Clinical Utility of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the Presurgical Evaluation of Motor, Speech, and Language Functions in Young Children With Refractory Epilepsy or Brain Tumor: Preliminary Evidence

Shalini Narayana, Savannah K Gibbs, Stephen P Fulton, Amy Lee McGregor, Basanagoud Mudigoudar, Sarah E Weatherspoon, Frederick A Boop, James W Wheless, Shalini Narayana, Savannah K Gibbs, Stephen P Fulton, Amy Lee McGregor, Basanagoud Mudigoudar, Sarah E Weatherspoon, Frederick A Boop, James W Wheless

Abstract

Accurate presurgical mapping of motor, speech, and language cortices, while crucial for neurosurgical planning and minimizing post-operative functional deficits, is challenging in young children with neurological disease. In such children, both invasive (cortical stimulation mapping) and non-invasive functional mapping imaging methods (MEG, fMRI) have limited success, often leading to delayed surgery or adverse post-surgical outcomes. We therefore examined the clinical utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in young children who require functional mapping. In a retrospective chart review of TMS studies performed on children with refractory epilepsy or a brain tumor, at our institution, we identified 47 mapping sessions in 36 children 3 years of age or younger, in whom upper and lower extremity motor mapping was attempted; and 13 children 5-6 years old in whom language mapping, using a naming paradigm, was attempted. The primary hand motor cortex was identified in at least one hemisphere in 33 of 36 patients, and in both hemispheres in 27 children. In 17 children, primary leg motor cortex was also successfully identified. The language cortices in temporal regions were successfully mapped in 11 of 13 patients, and in six of them language cortices in frontal regions were also mapped, with most children (n = 5) showing right hemisphere dominance for expressive language. Ten children had a seizure that was consistent with their clinical semiology during or immediately following TMS, none of which required intervention or impeded completion of mapping. Using TMS, both normal motor, speech, and language developmental patterns and apparent disease induced reorganization were demonstrated in this young cohort. The successful localization of motor, speech, and language cortices in young children improved the understanding of the risk-benefit ratio prior to surgery and facilitated surgical planning aimed at preserving motor, speech, and language functions. Post-operatively, motor function was preserved or improved in nine out of 11 children who underwent surgery, as was language function in all seven children who had surgery for lesions near eloquent cortices. We provide feasibility data that TMS is a safe, reliable, and effective tool to map eloquent cortices in young children.

Keywords: brain tumor; children; epilepsy; language mapping; motor mapping; presurgical; speech mapping; transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Narayana, Gibbs, Fulton, McGregor, Mudigoudar, Weatherspoon, Boop and Wheless.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Setup for TMS motor (A) and language (B) mapping studies in young children. (A): During TMS motor mapping in infants and toddlers, the child is seated on the parent's lap. (B): During TMS language mapping color naming task was used in some preschool children.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Examples of TMS-evoked MEPs and CSP in children under 3 years of age. (A): A 2.4-year-old male with right frontal lobe cortical dysplasia status post resection. MEP in the left APB muscle having an amplitude of 121 μV and a latency of 16 ms was evoked when TMS was applied to the right precentral gyrus. (B) An 18-month-old female with history of left hemisphere perinatal stroke involving left temporal lobe and subsequent infantile spasms demonstrating MEP evoked in the left brachioradialis muscle with an amplitude of 567 μV and a latency of 14 ms following TMS applied to the right precentral gyrus. (C) 1.7-year-old female with TSC- 2 demonstrating the MEP elicited in the right tibialis anterior muscle having an amplitude of 1.01 mV and a latency of 30 ms when TMS was applied to the left medial frontal lobe. (D) An 18-month-old female with history of left hemisphere perinatal stroke involving left temporal lobe and subsequent infantile spasms demonstrating CSP evoked in the right APB muscle following TMS applied to the left precentral gyrus. The left hemisphere is on the left side of the image.
