Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remogliflozin etabonate, a novel SGLT2 inhibitor, and metformin when co-administered in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Elizabeth K Hussey, Anita Kapur, Robin O'Connor-Semmes, Wenli Tao, Bryan Rafferty, Joseph W Polli, Charles D James Jr, Robert L Dobbins, Elizabeth K Hussey, Anita Kapur, Robin O'Connor-Semmes, Wenli Tao, Bryan Rafferty, Joseph W Polli, Charles D James Jr, Robert L Dobbins

Abstract

Background: The sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) is expressed in absorptive epithelia of the renal tubules. Remogliflozin etabonate (RE) is the prodrug of remogliflozin, the active entity that inhibits SGLT2. An inhibitor of this pathway would enhance urinary glucose excretion (UGE), and potentially improve plasma glucose concentrations in diabetic patients. RE is intended for use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as monotherapy and in combination with existing therapies. Metformin, a dimethylbiguanide, is an effective oral antihyperglycemic agent widely used for the treatment of T2DM.

Methods: This was a randomized, open-label, repeat-dose, two-sequence, cross-over study in 13 subjects with T2DM. Subjects were randomized to one of two treatment sequences in which they received either metformin alone, RE alone, or both over three, 3-day treatment periods separated by two non-treatment intervals of variable duration. On the evening before each treatment period, subjects were admitted and confined to the clinical site for the duration of the 3-day treatment period. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (urine glucose and fasting plasma glucose), and safety (adverse events, vital signs, ECG, clinical laboratory parameters including lactic acid) assessments were performed at check-in and throughout the treatment periods. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred on Day 3 of each treatment period.

Results: This study demonstrated the lack of effect of RE on steady state metformin pharmacokinetics. Metformin did not affect the AUC of RE, remogliflozin, or its active metabolite, GSK279782, although Cmax values were slightly lower for remogliflozin and its metabolite after co-administration with metformin compared with administration of RE alone. Metformin did not alter the pharmacodynamic effects (UGE) of RE. Concomitant administration of metformin and RE was well tolerated with minimal hypoglycemia, no serious adverse events, and no increase in lactic acid.

Conclusions: Coadministration of metformin and RE was well tolerated in this study. The results support continued development of RE as a treatment for T2DM.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00376038.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean metformin concentration (and standard deviation) vs. time profiles with and without remogliflozin etabonate, n = 13.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median remogliflozin etabonate (prodrug) concentration vs. time profiles with and without metformin, n = 13. (Median data is presented in this plot because the majority of the samples were below the lower limit of quantification).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean remogliflozin (active entity) concentration (and standard deviation) vs. time profiles with and without metformin, n = 13.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean GSK279782 (active metabolite) concentration (and standard deviation) vs. time profiles with and without metformin, n = 13.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Fasting plasma glucose concentration (FPG; mmol/L) – Change from baseline (pre- dose on Day 1 of each treatment period). MET BID, metformin 500 mg every 12 hours; RE BID, remogliflozin etabonate 500 mg every 12 hours; MET + RE BID, metformin 500 mg + remogliflozin etabonate 500 mg every 12 hours. Mean (and standard deviation) baseline FPG values for each treatment period: MET BID: 6.72 (1.88); RE BID, 6.98 (2.06); MET + RE BID, 6.42 (1.15).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Lactic acid concentration by treatment (normal range of 0.5 to 2.2 mmol/L). MET BID, metformin 500 mg every 12 hours; RE BID, remogliflozin etabonate 500 mg every 12 hours; MET + RE BID, metformin 500 mg + remogliflozin etabonate 500 mg every 12 hours.

