Addressing the Evidence Gap: Protocol for an Effectiveness Study of Circle of Security Parenting, an Attachment-Based Intervention

Anne-Marie Maxwell, Catherine McMahon, Anna Huber, Erinn Hawkins, Rebecca Elizabeth Reay, Anne-Marie Maxwell, Catherine McMahon, Anna Huber, Erinn Hawkins, Rebecca Elizabeth Reay

Abstract

Background: Parenting interventions informed by attachment theory are an increasingly popular choice for clinical services that work with parents of babies and young children. Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) is one such intervention, which has had extraordinary uptake internationally. Evidence for COS-P is very limited, however; there are few published studies, most with very small samples, and findings are mixed. This paper describes a multi-site evaluation of COS-P, designed to help address this evidence gap. Methods/Design: This is a non-randomized controlled effectiveness study of COS-P in four community child and family health settings. Participants are caregivers of children aged 6 years and under, who present to study sites with parenting challenges in the early parenting period. Participants are recruited through these sites, and allocated to either treatment or waitlist control condition based on their capacity to attend the next available COS-P group. Outcomes (changes in caregiving attitudes and capacities linked to child social and emotional development, and caregiver depression symptoms) are assessed at baseline and post-treatment/waitlist using self-report questionnaires (all participants), and a narrative interview and 5-min parent-child interaction (a sub-sample of participants). Additionally, potential moderators of the intervention (demographic, symptom severity) will be tested. Discussion: This is one of the first controlled evaluations of COS-P, and the first in Australia where COS-P dissemination has been particularly widespread. Results from this study will provide valuable information about the effectiveness of COS-P for caregivers with early parenting challenges, and will increase understanding of what works for whom.

Keywords: Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P); attachment-based intervention; caregiving representations; parent mentalization; parenting education.

Copyright © 2020 Maxwell, McMahon, Huber, Hawkins and Reay.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Circle of Security circle graphic. Copyright 2016 by Cooper, Hoffman, and Powell. Reproduced with permission.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart detailing participant flow through study, including timing of measures and intervention.

