Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine formulations in healthy adults: interim results of a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1-2, dose-ranging study

Paul A Goepfert, Bo Fu, Anne-Laure Chabanon, Matthew I Bonaparte, Matthew G Davis, Brandon J Essink, Ian Frank, Owen Haney, Helene Janosczyk, Michael C Keefer, Marguerite Koutsoukos, Murray A Kimmel, Roger Masotti, Stephen J Savarino, Lode Schuerman, Howard Schwartz, Lawrence D Sher, Jon Smith, Fernanda Tavares-Da-Silva, Sanjay Gurunathan, Carlos A DiazGranados, Guy de Bruyn, Paul A Goepfert, Bo Fu, Anne-Laure Chabanon, Matthew I Bonaparte, Matthew G Davis, Brandon J Essink, Ian Frank, Owen Haney, Helene Janosczyk, Michael C Keefer, Marguerite Koutsoukos, Murray A Kimmel, Roger Masotti, Stephen J Savarino, Lode Schuerman, Howard Schwartz, Lawrence D Sher, Jon Smith, Fernanda Tavares-Da-Silva, Sanjay Gurunathan, Carlos A DiazGranados, Guy de Bruyn

Abstract

Background: CoV2 preS dTM is a stabilised pre-fusion spike protein vaccine produced in a baculovirus expression system being developed against SARS-CoV-2. We present interim safety and immunogenicity results of the first-in-human study of the CoV2 preS dTM vaccine with two different adjuvant formulations.

Methods: This phase 1-2, randomised, double-blind study is being done in healthy, SARS-CoV-2-seronegative adults in ten clinical research centres in the USA. Participants were stratified by age (18-49 years and ≥50 years) and randomly assigned using an interactive response technology system with block randomisation (blocks of varying size) to receive one dose (on day 1) or two doses (on days 1 and 22) of placebo or candidate vaccine, containing low-dose (effective dose 1·3 μg) or high-dose (2·6 μg) antigen with adjuvant AF03 (Sanofi Pasteur) or AS03 (GlaxoSmithKline) or unadjuvanted high-dose antigen (18-49 years only). Primary endpoints were safety, assessed up to day 43, and immunogenicity, measured as SARS-C0V-2 neutralising antibodies (geometric mean titres), assessed on days 1, 22, and 36 serum samples. Safety was assessed according to treatment received in the safety analysis set, which included all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose. Neutralising antibody titres were assessed in the per-protocol analysis set for immunogenicity, which included participants who received at least one dose, met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, had no protocol deviation, had negative results in the neutralisation test at baseline, and had at least one valid post-dose serology sample. This planned interim analysis reports data up to 43 days after the first vaccination; participants in the trial will be followed up for 12 months after the last study injection. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04537208, and is ongoing.

Findings: Between Sept 3 and Sept 29, 2020, 441 individuals (299 aged 18-49 years and 142 aged ≥50 years) were randomly assigned to one of the 11 treatment groups. The interim safety analyses included 439 (>99%) of 441 randomly assigned participants (299 aged 18-49 years and 140 aged ≥50 years). Neutralising antibody titres were analysed in 326 (74%) of 441 participants (235 [79%] of 299 aged 18-49 years and 91 [64%] of 142 aged ≥50 years). There were no vaccine-related unsolicited immediate adverse events, serious adverse events, medically attended adverse events classified as severe, or adverse events of special interest. Among all study participants, solicited local and systemic reactions of any grade after two vaccine doses were reported in 81% (95% CI 61-93; 21 of 26) of participants in the low-dose plus AF03 group, 93% (84-97; 74 of 80) in the low-dose plus AS03 group, 89% (70-98; 23 of 26) in the high-dose plus AF03 group, 95% (88-99; 81 of 85) in the high-dose plus AS03 group, 29% (10-56; five of 17) in the unadjuvanted high-dose group, and 21% (8-40; six of 29) in the placebo group. A single vaccine dose did not generate neutralising antibody titres above placebo levels in any group at days 22 or 36. Among participants aged 18-49 years, neutralising antibody titres after two vaccine doses were 13·1 (95% CI 6·40-26·9) in the low-dose plus AF03 group, 20·5 (13·1-32·1) in the low-dose plus AS03 group, 43·2 (20·6-90·4) in the high-dose plus AF03 group, 75·1 (50·5-112·0) in the high-dose plus AS03 group, 5·00 (not calculated) in the unadjuvanted high-dose group, and 5·00 (not calculated) in the placebo group. Among participants aged 50 years or older, neutralising antibody titres after two vaccine doses were 8·62 (1·90-39·0) in the low-dose plus AF03 group, 12·9 (7·09-23·4) in the low-dose plus AS03 group, 12·3 (4·35-35·0) in the high-dose plus AF03 group, 52·3 (25·3-108·0) in the high-dose plus AS03 group, and 5·00 (not calculated) in the placebo group.

