The recurrent architecture of tumour initiation, progression and drug sensitivity
Andrea Califano, Mariano J Alvarez, Andrea Califano, Mariano J Alvarez
Abstract
Recent studies across multiple tumour types are starting to reveal a recurrent regulatory architecture in which genomic alterations cluster upstream of functional master regulator (MR) proteins, the aberrant activity of which is both necessary and sufficient to maintain tumour cell state. These proteins form small, hyperconnected and autoregulated modules (termed tumour checkpoints) that are increasingly emerging as optimal biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Crucially, as their activity is mostly dysregulated in a post-translational manner, rather than by mutations in their corresponding genes or by differential expression, the identification of MR proteins by conventional methods is challenging. In this Opinion article, we discuss novel methods for the systematic analysis of MR proteins and of the modular regulatory architecture they implement, including their use as a valuable reductionist framework to study the genetic heterogeneity of human disease and to drive key translational applications.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests statement
The authors declare competing interests: see Web version for details.
Competing interests statement
A. C is founder of DarwinHealth, Inc. M. J. A. has been employed by DarwinHealth, Inc. since March 2016.
Figures
References
- Hoadley KA, et al. Multiplatform analysis of 12 cancer types reveals molecular classification within and across tissues of origin. Cell. 2014;158:929–944.
- Shah SP, et al. The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature. 2012;486:395–399.
- Verhaak RG, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:98–110.
- Curtis C, et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486:346–352.
- Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70.
- Oakman C, Santarpia L, Di Leo A. Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:725–732.
- Chen JC, et al. Identification of causal genetic drivers of human disease through systems-level analysis of regulatory networks. Cell. 2014;159:402–414.
- Compagno M, et al. Mutations of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-κB in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2009;459:717–721.
- Aytes A, et al. Cross-species regulatory network analysis identifies a synergistic interaction between FOXM1 and CENPF that drives prostate cancer malignancy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:638–651.
- Carro MS, et al. The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours. Nature. 2010;463:318–325.
- Bisikirska B, et al. Elucidation and pharmacological targeting of novel molecular drivers of follicular lymphoma progression. Cancer Res. 2016;76:664–674.
- Yang J, et al. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell. 2004;117:927–939.
- Nambu JR, Lewis JO, Wharton KA, Jr, Crews ST. The Drosophila single-minded gene encodes a helix–loop–helix protein that acts as a master regulator of CNS midline development. Cell. 1991;67:1157–1167.
- Resnick MA, Tomso D, Inga A, Menendez D, Bell D. Functional diversity in the gene network controlled by the master regulator p53 in humans. Cell Cycle. 2005;4:1026–1029.
- Klapper LN, Kirschbaum MH, Sela M, Yarden Y. Biochemical and clinical implications of the ErbB/HER signaling network of growth factor receptors. Adv Cancer Res. 2000;77:25–79.
- Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–752.
- Dalla-Favera R, et al. Human c-myc oncogene is located on the region of chromosome 8 that is translocated in Burkitt lymphoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79:7824–7827.
- Klein U, et al. Transcriptional analysis of the B cell germinal center reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:2639–2644.
- Akavia UD, et al. An integrated approach to uncover drivers of cancer. Cell. 2010;143:1005–1017.
- Gu J, et al. Gene module based regulator inference identifying miR-139 as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10:3249–3254.
- Ergun A, Lawrence CA, Kohanski MA, Brennan TA, Collins JJ. A network biology approach to prostate cancer. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:82.
- Cannon WB. Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 1929;9:399–431.
- Waddington CH. Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature. 1959;183:1654–1655.
- Waddington CH. Genetic assimilation. Adv Genet. 1961;10:257–293.
- Siegel PM, Massague J. Cytostatic and apoptotic actions of TGF-β in homeostasis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:807–821.
- Carter SB. Tissue homeostasis and the biological basis of cancer. Nature. 1968;220:970–974.
- Young SR, et al. Establishment and serial passage of cell cultures derived from LuCaP xenografts. Prostate. 2013;73:1251–1262.
- Barretina J, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483:603–607.
- Rodriguez-Barrueco R, et al. Inhibition of the autocrine IL-6–JAK2–STAT3–calprotectin axis as targeted therapy for HR−/HER2+ breast cancers. Genes Dev. 2015;29:1631–1648.
