HbA1c level as a risk factor for retinopathy and nephropathy in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Swedish population based cohort study

Marcus Lind, Aldina Pivodic, Ann-Marie Svensson, Arndis F Ólafsdóttir, Hans Wedel, Johnny Ludvigsson, Marcus Lind, Aldina Pivodic, Ann-Marie Svensson, Arndis F Ólafsdóttir, Hans Wedel, Johnny Ludvigsson

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if the lowest target level for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of <6.5% is associated with lower risk for retinopathy and nephropathy than less tight control in children and adults with type 1 diabetes.

Design: Population based cohort study.

Setting: Swedish National Diabetes Registry, 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2017.

Participants: 10 398 children and adults with type 1 diabetes followed from diagnosis, or close thereafter, until end of 2017.

Main outcome measures: Relative risk (odds ratios) for retinopathy and nephropathy for different mean levels of HbA1c.

Results: Mean age of participants was 14.7 years (43.4% female), mean duration of diabetes was 1.3 years, and mean HbA1c level was 8.0% (63.4 mmol/mol). After adjustment for age, sex, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, blood lipid levels, body mass index, and smoking, the odds ratio for mean HbA1c <6.5% (<48 mmol/mol) compared with 6.5-6.9% (48-52 mmol/mol) for any retinopathy (simplex or worse) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.05, P=0.10), for preproliferative diabetic retinopathy or worse was 3.29 (0.99 to 10.96, P=0.05), for proliferative diabetic retinopathy was 2.48 (0.71 to 8.62, P=0.15), for microalbuminuria or worse was 0.98 (0.60 to 1.61, P=0.95), and for macroalbuminuria was 2.47 (0.69 to 8.87, P=0.17). Compared with HbA1c levels 6.5-6.9%, HbA1c levels 7.0-7.4% (53-57 mmol/mol) were associated with an increased risk of any retinopathy (1.31, 1.05 to 1.64, P=0.02) and microalbuminuria (1.55, 1.03 to 2.32, P=0.03). The risk for proliferative retinopathy (5.98, 2.10 to 17.06, P<0.001) and macroalbuminuria (3.43, 1.14 to 10.26, P=0.03) increased at HbA1c levels >8.6% (>70 mmol/mol). The risk for severe hypoglycaemia was increased at mean HbA1c <6.5% compared with 6.5-6.9% (relative risk 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 1.64, P=0.005).

Conclusions: Risk of retinopathy and nephropathy did not differ at HbA1c levels <6.5% but increased for severe hypoglycaemia compared with HbA1c levels 6.5-6.9%. The risk for severe complications mainly occurred at HbA1c levels >8.6%, but for milder complications was increased at HbA1c levels >7.0%.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: ML has received grants from AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer, and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk, and Rubin Medical; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for retinopathy and nephropathy for 10 mmol/mol increase in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) area under curve. y axis is on logarithmic scale. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy/laser photocoagulation and macroalbuminuria adjusted only for age and sex owing to small number of events; other outcomes adjusted for age, sex, mean systolic and mean diastolic blood pressure, mean body mass index, mean high and mean low density lipoprotein cholesterol, mean cholesterol, mean triglycerides, and smoking. PPDR=preproliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR=proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Whiskers represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig 2
Fig 2
Estimated cumulative probability for preproliferative diabetic retinopathy or worse (PPDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and laser photocoagulation for different area under the curve (AUC) glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values allowing for non-linear relation using spline functions for follow-up cohorts. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals

