Treatment of patients with aortic dissection presenting with peripheral vascular complications

J I Fann, G E Sarris, R S Mitchell, N E Shumway, E B Stinson, P E Oyer, D C Miller, J I Fann, G E Sarris, R S Mitchell, N E Shumway, E B Stinson, P E Oyer, D C Miller

Abstract

The incidence of peripheral vascular complications in 272 patients with aortic dissection during a 25-year span was determined, as was outcome after a uniform, aggressive surgical approach directed at repair of the thoracic aorta. One hundred twenty-eight patients (47%) presented with acute type A dissection, 70 (26%) with chronic type A, 40 (15%) with acute type B, and 34 (12%) with chronic type B dissections. Eighty-five patients (31%) sustained one or more peripheral vascular complications: Seven (3%) had a stroke, nine (3%) had paraplegia, 66 (24%) sustained loss of a peripheral pulse, 22 (8%) had impaired renal perfusion, and 14 patients (5%) had compromised visceral perfusion. Following repair of the thoracic aorta, local peripheral vascular procedures were unnecessary in 92% of patients who presented with absence of a peripheral pulse. The operative mortality rate for all patients was 25% +/- 3% (68 of 272 patients). For the subsets of individuals with paraplegia, loss of renal perfusion, and compromised visceral perfusion, the operative mortality rates (+/- 70% confidence limits) were high: 44% +/- 17% (4 of 9 patients), 50% +/- 11% (11 of 22 patients), and 43% +/- 14% (6 of 14 patients), respectively. The mortality rates were lower for patients presenting with stroke (14% +/- 14% [1 of 7 patients]) or loss of peripheral pulse (27% +/- 6% [18 of 66 patients]). Multivariate analysis revealed that impaired renal perfusion was the only peripheral vascular complication that was a significant independent predictor of increased operative mortality risk (p = 0.024); earlier surgical referral (replacement of the appropriate section of the thoracic aorta) or more expeditious diagnosis followed by surgical renal artery revascularization after a thoracic procedure may represent the only way to improve outcome in this high-risk patient subset. Early, aggressive thoracic aortic repair (followed by aortic fenestration and/or abdominal exploration with or without direct visceral or renal vascular reconstruction when necessary) can save some patients with compromised visceral perfusion; however, once visceral infarction develops the prognosis is also poor. Increased awareness of these devastating complications of aortic dissection and the availability of better diagnostic tools today may improve the survival rate for these patients in the future. The initial surgical procedure should include repair of the thoracic aorta in most patients.

References

    1. Am J Surg. 1979 Feb;137(2):240-3
    1. Circulation. 1955 Dec;12(6):1068-79
    1. J Vasc Surg. 1988 Feb;7(2):199-209
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981 Oct;82(4):576-84
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1965 Sep;50:364-73
    1. Stroke. 1986 Jul-Aug;17(4):644-7
    1. Am J Surg. 1988 May;155(5):697-700
    1. J Vasc Surg. 1985 May;2(3):472-6
    1. Surgery. 1982 Dec;92(6):1118-34
    1. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984 Dec;32(6):381-2
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1974 Dec;34(7):803-8
    1. Am J Med. 1976 May 10;60(5):625-33
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Aug;135(2):353-6
    1. Circulation. 1950 Mar;1(3):360-87
    1. Radiology. 1970 Apr;95(1):73-8
    1. Medicine (Baltimore). 1958 Sep;37(3):217-79
    1. J Vasc Surg. 1987 Mar;5(3):495-7
    1. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 22;317(17):1060-7
    1. Vasc Surg. 1977 Mar-Apr;11(2):52-4
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1974 Nov;68(5):815-21
    1. J Am Med Assoc. 1956 Jun 23;161(8):689-92
    1. Cardiovasc Clin. 1975;7(1):201-5
    1. Can J Surg. 1982 Mar;25(2):145-9
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Apr;3(4):1026-34
    1. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 Dec 2;144(14):1141-8
    1. Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):153-9
    1. World J Surg. 1980 Sep;4(5):563-9
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Sep;78(3):365-82
    1. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1984;7(6):257-66
    1. Brain. 1968 Mar;91(1):173-90
    1. Ann Surg. 1976 Mar;183(3):296-300
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Mar;93(3):375-84
    1. N Engl J Med. 1962 May 17;266:1040-2
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1985 Jun;65(3):721-41
    1. Ann Surg. 1983 Jun;197(6):738-42
    1. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;19(1):93-5
    1. South Med J. 1965 May;58:593-6
    1. Can J Neurol Sci. 1985 Nov;12(4):289-95
    1. Q J Med. 1979 Jan;48(189):55-63
    1. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1968 Feb;102(2):333-48
    1. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1981 May-Jun;22(3):195-202
    1. Am Heart J. 1949 Nov;38(5):747-57, illust
    1. Cardiovasc Clin. 1983;13(2):103-19
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Jan;39(1):21-6
    1. AMA Arch Pathol. 1952 Feb;53(2):121-41
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1968 Aug;56(2):184-8
    1. Br Med J. 1974 Oct 5;4(5935):23-4
    1. Ann Thorac Surg. 1970 Sep;10(3):237-47
    1. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1983 Nov-Dec;24(6):649-53

Source: PubMed

3
订阅