Time-dependent tuning of balance control and aftereffects following optical flow perturbation training in older adults

Jackson T Richards, Brian P Selgrade, Mu Qiao, Prudence Plummer, Erik A Wikstrom, Jason R Franz, Jackson T Richards, Brian P Selgrade, Mu Qiao, Prudence Plummer, Erik A Wikstrom, Jason R Franz

Abstract

Background: Walking balance in older adults is disproportionately susceptible to lateral instability provoked by optical flow perturbations. The prolonged exposure to these perturbations could promote reactive balance control and increased balance confidence in older adults, but this scientific premise has yet to be investigated. This proof of concept study was designed to investigate the propensity for time-dependent tuning of walking balance control and the presence of aftereffects in older adults following a single session of optical flow perturbation training.

Methods: Thirteen older adults participated in a randomized, crossover design performed on different days that included 10 min of treadmill walking with (experimental session) and without (control session) optical flow perturbations. We used electromyographic recordings of leg muscle activity and 3D motion capture to quantify foot placement kinematics, lateral margin of stability, and antagonist coactivation during normal walking (baseline), early (min 1) and late (min 10) responses to perturbations, and aftereffects immediately following perturbation cessation (post).

Results: At their onset, perturbations elicited 17% wider and 7% shorter steps, higher step width and length variability (+171% and +132%, respectively), larger and more variable margins of stability (MoS), and roughly twice the antagonist leg muscle coactivation (p-values<0.05). Despite continued perturbations, most outcomes returned to values observed during normal, unperturbed walking by the end of prolonged exposure. After 10 min of perturbation training and their subsequent cessation, older adults walked with longer and more narrow steps, modest increases in foot placement variability, and roughly half the MoS variability and antagonist lower leg muscle coactivation as they did before training.

Conclusions: Findings suggest that older adults: (i) respond to the onset of perturbations using generalized anticipatory balance control, (ii) deprioritize that strategy following prolonged exposure to perturbations, and (iii) upon removal of perturbations, exhibit short-term aftereffects that indicate a lessening of anticipatory control, an increase in reactive control, and/or increased balance confidence. We consider this an early, proof-of-concept study into the clinical utility of prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations as a training tool for corrective motor adjustments relevant to walking balance integrity toward reinforcing task-specific, reactive control and/or improving balance confidence in older adults.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03341728 ). Registered 14 November 2017.

Keywords: Coactivation; Elderly; Stability; Virtual reality; Walking.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Participants walked on a treadmill while watching a speed-matched immersive virtual hallway with and without continuous mediolateral (ML) optical flow perturbations with an amplitude of 0.35 m, applied as detailed in the current methods section. b Participants participated in two sessions performed on separate days separated by at least 1 week and in fully randomized order. Both sessions consisted of a 2 min “baseline” walking period without perturbations. In one session (“Experimental”), participants then walked for 10 min in the presence of perturbations, followed immediately by a 1-min “post” period without perturbations. In the other session (“Control”), participants simply walked for 10 min without perturbations. For analysis, we refer to the first and last minute of each 10-min prolonged walk as “early” and “late”, respectively
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations on foot placement kinematics. Group average (±standard error) of perturbation-induced effects on step width (SW), b step length (SL), c step width variability (SWV), and d step length variability (SLV) for older participants. The area between the vertical dashed lines represents the period when visual perturbations were present. Previously published reference data from young participants walking for 8 min with optical flow perturbations is shown for comparison. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant (p < 0.001) main effects across the perturbation session (baseline, early, late, post) for all outcome measures. Single asterisks (*) indicate significantly different from baseline values in older adults (p < 0.05). Double asterisks (**) indicate significantly different between early and late time points for prolonged exposure in older adults. We also note differences approaching significance for post and baseline for step width (p = 0.056), between early and late for step width (p = 0.054), and between post and baseline for step length (p = 0.054) in older adult participants (a)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations on lateral margin of stability (MoS) and its variability in older participants. Group average (±standard error) (a) lateral MoS and (b) its associated variability calculated at its stance phase minimum and at heel-strike for the perturbation session. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects across the perturbation session (baseline, early, late, post) for lateral MoS at heel strike (p = 0.012), the variabilities of lateral MoS at its stance phase minimum (p < 0.001) and at heel strike (p < X). Single asterisks (*) indicate significantly different from baseline values in older adults (p < 0.05). Double asterisks (**) indicate significantly different between early and late time points for prolonged exposure in older adults (p < 0.05). We also note differences approaching significance between baseline and early for lateral MoS at heel-strike (p = 0.051) and between early and late for stance phase minimum lateral MoS variability (p = 0.065) (a)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effects of prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations on antagonist leg muscle coactivations. Group average (±standard error) percent coactivation between (a) vastus lateralis (VL) and medial hamstring (MH), b tibialis anterior (TA) and medial gastrocnemius (MG), and c tibialis anterior and soleus (SOL) during the stance and swing phases of strides taken during the perturbation session in older adults. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects across the perturbation session (baseline, early, late, post) for all outcome measures (p-values≤0.020). Single asterisks (*) indicate significantly different from baseline values in older adults (p < 0.05). Double asterisks (**) indicate significantly different between early and late time points for prolonged exposure in older adults (p < 0.05). We also note differences approaching significance between early and late for TA-SOL coactivation during swing (p = 0.066) (a)