- Piovan E, et al. Direct reversal of glucocorticoid resistance by AKT inhibition in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:766–776.
- Mitrofanova A, Aytes A, Shen C, Abate-Shen C, Califano A. A systems biology approach to predict drug response for human prostate cancer based on in vivo preclinical analyses of mouse models. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1–12.
- Davis RE, Brown KD, Siebenlist U, Staudt LM. Constitutive nuclear factor kappaB activity is required for survival of activated B cell-like diffuse large B cell lymphoma cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1861–1874.
- Ngo VN, et al. Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma. Nature. 2011;470:115–119.
- Davis RE, et al. Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2010;463:88–92.
- Luo J, Solimini NL, Elledge SJ. Principles of cancer therapy: oncogene and non-oncogene addiction. Cell. 2009;136:823–837.
- Wayne DW. Kolmogorov–Smirnov One-sample Test: Applied Nonparametric Statistics. 2. pp. 319–330. (PWS-Kent, 1990)
- Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–15550.
- Alvarez MJ, et al. Functional characterization of somatic mutations in cancer using network-based inference of protein activity. Nat Genet. 2016;48:838–847.
- Lefebvre C, et al. A human B-cell interactome identifies MYB and FOXM1 as master regulators of proliferation in germinal centers. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:377.
- Castro MA, et al. Regulators of genetic risk of breast cancer identified by integrative network analysis. Nat Genet. 2016;48:12–21.
- Zhang S, et al. Stroma-associated master regulators of molecular subtypes predict patient prognosis in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16066.
- Yepes S, Torres MM, Lopez-Kleine L. Regulatory network reconstruction reveals genes with prognostic value for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:1002.
- Remo A, et al. Systems biology analysis reveals NFAT5 as a novel biomarker and master regulator of inflammatory breast cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13:138.
- Fletcher MN, et al. Master regulators of FGFR2 signalling and breast cancer risk. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2464.
- Tanaka H, Ogishima S. Network biology approach to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis: three stage theory. J Mol Cell Biol. 2015;7:253–266.
- Piao G, et al. A computational procedure for identifying master regulator candidates: a case study on diabetes progression in Goto–Kakizaki rats. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6(Suppl 1):S2.
- Liang Y, et al. Transcriptional network analysis identifies BACH1 as a master regulator of breast cancer bone metastasis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:33533–33544.
- Califano A, Butte AJ, Friend S, Ideker T, Schadt E. Leveraging models of cell regulation and GWAS data in integrative network-based association studies. Nat Genet. 2012;44:841–847.
- Pe’er D, Hacohen N. Principles and strategies for developing network models in cancer. Cell. 2011;144:864–873.
- Tovar H, Garcia-Herrera R, Espinal-Enriquez J, Hernandez-Lemus E. Transcriptional master regulator analysis in breast cancer genetic networks. Comput Biol Chem. 2015;59B:67–77.
- Sartor IT, Zeidan-Chulia F, Albanus RD, Dalmolin RJ, Moreira JC. Computational analyses reveal a prognostic impact of TULP3 as a transcriptional master regulator in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10:1461–1468.
- Lim WK, Lyashenko E, Califano A. Master regulators used as breast cancer metastasis classifiers. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2009;14:504–515.
- Ikiz B, et al. Dissecting the regulatory machinery of neurodegeneration in an in vitro model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Rep. 2015;12:335–345.
- Aubry S, et al. Assembly and interrogation of Alzheimer’s disease genetic networks reveal novel regulators of progression. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120352.
- Brichta L, et al. Identification of neurodegenerative factors using translatome-regulatory network analysis. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1325–1333.
- Repunte-Canonigo V, et al. Identifying candidate drivers of alcohol dependence-induced excessive drinking by assembly and interrogation of brain-specific regulatory networks. Genome Biol. 2015;16:68.
- Kushwaha R, et al. Interrogation of a context-specific transcription factor network identifies novel regulators of pluripotency. Stem Cells. 2015;33:367–377.
- Ravasi T, et al. An atlas of combinatorial transcriptional regulation in mouse and man. Cell. 2010;140:744–752.
- Basso K, et al. Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells. Nat Genet. 2005;37:382–390.