Figure 3
Figure 3
TMS motor mapping demonstrating normal motor development in children under 3 years of age. (A): A 3-month-old male with dysplasia along the inferior frontal sulcus involving the inferior aspect of the right precentral gyrus, inferior gyrus, frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus and history of infantile spasms. The motor cortices were localized along the precentral gyrus with MEPs elicited in contralateral and ipsilateral hand muscles, representing a normal developmental variant. (B): An 18-month-old female with history of left hemisphere perinatal stroke involving left temporal lobe and subsequent infantile spasms demonstrating a normal motor map. (C): A 2.4-year-old female with history of left frontal lobe focal cortical dysplasia, type IIb. Motor representation was localized posterior to the dysplasia.
Figure 4
Figure 4
TMS motor mapping demonstrating cortical reorganization in children under 3 years of age. (A): TMS motor mapping in a 1.7-year-old male with history of refractory seizures involving left-sided tonic flexion with a cortical dysplasia in the medial frontal side of the right frontal lobe on the pre- and post-central gyrus. TMS localized left hand and forearm representation to the precentral gyrus. Additionally, MEPs in the hand and forearm muscles were elicited while stimulating the area of cortical dysplasia. No MEPs were elicited in the left lower extremity even at 100% of stimulator output. The child underwent surgical resection of the lesion. At 9 months follow up, he was seizure-free with intact left-hand function and mild left leg monoparesis. (B): A 2-year-old male with history of left hemisphere perinatal stroke and right hemiparesis presenting with refractory epilepsy. TMS motor mapping demonstrated no motor representation for right upper extremity in the left hemisphere. Instead, both left and right upper extremities were represented around the precentral gyrus in the right hemisphere. The left hemisphere is on the left side of the image.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Validation of TMS motor mapping by CSM. Presurgical TMS-derived motor mapping in a 2.3-year-old female with tuberous sclerosis complex type 2. (A): TMS localized motor cortex in the right hemisphere in the precentral gyrus in the vicinity of a tuber. (B): The child underwent subdural grid placement, and the epileptogenic focus was localized to be anterior to the motor cortex. (C): The child underwent right anterior frontal lobectomy including the epileptogenic focus. Post-operatively, the child moves all extremities equally with normal bulk and strength and uses either hand to reach for an object.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Examples of language mapping with TMS. Speech errors in the form of speech arrest, semantic errors, and performance errors were elicited in both hemispheres. (A): Language mapping with TMS in a 5.6-year-old female with refractory cryptogenic focal epilepsy and asymptomatic cervical and thoracic syringohydromyelia. Her brain MRI was normal. TMS language mapping was completed using a color naming task and showed bilateral dominance for expressive language. (B): Language mapping with TMS in a 5.6-year-old male with right parietal cortical dysplasia that was in the inferior parietal lobule, predominantly superior to the marginal gyrus. TMS language mapping was completed using an object naming task and indicated a right hemisphere dominance for expressive language.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Clinical utility of presurgical TMS-derived language mapping in preschool children with brain tumors. (A): Left hemisphere temporal lobe language mapping in a 5.3-year-old female with recurrent pilomyxoid astrocytoma. She underwent a left temporal microsurgical subtotal (70%) tumor resection. Post-operatively, she had no speech deficits. (B): TMS language map from a 5-year-old male with recurrent left sylvian anaplastic ependymoma. Critical language areas were found around the margin of the tumor. The tumor was resected in full without any postoperative language deficits. (C) Right hemisphere temporal lobe language mapping in a 5.9-year-old female with a lesion in the right temporal lobe. Critical language areas were identified in bilateral temporal lobes. She underwent a resection of the right anterior temporal lobe, right amygdala, and hippocampus. The pathology classified the specimen as grade I ganglioglioma and focal cortical dysplasia type IIIb. Post-operatively, she had no speech deficits.

