Safety and immunogenicity of MAGE-A3 cancer immunotherapeutic with dacarbazine in patients with MAGE-A3-positive metastatic cutaneous melanoma: an open phase I/II study with a first assessment of a predictive gene signature

Jean-Jacques Grob, Laurent Mortier, Lionel D'Hondt, Florent Grange, Jean Francois Baurain, Brigitte Dréno, Céleste Lebbe, Caroline Robert, Anne Dompmartin, Bart Neyns, Marc Gillet, Jamila Louahed, Silvija Jarnjak, Frédéric F Lehmann, Jean-Jacques Grob, Laurent Mortier, Lionel D'Hondt, Florent Grange, Jean Francois Baurain, Brigitte Dréno, Céleste Lebbe, Caroline Robert, Anne Dompmartin, Bart Neyns, Marc Gillet, Jamila Louahed, Silvija Jarnjak, Frédéric F Lehmann

Abstract

Background: We assessed safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of recombinant MAGE-A3 antigen combined with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic) in association with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Methods: In this open-label, phase I/II, uncontrolled multicentre trial conducted in Belgium and France, patients with MAGE-A3-positive melanoma received up to 24 doses of MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic (four cycles) coadministered with eight doses of dacarbazine. Adverse events (AE) were recorded until 31 days postvaccination, and serious AEs (SAE), until 30 days following the last dose. MAGE-A3-specific antibodies were measured by ELISA. Clinical activity of MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic was assessed in patients positive/negative for previously identified gene signature (GS) associated with clinical outcome.

Results: Forty-eight patients were enrolled and treated (32 GS+, 15 GS-, 1 unknown GS status); two patients completed the study. All patients reported AEs, the most common were 'general disorders and administration site conditions' (94%). Treatment-related AEs were reported by 85% of patients; the most common was pain at injection site (38%). Sixteen SAEs were reported by 21% of patients; two were considered as treatment related (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia; grade 4). Postdose 4, all patients were seropositive for MAGE-A3-specific antibodies, with a geometric mean titre of 2778.7 ELISA units (EU)/mL (95% CI 1638.3 to 4712.8). One complete and three partial responses were reported (only in GS+ patients). Median overall survival was 11.4 months for GS+ and 5.3 months for GS- patients.

Conclusion: Although this trial shows poor results compared with the new results with checkpoint inhibitors, it gives an interesting insight in rapidly developing fields like combinations of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, new generation vaccines and the use of gene profile as a predictive marker.

Trial registration number: NCT00849875.

Keywords: immunotherapy; melanoma.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MG, JL and SJ are employees of the GSK group of companies. FFL was an employee of the GSK group of companies during the conduct of the study. FFL, JL and SJ own stock/stock options in the GSK group of companies. BD received grant/personal fees from GSK group of companies during the conduct of the study and from BMS, Roche and Novartis outside the submitted work. LM declares that his institution received support from GSK group of companies and Novartis to carry out clinical studies. LM reports personal fees from Roche, BMS, AMGEN, Novartis and GSK group of companies outside submitted work. JJG reports personal fees from GSK group of companies for his participation to an advisory board during the conduct of the study. CR received personal fees for participating to advisory boards for GSK, Novartis, Amgen, Roche, BMS and MSD. CL declares personal fees from Novartis, Roche, BMS, MSD and AMGEN for her participation to advisory boards.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.  *Tumour evaluation. ^Blood sampling for evaluation of MAGE-A3-specific antibody response. no., number; V, visit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant flow. *Patient was withdrawn after visit 4 due to a non-AE/SAE-related reason, that is, ‘neutropenia induced delay’. †All data collected after protocol violation were eliminated from the ATP immunogenicity analyses. AE, adverse event; ATP, according to protocol; N, number of patients; SAE, serious adverse event.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MAGE-A3-specific geometric mean concentrations (ATP population for immunogenicity). The numbers indicate the number of patients analysed at each timepoint. The error bars represent 95% CI. Due to a large CI for the last timepoint (21.3–1657225), the error bars for this timepoint are not shown. ATP, according to protocol; EU, ELISA units; GMC, geometric mean concentration; Post-2, postdose 2 (week 7); Post-4, postdose 4 (week 13); Post-8, postdose 8 (week 25); Post-12, postdose 12 (week 37); Post-16, postdose 16 (week 59); Pre, before first MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic administration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival (OS) by gene signature (total treated population). GS+, patients presenting gene signature; GS−, patients without gene signature.