References

    1. Ainsworth MDS. Patterns of attachment behavior shown by the infant in interaction with his mother. Merrill-Palmer Q. (1964) 10:51–8.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss Volume I: Attachment, 1st Edn. New York, NY: Basic Books; (1969). p. 428.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss Volume I: Attachment, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Basic Books; (1982). p. 436.
    1. Zeanah CH, Berlin LJ, Boris NW. Practitioner Review: clinical applications of attachment theory and research for infants and young children. J Child Psychol Psychiatr. (2011) 52:819–33. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02399.x
    1. Berlin LJ, Zeanah CH, Lieberman AF. Prevention and intervention programs to support early attachment security: a move to the level of the community. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR, editors. Handbook of Attachment. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; (2016). p. 739–58.
    1. Cooper G, Hoffman K, Powell B. Circle of Security Parenting: A Relationship Based Parenting Program. 1st ed. Facilitator DVD Manual (2009).
    1. Cooper G, Hoffman K, Powell B. COS-P facilitator manual. In: Circle of Security Parenting: A Relationship Based Parenting Program. 2nd ed. (2018). p. 96.
    1. Cooper G, Hoffman K, Marvin B, Powell B. Circle of Security Facilitator's Manual (2000).
    1. Powell B, Cooper G, Hoffman K, Marvin B. The Circle of Security Intervention: Enhancing Attachment in Early Parent-Child Relationships. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; (2014). p. 396.
    1. Woodhouse S, Powell B, Cooper G, Hoffman K, Cassidy J. The circle of security intervention: design, research and implementation. In: Steele H, Steele M, editors. Handbook of Attachment-Based Interventions. New York, NT: The Guilford Press; (2018). p. 50–78.
    1. Ainsworth MDS. Patterns of infant-mother attachments: antecedents and effects on development. Bull N Y Acad Med. (1985) 61:771–91.
    1. Bowlby J. A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. New York, NY: Basic Books; (1988). p. 205.
    1. Hoffman KT, Marvin RS, Cooper G, Powell B. Changing toddlers' and preschoolers' attachment classifications: the Circle of Security intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. (2006) 74:1017–26. 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1017
    1. McMahon C, Huber A, Kohlhoff J, Camberis AL. Does training in the Circle of Security framework increase relational understanding in infant/child and family workers? Infant Ment Health J. (2017) 38:658–68. 10.1002/imhj.21661
    1. California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare . Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego: Chadwick Center for Children and Families (2006–2019). Available online at: (accessed January 8, 2019).
    1. Huber A, McMahon CA, Sweller N. Efficacy of the 20-week Circle of Security Intervention: changes in caregiver reflective functioning, representations, and child attachment in an Australian clinical sample. Infant Ment Health J. (2015) 36:556–74. 10.1002/imhj.21540
    1. Huber A, McMahon CA, Sweller N. Improved child behavioural and emotional functioning after Circle of Security 20-week intervention. Attach Hum Dev. (2015) 17:547–69. 10.1080/14616734.2015.1086395
    1. Huber A, McMahon C, Sweller N. Improved parental emotional functioning after Circle of Security 20-week parent–child relationship intervention. J Child Fam Stud. (2016) 25:2526–40. 10.1007/s10826-016-0426-5
    1. Pazzagli C, Laghezza L, Manaresi F, Mazzeschi C, Powell B. The Circle of Security Parenting and parental conflict: a single case study. Front Psychol. (2014) 5:887. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00887
    1. Kim M, Woodhouse SS, Dai C. Learning to provide children with a secure base and a safe haven: the Circle of Security-Parenting (COS-P) group intervention. J Clin Psychol. (2018) 74:1319–32. 10.1002/jclp.22643
    1. Horton E, Murray C. A quantitative exploratory evaluation of the Circle of Security - parenting program with mothers in residential substance-abuse treatment. Infant Ment Health J. (2015) 36:320–36. 10.1002/imhj.21514
    1. Kohlhoff J, Stein M, Ha M, Mejaha K. The Circle of Security Parenting (COS-P) intervention: pilot evaluation. Aust J Child Fam Health Nurs. (2016) 13:3–7.
    1. Coleman M. An attachment-based parenting training program for opiate dependent carers. J Addict Res Ther. (2014) 5:1–7. 10.4172/2155-6105.1000201
    1. Maupin AN, Samuel EE, Nappi SM, Heath JM, Smith MV. Disseminating a parenting intervention in the community: experiences from a multi-site evaluation. J Child Fam Stud. (2017) 26:3079–92. 10.1007/s10826-017-0804-7