- ENCODE Project Consortium. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature. 2007;447:799–816.
- Sumazin P, et al. An extensive microRNA-mediated network of RNA–RNA interactions regulates established oncogenic pathways in glioblastoma. Cell. 2011;147:370–381.
- Lewis BP, Shih IH, Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Burge CB. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell. 2003;115:787–798.
- Friedlander MR, et al. Discovering microRNAs from deep sequencing data using miRDeep. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:407–415.
- Rual JF, et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature. 2005;437:1173–1178.
- Bandyopadhyay S, et al. A human MAP kinase interactome. Nat Methods. 2010;7:801–805.
- Wang K, et al. Genome-wide identification of post-translational modulators of transcription factor activity in human B cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:829–839.
- Zhang QC, et al. Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature. 2012;490:556–560.
- AlQuraishi M, Koytiger G, Jenney A, MacBeath G, Sorger PK. A multiscale statistical mechanical framework integrates biophysical and genomic data to assemble cancer networks. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1363–1367.
- Faith JJ, et al. Large-scale mapping and validation of Escherichia coli transcriptional regulation from a compendium of expression profiles. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e8.
- Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science. 2004;303:799–805.
- Kundaje A, et al. Learning regulatory programs that accurately predict differential expression with MEDUSA. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007;1115:178–202.
- Kramer A, Green J, Pollard J, Jr, Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:523–530.
- Maher B. ENCODE: the human encyclopaedia. Nature. 2012;489:46–48.
- Palomero T, et al. NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:18261–18266.
- Affara M, et al. Vasohibin-1 is identified as a master-regulator of endothelial cell apoptosis using gene network analysis. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:23.
- Werner HM, Mills GB, Ram PT. Cancer systems biology: a peek into the future of patient care? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:167–176.
- Saito M, et al. BCL6 suppression of BCL2 via Miz1 and its disruption in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:11294–11299.
- Luscombe NM, et al. Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes. Nature. 2004;431:308–312.
- Phillips HS, et al. Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:157–173.
- Brennan CW, et al. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell. 2013;155:462–477.
- Wapinski OL, et al. Hierarchical mechanisms for direct reprogramming of fibroblasts to neurons. Cell. 2013;155:621–635.
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674.
- Chudnovsky Y, et al. ZFHX4 interacts with the NuRD core member CHD4 and regulates the glioblastoma tumor-initiating cell state. Cell Rep. 2014;6:313–324.
- Taylor BS, et al. Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:11–22.
- US National Library of Medicine. . 2014 .
- Tzoneva G, et al. Activating mutations in the NT5C2 nucleotidase gene drive chemotherapy resistance in relapsed ALL. Nat Med. 2013;19:368–371.
- Woyach JA, et al. Resistance mechanisms for the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2286–2294.
- Flusberg DA, Sorger PK. Modulating cell-to-cell variability and sensitivity to death ligands by co-drugging. Phys Biol. 2013;10:035002.
- Fenner A. Prostate cancer: next-generation RNA sequencing identifies gene signature of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate tumors. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:8.
- Van Vlierberghe P, Ferrando A. The molecular basis of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3398–3406.
- Wei G, et al. Gene expression-based chemical genomics identifies rapamycin as a modulator of MCL1 and glucocorticoid resistance. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:331–342.
- Rubin EH, Gilliland DG. Drug development and clinical trials—the path to an approved cancer drug. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:215–222.
- Shelanski M, et al. A systems approach to drug discovery in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12:126–131.
- Schadt EE, et al. An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nat Genet. 2005;37:710–717.
- Hofree M, Shen JP, Carter H, Gross A, Ideker T. Network-based stratification of tumor mutations. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1108–1115.
- Alvarez MJ, Chen JC, Califano A. DIGGIT: a Bioconductor package to infer genetic variants driving cellular phenotypes. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:4032–4034.
- Weinstein IB. Cancer. Addiction to oncogenes—the Achilles heal of cancer. Science. 2002;297:63–64.
- Druker BJ, et al. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med. 1996;2:561–566.
- Wang X, Haswell JR, Roberts CW. Molecular pathways: SWI/SNF (BAF) complexes are frequently mutated in cancer—mechanisms and potential therapeutic insights. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:21–27.
