Replacement of acetate with citrate in dialysis fluid: a randomized clinical trial of short term safety and fluid biocompatibility

Gunilla Grundström, Anders Christensson, Maria Alquist, Lars-Göran Nilsson, Mårten Segelmark, Gunilla Grundström, Anders Christensson, Maria Alquist, Lars-Göran Nilsson, Mårten Segelmark

Abstract

Background: The majority of bicarbonate based dialysis fluids are acidified with acetate. Citrate, a well known anticoagulant and antioxidant, has been suggested as a biocompatible alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate short term safety and biocompatibility of a citrate containing acetate-free dialysis fluid.

Methods: Twenty four (24) patients on maintenance dialysis three times per week, 13 on on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) and 11 on hemodialysis (HD), were randomly assigned to start with either citrate dialysis fluid (1 mM citrate, 1.5 mM calcium) or control fluid (3 mM acetate, 1.5 mM calcium) in an open-labeled cross-over trial (6 + 6 weeks with 8 treatments wash-out in between). Twenty (20) patients, 11 on HDF and 9 on HD were included in the analyses. Main objective was short term safety assessed by acid-base status, plasma ionized calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH). In addition, biocompatibility was assessed by markers of inflammation (pentraxin 3 (PTX-3), CRP, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β) and thrombogenicity (activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and visual clotting scores).

Results: No differences dependent on randomization order or treatment mode (HD vs. HDF) were detected. Citrate in the dialysis fluid reduced the intra-dialytic shift in pH (+0.04 week 6 vs. +0.06 week 0, p = 0.046) and base excess (+3.9 mM week 6 vs. +5.6 mM week 0, p = 0.006) over the study period. Using the same calcium concentration (1.5 mM), citrate dialysis fluid resulted in lower post-dialysis plasma ionized calcium level (1.10 mM vs. 1.27 mM for control, p < 0.0001) and higher post-dialysis PTH level (28.8 pM vs. 14.7 pM for control, p < 0.0001) while pre-dialysis levels were unaffected. Citrate reduced intra-dialytic induction of PTX-3 (+1.1 ng/ml vs. +1.4 ng/ml for control, p = 0.04) but had no effect on other markers of inflammation or oxidative stress. Citrate reduced visual clotting in the arterial air chamber during HDF (1.0 vs. 1.8 for control, p = 0.03) and caused an intra-dialytic increase in APTT (+6.8 s, p = 0.003) without affecting post-dialysis values compared to control.

Conclusions: During this small short term study citrate dialysis fluid was apparently safe to use in HD and on-line HDF treatments. Indications of reduced treatment-induced inflammation and thrombogenicity suggest citrate as a biocompatible alternative to acetate in dialysis fluid. However, the results need to be confirmed in long term studies.

Trial registration isrctn: ISRCTN28536511.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of citrate dialysis fluid on acid–base status. A) Intra-dialytic change in pH at study start (Week 0) and study end (Week 6). B) Intra-dialytic change in Base Excess at study start (Week 0) and study end (Week 6). C) Overall intra-dialytic change in carbon dioxide pressure when using citrate dialysis fluid compared to control. Black bars represent pre-dialysis values and white bars post-dialysis values. Bars show means and error bars represent SEM, n = 20. * = p < 0.05 and ** = p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Analyses of calcium balance over the study period. A) Intra-dialytic change in plasma ionized calcium levels at each sampling occasion when using citrate dialysis fluid compared to control. B) Intra-dialytic change in plasma PTH levels at each sampling occasion when using citrate dialysis fluid compared to control. Black bars represent pre-dialysis values and white bars post-dialysis values. Bars show means and error bars represent SEM, n = 20. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 and *** = p < 0.001 and ** = p < 0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect on plasma citrate levels over the citrate dialysis fluid study period. Black bars represent pre-dialysis values and white bars post-dialysis values. Bars show means and error bars represent SEM, n = 20.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of citrate dialysis fluid on inflammation presented as overall intra-dialytic change in PTX-3 expression when using citrate dialysis fluid compared to control. Black bars represent pre-dialysis values and white bars post-dialysis values. Bars show means and error bars represent SEM, n = 20. * = p < 0.05.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Changes in mean arterial blood pressure during the dialysis treatment. Diamonds represent citrate dialysis fluid and squares control dialysis fluid. Symbols show means and error bars represent SEM, n = 20, * = p < 0.05.

