Feasibility and efficacy of shared decision making for first-admission schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial

Mio Ishii, Yasuyuki Okumura, Naoya Sugiyama, Hana Hasegawa, Toshie Noda, Yoshio Hirayasu, Hiroto Ito, Mio Ishii, Yasuyuki Okumura, Naoya Sugiyama, Hana Hasegawa, Toshie Noda, Yoshio Hirayasu, Hiroto Ito

Abstract

Background: The feasibility of shared decision making (SDM) for patients with schizophrenia remains controversial due to the assumed inability of patients to cooperate in treatment decision making. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of SDM in patients upon first admission for schizophrenia.

Methods: This was a randomized, parallel-group, two-arm, open-label, single-center study conducted in an acute psychiatric ward of Numazu Chuo Hospital, Japan. Patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia upon their first admission were randomized into a SDM intervention group or a usual treatment group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction at discharge. The secondary outcomes were attitudes toward medication at discharge and treatment continuation at 6 months after discharge.

Results: Twenty-four patients were randomly assigned. The trial was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. At discharge, the mean score on satisfaction was 23.7 in the SDM group and 22.1 in the usual care group (unadjusted mean difference: 1.6; 95% CI: -5.2 to 2.0). Group differences were not observed in attitude toward medication and treatment continuation. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the mean Global Assessment of Functioning score at discharge or length of stay as safety endpoint.

Conclusions: No statistical differences were found between the SDM group and usual care group in the efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints. Large trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of the SDM program upon first admission for schizophrenia.

Trial registration: The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01869660 (registered 27 May, 2013).

Keywords: Inpatient treatment; Pilot study; Randomized controlled trial; SDM; Schizophrenia; Shared decision making.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram. SDM = shared decision making.†Some patients met 1 > criterion

References

    1. Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996;275:152–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530260066035.
    1. Truog RD. Patients and doctors-evolution of a relationship. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:581–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1110848.
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango) Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00221-3.
    1. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001431.
    1. Hamann J, Heres S. Adapting shared decision making for individuals with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:1483–6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400307.
    1. Deegan PE, Ph D. Shared decision making must be adopted, not Adapted. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:1487. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.650906.
    1. SAMHSA’ s Working Definition Of Recovery. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. . Accessed 31 Jul 2016.
    1. Service User Experience in Adult Mental Health: Improving the Experience of Care for People Using Adult NHS Mental Health Services. 2012. . Accessed 31 Jul 2016.
    1. Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. . Accessd 31 Jul 2016.
    1. Hamann J, Langer B, Winkler V, Busch R, Cohen R, Leucht S. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114:265–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00798.x.
    1. Hamann J, Mendel R, Meier A, Asani F, Pausch E, Leucht S, Kissling W. “How to speak to your psychiatrist”: shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:1218–21. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.10.pss6210_1218.
    1. Pickett SA, Diehl SM, Steigman PJ, Prater JD, Fox A, Shipley P, Grey DD, Cook JA. Consumer empowerment and self-advocacy outcomes in a randomized study of peer-led education. Community Ment Health J. 2012;48:420–30. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9507-0.
    1. Troquete NAC, van den Brink RHS, Beintema H, Mulder T, van Os TWDP, Schoevers RA, Wiersma D. Risk assessment and shared care planning in out-patient forensic psychiatry: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:365–71. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113043.
    1. van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Boonstra N, Wunderink L, de Jonge P, Sytema S. A web-based tool to support shared decision making for people with a psychotic disorder: randomized controlled trial and process evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2851.
    1. McCabe R, Saidi M, Priebe S. Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;191:s21–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.191.50.s21.
    1. Ishii M, Okumura Y, Sugiyama N, Hasegawa H, Noda T, Hirayasu Y. Efficacy of shared decision making on treatment satisfaction for patients with first-admission schizophrenia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-111.
    1. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychol Rep. 1962;10:799–812. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799.
    1. Miyata R, Fujii Y, Inagaki A. Reliability of the Japanese version of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales (BPRS) [in Japanese] Rinsho Hyoka. 1995;23:357–67.
    1. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2:197–207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6.
    1. Tachimori H, Ito H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Seishin Igaku (Clinical Psychiatry) 1999;41:711–7.
    1. Ito H, Shingai N, Yamazumi S, Sawa Y, Iwasaki S. Patient perceptions and satisfaction of psychiatric services at their discharge. Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1999;101:138–47.
    1. Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R. A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med. 1983;13:177–83. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700050182.
    1. Miyata R, Fujii Y, Inagaki A, Yagi G. Psychophardmacology for the patients with schizophrenia and their quality of life (QOL): Assessment using the Japanese version of Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). (abstract) (in Japanese) Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1996;98:1045–6.
    1. Hall RC. Global assessment of functioning. A modified scale. Psychosomatics. 1995;36:267–75. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71666-8.
    1. Richardson DB, Kinlaw AC, MacLehose RF, Cole SR. Standardized binomial models for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:1660–72. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv137.
    1. Hamann J, Kohl S, McCabe R, Buhner M, Mendel R, Albus M, Bernd J. What can patients do to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative study of patients with depression or schizophrenia and psychiatrists. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51:617–25. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1089-z.
    1. Kroken RA, Kjelby E, Wentzel-Larsen T, Mellesdal LS, Jorgensen HA, Johnsen E. Time to discontinuation of antipsychotic drugs in a schizophrenia cohort: influence of current treatment strategies. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2014;4:228–39. doi: 10.1177/2045125314545614.
    1. Dahlqvist Jönsson P, Schön UK, Rosenberg D, Sandlund M, Svedberg P. Service users’ experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015;22:688–97. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12246.
    1. Washington KT, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, Shaunfield S, Crumb E. Application of the VALUE communication principles in ACTIVE hospice team meetings. J Palliat Med. 2012;16:121004063216008. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0229.
    1. Wittenberg-Lyles E, Oliver DP, Kruse RL, Demiris G, Gage LA, Wagner K. Family caregiver participation in hospice interdisciplinary team meetings: how does it affect the nature and content of communication? Health Commun. 2013;28:110–8. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.652935.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