References

    1. Papanicolaou AC, Rezaie R, Narayana S, Choudhri AF, Babajani-Feremi A, Boop FA, et al. . On the relative merits of invasive and non-invasive pre-surgical brain mapping: new tools in ablative epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Res. (2018) 142:153–5. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.07.002
    1. Papanicolaou AC, Rezaie R, Narayana S, Choudhri AF, Wheless JW, Castillo EM, et al. . Is it time to replace the Wada test and put awake craniotomy to sleep? Epilepsia. (2014) 55:629–32. 10.1111/epi.12569
    1. Papanicolaou AC, Simos PG, Castillo EM, Breier JI, Sarkari S, Pataraia E, et al. . Magnetocephalography: a noninvasive alternative to the Wada procedure. J Neurosurg. (2004) 100:867–76. 10.3171/jns.2004.100.5.0867
    1. Bookheimer S. Pre-surgical language mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychol Rev. (2007) 17:145–55. 10.1007/s11065-007-9026-x
    1. Szaflarski JP, Gloss D, Binder JR, Gaillard WD, Golby AJ, Holland SK, et al. . Practice guideline summary: use of fMRI in the presurgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. (2017) 88:395–402. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003532
    1. Tarapore PE, Tate MC, Findlay AM, Honma SM, Mizuiri D, Berger MS, et al. . Preoperative multimodal motor mapping: a comparison of magnetoencephalography imaging, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, and direct cortical stimulation. J Neurosurg. (2012) 117:354–62. 10.3171/2012.5.JNS112124
    1. Tarapore PE, Findlay AM, Honma SM, Mizuiri D, Houde JF, Berger MS, et al. . Language mapping with navigated repetitive TMS: proof of technique and validation. NeuroImage. (2013) 82:260–72. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.018
    1. Lefaucheur J-P, Picht T. The value of preoperative functional cortical mapping using navigated TMS. Neurophysiol Clin. (2016) 46:125–33. 10.1016/j.neucli.2016.05.001
    1. Krieg SM, Lioumis P, Mäkelä JP, Wilenius J, Karhu J, Hannula H, et al. . Protocol for motor and language mapping by navigated TMS in patients and healthy volunteers; workshop report. Acta Neurochir. (2017) 159:1187–95. 10.1007/s00701-017-3187-z
    1. Narayana S, Papanicolaou AC, McGregor A, Boop FA, Wheless JW. Clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric neurology. J Child Neurol. (2015) 30:1111–24. 10.1177/0883073814553274
    1. Vitikainen A, Lioumis P, Paetau R, Salli E, Komssi S, Metsähonkala L, et al. . Combined use of non-invasive techniques for improved functional localization for a selected group of epilepsy surgery candidates. NeuroImage. (2009) 45:342–8. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.026
    1. Vitikainen A-M, Salli E, Lioumis P, Mäkelä JP, Metsähonkala L. Applicability of nTMS in locating the motor cortical representation areas in patients with epilepsy. Acta Neurochir. (2013) 155:507–18. 10.1007/s00701-012-1609-5
    1. Babajani-Feremi A, Narayana S, Rezaie R, Choudhri AF, Fulton SP, Boop FA, et al. . Language mapping using high gamma electrocorticography, fMRI, and TMS versus electrocortical stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. (2016) 127:1822–36. 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.017
    1. Babajani-Feremi A, Holder CM, Narayana S, Fulton SP, Choudhri AF, Boop FA, et al. . Predicting postoperative language outcome using presurgical fMRI, MEG, TMS, and high gamma ECoG. Clin Neurophysiol. (2018) 129:560–71. 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.12.031
    1. Engel J, Jr., Wiebe S, Radhakrishnan K, Palmini A. Surgical treatment for epilepsy. Neurologisch (Wien). (2013) 2013:12–4.
