SR. The measurement of multidimensional poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality 2003;1:25–49. 10.1023/A:1023913831342
    1. Alkire S, Roche JM, Ballon P, et al. . Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. USA: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    1. Alkire S, Foster J. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. J Public Econ 2011;95:476–87. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
    1. Tandon A, Cashin C. Assessing public expenditure on health from a fiscal space perspective: world bank, 2010.
    1. Heller PS. The prospects of creating 'fiscal space' for the health sector. Health Policy Plan 2006;21:75–9. 10.1093/heapol/czj013
    1. Briggs A. Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: statistical representation of parameter uncertainty. Value Health 2005;8:1–2. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.08101.x
    1. Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2006;4 10.1186/1478-7547-4-14

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