Patients' and practitioners' views of knee osteoarthritis and its management: a qualitative interview study

Sophie Alami, Isabelle Boutron, Dominique Desjeux, Monique Hirschhorn, Gwendoline Meric, François Rannou, Serge Poiraudeau, Sophie Alami, Isabelle Boutron, Dominique Desjeux, Monique Hirschhorn, Gwendoline Meric, François Rannou, Serge Poiraudeau

Abstract

Purpose: To identify the views of patients and care providers regarding the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to reveal potential obstacles to improving health care strategies.

Methods: We performed a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews of a stratified sample of 81 patients (59 women) and 29 practitioners (8 women, 11 general practitioners [GPs], 6 rheumatologists, 4 orthopedic surgeons, and 8 [4 GPs] delivering alternative medicine).

Results: Two main domains of patient views were identified: one about the patient-physician relationship and the other about treatments. Patients feel that their complaints are not taken seriously. They also feel that practitioners act as technicians, paying more attention to the knee than to the individual, and they consider that not enough time is spent on information and counseling. They have negative perceptions of drugs and a feeling of medical uncertainty about OA, which leads to less compliance with treatment and a switch to alternative medicine. Patients believe that knee OA is an inevitable illness associated with age, that not much can be done to modify its evolution, that treatments are of little help, and that practitioners have not much to propose. They express unrealistic fears about the impact of knee OA on daily and social life. Practitioners' views differ from those of patients. Physicians emphasize the difficulty in elaborating treatment strategies and the need for a tool to help in treatment choice.

Conclusions: This qualitative study suggests several ways to improve the patient-practitioner relationship and the efficacy of treatment strategies, by increasing their acceptability and compliance. Providing adapted and formalized information to patients, adopting more global assessment and therapeutic approaches, and dealing more accurately with patients' paradoxal representation of drug therapy are main factors of improvement that should be addressed.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Sophie Alami, Isabelle Boutron, Dominique Desjeux, and Serge Poiraudeau received honoria from Pfizer and Gwendoline Meric is employed by Pfizer.

References

    1. LaPlante MP. The demographics of disability. Milbank Q. 1991;69:55–77.
    1. Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol. 1994;21:505–14.
    1. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Int Med. 1993;118:622–9.
    1. Boutron I, Rannou F, Jardinaud-Lopez M, Meric G, Revel M, et al. Disability and quality of life of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis in the primary care setting and factors associated with general practitioners' indication for prosthetic replacement within 1 year. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16:1024–31.
    1. Van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, Van der Windt DAWM, Bouter LM, Dekker J. Health-related and overall quality of life of patients with chronic knee and hip complaints in general practice. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:795–803.
    1. Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17:255–63.
    1. Lam CLK, Lauder IJ. The impact of chronic disease on the health-related quality of life of Chinese patients in primary care. Fam Pract. 2000;17:159–66.
    1. Wylde V, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. Personal impact of disability in osteoarthritis: patient, professional and public values. Musculoskeletal Care. 2006;4:152–66.
    1. Hewlett S, Smith AP, Kirwan JR. Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:928–33.
    1. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith C, Grace E, et al. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:59–62.
    1. Xie F, Fong KY, Lo NN, Yang KY. What health domains and items are important to patients with knee osteoarthritis? A focus group study a multiethnic urban Asian population. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:224–30.
    1. Rosemann T, Wensing M, Joest K, Backenstrass M, Malher C. Problems and needs for improving primary care of osteoarthritis patients: the views of patients, general practitioners and practice nurses. BMC musculoskeletal Dis. 2006;7:48–68.
    1. The PloS Medicine Editors. Qualitative Research: Understanding patients' needs and experiences. PloS Medicine. 2007;4(8):e258. doi: .
    1. The Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labelling claims. Clinical/medical 2006
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
    1. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. London: Sage; 1990.
    1. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BE, Miller WL, editors. Doing qualitative research. London: Sage; 1992. pp. 31–44.
    1. Alami S, Desjeux D, Mousaoui I. Les méthodes qualitatives. Paris: PUF; 2009.
    1. Desjeux D, Lihua Zheng. The Itinerary Method. 2002. Available: .
    1. Taponier S, Dekens S, Ras I, Desjeux D. The Itinerary Method Applied to DMLA, (Dégénérescence Maculaire Liée à l'Age). 1999. Available: .
    1. Van deer Geest A. The anthropology of pharmaceuticals: a biographical approach. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1996;25:153–178.
    1. Fainzang S. Médicaments et sociétés. Le patient, le médecin et l'ordonnance. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2001.
    1. Ramond A, Bouton C, Richard I, Roquelaure Y, Baufreton C, et al. Psychological risk factors for chronic low back pain in primary care: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2010. 2010 [Epub ahead of print]

Source: PubMed

3
订阅