    1. Ogg RJ, Laningham FH, Clarke D, Einhaus S, Zou P, Tobias ME, et al. . Passive range of motion functional magnetic resonance imaging localizing sensorimotor cortex in sedated children: clinical article. PED. (2009) 4:317–22. 10.3171/2009.4.PEDS08402
    1. Bercovici E, Pang EW, Sharma R, Mohamed IS, Imai K, Fujimoto A. Somatosensory-evoked fields on magnetoencephalography for epilepsy infants younger than 4 years with total intravenous anesthesia. Clin Neurophysiol. (2008) 119:1328–34. 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.02.018
    1. Lauronen L, Nevalainen P, Pihko E. Magnetoencephalography in neonatology. Neurophysiol Clin. (2012) 42:27–34. 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.08.006
    1. Birg L, Narayana S, Rezaie R, Papanicolaou A. Technical tips: MEG and EEG with sedation. Neurodiagnostic J. (2013) 53:229–40. 10.1080/21646821.2013.11079909
    1. Narayana S, Rezaie R, McAfee SS, Choudhri AF, Babajani-Feremi A, Fulton S, et al. . Assessing motor function in young children with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pediatric Neurol. (2015) 52:94–103. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.08.031
    1. Jayakar P. Cortical electrical stimulation mapping: special considerations in children. J Clin Neurophysiol. (2018) 35:106–9. 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000451
    1. de Ribaupierre S, Fohlen M, Bulteau C, Dorfmüller G, Delalande O, Dulac O, et al. . Presurgical language mapping in children with epilepsy: clinical usefulness of functional magnetic resonance imaging for the planning of cortical stimulation: Pediatric Presurgical Language Mapping. Epilepsia. (2012) 53:67–78. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03329.x
    1. Arya R, Rutka JT. Pediatric epilepsy surgery: toward increased utilization and reduced invasiveness. Neurology. (2018) 90:401–2. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005036
    1. Chou N, Serafini S, Muh CR. Cortical language areas and plasticity in pediatric patients with epilepsy: a review. Pediatric Neurol. (2018) 78:3–12. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.10.001
    1. Schevon CA, Carlson C, Zaroff CM, Weiner HJ, Doyle WK, Miles D, et al. . Pediatric language mapping: sensitivity of neurostimulation and wada testing in epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. (2007) 48:539–45. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00962.x
    1. Yerys BE, Jankowski KF, Shook D, Rosenberger LR, Barnes KA, Berl MM, et al. . The fMRI success rate of children and adolescents: typical development, epilepsy, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorders. Hum Brain Mapp. (2009) 30:3426–35. 10.1002/hbm.20767
    1. Rezaie R, Narayana S, Schiller K, Birg L, Wheless JW, Boop FA, et al. . Assessment of hemispheric dominance for receptive language in pediatric patients under sedation using magnetoencephalography. Front Human Neurosci. (2014) 8:657. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00657
    1. Skirrow C, Cross JH, Owens R, Weiss-Croft L, Martin-Sanfilippo P, Banks T, et al. . Determinants of IQ outcome after focal epilepsy surgery in childhood: a longitudinal case-control neuroimaging study. Epilepsia. (2019) 60:872–84. 10.1111/epi.14707
    1. Sherman EMS, Wiebe S, Fay-McClymont TB, Tellez-Zenteno J, Metcalfe A, Hernandez-Ronquillo L, et al. . Neuropsychological outcomes after epilepsy surgery: systematic review and pooled estimates: cognitive change after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. (2011) 52:857–69. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03022.x
    1. Tieleman A, Deblaere K, Van Roost D, Van Damme O, Achten E. Preoperative fMRI in tumour surgery. Eur Radiol. (2009) 19:2523–34. 10.1007/s00330-009-1429-z
    1. Narayana S, Mudigoudar B, Babajani-Feremi A, Choudhri AF, Boop FA. Successful motor mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation in an infant: a case report. Neurology. (2017) 89:2115–7. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004650
    1. Narayana S, Embury LM, Shah N, Weatherspoon S, Choudhri AF, Boop FA. Noninvasive localization of language cortex in an awake 4-year-old child with rasmussen encephalitis: a case report. Operative Neurosurg. (2020) 18:E175–80. 10.1093/ons/opz202
    1. Gaillard WD, Jette N, Arnold ST, Arzimanoglou A, Braun KPJ, Cukiert A, et al. . Establishing criteria for pediatric epilepsy surgery center levels of care: report from the ILAE pediatric epilepsy surgery task force. Epilepsia. (2020) 61:2629–42. 10.1111/epi.16698