References

    1. Noris M, Todeschini M, Casiraghi F, Roccatello D, Martina G, Minetti L, Imberti B, Gaspari F, Atti M, Remuzzi G. Effect of acetate, bicarbonate dialysis, and acetate-free biofiltration on nitric oxide synthesis: implications for dialysis hypotension. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;14:115–124. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9669432.
    1. Todeschini M, Macconi D, Fernandez NG, Ghilardi M, Anabaya A, Binda E, Morigi M, Cattaneo D, Perticucci E, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Effect of acetate-free biofiltration and bicarbonate hemodialysis on neutrophil activation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;14:783–793. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.35690.
    1. Pizzarelli F, Cerrai T, Dattolo P, Ferro G. On-line haemodiafiltration with and without acetate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;14:1648–1651. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfk093.
    1. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Consequences and therapy of the metabolic acidosis of chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2011;14:19–28. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1564-4.
    1. Garibotto G, Sofia A, Saffioti S, Bonanni A, Mannucci I, Verzola D. Amino acid and protein metabolism in the human kidney and in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Nutr. 2010;14:424–433. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.02.005.
    1. Starai VJ, Escalante-Semerena JC. Acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase (AMP forming) Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;14:2020–2030.
    1. Daimon S, Dan K, Kawano M. Comparison of acetate-free citrate hemodialysis and bicarbonate hemodialysis regarding the effect of intra-dialysis hypotension and post-dialysis malaise. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;14:460–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.00976.x.
    1. Matsuyama K, Tomo T, Kadota J. Acetate-free blood purification can impact improved nutritional status in hemodialysis patients. J Artif Organs. 2011;14:112–119. doi: 10.1007/s10047-010-0551-7.
    1. Kanbay M, Afsar B, Goldsmith D, Covic A. Sudden death in hemodialysis: an update. Blood Purif. 2010;14:135–145. doi: 10.1159/000320370.
    1. Taki K, Takayama F, Tsuruta Y, Niwa T. Oxidative stress, advanced glycation end product, and coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;14:218–224. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000330.
    1. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, McCullough PA, Kasiske BL, Kelepouris E, Klag MJ. et al.Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2003;14:2154–2169. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095676.90936.80.
    1. Del Vecchio L, Locatelli F, Carini M. What we know about oxidative stress in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis--clinical effects, potential treatment, and prevention. Semin Dial. 2011;14:56–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2010.00819.x.
    1. Tsirpanlis G. Is inflammation the link between atherosclerosis and vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease? Blood Purif. 2007;14:179–182. doi: 10.1159/000099011.
    1. Himmelfarb J, Stenvinkel P, Ikizler TA, Hakim RM. The elephant in uremia: oxidant stress as a unifying concept of cardiovascular disease in uremia. Kidney Int. 2002;14:1524–1538. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00600.x.
    1. Borensztajn K, Peppelenbosch MP, Spek CA. Factor Xa: at the crossroads between coagulation and signaling in physiology and disease. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14:429–440. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2008.08.001.
    1. Nilsson B, Ekdahl KN, Mollnes TE, Lambris JD. The role of complement in biomaterial-induced inflammation. Mol Immunol. 2007;14:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.020.
    1. Bryland A, Wieslander A, Carlsson O, Hellmark T, Godaly G. Citrate treatment reduces endothelial death and inflammation under hyperglycaemic conditions. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2012;14:42–51. doi: 10.1177/1479164111424297.
