Efficacy of shared decision making on treatment satisfaction for patients with first-admission schizophrenia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Mio Ishii, Yasuyuki Okumura, Naoya Sugiyama, Hana Hasegawa, Toshie Noda, Yoshio Hirayasu, Hiroto Ito, Mio Ishii, Yasuyuki Okumura, Naoya Sugiyama, Hana Hasegawa, Toshie Noda, Yoshio Hirayasu, Hiroto Ito

Abstract

Background: Shared decision making is a promising model for patient-centred medicine, resulting in better clinical outcomes overall. In the mental health field, interventions that consider the patient-centred perspective--such as patient quality of life, involvement in the treatment, treatment satisfaction, and working alliance--have increased and better clinical outcomes discovered for patients with schizophrenia. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of shared decision making for schizophrenia treatment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of a shared decision making intervention compared to treatment as usual on patient satisfaction at discharge for first-admission patients with schizophrenia.

Methods/design: This is a randomised, parallel-group, two-arm, open-label, single-centre study currently being conducted in an acute psychiatric ward of Numazu Chuo Hospital, Japan. We are recruiting patients between 16 and 65 years old who are admitted to the ward with a diagnosis of schizophrenia without prior experience of psychiatric admission. Fifty-eight participants are being randomised into a shared decision making intervention group or a treatment as usual control group in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention program was developed based on a shared decision making model and is presented as a weekly course lasting the duration of the patients' acute psychiatric ward stay. The primary outcome measure is patient satisfaction at discharge as assessed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Due to the study's nature, neither the patient nor staff can be blinded.

Discussion: This is the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of shared decision making for patients with early-treatment-stage schizophrenia. The intervention program in this study is innovative in that it includes both of the patient and staff who are involved in the treatment.

Trial registration: The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01869660.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram; it provides an overview of the trial flow from baseline assessment at the admission to the follow-up at 6 months after the discharge.

References

    1. Laine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996;275:152–156.
    1. Truog RD. Patients and doctors–evolution of a relationship. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:581–585.
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango) Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–692.
    1. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Légaré F, Thomson R. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD001431. .
    1. Lacro JP, Dunn LB, Dolder CR, Leckband SG, Jeste DV. Prevalence of and risk factors for medication nonadherence in patients with schizophrenia: a comprehensive review of recent literature. J Clin Psychiatr. 2002;63:892–909.
    1. Zygmunt A, Olfson M, Boyer CA, Mechanic D. Interventions to improve medication adherence in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatr. 2002;159:1653–1664.
    1. Nosé M, Barbui C, Gray R, Tansella M. Clinical interventions for treatment non-adherence in psychosis: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatr. 2003;183:197–206.
    1. Schulz M, Gray R, Spiekermann A, Abderhalden C, Behrens J, Driessen M. Adherence therapy following an acute episode of schizophrenia: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2013;146:59–63.
    1. Maneesakorn S, Robson D, Gournay K, Gray R. An RCT of adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia in Chiang Mai, Thailand. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16:1302–1312.
    1. Gray R, Leese M, Bindman J, Becker T, Burti L, David A, Gournay K, Kikkert M, Koeter M, Puschner B, Schene A, Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia. European multicentre randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatr. 2006;189:508–514.
    1. Anderson KH, Ford S, Robson D, Cassis J, Rodrigues C, Gray R. An exploratory, randomized controlled trial of adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010;19:340–349.
    1. De Haan L, van Amelsvoort T, Dingemans P, Linszen D. Risk factors for medication non-adherence in patients with first episode schizophrenia and related disorders; a prospective five year follow-up. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2007;40:264–268.
    1. Day JC, Bentall RP, Roberts C, Randall F, Rogers A, Cattell D, Healy D, Rae P, Power C. Attitudes toward antipsychotic medication: the impact of clinical variables and relationships with health professionals. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 2005;62:717–724.
    1. Junghan UM, Leese M, Priebe S, Slade M. Staff and patient perspectives on unmet need and therapeutic alliance in community mental health services. Br J Psychiatr. 2007;191:543–547.
    1. Hamann J, Langer B, Winkler V, Busch R, Cohen R, Leucht S. Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2006;114:265–273.
    1. Hamann J, Mendel R, Meier A, Asani F, Pausch E, Leucht S, Kissling W. “How to speak to your psychiatrist”: shared decision-making training for inpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:1218–1221.
    1. Van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Boonstra N, Wunderink L, de Jonge P, Sytema S. A Web-Based Tool to Support Shared Decision Making for People With a Psychotic Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial and Process Evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e216.
    1. Overall JE, Gorham DR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep. 1962;10:799–812.
    1. Miyata R, Fujii Y, Inagaki A. Reliability of the Japanese version of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales (BPRS) [in Japanese] Rinsho Hyoka. 1995;23:357–367.
    1. Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2:197–207.
    1. Tachimori H, Ito H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Seishin Igaku (Clin Psychiatr) 1999;41:711–717.
    1. Priebe S, McCabe R, Bullenkamp J, Hansson L, Lauber C, Martinez-Leal R, Rössler W, Salize H, Svensson B, Torres-Gonzales F, van den Brink R, Wiersma D, Wright DJ. Structured patient-clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatr. 2007;191:420–426.
    1. Huguelet P, Mohr S, Betrisey C, Borras L, Gillieron C, Marie AM, Rieben I, Perroud N, Brandt P-Y. A randomized trial of spiritual assessment of outpatients with schizophrenia: patients’ and clinicians' experience. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:79–86.
    1. Ito H, Shingai N, Yamazumi S, Sawa Y, Iwasaki S. Patient Perceptions and Satisfaction of Psychiatric Services at their Discharge. Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1999;101:138–147.
    1. Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R. A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med. 1983;13:177–183.
    1. Miyata R, Fujii Y, Inagaki A, Yagi G. Psychophardmacology for the patients with schizophrenia and their quality of life (QOL): Assessment using the Japanese version of Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). (abstract) (in Japanese) Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1996;98:1045–1046.
    1. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67:324–332.
    1. Buuren S. Flexible Imputation of Missing Data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2012. p. 342. ISBN 9781439868249.
    1. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:438–450.
    1. Duncan E, Best C, Hagen S. Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD007297. .

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