References

    1. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(26):1701–1707.
    1. Alexander BH, Rivara FP, Wolf ME. The cost and frequency of hospitalization for fall-related injuries in older adults. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(7):1020–1023.
    1. Web-based injury statistics query and reporting system (WISQARS), N.C.f.I.P.a.C. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Editor.
    1. Bauby CE, Kuo AD. Active control of lateral balance in human walking. J Biomech. 2000;33(11):1433–1440.
    1. Donelan JM, et al. Mechanical and metabolic requirements for active lateral stabilization in human walking. J Biomech. 2004;37(6):827–835.
    1. Bruijn Sjoerd M., van Dieën Jaap H. Control of human gait stability through foot placement. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2018;15(143):20170816.
    1. Franz JR, et al. Visuomotor entrainment and the frequency-dependent response of balance to perturbations. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(8):1132–1142.
    1. Francis CA, et al. Gait variability in healthy old adults is more affected by a visual perturbation than by a cognitive or narrow step placement demand. Gait Posture. 2015;42(3):380–385.
    1. O'Connor SM, Kuo AD. Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing. J Neurophysiol. 2009;102(3):1411–1419.
    1. Hof AL, Gazendam MG, Sinke WE. The condition for dynamic stability. J Biomech. 2005;38(1):1–8.
    1. Wingert JR, Welder C, Foo P. Age-related hip proprioception declines: effects on postural sway and dynamic balance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):253–261.
    1. Goble DJ, et al. Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(3):271–278.
    1. Jeka JJ, Allison LK, Kiemel T. The dynamics of visual reweighting in healthy and fall-prone older adults. J Mot Behav. 2010;42(4):197–208.
    1. Eikema DJ, et al. Elderly adults delay proprioceptive reweighting during the anticipation of collision avoidance when standing. Neuroscience. 2013;234:22–30.
    1. Lord SR, Webster IW. Visual field dependence in elderly fallers and non-fallers. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1990;31(4):267–277.
    1. Franz JR, et al. Advanced age brings a greater reliance on visual feedback to maintain balance during walking. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;40:381–392.
    1. Thompson J, Plummer P, Franz JR. Age and falls history effects on antagonist leg muscle coactivation during walking with optical flow perturbations. Clin Biomech. 2018;59:94–100.
    1. Qiao M, Truong K, Franz JR. Does local dynamic stability during unperturbed walking predict the response to balance perturbations? An examination across age and falls history. Gait Posture. 2018;62:80–85.
    1. Hortobagyi T, et al. Interaction between age and gait velocity in the amplitude and timing of antagonist muscle coactivation. Gait Posture. 2009;29(4):558–564.
    1. Nagai K, et al. Effects of fear of falling on muscular coactivation during walking. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012;24(2):157–161.
    1. Finley JM, Dhaher YY, Perreault EJ. Contributions of feed-forward and feedback strategies at the human ankle during control of unstable loads. Exp Brain Res. 2012;217(1):53–66.
    1. Grabiner MD, et al. Task-specific training reduces trip-related fall risk in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(12):2410–2414.
    1. Thompson JD, Franz JR. Do gait kinematics adapt to perturbed optical flow? Hum Mov Sci. 2017;54:34–40.
    1. Stokes HE, Thompson JD, Franz JR. The neuromuscular origins of kinematic variability during perturbed walking. Nat Sci Rep. 2017;7:808.
    1. O'Connor SM, Xu HZ, Kuo AD. Energetic cost of walking with increased step variability. Gait Posture. 2012;36(1):102–107.
    1. Yang F, Pai YC. Can sacral marker approximate center of mass during gait and slip-fall recovery among community-dwelling older adults? J Biomech. 2014;47(16):3807–3812.
    1. Cram JR, Kasman GS. Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg: Aspen Publishers; 1998.
    1. Zeni JA, Jr, Richards JG, Higginson JS. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture. 2008;27(4):710–4.
    1. Bruijn SM, et al. Split-belt walking: adaptation differences between young and older adults. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108(4):1149–1157.
    1. Fujiki S, et al. Adaptation mechanism of interlimb coordination in human split-belt treadmill walking through learning of foot contact timing: a robotics study. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12(110):0542.
    1. Malone LA, Bastian AJ. Thinking about walking: effects of conscious correction versus distraction on locomotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103(4):1954–1962.
    1. Noel M, Fortin K, Bouyer LJ. Using an electrohydraulic ankle foot orthosis to study modifications in feedforward control during locomotor adaptation to force fields applied in stance. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:16.
    1. McAndrew Young PM, Wilken JM, Dingwell JB. Dynamic margins of stability during human walking in destabilizing environments. J Biomech. 2012;45(6):1053–1059.
    1. Peebles AT, et al. Dynamic margin of stability during gait is altered in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Biomech. 2016;49(16):3949–3955.
    1. Davis PR. Human factors contributing to slips, trips and falls. Ergonomics. 1983;26(1):51–59.
    1. Tang PF, Woollacott MH. Inefficient postural responses to unexpected slips during walking in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53(6):M471–M480.
    1. Falconer K, Winter DA. Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985;25(2–3):135–149.
    1. Espy DD, Yang F, Pai YC. Control of center of mass motion state through cuing and decoupling of spontaneous gait parameters in level walking. J Biomech. 2010;43(13):2548–2553.
    1. Hortobagyi T, et al. Association between muscle activation and metabolic cost of walking in young and old adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66(5):541–547.
    1. Peterson SM, Rios E, Ferris DP. Transient visual perturbations boost short-term balance learning in virtual reality by modulating electrocortical activity. J Neurophysiol. 2018;120(4):1998–2010.
    1. Seidler RD, et al. Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34(5):721–733.
    1. Streubel PN, et al. Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(4):1188–1196.
    1. Cumming RG, et al. Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling on activities of daily living, SF-36 scores, and nursing home admission. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(5):M299–M305.
    1. Bruce DG, Devine A, Prince RL. Recreational physical activity levels in healthy older women: the importance of fear of falling. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(1):84–89.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