Canagliflozin and Stroke in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Zien Zhou, Richard I Lindley, Karin Rådholm, Bronwyn Jenkins, John Watson, Vlado Perkovic, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Dick de Zeeuw, Greg Fulcher, Wayne Shaw, Richard Oh, Mehul Desai, David R Matthews, Bruce Neal, Zien Zhou, Richard I Lindley, Karin Rådholm, Bronwyn Jenkins, John Watson, Vlado Perkovic, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Dick de Zeeuw, Greg Fulcher, Wayne Shaw, Richard Oh, Mehul Desai, David R Matthews, Bruce Neal

Abstract

Background and Purpose- This study reports the detailed effects of canagliflozin on stroke, stroke subtypes, and vascular outcomes in participants with and without cerebrovascular disease (stroke or transient ischemic attack) at baseline from the CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study) Program. Methods- The CANVAS Program, comprising 2 similarly designed and conducted clinical trials, randomly assigned 10 142 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high cardiovascular risk to canagliflozin or placebo. Its primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events. The main outcome of interest for this report was fatal or nonfatal stroke. Additional exploratory outcomes were stroke subtypes and other vascular outcomes defined according to standard criteria. Results- There were 1 958 (19%) participants with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack at baseline. These individuals were older, more frequently women, and had higher rates of heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and microvascular disease (all P<0.001) compared with those without such a history. There were 309 participants with stroke events during follow-up (123 had prior stroke or transient ischemic attack at baseline and 186 did not), at a rate of 7.93/1000 patient-years among those assigned canagliflozin and 9.62/1000 patient-years among placebo (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69-1.09). Analysis of stroke subtypes found no effect on ischemic stroke (n=253, hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74-1.22), a significant reduction for hemorrhagic stroke (n=30, hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.89) and no effect on undetermined stroke (n=29, hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.48-2.22). Effects on other cardiovascular outcomes were comparable among participants with and without stroke or transient ischemic attack at baseline. Conclusions- There were too few events in the CANVAS Program to separately define the effects of canagliflozin on stroke, but benefit is more likely than harm. The observed possible protective effect for hemorrhagic stroke was based on small numbers but warrants further investigation. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT01032629 and NCT01989754.

Keywords: canagliflozin; cardiovascular diseases; diabetes mellitus, type 2; ischemic attack, transient; stroke.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of canagliflozin on stroke and TIA. *TIAs were not adjudicated but based upon adverse event reports made by site investigators. Incomplete ascertainment of TIAs is possible because adverse event reporting in the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program was streamlined from January 2014 to capture only serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation, and TIA events considered by the site investigator as nonserious would not be captured after this time. HR indicates hazard ratio; and TIA, transient ischemic attack.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effects of canagliflozin on fatal and nonfatal stroke. A, Fatal or nonfatal stroke. B, Nonfatal stroke. Reprinted from Neal et al with permission. Copyright ©2017, Massachusetts Medical Society. C, Fatal stroke. HR indicates hazard ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effects of canagliflozin on stroke subtypes. A, Ischemic stroke. B, Hemorrhagic stroke. C, Undetermined stroke. HR indicates hazard ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effects of canagliflozin on stroke in patient subgroups. BMI indicates body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CANVAS, Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study; CANVAS-R, CANVAS-Renal; CV, cardiovascular; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; PVD, peripheral vascular disease; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; and SBP, systolic BP.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effects of canagliflozin on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patient with and without cerebrovascular (stroke or TIA) disease at baseline. eGFR indicates estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death); and TIA, transient ischemic attack. *Composite of 40% reduction in eGFR sustained for at least 2 consecutive measures, end-stage kidney disease, or death from renal causes.

References

    1. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ. The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus–present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;8:228–236. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.183.
    1. Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Furie KL, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, Gorman M, et al. IRIS Trial Investigators. Pioglitazone after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1321–1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506930.
    1. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. SUSTAIN-6 Investigators. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141.
    1. Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, Mainou M, Liakos A, Bekiari E, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:262–274. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-4-201308200-00007.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720.
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. CANVAS Program Collaborative Group. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925.
    1. Zinman B, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Wanner C, Fitchett D, Kohler S, et al. EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators (Empagliflozin Cardiovascular Outcome Event Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients) Empagliflozin and cerebrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk. Stroke. 2017;48:1218–1225. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015756.
    1. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di AE, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–2222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9.
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Stein P, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS)–a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2013;166:217.e11–223.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.05.007.
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Matthews DR, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Meininger G, et al. CANVAS-R Trial Collaborative Group. Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study-Renal (CANVAS-R): a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:387–393. doi: 10.1111/dom.12829.
    1. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, Fulcher G, Erondu N, Desai M, et al. CANVAS Program collaborative group. Optimizing the analysis strategy for the CANVAS Program: a prespecified plan for the integrated analyses of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:926–935. doi: 10.1111/dom.12924.
    1. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:2064–2089. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca.
    1. Lawes CM, Rodgers A, Bennett DA, Parag V, Suh I, Ueshima H, et al. Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region. J Hypertens. 2003;21:707–716. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000052492.18130.07.
    1. Mahaffey KW, Neal B, Perkovic V, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. CANVAS Program Collaborative Group. Canagliflozin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the CANVAS Program (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study). Circulation. 2018;137:323–334. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032038.
    1. Jardine MJ, Mahaffey KW, Neal B, Agarwal R, Bakris GL, Brenner BM, et al. CREDENCE study Investigators. The Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) study rationale, design, and baseline characteristics. Am J Nephrol. 2017;46:462–472. doi: 10.1159/000484633.
    1. Turnbull F Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362:1527–1535. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14739-3.
    1. Turnbull F, Neal B, Algert C, Chalmers J, Chapman N, Cutler J, et al. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1410–1419. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.12.1410.
    1. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. 2001;358:1033–1041. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06178-5.
    1. Xie X, Atkins E, Lv J, Bennett A, Neal B, Ninomiya T, et al. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:435–443. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3.
    1. Emdin CA, Rahimi K, Neal B, Callender T, Perkovic V, Patel A. Blood pressure lowering in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2015;313:603–615. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.18574.
    1. Malyszko J, Muntner P, Rysz J, Banach M. Blood pressure levels and stroke: J-curve phenomenon? Curr Hypertens Rep. 2013;15:575–581. doi: 10.1007/s11906-013-0402-z.
    1. Baker WL, Smyth LR, Riche DM, Bourret EM, Chamberlin KW, White WB. Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:262.e9–275.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.01.007.
    1. Inzucchi SE, Zinman B, Wanner C, Ferrari R, Fitchett D, Hantel S, et al. SGLT-2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: proposed pathways and review of ongoing outcome trials. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015;12:90–100. doi: 10.1177/1479164114559852.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