A phase II/III randomized, multicenter trial of prednisone/sirolimus versus prednisone/ sirolimus/calcineurin inhibitor for the treatment of chronic graft- versus-host disease: BMT CTN 0801

Paul A Carpenter, Brent R Logan, Stephanie J Lee, Daniel J Weisdorf, Laura Johnston, Luciano J Costa, Carrie L Kitko, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Stefanie Sarantopoulos, Amin M Alousi, Sunil Abhyankar, Edmund K Waller, Adam Mendizabal, Jiaxi Zhu, Kelly A O'Brien, Aleksandr Lazaryan, Juan Wu, Eneida R Nemecek, Steven Z Pavletic, Corey S Cutler, Mary M Horowitz, Mukta Arora, BMT CTN., Paul A Carpenter, Brent R Logan, Stephanie J Lee, Daniel J Weisdorf, Laura Johnston, Luciano J Costa, Carrie L Kitko, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Stefanie Sarantopoulos, Amin M Alousi, Sunil Abhyankar, Edmund K Waller, Adam Mendizabal, Jiaxi Zhu, Kelly A O'Brien, Aleksandr Lazaryan, Juan Wu, Eneida R Nemecek, Steven Z Pavletic, Corey S Cutler, Mary M Horowitz, Mukta Arora, BMT CTN.

Abstract

Initial therapy of chronic graft-versus-host disease is prednisone ± a calcineurin-inhibitor, but most patients respond inadequately. In a randomized, adaptive, phase II/III, multicenter trial we studied whether prednisone/sirolimus or prednisone/sirolimus/photopheresis was more effective than prednisone/sirolimus/calcineurin-inhibitor for treating chronic graft-versus-host disease in treatment-naïve or early inadequate responders. Primary endpoints of this study were proportions of subjects alive without relapse or secondary therapy with 6-month complete or partial response in phase II, or with 2-year complete response in phase III. The prednisone/sirolimus/photopheresis arm closed prematurely because of slow accrual and the remaining two-drug versus three-drug study ended in phase II due to statistical futility with 138 evaluable subjects. The two-drug and three-drug arms did not differ in rates of 6-month complete or partial response (48.6% versus 50.0%, P=0.87), or 2-year complete response (14.7% versus 15.5%, P=0.90). Serum creatinine values >1.5 times baseline were less frequent in the calcineurin-inhibitor-free arm at 2 months (1.5% versus 11.7%, P=0.025) and 6 months (7.8% versus 24.0%, P=0.016). Higher adjusted Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary and Physical Functioning scores were seen in the two-drug arm at both 2 months (P=0.02 and P=0.04, respectively) and 6 months (P=0.007 and P=0.001, respectively). Failure-free survival and overall survival rates at 2 years were similar for patients in the the two-drug and three-drug arms (48.6% versus 46.2%, P=0.78; 81.5% versus 74%, P=0.28). Based on similar long-term outcomes, prednisone/sirolimus is a therapeutic alternative to prednisone/sirolimus/calcineurin-inhibitor for chronic graft-versus-host disease, being easier to administer and better tolerated. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01106833.

Copyright© 2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
BMT CTN 0801 Consort flow diagram. ECP: extracorporeal photopheresis; PDN: prednisone; SRL: sirolimus; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overall survival, progression-free survival, and failure-free survival. (A) Probability of overall survival by treatment arm (P=0.281). (B) Probability of progression-free survival by treatment arm (P=0.142). Progression-free survival was defined as no clinical evidence of progression or relapsed disease, or any therapy used to treat persistent, progressive, or relapsed disease including withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy or donor lymphocyte infusion. (C) Probability of failure-free survival in the (C) sirolimus + prednisone (2-drug) arm and (D) control (3-drug) arm. Failure-free survival was defined by the absence of secondary immunosuppressive therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease, non-relapse mortality, and recurrent or progressive malignancy during treatment. Note: the numbers shown are estimates at each time point for each endpoint. Siro/Pred: sirolimus + prednisone; NRM: non-relapse mortality; FFS: failure-free survival.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative incidence of discontinuation of all systemic immunosuppressive therapy without the need to add additional therapy by 2 years.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Quality of life. Unadjusted graphs are shown for SF-36 quality of life scores:23 (left) Physical Component Summary scores; (right) Physical Functioning subscale scores.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Six-month landmark analysis. (A) Overall survival after the 6-month landmark with a median follow up for survivors of 30 months. The mortality rates after the 6-month landmark were similar in the complete or partial response group and stable or progressive disease group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.17–2.96; P=0.63) or secondary treatment groups (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.13–2.26; P=0.39), respectively. (B) Cumulative incidence of discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy after the 6-month landmark. Patients who died or were lost to follow up or experienced relapse before the landmark were excluded (n=19) and no patients ended immunosuppressive therapy before the landmark. CR/PR: patients with complete or partial response without relapse and without secondary therapy at the time of assessment (n=68). SD/PD/Rx: patients not in complete or partial response and alive without relapse and without secondary therapy at the time of assessment (n=31), and patients who had secondary therapy without relapse regardless of response before the landmark (n=16); IST: immunosuppressive therapy.

