Effects of secukinumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover biomarkers in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year data from a phase 3 study, MEASURE 1

Jürgen Braun, Bjoern Buehring, Xenofon Baraliakos, Lianne S Gensler, Brian Porter, Erhard Quebe-Fehling, Sibylle Haemmerle, Jürgen Braun, Bjoern Buehring, Xenofon Baraliakos, Lianne S Gensler, Brian Porter, Erhard Quebe-Fehling, Sibylle Haemmerle

Abstract

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is characterized by chronic inflammation and new bone formation in the axial skeleton. On the other hand, bone loss, osteoporosis and an increased risk of vertebral fractures is known to frequently occur in AS. In the MEASURE 1 study, the clinically efficacious interleukin-17A inhibitor secukinumab was shown to have limited radiographic progression through 4 years in patients with active AS. Here we present a post hoc analysis to evaluate the effect of secukinumab on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover biomarkers over 2 years in this study.

Methods: BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck. Spinal radiographs performed at baseline and Week 104 were assessed by modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) and analyzed in relation to BMD change, considering baseline syndesmophytes. Bone turnover biomarkers were assessed at baseline and at Weeks 52 or 104.

Results: Among 104 patients included in this analysis, 66% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 40.4 (12.3) years. In postmenopausal women and men ≥50 years of age (T-score), the proportion of patients having normal BMD at baseline and Week 104 were 54.5%/54.5% (lumbar spine), 31.6%/55.6% (total hip), and 42.1%/44.4% (femoral neck). Similarly, at baseline, the proportion of patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis was 31.8%/13.6% (lumbar spine), 57.9%/10.5% (total hip), 42.1%/15.8% (femoral neck), and 36.4%/9.1% (lumbar spine), 44.4%/0% (total hip) and 55.6%/0% (femoral neck) at Week 104, respectively. In premenopausal women and men < 50 years of age (Z-score), the proportion of patients having BMD below the expected range for age at baseline and Week 104 were 25.0%/21.2% (lumbar spine), 11.3%/17.8% (total hip), and 9.9%/8.9% (femoral neck). In relation to mSASSS change scores ≥2 over 2 years, the increase in lumbar spine BMD was not related to radiographic progression and syndesmophyte formation. No significant changes were observed in the bone turnover markers over time.

Conclusion: The high proportion of AS patients with diminished BMD was confirmed in this study. An increase of BMD in the lumbar spine after 2 years of secukinumab treatment in patients with AS was found that was probably unrelated to radiographic progression. No relevant effects of secukinumab on bone turnover biomarkers were documented.

Trial registration: MEASURE 1 (post hoc analysis) Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01358175 ; Registered, 23 May 2011.

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis; Bone mineral density; Bone turnover biomarkers; Osteopenia; Osteoporosis; Secukinumab; Vertebral fractures.

Conflict of interest statement

JB: Grant/research support from: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB, Eli Lilly consultant for: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB, Eli Lilly and received speakers bureau fees from: Abbvie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB pharma, Eli Lilly.

BB: Grant/research support from: Kinemed, Extendicare Foundation, Lilly, GE/Lunar and MSD; consultant for: GE/Lunar, Gilead, Theramex, UCB; received speakers bureau fees from UCB, MSD, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme; Travel support from Janssen, UCB, Gilead, AbbVie.

XB: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant for: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Werfen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB.

LSG: Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant for: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis and UCB.

BP: Employee of Novartis and owns Novartis stock.

EQF: Employee of Novartis and owns Novartis stock.