References

    1. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 1995;44:968-83. 10.2337/diab.44.8.968
    1. Bojestig M, Arnqvist HJ, Hermansson G, Karlberg BE, Ludvigsson J. Declining incidence of nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1994;330:15-8. 10.1056/NEJM199401063300103
    1. Nordwall M, Abrahamsson M, Dhir M, Fredrikson M, Ludvigsson J, Arnqvist HJ. Impact of HbA1c, followed from onset of type 1 diabetes, on the development of severe retinopathy and nephropathy: the VISS Study (Vascular Diabetic Complications in Southeast Sweden). Diabetes Care 2015;38:308-15. 10.2337/dc14-1203.
    1. Lind M, Odén A, Fahlén M, Eliasson B. A systematic review of HbA1c variables used in the study of diabetic complications. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2008;2:282-93 10.1016/j.dsx.2008.04.006.
    1. Wang SY, Andrews CA, Herman WH, Gardner TW, Stein JD. Incidence and Risk Factors for Developing Diabetic Retinopathy among Youths with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes throughout the United States. Ophthalmology 2017;124:424-30. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.10.031.
    1. Grauslund J, Green A, Sjølie AK. Prevalence and 25 year incidence of proliferative retinopathy among Danish type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2009;52:1829-35. 10.1007/s00125-009-1450-4.
    1. Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XXII the twenty-five-year progression of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1859-68. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.023.
    1. Matuleviciene-Anängen V, Rosengren A, Svensson AM, et al. Glycaemic control and excess risk of major coronary events in persons with type 1 diabetes. Heart 2017;103:1687-95. 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-311050
    1. Lind M, Odén A, Fahlén M, Eliasson B. The true value of HbA1c as a predictor of diabetic complications: simulations of HbA1c variables. PLoS One 2009;4:e4412. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004412
    1. American Diabetes Association 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018 . Diabetes Care 2018;41(Suppl 1):S55-64.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management NICE guideline 26 August 2015 accessed 2019 Jul 9.
    1. Gudbjörnsdottir S, Svensson A-M, Eliasson B. et al NDR report 2017 available online accessed 2018 Oct 17.
    1. DiMeglio LA, Acerini CL, Codner E, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Glycemic control targets and glucose monitoring for children, adolescents, and young adults with diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19(Suppl 27):105-14; [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/pedi.12737.
    1. Fisher L, Hessler D, Polonsky W, Strycker L, Masharani U, Peters A. Diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes: Prevalence, incidence and change over time. J Diabetes Complications 2016;30:1123-8. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.03.032
    1. Lindström C, Åman J, Norberg AL, Forssberg M, Anderzén-Carlsson A. “Mission Impossible”; the Mothering of a Child With Type 1 Diabetes - From the Perspective of Mothers Experiencing Burnout. J Pediatr Nurs 2017;36:149-56. 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.06.002.
    1. Eeg-Olofsson K, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, et al. Glycemic control and cardiovascular disease in 7,454 patients with type 1 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Care 2010;33:1640-6. 10.2337/dc10-0398
    1. Samuelsson U, Åkesson K, Peterson A, Hanas R, Hanberger L. Continued improvement of metabolic control in Swedish pediatric diabetes care. Pediatr Diabetes 2018;19:150-7. 10.1111/pedi.12467.
    1. Nordin G. Accuracy of HbA1c as Monitored by External Quality Assessment and Compared With Patient Mean Values. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018;12:771-9. 10.1177/1932296818785622.
    1. Lindblad B, Nordin G. External quality assessment of HbA1c and its effect on comparison between Swedish pediatric diabetes clinics. Experiences from the Swedish pediatric diabetes quality register (Swediabkids) and Equalis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:2045-52. 10.1515/cclm-2013-0226.
    1. Hanas R, John G, International HBA1c Consensus Committee 2010 consensus statement on the worldwide standardization of the hemoglobin A1C measurement. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1903-4. 10.2337/dc10-0953
    1. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models. Biometrika 1986;73:13-22 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13.
    1. Description of GEE-model and SAS code in SAS: accessed 2019 Jul 9.
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: the perspective of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 1996;45:1289-98. 10.2337/diab.45.10.1289
    1. Umino Y, Cuenca N, Everhart D, Fernandez-Sanchez L, Barlow RB, Solessio E. Partial rescue of retinal function in chronically hypoglycemic mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:915-23. 10.1167/iovs.11-8787.
    1. Khan MI, Barlow RB, Weinstock RS. Acute hypoglycemia decreases central retinal function in the human eye. Vision Res 2011;51:1623-6. 10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.003.
    1. Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, et al. International consensus on use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1631-40. 10.2337/dc17-1600
    1. Lachin JM, Genuth S, Cleary P, Davis MD, Nathan DM, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. N Engl J Med 2000;342:381-9. 10.1056/NEJM200002103420603
    1. Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, et al. Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017;317:379-87. 10.1001/jama.2016.19976
    1. Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B, et al. SWITCH Study Group The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2012;55:3155-62. 10.1007/s00125-012-2708-9.
    1. Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, et al. ASPIRE In-Home Study Group Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 2013;369:224-32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1303576.
    1. Forlenza GP, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Liljenquist DR, et al. Safety Evaluation of the MiniMed 670G System in Children 7-13 Years of Age with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:11-9. 10.1089/dia.2018.0264.
    1. Mathieu C, Dandona P, Gillard P, et al. DEPICT-2 Investigators Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 1 Diabetes (the DEPICT-2 Study): 24-Week Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1938-46. 10.2337/dc18-0623.
    1. Mathieu C, Dandona P, Phillip M, et al. DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2 Investigators Glucose Variables in Type 1 Diabetes Studies With Dapagliflozin: Pooled Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data From DEPICT-1 and -2. Diabetes Care 2019;42:1081-7. 10.2337/dc18-1983.
    1. Laranjeira FO, de Andrade KRC, Figueiredo ACMG, Silva EN, Pereira MG. Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2018;13:e0194801.
    1. Joubert M, Reznik Y. Personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management: review of the literature and implementation for practical use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;96:294-305. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.12.010.
    1. Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M, et al. Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1972-82. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408214

Source: PubMed

3
订阅