Interpretation: The lower than expected immune responses, especially in the older age groups, and the high reactogenicity after dose two were probably due to higher than anticipated host-cell protein content and lower than planned antigen doses in the formulations tested, which was discovered during characterisation studies on the final bulk drug substance. Further development of the AS03-adjuvanted candidate vaccine will focus on identifying the optimal antigen formulation and dose.

Funding: Sanofi Pasteur and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow through the study for those randomised to receive two vaccine doses in the 18–49 years (A) and ≥50 years (B) age strata *Two participants who were found not to meet all inclusion criteria after randomisation were withdrawn from the study before receiving the first dose.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of solicited injection-site reactions after the first or second dose in participants from the two-dose cohort
Figure 3
Figure 3
Frequency of solicited systemic reactions after the first or second dose in participants from the two-dose cohort
Figure 4
Figure 4
Neutralising (A) and binding (B) antibody responses after the first and second doses by age group Data for the two-dose cohort; per-protocol analysis set for immunogenicity. Neutralising antibody titres are additionally shown for a panel of 93 convalescent serum samples as indicated in (A).

References

    1. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:533–534.
    1. WHO Draft landscape of COVID-19 candidate vaccines.
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2603–2615.
    1. Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA, et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet. 2021;397:99–111.
    1. Logunov DY, Dolzhikova IV, Shcheblyakov DV, et al. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet. 2021;397:671–681.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Vaccines and related biological products advisory committee meeting. December 17, 2020.
    1. Sinopharm - Beijng Institute of Biological Products Press release [Chinese]
    1. Novavax Novavax COVID-19 vaccine demonstrates 89·3% efficacy in UK phase 3 trial. Press release. Jan 28, 2021.
    1. National Institutes of Health News Release. Janssen investigational COVID-19 vaccine: interim analysis of phase 3 clinical data released.
    1. Pallesen J, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E7348–E7357.
    1. Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263.
    1. Keech C, Albert G, Cho I, et al. Phase 1–2 trial of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein nanoparticle vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2320–2332.
    1. Nascimento IP, Leite LCC. Recombinant vaccines and the development of new vaccine strategies. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45:1102–1111.
    1. Klucker MF, Dalençon F, Probeck P, Haensler J. AF03, an alternative squalene emulsion-based vaccine adjuvant prepared by a phase inversion temperature method. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:4490–4500.
    1. Garçon N, Vaughn DW, Didierlaurent AM. Development and evaluation of AS03, an adjuvant system containing α-tocopherol and squalene in an oil-in-water emulsion. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012;11:349–366.
    1. Kalnin KV, Plitnik T, Kishko M, et al. Immunogenicity of novel mRNA COVID-19 vaccine MRT5500 in mice and 2 non-human primates. bioRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.10.14.337535. published online Oct 14. (preprint).
    1. Tavares Da Silva F, De Keyser F, Lambert PH, Robinson WH, Westhovens R, Sindic C. Optimal approaches to data collection and analysis of potential immune mediated disorders in clinical trials of new vaccines. Vaccine. 2013;31:1870–1876.
    1. Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–872.