SH: Employee of Novartis and owns Novartis stock.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Normal BMD, Osteopenia, and Osteoporosis Rates in Postmenopausal Women and Men ≥50 years of age through Week 104. Data presented as observed. Normal BMD, T-score ≥ − 1.0; Osteopenia, − 1.0 > T-score > − 2.5; and Osteoporosis, T-score ≤ − 2.5. N, total number of patients; n, number of evaluable patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
BMD Below and Within Expected Range in Premenopausal Women and Men  − 2.0, and below the expected range for age (‘Below Range’) = Z score ≤ − 2.0. BMD, bone mineral density; N, total number of patients; n, number of evaluable patients
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Bone turnover biomarkers course over time for highest and lowest quartile subgroups (at baseline). Symbol 1 – lowest quartile group of parameter at baseline. Symbol 2 – highest quartile group of parameter at baseline. For each subgroup: The box represents the upper and lower quartiles and the whiskers (10th and 90th percentiles) represents the minimum and maximum values. The center horizontal line represents the median and * represents the mean. Circles outside the boxes represent outliers
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scatter plot of change in lumbar spine BMD and mSASSS in patients with/without baseline syndesmophytes. BMD, bone mineral density; mSASSS, modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score. Horizontal line indicates change in the lumbar spine BMD of zero, and vertical line is an indicator of change in mSASSS of 2

