Effects of adjustable sit-stand VDT workstations on workers' musculoskeletal discomfort, alertness and performance

Takeshi Ebara, Tomohide Kubo, Tatsuki Inoue, Gen-i Murasaki, Hidemaro Takeyama, Tomoaki Sato, Hatsuko Suzumura, Sayuri Niwa, Toshimasa Takanishi, Norihide Tachi, Toru Itani, Takeshi Ebara, Tomohide Kubo, Tatsuki Inoue, Gen-i Murasaki, Hidemaro Takeyama, Tomoaki Sato, Hatsuko Suzumura, Sayuri Niwa, Toshimasa Takanishi, Norihide Tachi, Toru Itani

Abstract

Adjustable sit-stand workstations, which are designed to allow workers to sit and stand autonomously while working, were examined to identify the effects on workers' musculoskeletal discomfort, alertness and performance. Twenty-four healthy subjects participated in the study. The subjects were required to do an English transcription task for 150 min under the following conditions: 1) sitting at standard workstations (Standard), 2) sitting on a chair with the work surface elevated to standing position (High-chair) and 3) a combination of 10-min sitting and 5-min standing with the same setting as that in the high-chair condition (Sit-stand). The subjective musculoskeletal discomfort scores indicated that High-chair and Sit-stand resulted in relatively higher discomfort levels than the Standard condition. Although the ratio between low-frequency (0.04-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (0.15-0.4 Hz) components of heart rate variability (LF/HF ratio) in Sit-stand was higher than that in other conditions, there were no significant differences in subjective sleepiness among the three conditions. As for work performance, there was a tendency to be steadily high under the Sit-stand condition compared with other conditions, but not a significant difference. This study revealed that although the use of sit-stand workstations can contribute to keeping workers' arousal level steady, it has an adverse effect in light of musculoskeletal discomfort.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