References

    1. Skin cancer mortality statistics: Cancer Research UK, 2014. Available at: (accessed on 02 Nov 2016)
    1. Skin cancers: World Health Organization. Available at (accessed on 02 Nov 2016).
    1. Garbe C, Eigentler TK, Keilholz U, et al. . Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist 2011;16:5–24. 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0190
    1. Melanoma Skin Cancer: American Cancer Society. Available at (accessed on 02 Nov2016).
    1. Aris M, Barrio MM. Combining immunotherapy with oncogene-targeted therapy: a new road for melanoma treatment. Front Immunol 2015;6:46 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00046
    1. Chakraborty R, Wieland CN, Comfere NI. Molecular targeted therapies in metastatic melanoma. Pharmacogenomics Pers Med 2013;6:49–56.
    1. Jarkowski A, Khushalani NI. BRAF and beyond: Tailoring strategies for the individual melanoma patient. J Carcinog 2014;13:11 10.4103/1477-3163.126759
    1. Mahoney KM, Freeman GJ, McDermott DF. The Next Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors: PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Melanoma. Clin Ther 2015;37:764–82. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.018
    1. Blankenstein T, Coulie PG, Gilboa E, et al. . The determinants of tumour immunogenicity. Nat Rev Cancer 2012;12:307–13. 10.1038/nrc3246
    1. Coulie PG, Van den Eynde BJ, van der Bruggen P, et al. . Tumour antigens recognized by T lymphocytes: at the core of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2014;14:135–46. 10.1038/nrc3670
    1. Even-Desrumeaux K, Baty D, Chames P. State of the art in tumor antigen and biomarker discovery. Cancers 2011;3:2554–96. 10.3390/cancers3022554
    1. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat Immunol 2013;14:1014–22. 10.1038/ni.2703
    1. Ulloa-Montoya F, Louahed J, Dizier B, et al. . Predictive gene signature in MAGE-A3 antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2388–95. 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.3762
    1. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer staging manual. 6 ed: American Joint Committee on Cancer, 2002.
    1. Kruit WH, Suciu S, Dreno B, et al. . Selection of immunostimulant AS15 for active immunization with MAGE-A3 protein: results of a randomized phase II study of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer melanoma group in metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2413–20. 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.7111
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16.
    1. Brookmeyer R, Crowley J. A Confidence Interval for the Median Survival Time. Biometrics 1982;38:29–41. 10.2307/2530286
    1. Pujol JL, Vansteenkiste JF, De Pas TM, et al. . Safety and Immunogenicity of MAGE-A3 Cancer Immunotherapeutic with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Stage IB to III MAGE-A3-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1458–67. 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000653
    1. Kruit WH, van Ojik HH, Brichard VG, et al. . Phase 1/2 study of subcutaneous and intradermal immunization with a recombinant MAGE-3 protein in patients with detectable metastatic melanoma. Int J Cancer 2005;117:596–604. 10.1002/ijc.21264
    1. Vansteenkiste J, Zielinski M, Linder A, et al. . Adjuvant MAGE-A3 immunotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer: phase II randomized study results. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2396–403. 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.7103
    1. Marchand M, Punt CJ, Aamdal S, et al. . Immunisation of metastatic cancer patients with MAGE-3 protein combined with adjuvant SBAS-2: a clinical report. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:70–7. 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00479-3
    1. Drake CG. Combination immunotherapy approaches. Ann Oncol 2012;23(Suppl 8):viii41–6. 10.1093/annonc/mds262
    1. Machiels JP, Reilly RT, Emens LA, et al. . Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and paclitaxel enhance the antitumor immune response of granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor-secreting whole-cell vaccines in HER-2/neu tolerized mice. Cancer Res 2001;61:3689–97.
    1. Wada S, Yoshimura K, Hipkiss EL, et al. . Cyclophosphamide augments antitumor immunity: studies in an autochthonous prostate cancer model. Cancer Res 2009;69:4309–18. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4102

Source: PubMed

3
订阅