    1. Navigated Brain Stimulation System 5.0, User Manual. Helsinki: Nexstim Plc. (2019).
    1. Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin. (2010) 40:7–17. 10.1016/j.neucli.2010.01.006
    1. Garvey MA, Mall V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children. Clin Neurophysiol. (2008) 119:973–84. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.048
    1. Cvetković M, Poljak D, Rogić Vidaković M, Ð*ogaš Z. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced fields in different brain models. J Electromagnetic Waves Applic. (2016) 30:1820–35. 10.1080/09205071.2016.1216807
    1. Wolters A, Ziemann U, Benecke R. The cortical silent period. In: Wassermann EM, Epstein CM, Ziemann U, Walsh V, Paus T, Lisanby SH. editors. The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; (2011). p. 91–102. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568926.013.0010
    1. Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol. (2003) 2:145–56. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00321-1
    1. Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, et al. . Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. an updated report from an I.F.C.N. committee. Clin Neurophysiol. (2015) 126:1071–107. 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001
    1. Cincotta M, Giovannelli F, Borgheresi A, Tramacere L, Viggiano MP, Zaccara G. A meta-analysis of the cortical silent period in epilepsies. Brain Stimul. (2015) 8:693–701. 10.1016/j.brs.2015.04.008
    1. de Goede AA, ter Braack EM, van Putten MJAM. Single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in drug naïve epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. (2016) 127:3140–55. 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.06.025
    1. Tataroglu C, Ozkiziltan S, Baklan B. Motor cortical thresholds and cortical silent periods in epilepsy. Seizure. (2004) 13:481–5. 10.1016/j.seizure.2003.11.003
    1. Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience - virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opinion Neurobiol. (2000) 10:232–7. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00081-7
    1. Schiller K, Choudhri AF, Jones T, Holder C, Wheless JW, Narayana S. Concordance between transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) derived localization of language in a clinical cohort. J Child Neurol. (2020) 35:363–79. 10.1177/0883073820901415
    1. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures. norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol. (1980) 6:174–215. 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
    1. Lehtinen H, Mäkelä JP, Mäkelä T, Lioumis P, Metsähonkala L, Hokkanen L, et al. . Language mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in pediatric and adult patients undergoing epilepsy surgery: comparison with extraoperative direct cortical stimulation. Epilepsia Open. (2018) 3:224–35. 10.1002/epi4.12110
    1. Picht T, Krieg SM, Sollmann N, Rösler J, Niraula B, Neuvonen T, et al. . A comparison of language mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and direct cortical stimulation during awake surgery. Neurosurgery. (2013) 72:808–19. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182889e01
    1. Rezaie R, Schiller KK, Embury L, Boop FA, Wheless JW, Narayana S. The clinical utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in determining hemispheric dominance for language: a magnetoencephalography comparison study. J Clin Neurophysiol. (2020) 37:90–103. 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000499
    1. Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmöller J, et al. . Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: expert guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. (2020) 132:269–306. 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003
    1. Papanicolaou AC, Kilintari M, Rezaie R, Narayana S, Babajani-Feremi A. The role of the primary sensory cortices in early language processing. J Cogn Neurosci. (2017) 29:1755–65. 10.1162/jocn_a_01147