    1. Díez-Domingo J, Baldó JM, Planelles-Catarino MV, et al. Phase II, randomized, open, controlled study of AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 pre-pandemic influenza vaccine in children aged 3 to 9 years: follow-up of safety and immunogenicity persistence at 24 months post-vaccination. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2015;9:68–77.
    1. Leroux-Roels G, Marchant A, Levy J, et al. Impact of adjuvants on CD4(+) T cell and B cell responses to a protein antigen vaccine: results from a phase II, randomized, multicenter trial. Clin Immunol. 2016;169:16–27.
    1. Moris P, van der Most R, Leroux-Roels I, et al. H5N1 influenza vaccine formulated with AS03 A induces strong cross-reactive and polyfunctional CD4 T-cell responses. J Clin Immunol. 2011;31:443–454.
    1. Ward BJ, Gobeil P, Séguin A, et al. Phase 1 trial of a candidate recombinant virus-like particle vaccine for covid-19 disease produced in plants. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.11.04.20226282. published online Nov 6. (preprint).
    1. Callow KA. Effect of specific humoral immunity and some non-specific factors on resistance of volunteers to respiratory coronavirus infection. J Hyg (Lond) 1985;95:173–189.
    1. Reed SE. The behaviour of recent isolates of human respiratory coronavirus in vitro and in volunteers: evidence of heterogeneity among 229E-related strains. J Med Virol. 1984;13:179–192.
    1. McMahan K, Yu J, Mercado NB, et al. Correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature. 2020;590:630–634.
    1. Cohet C, van der Most R, Bauchau V, et al. Safety of AS03-adjuvanted influenza vaccines: a review of the evidence. Vaccine. 2019;37:3006–3021.
    1. Jackson LA, Campbell JD, Frey SE, et al. Effect of varying doses of a monovalent H7N9 influenza vaccine with and without AS03 and MF59 adjuvants on immune response: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:237–246.
    1. Levie K, Leroux-Roels I, Hoppenbrouwers K, et al. An adjuvanted, low-dose, pandemic influenza A (H5N1) vaccine candidate is safe, immunogenic, and induces cross-reactive immune responses in healthy adults. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:642–649.
    1. Vesikari T, Pepin S, Kusters I, Hoffenbach A, Denis M. Assessment of squalene adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted vaccines against pandemic H1N1 influenza in children 6 months to 17 years of age. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:1283–1292.
    1. Jackson LA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael NG, et al. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2—preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1920–1931.
    1. Mulligan MJ, Lyke KE, Kitchin N, et al. Phase I/II study of COVID-19 RNA vaccine BNT162b1 in adults. Nature. 2020;586:589–593.
    1. Sadoff J, Le Gars M, Shukarev G, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine candidate: interim results 1 of a phase 1/2a, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.09.23.20199604. published online Sept 25. (preprint).
    1. Kremsner P, Mann P, Bosch J, et al. Phase 1 assessment of the safety and immunogenicity of an mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate against SARS-CoV-2 in human volunteers. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.11.09.20228551. published online Nov 9. (preprint).
    1. Czub M, Weingartl H, Czub S, He R, Cao J. Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara based recombinant SARS vaccine in ferrets. Vaccine. 2005;23:2273–2279.
    1. Lambert P-H, Ambrosino DM, Andersen SR, et al. Consensus summary report for CEPI/BC March 12–13, 2020 meeting: assessment of risk of disease enhancement with COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine. 2020;38:4783–4791.
    1. Tseng CT, Sbrana E, Iwata-Yoshikawa N, et al. Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One. 2012;7
    1. Yasui F, Kai C, Kitabatake M, et al. Prior immunization with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nucleocapsid protein causes severe pneumonia in mice infected with SARS-CoV. J Immunol. 2008;181:6337–6348.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