References

    1. Socie G, Stone JV, Wingard JR, et al. Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Late Effects Working Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(1):14–21.
    1. Pidala J, Kurland B, Chai X, et al. Patient-reported quality of life is associated with severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease as measured by NIH criteria: report on baseline data from the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Blood. 2011;117(17):4651–4657.
    1. Sullivan KM, Witherspoon RP, Storb R, et al. Prednisone and azathioprine compared with prednisone and placebo for treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease: prognostic influence of prolonged thrombocytopenia after allogeneic marrow transplantation. Blood. 1988;72(2):546–554.
    1. Koc S, Leisenring W, Flowers ME, et al. Therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease: a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine plus prednisone versus prednisone alone. Blood. 2002;100(1):48–51.
    1. Arora M, Wagner JE, Davies SM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of thalidomide, cyclosporine, and prednisone versus cyclosporine and prednisone as initial therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7(5):265–273.
    1. Koc S, Leisenring W, Flowers ME, et al. Thalidomide for treatment of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2000;96(12):3995–3996.
    1. Martin PJ, Storer BE, Rowley SD, et al. Evaluation of mycophenolate mofetil for initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2009;113(21):5074–5082.
    1. Gilman AL, Schultz KR, Goldman FD, et al. Randomized trial of hydroxychloroquine for newly diagnosed chronic graft-versus-host disease in children: a Children’s Oncology Group study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18(1):84–91.
    1. Couriel DR, Saliba R, Escalon MP, et al. Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus and corticosteroids for the treatment of resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol. 2005;130(3):409–417.
    1. Couriel DR, Hosing C, Saliba R, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for the treatment of steroid-resistant chronic GVHD. Blood. 2006;107(8):3074–3080.
    1. Cutler C, Miklos D, Kim HT, et al. Rituximab for steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2006;108(2):756–762
    1. Lopez F, Parker P, Nademanee A, et al. Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(4):307–313.
    1. Jacobsohn DA, Chen AR, Zahurak M, et al. Phase II study of pentostatin in patients with corticosteroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(27): 4255–4261.
    1. Zeiser R, Nguyen VH, Beilhack A, et al. Inhibition of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell function by calcineurin-dependent interleukin-2 production. Blood. 2006;108(1): 390–399.
    1. Zeiser R, Leverson-Gower DB, Zambricki EA, et al. Differential impact of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition on CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells compared with conventional CD4+ T cells. Blood. 2008;111(1):453–462.
    1. Coenen JJ, Koenen HJ, van Rijsen E, et al. Rapamycin, not cyclosporine, permits thymic generation and peripheral preservation of CD4+Cd25+FoxP3+ T cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(9):537–545.
    1. Gatza E, Rogers CE, Clouthier SG, et al. Extracorporeal photopheresis reverses experimental graft-versus-host disease through regulatory T cells. Blood. 2008;112(4):1515–1521.
    1. Biagi E, Di Biaso I, Leoni V, et al. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy is accompanied by increasing levels of circulating CD4+CD25+GITR+Foxp3+CD62L+ functional regulatory T-cells in patients with graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 2007;84(1):31–39.
    1. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(12):945–956.
    1. Pavletic SZ, Martin PJ, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. Response criteria working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(3):252–266.
    1. Martin PJ, Weisdorf D, Przepiorka D, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: VI. Design of clinical trials working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006;12(5):491–505.
    1. Carpenter PA, Kitko CL, Elad S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: V. The 2014 ancillary therapy and supportive care working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(7):1167–1187.
    1. Sarantopoulos S, Stevenson KE, Kim HT, et al. Altered B-cell homeostasis and excess BAFF in human chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2009;113(6):3865–3874.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. User’s Manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey. 2nd edn. QualityMetric Incorporated; Lincoln, RI: 2007.
    1. Johnston LJ, Brown J, Shizuru JA, et al. Rapamycin (sirolimus) for treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(1):47–55.
    1. Lee SJ. Classification systems for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017;129(1):30–37.
    1. Duarte RF, Greinix H, Rabin B, et al. Uptake and use of recommendations for the diagnosis, severity scoring and management of chronic GVHD: an international survey of the EBMT-NCI Chronic GVHD Task Force. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(1):49–54.
    1. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01879072

    1. Jagasia MH, Greinix HT, Arora M, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. The 2014 diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(3):389–401.
    1. Lee SJ, Wolff D, Kitko C, et al. Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. The 2014 response criteria working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(6):984–99.
    1. Inamoto Y, Flowers ME, Sandmaier BM, et al. Failure-free survival after initial systemic treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2014;124(8):1363–1371.
    1. Palmer J, Chai X, Martin PJ, et al. Failure-free survival in a prospective cohort of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Haematologica. 2015;100(5):690–695.
    1. Martin PJ, Storer BE, Inamoto Y, et al. An endpoint associated with clinical benefit after initial treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017;130(3):360–367.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