    1. Krieg SM, Tarapore PE, Picht T, Tanigawa N, Houde J, Sollmann N, et al. . Optimal timing of pulse onset for language mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage. (2014) 100:219–36. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.016
    1. Corina DP, Loudermilk BC, Detwiler L, Martin RF, Brinkley JF, Ojemann G. Analysis of naming errors during cortical stimulation mapping: implications for models of language representation. Brain Lang. (2010) 115:101–12. 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.001
    1. Springer JA, Binder JR, Hammeke TA, Swanson SJ, Frost JA, Bellgowan PSF, et al. . Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects. Brain. (1999) 122:2033–46. 10.1093/brain/122.11.2033
    1. Seghier ML. Laterality index in functional MRI: methodological issues. Magn Reson Imaging. (2008) 26:594–601. 10.1016/j.mri.2007.10.010
    1. Guerin JB, Greiner HM, Mangano FT, Leach JL. Functional MRI in children: current clinical applications. Semin Pediatr Neurol. (2020) 33:100800. 10.1016/j.spen.2020.100800
    1. Bashir S, Vernet M, Najib U, Perez J, Alonso-Alonso M, Knobel M, et al. . Enhanced motor function and neurophysiological correlates with navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke. Brain Stimul. (2015) 8:319–20. 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.037
    1. Picht T, Frey D, Thieme S, Kliesch S, Vajkoczy P. Presurgical navigated TMS motor cortex mapping improves outcome in glioblastoma surgery: a controlled observational study. J Neurooncol. (2016) 126:535–43. 10.1007/s11060-015-1993-9
    1. Krieg SM, Picht T, Sollmann N, Bährend I, Ringel F, Nagarajan SS, et al. . Resection of motor eloquent metastases aided by preoperative nTMS-Based motor maps-comparison of two observational cohorts. Front Oncol. (2016) 6:261. 10.3389/fonc.2016.00261
    1. Benjamin CFA, Li AX, Blumenfeld H, Constable RT, Alkawadri R, Bickel S, et al. . Presurgical language fMRI: clinical practices and patient outcomes in epilepsy surgical planning. Human Brain Mapping. (2018) 39:2777–85. 10.1002/hbm.24039
    1. Sollmann N, Ille S, Hauck T, Maurer S, Negwer C, Zimmer C, et al. . The impact of preoperative language mapping by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation on the clinical course of brain tumor patients. BMC Cancer. (2015) 15:261. 10.1186/s12885-015-1299-5
    1. Nezu A, Kimura S, Uehara S, Kobayashia T, Tanaka M, Saito K. Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex in children: maturity of corticospinal pathway and problem of clinical application. Brain Dev. (1997) 19:176–80. 10.1016/S0387-7604(96)00552-9
    1. Fietzek UM, Heinen F, Berweck S, Maute S, Hufschmidt A, Schulte-Mönting J, et al. . Development of the corticospinal system and hand motor function: central conduction times and motor performance tests. Dev Med Child Neurol. (2000) 42:220–7. 10.1017/S0012162200000384
    1. Eyre JA, Taylor JP, Villagra F, Smith M, Miller S. Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development. Neurology. (2001) 57:1543–54. 10.1212/WNL.57.9.1543
    1. Garvey MA, Ziemann U, Bartko JJ, Denckla MB, Barker CA, Wassermann EM. Cortical correlates of neuromotor development in healthy children. Clin Neurophysiol. (2003) 114:1662–70. 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00130-5
    1. Cantello R, Gianelli M, Civardi C, Mutani R. Magnetic brain stimulation: the silent period after the motor evoked potential. Neurology. (1992) 42:1951–9. 10.1212/WNL.42.10.1951
    1. Connors B, Malenka R, Silva L. Two inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, and GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated responses in neocortex of rat and cat. J Physiol. (1988) 406:443–68. 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017390
    1. Rábago CA, Lancaster JL, Narayana S, Zhang W, Fox PT. Automated-parameterization of the motor evoked potential and cortical silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. (2009) 120:1577–87. 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.04.020
    1. Narayana S, Rábago CA, Zhang W, Strickland C, Franklin C, Fox PT, et al. . Thresholds and locations of excitation and inhibition in primary motor cortex: evidence from electromyography and imaging. Soc Neurosci. (2010).
