The effects on dynamic balance of dual-tasking using smartphone functions

In Hyouk Hyong, In Hyouk Hyong

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to compare dynamic balance with respect to completing a single task while not using smartrphone function and completing two task while using different smartphone functions, therby preventing falls or injuries resulting from completion of dual tasks. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of this study were 36 healthy males and females. The experiment was conducted for five situations: a Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) was performed (1) during single-tasking without a smartphone and during dual-tasking with a smartphone, (2) when listening to music using a smartphone, (3) when sending message using a smartphone, (4) when surfing the web using a smartphone, and (5) when playing a game using a smartphone. The condition were the same for all five experimentes. Random selection was done to prevent learing. All experiments were conducted three times, and the averaged values were used for analysis. The SEBT was performed in three directions: anterior, posterolateral, and posterormedial. In consideration the differences in leg length of the subjects, their actual leg length were measured to be used as percentages. Their leg length was measured from the anterior superior iliac spine of the femur to the medial malleolus. [Results] Compared with single task not done using a smartphone, dynamic balance statistically significantly changed for dual tasks done using a smartphone in all three directions. Dynamic balance decreased in all three directions when playing games, sending messages, web surfing, and listening to music. [Conclusion] Completing two tasks using a smartphone reduced cognitive ability, decreasing dynamic balance. Therefore, performing a single task rather than using the diverse functions of a smartphone while walking or working is considered a factor that can prevent falls and injuries.

Keywords: Fall; Smart phone; Star excursion balance test.

References

    1. Won JI: Effect of using a mobile phone on postural control. Phys Ther Kor, 2012, 19: 61–71.
    1. Vuillerme N, Forestier N, Nougier V: Attentional demands and postural sway: the effect of the calf muscles fatigue. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2002, 34: 1907–1912.
    1. Greig AM, Straker LM, Briggers AM, et al. : Cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius muscles activity in children using different information technologies. Phys Ther, 2005, 91: 119–126.
    1. Straker LM, Coleman J, Skoss R, et al. : A comparison of posture and muscle activity during tablet computer, desktop computer and paper use by young children. Ergonomics, 2008, 51: 540–555.
    1. Patten CJ, Kircher A, Ostlund J, et al. : Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accid Anal Prev, 2004, 36: 341–350.
    1. Hyong IH, Kim JH: Test of intrarater and interrater reliability for the star excursion balance test. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26: 1139–1141.
    1. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Denegar CR, et al. : The Effects of fatigue and chronic ankle instability on dynamic postural control. J Athl Train, 2004, 39: 321–329.
    1. Beattie P, Isaacson K, Riddle DL, et al. : Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure. Phys Ther, 1990, 70: 150–157.
    1. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M: Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2000, 55: M10–M16.
    1. Lacour M, Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M: Posture control, aging, and attention resources: models and posture-analysis methods. Neurophysiol Clin, 2008, 38: 411–421.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