Effects of the new dual PPAR α/δ agonist GFT505 on lipid and glucose homeostasis in abdominally obese patients with combined dyslipidemia or impaired glucose metabolism

Bertrand Cariou, Yassine Zaïr, Bart Staels, Eric Bruckert, Bertrand Cariou, Yassine Zaïr, Bart Staels, Eric Bruckert

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the metabolic effects and tolerability of GFT505, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α/δ agonist, in abdominally obese patients with either combined dyslipidemia or prediabetes.

Research design and methods: The S1 study was conducted in 94 patients with combined dyslipidemia while the S2 study was conducted in 47 patients with prediabetes. Participants were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to GFT505 at 80 mg/day or placebo for 28 (S1) or 35 (S2) days. Primary efficacy end points were changes from baseline at week 4 in both fasting plasma triglycerides and HDL cholesterol in the S1 group and 2-h glucose upon oral glucose tolerance test in the S2 group.

Results: In comparison with placebo, GFT505 significantly reduced fasting plasma triglycerides (S1: least squares means -16.7% [95% one-sided CI -∞ to -5.3], P = 0.005; S2: -24.8% [-∞ to -10.5], P = 0.0003) and increased HDL cholesterol (S1: 7.8% [3.0 to ∞], P = 0.004; S2: 9.3% [1.7 to ∞], P = 0.009) in both studies, whereas LDL cholesterol only decreased in S2 (-11.0% [ -∞ to -3.5], P = 0.002). In S2, GFT505 did not reduce 2-h glucose (-0.52 mmol/L [-∞ to 0.61], P = 0.18) but led to a significant decrease of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (-31.4% [-∞ to 12.5], P = 0.001), fasting plasma glucose (-0.37 mmol/L [-∞ to -0.10], P = 0.01) and fructosamine (-3.6% [-∞ to -0.20], P = 0.02). GFT505 also reduced γ glutamyl transferase levels in both studies (S1: -19.9% [-∞ to -12.8], P < 0.0001; S2: -15.1% [-∞ to -1.1], P = 0.004). No specific adverse safety signals were reported during the studies.

Conclusions: GFT505 may be considered a new drug candidate for the treatment of lipid and glucose disorders associated with the metabolic syndrome.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01271751 NCT01275469.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in metabolic parameters. Least squares (ls) means changes in lipid parameters (A and B), glucose homeostasis parameters (C and D), and liver function and inflammatory markers (E) from baseline at end point (week 4). C: ■, Placebo; □, GFT505-2. Data are least squares means ± SD. P value vs. placebo: *< 0.05, **< 0.001, ***< 0.0001. £P value vs. baseline < 0.05. AUC, area under the curve; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; PCB, placebo; TC, total cholesterol, TG, triglyceride.

References

    1. Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, et al. . Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2001;24:683–689
    1. Staels B, Fruchart JC. Therapeutic roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists. Diabetes 2005;54:2460–2470
    1. Reilly SM, Lee CH. PPAR delta as a therapeutic target in metabolic disease. FEBS Lett 2008;582:26–31
    1. Tanaka T, Yamamoto J, Iwasaki S, et al. . Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta induces fatty acid beta-oxidation in skeletal muscle and attenuates metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:15924–15929
    1. Wang YX, Lee CH, Tiep S, et al. . Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor delta activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity. Cell 2003;113:159–170
    1. Luquet S, Lopez-Soriano J, Holst D, et al. . Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta controls muscle development and oxidative capability. FASEB J 2003;17:2299–2301
    1. Lee CH, Olson P, Hevener A, et al. . PPARdelta regulates glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:3444–3449
    1. Sprecher DL, Massien C, Pearce G, et al. . Triglyceride:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol effects in healthy subjects administered a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor δ agonist. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27:359–365
    1. Risérus U, Sprecher D, Johnson T, et al. . Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)δ promotes reversal of multiple metabolic abnormalities, reduces oxidative stress, and increases fatty acid oxidation in moderately obese men. Diabetes 2008;57:332–339
    1. Hanf R, Darteil R, Hum DW, Staels B. GFT505 efficacy and safety in healthy volunteers and patients suffering from atherogenic dyslipidemia. Diabetes 2010;59(Suppl. 1):A185
    1. Caron S, Staels B. Apolipoprotein CIII: a link between hypertriglyceridemia and vascular dysfunction? Circ Res 2008;103:1348–1350
    1. Maeda N, Takahashi M, Funahashi T, et al. . PPARgamma ligands increase expression and plasma concentrations of adiponectin, an adipose-derived protein. Diabetes 2001;50:2094–2099
    1. Staels B, Vu-Dac N, Kosykh VA, et al. . Fibrates downregulate apolipoprotein C-III expression independent of induction of peroxisomal acyl coenzyme A oxidase. A potential mechanism for the hypolipidemic action of fibrates. J Clin Invest 1995;95:705–712
    1. Hennuyer N, Poulain P, Madsen L, et al. . Beneficial effects of fibrates on apolipoprotein A-I metabolism occur independently of any peroxisome proliferative response. Circulation 1999;99:2445–2451
    1. Vu-Dac N, Schoonjans K, Kosykh V, et al. . Fibrates increase human apolipoprotein A-II expression through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J Clin Invest 1995;96:741–750
    1. Oliver WR, Jr, Shenk JL, Snaith MR, et al. . A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ agonist promotes reverse cholesterol transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:5306–5311
    1. Rasouli N, Kern PA, Reece EA, Elbein SC. Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on β-cell function in nondiabetic subjects at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007;292:E359–E365
    1. Belfort R, Berria R, Cornell J, Cusi K. Fenofibrate reduces systemic inflammation markers independent of its effects on lipid and glucose metabolism in patients with the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:829–836
    1. Fabbrini E, Mohammed BS, Korenblat KM, et al. . Effect of fenofibrate and niacin on intrahepatic triglyceride content, very low-density lipoprotein kinetics, and insulin action in obese subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:2727–2735
    1. Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC, et al. ; ACCORD Study Group. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1563–1574
    1. Jun M, Foote C, Lv J, et al. . Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010;375:1875–1884
    1. Nagasawa T, Inada Y, Nakano S, et al. . Effects of bezafibrate, PPAR pan-agonist, and GW501516, PPARdelta agonist, on development of steatohepatitis in mice fed a methionine- and choline-deficient diet. Eur J Pharmacol 2006;536:182–191
    1. Laurin J, Lindor KD, Crippin JS, et al. . Ursodeoxycholic acid or clofibrate in the treatment of non-alcohol-induced steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Hepatology 1996;23:1464–1467
    1. Davis TM, Ting R, Best JD, et al. ; Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes Study investigators. Effects of fenofibrate on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) Study. Diabetologia 2011;54:280–290

Source: PubMed

3
订阅