    1. Mäkelä JP, Vitikainen A-M, Lioumis P, Paetau R, Ahtola E, Kuusela L, et al. . Functional plasticity of the motor cortical structures demonstrated by navigated TMS in two patients with epilepsy. Brain Stimul. (2013) 6:286–91. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.012
    1. Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, et al. . Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. (2011) 69:581–9. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181b89
    1. Forster M-T, Hattingen E, Senft C, Gasser T, Seifert V, Szelényi A. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery. (2011) 68:1317–25. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820b528c
    1. Krieg SM, Shiban E, Buchmann N, Gempt J, Foerschler A, Meyer B, et al. . Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas: clinical article. JNS. (2012) 116:994–1001. 10.3171/2011.12.JNS111524
    1. Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Jutta S, KraÈgeloh-Mann I. Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. Brain. (2002) 125:2222–37. 10.1093/brain/awf227
    1. Staudt M. Brain plasticity following early life brain injury: insights from neuroimaging. Semin Perinatol. (2010) 34:87–92. 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.009
    1. Kabat J, Król P. Focal cortical dysplasia - review. Polish J Radiol. (2012) 77:35–43. 10.12659/PJR.882968
    1. Baumer FM, Cardon AL, Porter BE. Language dysfunction in pediatric epilepsy. J Pediatrics. (2018) 194:13–21. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.031
    1. Ibrahim GM, Morgan BR, Doesburg SM, Taylor MJ, Pang EW, Donner E, et al. . Atypical language laterality is associated with large-scale disruption of network integration in children with intractable focal epilepsy. Cortex. (2015) 65:83–8. 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.12.016
    1. Lillywhite LM, Saling MM, Simon Harvey A, Abbott DF, Archer JS, Vears DF, et al. . Neuropsychological and functional MRI studies provide converging evidence of anterior language dysfunction in BECTS. Epilepsia. (2009) 50:2276–84. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02065.x
    1. Datta AN, Oser N, Bauder F, Maier O, Martin F, Ramelli GP, et al. . Cognitive impairment and cortical reorganization in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. Epilepsia. (2013) 54:487–94. 10.1111/epi.12067
    1. Vannest J, Szaflarski JP, Eaton KP, Henkel DM, Morita D, Glauser TA, et al. . Functional magnetic resonance imaging reveals changes in language localization in children with benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. J Child Neurol. (2013) 28:435–45. 10.1177/0883073812447682
    1. You X, Adjouadi M, Guillen MR, Ayala M, Barreto A, Rishe N, et al. . Sub-patterns of language network reorganization in pediatric localization related epilepsy: a multisite study. Hum Brain Mapp. (2011) 32:784–99. 10.1002/hbm.21066
    1. Rejnö-Habte Selassie G, Pegenius G, Karlsson T, Viggedal G, Hallböök T, Elam M. Cortical mapping of receptive language processing in children using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Epilepsy Behav. (2020) 103:106836. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106836
    1. Rosenstock T, Picht T, Schneider H, Koch A, Thomale U-W. Left perisylvian tumor surgery aided by TMS language mapping in a 6-year-old boy: case report. Child's Nerv Syst. (2019) 35:175–81. 10.1007/s00381-018-3944-1
    1. Rosenstock T, Picht T, Schneider H, Vajkoczy P, Thomale U-W. Pediatric navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor and language mapping combined with diffusion tensor imaging tractography: clinical experience. J Neurosurg. (2020) 26:583–93. 10.3171/2020.4.PEDS20174
    1. Rogić M, Deletis V, Fernández-Conejero I. Inducing transient language disruptions by mapping of Broca's area with modified patterned repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol: clinical article. JNS. (2014) 120:1033–41. 10.3171/2013.11.JNS13952
    1. Rogić Vidaković M, Jerković A, Jurić T, Vujović I, Šoda J, Erceg N, et al. . Neurophysiologic markers of primary motor cortex for laryngeal muscles and premotor cortex in caudal opercular part of inferior frontal gyrus investigated in motor speech disorder: a navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study. Cognitive Process. (2016) 17:429–42. 10.1007/s10339-016-0766-5