- Vazquez M, Valencia A, Pons T. Structure-PPi: a module for the annotation of cancer-related single-nucleotide variants at protein-protein interfaces. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2397–2399.
- Morris JPt, Wang SC, Hebrok M. KRAS, Hedgehog, Wnt and the twisted developmental biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:683–695.
- Dhomen N, Marais R. BRAF signaling and targeted therapies in melanoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009;23:529–545.
- Davoli A, Hocevar BA, Brown TL. Progression and treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010;65:611–623.
- Bansal M, et al. A community computational challenge to predict the activity of pairs of compounds. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:1213–1222.
- Woo JH, et al. Elucidating compound mechanism of action by network dysregulation analysis in pertubed cells. Cell. 2015;162:441–451.
- Tallarida RJ. An overview of drug combination analysis with isobolograms. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319:1–7.
- Patel AP, et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science. 2014;344:1396–1401.
- Park HS, Jun CH. A simple and fast algorithm for K-medoids clustering. Expert Systems With Appl. 2009;36:3336–3341.
- Lefebvre C, Rieckhof G, Califano A. Reverse-engineering human regulatory networks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2012;4:311–325.
- Linding R, et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell. 2007;129:1415–1426.
- Srivas R, et al. Assembling global maps of cellular function through integrative analysis of physical and genetic networks. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:1308–1323.
- Rhodes DR, et al. Mining for regulatory programs in the cancer transcriptome. Nat Genet. 2005;37:579–583.
- Lachmann A, et al. ChEA: transcription factor regulation inferred from integrating genome-wide ChIP-X experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2438–2444.
- Needham CJ, Bradford JR, Bulpitt AJ, Westhead DR. Inference in Bayesian networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:51–53.
- Yeung MK, Tegner J, Collins JJ. Reverse engineering gene networks using singular value decomposition and robust regression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:6163–6168.
- Martinez MR, et al. Quantitative modeling of the terminal differentiation of B cells and mechanisms of lymphomagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:2672–2677.
- Polynikis A, Hogan SJ, di Bernardo M. Comparing different ODE modelling approaches for gene regulatory networks. J Theor Biol. 2009;261:511–530.
- Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science. 2003;302:249–255.
- Horvath S, Dong J. Geometric interpretation of gene coexpression network analysis. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008;4:e1000117.
- Jansen R, et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting protein-protein interactions from genomic data. Science. 2003;302:449–453.
- He F, Balling R, Zeng AP. Reverse engineering and verification of gene networks: principles, assumptions, and limitations of present methods and future perspectives. J Biotechnol. 2009;144:190–203.
- Stolovitzky G, Prill RJ, Califano A. Lessons from the DREAM2 Challenges. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2009;1158:159–195.
- Marbach D, et al. Revealing strengths and weaknesses of methods for gene network inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6286–6291.
- Bussemaker HJ, Li H, Siggia ED. Regulatory element detection using correlation with expression. Nat Genet. 2001;27:167–171.
- Fiedler D, et al. Functional organization of the S cerevisiae phosphorylation network. Cell. 2009;136:952–963.
- Mani KM, et al. A systems biology approach to prediction of oncogenes and molecular perturbation targets in B-cell lymphomas. Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4:169.
- Ideker T, Krogan NJ. Differential network biology. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:565.
- Barrios-Rodiles M, et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science. 2005;307:1621–1625.
- Saez-Rodriguez J, et al. Comparing signaling networks between normal and transformed hepatocytes using discrete logical models. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5400–5411.
- Menashe I, et al. Pathway analysis of breast cancer genome-wide association study highlights three pathways and one canonical signaling cascade. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4453–4459.
- Laoukili J, et al. FoxM1 is required for execution of the mitotic programme and chromosome stability. Nature Cell Biol. 2005;7:126–136.
- Basu A, et al. An interactive resource to identify cancer genetic and lineage dependencies targeted by small molecules. Cell. 2013;154:1151–1161.
- Flusberg DA, Roux J, Spencer SL, Sorger PK. Cells surviving fractional killing by TRAIL exhibit transient but sustainable resistance and inflammatory phenotypes. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:2186–2200.
- Roschewski M, Staudt LM, Wilson WH. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma-treatment approaches in the molecular era. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:12–23.
Source: PubMed