References

    1. Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007;369(9570):1379–1390.
    1. Sieper J, Poddubnyy D. Axial spondyloarthritis. Lancet. 2017;390(10089):73–84.
    1. Stolwijk C, van Tubergen A, Castillo-Ortiz JD, Boonen A. Prevalence of extra-articular manifestations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):65–73.
    1. Davey-Ranasinghe N, Deodhar A. Osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013;25(4):509–516.
    1. Klingberg E, Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Geijer M, Gothlin J, Hilme E, et al. Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis - prevalence, risk factors and methods of assessment. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(3):R108.
    1. Lories RJ, Schett G. Pathophysiology of new bone formation and ankylosis in spondyloarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2012;38(3):555–567.
    1. Tan S, Wang RS, Ward MM. Syndesmophyte growth in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27(4):326–332.
    1. Singh HJ, Nimarpreet K, Ashima DS, Kumar A, Prakash S. Study of bone mineral density in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2832–2835.
    1. Malochet-Guinamand S, Pereira B, Tatar Z, Tournadre A, Molto A, Dougados M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of low bone mineral density in spondyloarthritis and prevalence of vertebral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):357.
    1. Ulu MA, Batmaz I, Dilek B, Cevik R. Prevalence of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures and related factors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Chin Med J. 2014;127(15):2740–2747.
    1. Munoz-Ortego J, Vestergaard P, Rubio JB, Wordsworth P, Judge A, Javaid MK, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis is associated with an increased risk of vertebral and nonvertebral clinical fractures: a population-based cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(8):1770–1776.
    1. Hinze AM, Louie GH. Osteoporosis Management in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2016;2(4):271–282.
    1. Magrey M, Khan MA. Osteoporosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010;12(5):332–336.
    1. Klingberg E, Nurkkala M, Carlsten H, Forsblad-d'Elia H. Biomarkers of bone metabolism in ankylosing spondylitis in relation to osteoproliferation and osteoporosis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(7):1349–1356.
    1. Klingberg E, Lorentzon M, Gothlin J, Mellstrom D, Geijer M, Ohlsson C, et al. Bone microarchitecture in ankylosing spondylitis and the association with bone mineral density, fractures, and syndesmophytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(6):R179.
    1. Kuo TR, Chen CH. Bone biomarker for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis: recent developments and future perspectives. Biomark Res. 2017;5:18.
    1. Shetty S, Kapoor N, Bondu JD, Thomas N, Paul TV. Bone turnover markers: emerging tool in the management of osteoporosis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20(6):846–852.
    1. van der Heijde D, Ramiro S, Landewé R, Baraliakos X, Van den Bosch F, Sepriano A, et al. 2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):978–991.
    1. Ward MM, Deodhar A, Gensler LS, Dubreuil M, Yu D, Khan MA, et al. 2019 update of the American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(10):1599–1613.
    1. Haroon N, Inman RD, Learch TJ, Weisman MH, Lee M, Rahbar MH, et al. The impact of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors on radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(10):2645–2654.
    1. Maas F, Arends S, Wink FR, Bos R, Bootsma H, Brouwer E, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis patients at risk of poor radiographic outcome show diminishing spinal radiographic progression during long-term treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0177231.
    1. Li H, Li Q, Chen X, Ji C, Gu J. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy increased spine and femoral neck bone mineral density of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis with low bone mineral density. J Rheumatol. 2015;42(8):1413–1417.
    1. van der Weijden MA, van Denderen JC, Lems WF, Nurmohamed MT, Dijkmans BA, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE. Etanercept increases bone mineral density in ankylosing spondylitis, but does not prevent vertebral fractures: results of a prospective observational cohort study. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(4):758–764.
    1. Haroon NN, Sriganthan J, Al Ghanim N, Inman RD, Cheung AM. Effect of TNF-alpha inhibitor treatment on bone mineral density in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(2):155–161.
    1. Baeten D, Sieper J, Braun J, Baraliakos X, Dougados M, Emery P, et al. Secukinumab, an Interleukin-17A Inhibitor, in ankylosing spondylitis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(26):2534–2548.
    1. Baraliakos X, Braun J, Deodhar A, Poddubnyy D, Kivitz A, Tahir H, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of secukinumab 150 mg in ankylosing spondylitis: 5-year results from the phase III MEASURE 1 extension study. RMD Open. 2019;5(2):e001005.
    1. Baraliakos X, Borah B, Braun J, Baeten D, Laurent D, Sieper J, et al. Long-term effects of secukinumab on MRI findings in relation to clinical efficacy in subjects with active ankylosing spondylitis: an observational study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(2):408–412.
    1. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, Baeten D, Sieper J, Emery P, et al. Effect of secukinumab on clinical and radiographic outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results from the randomised phase III MEASURE 1 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1070–1077.
    1. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Deodhar A, Poddubnyy D, Emery P, Delicha EM, et al. Secukinumab shows sustained efficacy and low structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis: 4-year results from the MEASURE 1 study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(5):859–868.
    1. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27(4):361–368.
    1. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(12):2286–2291.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.
    1. Consensus Development Conference on Osteoporosis Hong Kong, April 1-2, 1993. Am J Med. 1993;95(5A):1S–78S.
    1. Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):364–376.
    1. Lewiecki EM, Gordon CM, Baim S, Leonard MB, Bishop NJ, Bianchi ML, et al. International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 adult and pediatric official positions. Bone. 2008;43(6):1115–1121.
    1. Creemers MC, Franssen MJ, van't Hof MA, Gribnau FW, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(1):127–129.
    1. van der Heijde D, Braun J, Deodhar A, Baraliakos X, Landewé R, Richards HB, et al. Modified stoke ankylosing spondylitis spinal score as an outcome measure to assess the impact of treatment on structural progression in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(3):388–400.
    1. Kim HR, Hong YS, Park S-H, Ju JH, Kang KY. Low bone mineral density predicts the formation of new syndesmophytes in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):231.
    1. Baraliakos X, Listing J, Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Brandt J, Sieper J, et al. Progression of radiographic damage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: defining the central role of syndesmophytes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(7):910–915.
    1. van der Weijden MA, Claushuis TA, Nazari T, Lems WF, Dijkmans BA, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE. High prevalence of low bone mineral density in patients within 10 years of onset of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31(11):1529–1535.
    1. Lee SG, Park YE, Park SH, Kim TK, Choi HJ, Lee SJ, et al. Increased frequency of osteoporosis and BMD below the expected range for age among South Korean women with rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2012;15(3):289–296.
    1. Visvanathan S, van der Heijde D, Deodhar A, Wagner C, Baker DG, Han J, et al. Effects of infliximab on markers of inflammation and bone turnover and associations with bone mineral density in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(2):175–182.
    1. Ashany D, Stein EM, Goto R, Goodman SM. The effect of TNF inhibition on bone density and fracture risk and of IL17 inhibition on radiographic progression and bone density in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019;21(5):20.
    1. Deminger A, Klingberg E, Lorentzon M, Geijer M, Gothlin J, Hedberg M, et al. Which measuring site in ankylosing spondylitis is best to detect bone loss and what predicts the decline: results from a 5-year prospective study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):273.
    1. Ferreira A, Alho I, Casimiro S, Costa L. Bone remodeling markers and bone metastases: from cancer research to clinical implications. Bonekey Rep. 2015;4:668.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