    1. Vitikainen A-M, Mäkelä E, Lioumis P, Jousmäki V, Mäkelä JP. Accelerometer-based automatic voice onset detection in speech mapping with navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. (2015) 253:70–7. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.015
    1. Kim SJ, Kim MY, Choi YM, Song MK. Effects of topiramate on language functions in newly diagnosed pediatric epileptic patients. Pediatric Neurol. (2014) 51:324–9. 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.05.033
    1. Rösler J, Niraula B, Strack V, Zdunczyk A, Schilt S, Savolainen P, et al. . Language mapping in healthy volunteers and brain tumor patients with a novel navigated TMS system: Evidence of tumor-induced plasticity. Clin Neurophysiol. (2014) 125:526–36. 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.015
    1. Sollmann N, Tanigawa N, Ringel F, Zimmer C, Meyer B, Krieg SM. Language and its right-hemispheric distribution in healthy brains: an investigation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage. (2014) 102:776–88. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.002
    1. Holland SK, Plante E, Weber Byars A, Strawsburg RH, Schmithorst VJ, Ball WS. Normal fMRI brain activation patterns in children performing a verb generation task. NeuroImage. (2001) 14:837–43. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0875
    1. Szaflarski JP, Holland SK, Schmithorst VJ, Byars AW. fMRI study of language lateralization in children and adults. Hum Brain Mapp. (2006) 27:202–12. 10.1002/hbm.20177
    1. Szaflarski JP, Schmithorst VJ, Altaye M, Byars AW, Ret J, Plante E, et al. . A longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language development in children 5 to 11 years old. Ann Neurol. (2006) 59:796–807. 10.1002/ana.20817
    1. Sollmann N, Ille S, Obermueller T, Negwer C, Ringel F, Meyer B, et al. . The impact of repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation coil positioning and stimulation parameters on human language function. Eur J Med Res. (2015) 20:47. 10.1186/s40001-015-0155-z
    1. Hauck T, Tanigawa N, Probst M, Wohlschlaeger A, Ille S, Sollmann N, et al. . Stimulation frequency determines the distribution of language positive cortical regions during navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. BMC Neurosci. (2015) 16:5. 10.1186/s12868-015-0143-9
    1. Ungerleider LG, Pasternak T. Ventral and dorsal cortical processing streams. In: Chalupa L, Werner J. editors. The Visual Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; (2004). p. 541–62.
    1. D'Amico S, Devescovi A, Bates E. Picture naming and lexical access in italian children and adults. J Cogn Dev. (2001) 2:71–105. 10.1207/S15327647JCD0201_4
    1. Cycowicz YM, Friedman D, Rothstein M, Snodgrass JG. Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Child Psychol. (1997) 65:171–237. 10.1006/jecp.1996.2356
    1. Bae EH, Schrader LM, Machii K, Alonso-Alonso M, Riviello JJ, Pascual-Leone A, et al. . Safety and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a review of the literature. Epilepsy Behav. (2007) 10:521–8. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.03.004
    1. Schrader LM, Stern JM, Koski L, Nuwer MR, Engel J. Seizure incidence during single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals with epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. (2004) 115:2728–37. 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.018
    1. Lerner AJ, Wassermann EM, Tamir DI. Seizures from transcranial magnetic stimulation 2012-2016: results of a survey of active laboratories and clinics. Clin Neurophysiol. (2019) 130:1409–16. 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.03.016
    1. Pereira LS, Müller VT, da Mota Gomes M, Rotenberg A, Fregni F. Safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with epilepsy: a systematic review. Epilepsy Behav. (2016) 57:167–76. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.01.015
    1. Garvey MA, Kaczynski KJ, Becker DA, Bartko JJ. Subjective reactions of children to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Child Neurol. (2001) 16:891–4. 10.1177/088307380101601205

Source: PubMed

3
订阅