Costing of three feeding regimens for home-based management of children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition from a randomised trial in India

Charu C Garg, Sarmila Mazumder, Sunita Taneja, Medha Shekhar, Sanjana Brahmawar Mohan, Anuradha Bose, Sharad D Iyengar, Rajiv Bahl, Jose Martines, Nita Bhandari, Charu C Garg, Sarmila Mazumder, Sunita Taneja, Medha Shekhar, Sanjana Brahmawar Mohan, Anuradha Bose, Sharad D Iyengar, Rajiv Bahl, Jose Martines, Nita Bhandari

Abstract

Trial design: Three feeding regimens-centrally produced ready-to-use therapeutic food, locally produced ready-to-use therapeutic food, and augmented, energy-dense, home-prepared food-were provided in a community setting for children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in the age group of 6-59 months in an individually randomised multicentre trial that enrolled 906 children. Foods, counselling, feeding support and treatment for mild illnesses were provided until recovery or 16 weeks.

Methods: Costs were estimated for 371 children enrolled in Delhi in a semiurban location after active survey and identification, enrolment, diagnosis and treatment for mild illnesses, and finally treatment with one of the three regimens, both under the research and government setting. Direct costs were estimated for human resources using a price times quantity approach, based on their salaries and average time taken for each activity. The cost per week per child for food, medicines and other consumables was estimated based on the total expenditure over the period and children covered. Indirect costs for programme management including training, transport, non-consumables, infrastructure and equipment were estimated per week per child based on total expenditures for research study and making suitable adjustments for estimations under government setting.

Results: No significant difference in costs was found across the three regimens per covered or per treated child. The average cost per treated child in the government setting was estimated at US$56 (<3500 rupees).

Conclusion: Home-based management of SAM with a locally produced ready-to-use therapeutic food is feasible, acceptable, affordable and very cost-effective in terms of the disability-adjusted life years saved and gross national income per capita of the country. The treatment of SAM at home needs serious attention and integration into the existing health system, along with actions to prevent SAM.

Trial registration number: NCT01705769; Pre-results.

Keywords: India; child; community management; costs; severe acute malnutrition (SAM).

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Collins S, Dent N, Binns P, et al. . Management of severe acute malnutrition in children. Lancet 2006;368:1992–2000. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69443-9
    1. WHO. Management of Severe Malnutrition: A manual for physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva: WHO, 1990.
    1. World Health Organization. Community- Based Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition: A Joint Statement by the World Health Organization, the World Food Programme, the United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.
    1. Kapil U. Ready to Use Therapeutic Food(RUTF) in the management of severe acute malnutrition in India. Indian Pediatr 2009;46:381–2.
    1. Ashworth A. Efficacy and effectiveness of community-based treatment of severe malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull 2006;27:S24–S48. 10.1177/15648265060273S303
    1. Bhandari N, Mohan SB, Bose A, et al. . Efficacy of three feeding regimens for home-based management of children with uncomplicated severe acute malnutrition: a randomised trial in India. BMJ Glob Health 2016;1:e000144 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000144
    1. Gupta P, Shah D, Sachdev HP, et al. . National workshop on "Development of guidelines for effective home based care and treatment of children suffering from severe acute malnutrition". Indian Pediatr 2006;43:131–9.
    1. Golden M. Questions from the field. Field Exchange, Emergency Nutrition Network 2007;31:17–20.
    1. Prasad V. Should India use commercially produced ready to use therapeutic foods (RUTF) for severe acute malnutrition (SAM). Social Medicine 2009;4:52–5.
    1. Sachdev HP, Kapil U, Vir S. Consensus Statement National Consensus Workshop on Management of SAM Children through Medical Nutrition Therapy. Indian Pediatr 2010;47:661–5. 10.1007/s13312-010-0097-z
    1. Tekeste A, Wondafrash M, Azene G, et al. . Cost effectiveness of community-based and in-patient therapeutic feeding programs to treat severe acute malnutrition in Ethiopia. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 2012;10:4 10.1186/1478-7547-10-4
    1. Puett C, Sadler K, Alderman H, et al. . Cost-effectiveness of the community-based management of severe acute malnutrition by community health workers in southern Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan 2013;28:386–99. 10.1093/heapol/czs070
    1. Guidelines for ASHA and Mahila Arogya Samiti in the Urban Context. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2014.
    1. Bachmann MO. Cost-effectiveness of community-based treatment of severe acute malnutrition in children. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2010;10:605–12. 10.1586/erp.10.54
    1. Wilford R, Golden K, Walker DG. Cost-effectiveness of community-based management of acute malnutrition in Malawi. Health Policy Plan 2012;27:127–37. 10.1093/heapol/czr017
    1. Bachmann MO. 2009. Cost effectiveness of community-based therapeutic care for children with severe acute malnutrition in Zambia: decision tree model. BioMed Central; Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2009,7: 2. 2009. .
    1. Black RE, Laxminarayan R, Temmerman M, et al. Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health. Disease Control Priorities, third edition, volume 2. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