References

    1. DCCT Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes. 1995;44:968–983.
    1. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, Miyata T, Isami S, Motoyoshi S, Kojima Y, Furuyoshi N, Shichiri M. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995;28:103–117. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(95)01064-K.
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. Br Med J. 2000;321:405–412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) Lancet. 1998;352:854–865.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) Lancet. 1998;352:837–853.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. PhD Thesis. 2007.
    1. Nathan D, Buse J, Davidson M, Heine R, Holman R, Sherwin R, Zinman B. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1711–1721. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0316-2.
    1. Scheen AJ. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996;30:359–371. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199630050-00003.
    1. Graham GG, Punt J, Arora M, Day R, Doogue MP, Duopng JK, Furlong TJ, Greenfield JR, Greenup LC, Kirkpatrick CM, Ray JE, Timmins P, Williams KM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:81–98. doi: 10.2165/11534750-000000000-00000.
    1. Scheen AJ. Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update. Drug Saf. 2005;28:601–631. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528070-00004.
    1. Bodmer M, Meier C, Krahenbuhl S, Jick SS, Meier CR. Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case–control analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2086–2091. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1171.
    1. Davis TM, Jackson D, Davis WA, Bruce DG, Chubb P. The relationship between metformin therapy and the fasting plasma lactate in type 2 diabetes: the fremantle diabetes study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:137–144. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01423.x.
    1. Salpeter SR, Greyber E, Pasternak GA, Salpeter EE. Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2594–2602. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.21.2594.
    1. Kanai Y, Lee WS, You G, Brown D, Hediger MA. The human kidney low affinity Na+/glucose cotransporter SGLT2. Delineation of the major renal reabsorptive mechanism for D-glucose. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:397–404. doi: 10.1172/JCI116972.
    1. Wright EM, Hirayama BA, Loo DF. Active sugar transport in health and disease. J Intern Med. 2007;261:32–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01746.x.
    1. Handlon AL. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors as potential antidiabetic agents. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2005;13:1531–1540.
    1. Hussey E, Clark R, Amin D, Kipnes M, O'Connor-Semmes R, O'Driscoll E, Leong J, Murray S, Dobbins R, Layko D. et al.The single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sergliflozin etabonate, a novel inhibitor of glucose reabsorption, in healthy volunteers and subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;50:623–635. doi: 10.1177/0091270009351879.
    1. Hussey EK, Dobbins RL, Stoltz RR, Stockman NL, O'Connor-Semmes RL, Kapur A, Murray SC, Layko D, Nunez DJR. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sergliflozin etabonate, a novel inhibitor of glucose reabsorption, in healthy overweight and obese subjects: a randomized double-blind study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;50:636–646. doi: 10.1177/0091270009352185.
    1. Idris I, Donnelly R. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: an emerging new class of oral antidiabetic drug. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:79–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00982.x.
    1. Isaji M. Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors for diabetes. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;8:285–292.
    1. Komoroski B, Vachharajani N, Feng Y, Li L, Kornhauser D, Pfister M. Dapagliflozin, a novel, selective SGLT2 inhibitor, improved glycemic control over 2 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85:513–519. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.250.
    1. Komoroski B, Vachharajani N, Boulton D, Kornhauser D, Geraldes M, Li L, Pfister M. Dapagliflozin, a novel SGLT2 inhibitor, induces dose-dependent glucosuria in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85:520–526. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.251.
    1. Asano T, Ogihara T, Katagiri H, Sakoda H, Ono H, Fujishiro M, Anai M, Kurihara H, Uchijima Y. Glucose transporter and Na+/glucose cotransporter as molecular targets of anti-diabetic drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:2717–2724. doi: 10.2174/0929867043364360.
    1. Ehrenkranz JR, Lewis NG, Kahn CR, Roth J. Phlorizin: a review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005;21:31–38. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.532.
    1. Katsuno K, Fujimori Y, Takemura Y, Hiratochi M, Itoh F, Komatsu Y, Fujikura H, Isaji M. Sergliflozin, a novel selective inhibitor of low-affinity sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2), validates the critical role of SGLT2 in renal glucose reabsorption and modulates plasma glucose level. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;320:323–330.
    1. Jabbour SA, Goldstein BJ. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: blocking renal tubular reabsorption of glucose to improve glycaemic control in patients with diabetes. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62:1279–1284. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01829.x.
    1. Fujimori Y, Katsuno K, Nakashima I, Ishikawa-Takemura Y, Fujikura H, Isaji M. Remogliflozin etabonate, in a novel category of selective low-affinity sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors, exhibits antidiabetic efficacy in rodent models. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;327:268–276. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.140210.
    1. Sigafoos J, Bowers G, Castellino S, Culp AG, Wagner DS, Reese JM, Humphreys JE, Hussey EK, O'Connor-Semmes RL, Kapur A, Tao W, Dobbins RL, Polli JW. Assessment of the drug interaction risk for remogliflozin etabonate, a sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor: evidence from in vitro, human mass balance, and ketoconazole interaction studies. Drug Metab Dispos. 2012;40:2090–2101. doi: 10.1124/dmd.112.047258.
    1. Dobbins R, Kapur A, Kapitza C, O'Connor-Semmes R, Tao W, Hussey E. Remogliflozin etabonate, a selective inhibitor of the sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SCLT2) reduces serum glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Diabetes. 2009;58:1573-P.
    1. Kapur A, O'Connor-Semmes R, Hussey E, Dobbins R, Tao W, Hompesch M, Nunez D. First human dose escalation study with remogliflozin etabonate (RE) in healthy subjects and in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) Diabetes. 2009;58:509-P.
    1. Sung EY, Moore MP, Lunt H, Doogue M, Zhang M, Begg EJ. Do thiazide diuretics alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes already established on metformin? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67:130–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03302.x.
    1. Thurman J, Wiseman A. In: Manual of Nephrology. 7. Schrier RW, editor. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. The patient with glomerulonephritis or vasculitis; pp. 140–153.
    1. Saffar F, Aiache JM, Andre P. Influence of food on the disposition of the antidiabetic drug metformin in diabetic patients at steady-state. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1995;17:483–487.
    1. Timmins P, Donahue S, Meeker J, Marathe P. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of a novel extended-release metformin formulation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44:721–729. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544070-00004.
    1. Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15:657–680. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.
    1. Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Diletti E. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1990;28:72–78.
    1. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. New York: Wiley; 1973.
    1. Del Prato S, Felton A-M, Munro N, Nesto R, Zimmet P, Zinman B. on behalf of the Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management. Improving glucose management: ten steps to get more patients with type 2 diabetes to goal. Recommendations from the Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59:1345–1355. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00674.x.
    1. Polli JW, Humphreys JE, Harmon KA, Webster LO, Reese MJ, MacLauchlin CC. Assessment of remogliflozin etabonate, a sodium-dependent glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, as a perpetrator of clinical drug interactions: a study on drug transporters and metabolic enzymes. J Diabetes Metab. 2012;3:5. .

Source: PubMed

3
订阅