    1. Delvecchio FC, Brizuela RM, Khan SR, Byer K, Li Z, Zhong P, Preminger GM. Citrate and vitamin E blunt the shock wave-induced free radical surge in an in vitro cell culture model. Urol Res. 2005;14:448–452. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0506-2.
    1. Paim BA, Velho JA, Castilho RF, Oliveira HC, Vercesi AE. Oxidative stress in hypercholesterolemic LDL (low-density lipoprotein) receptor knockout mice is associated with low content of mitochondrial NADP-linked substrates and is partially reversed by citrate replacement. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;14:444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.10.005.
    1. Kossmann RJ, Gonzales A, Callan R, Ahmad S. Increased efficiency of hemodialysis with citrate dialysate: a prospective controlled study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;14:1459–1464. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02590409.
    1. Sands JJ, Kotanko P, Segal JH, Ho CH, Usvat L, Young A, Carter M, Sergeyeva O, Korth L, Maunsell E. et al.Effects of citrate acid concentrate (citrasate®) on heparin N requirements and hemodialysis adequacy: a multicenter, prospective noninferiority trial. Blood Purif. 2012;14:199–204. doi: 10.1159/000334157.
    1. Hoenich NA, Ronco C. Haemodialysis fluid: composition and clinical importance. Blood Purif. 2007;14:62–68. doi: 10.1159/000096400.
    1. Ledebo I. Ultrapure dialysis fluid–direct and indirect benefits in dialysis therapy. Blood Purif. 2004;14(Suppl 2):20–25.
    1. McNamara J, Worthley LI. Acid–base balance: part II. Pathophysiology. Crit Care Resusc. 2001;14:188–201.
    1. Gabutti L, Lucchini B, Marone C, Alberio L, Burnier M. Citrate- vs. acetate-based dialysate in bicarbonate haemodialysis: consequences on haemodynamics, coagulation, acid–base status, and electrolytes. BMC Nephrol. 2009;14:7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-10-7.
    1. Boehme M, Kaehne F, Kuehne A, Bernhardt W, Schroder M, Pommer W, Fischer C, Becker H, Muller C, Schindler R. Pentraxin 3 is elevated in haemodialysis patients and is associated with cardiovascular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;14:2224–2229. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl747.
    1. Oldani S, Finazzi S, Bottazzi B, Garlanda C, Baldassarre E, Valaperta S, Cuccovillo I, Albini M, Child M, Montanelli A. et al.Plasma pentraxin-3 as a marker of bioincompatibility in hemodialysis patients. J Nephrol. 2012;14:120–126. doi: 10.5301/JN.2011.8432.
    1. Gritters M, Grooteman MP, Schoorl M, Bartels PC, Scheffer PG, Teerlink T, Schalkwijk CG, Spreeuwenberg M, Nube MJ. Citrate anticoagulation abolishes degranulation of polymorphonuclear cells and platelets and reduces oxidative stress during haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;14:153–159. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi069.
    1. Mac-Way F, Leboeuf A, Agharazii M. Arterial stiffness and dialysis calcium concentration. Int J Nephrol. 2011;14:839793.
    1. Gabutti L, Bianchi G, Soldini D, Marone C, Burnier M. Haemodynamic consequences of changing bicarbonate and calcium concentrations in haemodialysis fluids. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;14:973–981.
    1. London GM, Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, Boutouyrie P, Metivier F, De Vernejoul MC. Association of bone activity, calcium load, aortic stiffness, and calcifications in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;14:1827–1835. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007050622.
    1. Paravicini TM, Touyz RM. NADPH oxidases, reactive oxygen species, and hypertension: clinical implications and therapeutic possibilities. Diabetes Care. 2008;14(Suppl 2):S170–S180.
    1. Sternby JP, Nilsson A, Garred LJ. Diffusive-convective mass transfer rates for solutes present on both sides of a dialyzer membrane. ASAIO J. 2005;14:246–251. doi: 10.1097/01.MAT.0000159382.33864.4D.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Int Med. 2010;14(11):726–732. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232.
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. BMJ. 2010;14:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