    1. Risholm Mothander P, Furmark C, Neander K. Adding “Circle of Security–Parenting” to treatment as usual in three Swedish infant mental health clinics. Effects on parents' internal representations and quality of parent-infant interaction. Scand J Psychol. (2018) 59:262–72. 10.1111/sjop.12419
    1. Cassidy J, Brett BE, Gross JT, Stern JA, Martin DR, Mohr JJ, et al. . Circle of security–parenting: a randomized controlled trial in head start. Dev Psychopathol. (2017) 29:651–73. 10.1017/S0954579417000244
    1. Hand K. Working out what works for families: evidence and the Australian child and family service system. Fam Matters (2017) 99:4–7.
    1. Wilson P, Rush R, Hussey S, Puckering C, Sim F, Allely CS, et al. . How evidence-based is an 'evidence-based parenting program'? A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of Triple P. BMC Med. (2012) 10:130. 10.1186/1741-7015-10-130
    1. Meldrum ML. A brief history of the randomized controlled trial: from oranges and lemons to the gold standard. Hematol Oncol Clin N. (2000) 14:745–60. 10.1016/S0889-8588(05)70309-9
    1. McCall RB, Green BL. Beyond the methodological gold standards of behavioral research: considerations for practice and policy. Soc Policy Rep. (2004) 18:1–20. 10.1002/j.2379-3988.2004.tb00025.x
    1. Victora CG, Habicht J-P, Bryce J. Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. Am J Public Health. (2004) 94:400–5. 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.400
    1. Sanson-Fisher RW, Bonevski B, Green LW, D'Este C. Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. Am J Prev Med. (2007) 33:155–61. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.007
    1. Eccles MP, Armstrong D, Baker R, Cleary K, Davies H, Davies S, et al. . An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci. (2009) 4:18. 10.1186/1748-5908-4-18
    1. Silverman SL. From randomized controlled trials to observational studies. Am J Med. (2009) 122:114–20. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.030
    1. Frieden TR. Evidence for health decision making—beyond randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:465–75. 10.1056/NEJMra1614394
    1. Berlin LJ, Martoccio TL, Jones Harden B. Improving Early Head Start's impacts on parenting through attachment-based intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Psychol. (2018) 54:2316–27. 10.1037/dev0000592
    1. Biggs K, Hind D, Gossage-Worrall R, Sprange K, White D, Wright J, et al. . Challenges in the design, planning and implementation of trials evaluating group interventions. Trials. (2020) 21:116. 10.1186/s13063-019-3807-4
    1. Rabin BA, Brownson RC. Terminology for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; (2018). p. 19–45. 10.1093/oso/9780190683214.003.0002
    1. Deaton A, Cartwright N. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Social Sci Med. (2018) 210:2–21. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005
    1. Goodman SH, Gotlib IH. Risk for psychopathology in the children of depressed mothers: a developmental model for understanding mechanisms of transmission. Psychol Rev. (1999) 106:458–90. 10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.458
    1. Reupert A, Maybery D, Kowalenko N. Children whose parents have a mental illness: prevalence, need and treatment. Med J Aust. (2012) 199(Suppl. 3):7–9. 10.5694/mjao11.11200
    1. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. . Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. (2014) 384:1800–19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61277-0
    1. Forman DR, O'Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Larsen KE, Coy KC. Effective treatment for postpartum depression is not sufficient to improve the developing mother–child relationship. Dev Psychopathol. (2007) 19:585–602. 10.1017/S0954579407070289
    1. Murray L, Fearon P, Cooper P. Postnatal depression, mother–infant interactions, and child development. In: Milgrom J, Gemmill AW, editors. Identifying Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: Evidence-Based Practice in Screening, Psychosocial Assessment, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. (2015). p. 139–64. 10.1002/9781118509722.ch9
    1. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. (1997) 38:581–6. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
    1. Huber A, Hawkins E. Circle of security interventions: distinguishing 2 theories of change. Paper Presented at: Healthy Attachment Australia New Zealand (HAANZ) Workshop. Sydney, NSW (2018).
    1. Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van IJzendoorn MH. A psychometric study of the adult attachment interview: reliability and discriminant validity. Dev Psychol. (1993) 29:870–9. 10.1037/0012-1649.29.5.870
    1. Sagi A, van IJzendoorn MH, Scharf M, Koren-Karie N, Joels T, Mayseless O. Stability and discriminant validity of the adult attachment interview: a psychometric study in young Israeli adults. Dev Psychol. (1994) 30:771–7. 10.1037/0012-1649.30.5.771
    1. Kendall S, Bloomfield L. Developing and validating a tool to measure parenting self-efficacy. J Adv Nurs. (2005) 51:174–81. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03479.x
    1. Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) . Department of Social Services; Australian Institute of Family Studies; Australian Bureau of Statistics. Study Questionnaires (2003). Available online at: (accessed July 20, 2016).
    1. Prior M, Sanson A, Smart D, Oberklaid F. Pathways from Infancy to Adolescence: Australian Temperament Project 1983-2000. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Research report No. 4. (2000). Available online at: (accessed July 20, 2016). 10.1037/e567532013-001
    1. George C, Solomon J. Caregiving helplessness: the development of a screening measure for disorganized maternal caregiving. In: eds Solomon J, George C, editors. Disorganized Attachment and Caregiving. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; (2011). p. 133–66.
    1. Diamond C. Keeping baby in mind: the development of a maternal reflective functioning scale for primary health services [DPsych thesis]. James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia: (2014).
    1. George C, Kaplan N, Main M. Adult Attachment Interview Protocol. 3rd ed. Berkley, MI: University of California; (1996).
    1. Aber J, Slade A, Berger B, Bresgi I, Kaplan M. The Parent Development Interview: Interview Protocol. New York, NY: Barnard College, Columbia University; (1985).
    1. Maxwell A-M. Interactional mind-mindedness: measurement in caregiver-preschooler dyads before and after the Circle of Security intervention [MRes thesis]. Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia: (2016).
    1. Meins E, Fernyhough C. Mind-Mindedness Coding Manual, Version 2.2. York: University of York; (2015).
    1. Meins E. Sensitivity, security and internal working models: bridging the transmission gap. Attach Hum Dev. (1999) 1:325–42. 10.1080/14616739900134181
    1. Meins E. Sensitive attunement to infants' internal states: operationalizing the construct of mind-mindedness. Attach Hum Dev. (2013) 15:524–44. 10.1080/14616734.2013.830388
    1. Zeegers MA, Colonnesi C, Stams G-JJ, Meins E. Mind matters: a meta-analysis on parental mentalization and sensitivity as predictors of infant–parent attachment. Psychol Bull. (2017) 143:1245–72. 10.1037/bul0000114
    1. McMahon CA, Bernier A. Twenty years of research on parental mind-mindedness: empirical findings, theoretical and methodological challenges, and new directions. Dev Rev. (2017) 46:54–80. 10.1016/j.dr.2017.07.001
    1. Calkins SD, Hungerford A, Dedmon SE. Mothers' interactions with temperamentally frustrated infants. Infant Mental Health J. (2004) 25:219–39. 10.1002/imhj.20002
    1. Bernier A, Calkins SD, Bell MA. Longitudinal associations between the quality of mother-infant interactions and brain development across infancy. Child Dev. (2016) 87:1159–74. 10.1111/cdev.12518
    1. Whipple N, Bernier A, Mageau GA. Broadening the study of infant security of attachment: maternal autonomy-support in the context of infant exploration. Soc Dev. (2011) 20:17–32. 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00574.x
    1. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression - development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. (1987) 150:782–6. 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
    1. Cox JL, Chapman G, Murray D, Jones P. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women. J Affect Disord. (1996) 39:185–9. 10.1016/0165-0327(96)00008-0
    1. Matthey S, Barnett B, Kavanagh DJ, Howie P. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for men, and comparison of item endorsement with their partners. J Affect Disord. (2001) 64:175–84. 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00236-6
    1. Matijasevich A, Munhoz TN, Tavares BF, Barbosa APPN, da Silva DM, Abitante MS, et al. . Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening of major depressive episode among adults from the general population. BMC Psychiatry. (2014) 14:284. 10.1186/s12888-014-0284-x
    1. Gray SAO. Widening the Circle of Security: a quasi-experimental evaluation of attachment-based professional development for family child care providers. Infant Ment Health J. (2015) 36:308–19. 10.1002/imhj.21513
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. (2007) 39:175–91. 10.3758/BF03193146
    1. Ten Have TR, Normand SLT, Marcus SM, Brown CH, Lavori P, Duan N. Intent-to-treat vs. non-intent-to-treat analyses under treatment non-adherence in mental health randomized trials. Psychiatric Ann. (2008) 38:772–83. 10.3928/00485713-20081201-10
    1. IBM . Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS 26.0. New York, NY. (2019).
    1. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. (2007) 147:573–7.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