The diagnostic validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound in lateral epicondylalgia: a systematic review

Valentin C Dones 3rd, Karen Grimmer, Kerry Thoirs, Consuelo G Suarez, Julie Luker, Valentin C Dones 3rd, Karen Grimmer, Kerry Thoirs, Consuelo G Suarez, Julie Luker

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is considered a reliable, widely available, non-invasive and inexpensive imaging technique for assessing soft tissue involvement in Lateral epicondylalgia. Despite the number of diagnostic studies for Lateral Epicondylalgia, there is no consensus in the current literature on the best abnormal ultrasound findings that confirm lateral epicondylalgia.

Methods: Eligible studies identified by searching electronic databases, scanning reference lists of articles and chapters on ultrasound in reference books, and consultation of experts in sonography. Three reviewers (VCDIII, KP, KW) independently searched the databases using the agreed search strategy, and independently conducted all stages of article selection. Two reviewers (VCDIII, KP) then screened titles and abstracts to remove obvious irrelevance. Potentially relevant full text publications which met the inclusion criteria were reviewed by the primary investigator (VCDIII) and another reviewer (CGS).

Results: Among the 15 included diagnostic studies in this review, seven were Level II diagnostic accuracy studies for chronic lateral epicondylalgia based on the National Health and Medical Research Council Hierarchy of Evidence. Based from the pooled sensitivity of abnormal ultrasound findings with homogenous results (p > 0.05), the hypoechogenicity of the common extensor origin has the best combination of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. It is moderately sensitive [Sensitivity: 0.64 (0.56-0.72)] and highly specific [Specificity: 0.82 (0.72-0.90)] in determining elbows with lateral epicondylalgia. Additionally, bone changes on the lateral epicondyle [Sensitivity: 0.56 (0.50-0.62)] were moderately sensitive to chronic LE. Conversely, neovascularity [Specificity: 1.00 (0.97-1.00)], calcifications [Specificity: 0.97 (0.94-0.99)] and cortical irregularities [Specificity: 0.96 (0.88-0.99)] have strong specificity for chronic lateral epicondylalgia. There is insufficient evidence supporting the use of Power Doppler Ultrasonogrophy, Real-time Sonoelastography and sonographic probe-induced tenderness in diagnosing LE.

Conclusions: The use of Gray-scale Ultrasonography is recommended in objectively diagnosing lateral epicondylalgia. The presence of hypoechogenicity and bone changes indicates presence of a stressed common extensor origin-lateral epicondyle complex in elbows with lateral epicondylalgia. In addition to diagnosis, detection of these abnormal ultrasound findings allows localization of pathologies to tendon or bone that would assist in designing an appropriate treatment suited to patient's condition.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA flow diagram.Key: PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plots for over-all gray-scale changes. A. Sensitivity, B. Specificity.

References

    1. Regan W, Wold LE, Coonrad R, Morrey BF. Microscopic histopathology of chronic refractory lateral epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:746–749. doi: 10.1177/036354659202000618.
    1. Bunata RE, Brown DS, Capelo R. Anatomic factors related to the cause of tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1955–1963. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00727.
    1. Faro F, Wolf JM. Lateral epicondylitis: review and current concepts. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:1271–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.019.
    1. Oskarsson E, Gustafsson BE, Pettersson K, Aulin KP. Decreased intramuscular blood flow in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17:211–215.
    1. Erak S, Day R, Wang A. The role of supinator in the pathogenesis of chronic lateral elbow pain: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29:461–464. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.06.001.
    1. Fairbank SM, Corlett RJ. The role of the extensor digitorum communis muscle in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:405–409. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0761.
    1. Albrecht S, Cordis R, Kleihues H, Noack W. Pathoanatomic findings in radiohumeral epicondylopathy. A combined anatomic and electromyographic study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:157–163. doi: 10.1007/BF00426065.
    1. Briggs CA, Elliott BG. Lateral epicondylitis. A review of structures associated with tennis elbow. Anat Clin. 1985;7:149–153. doi: 10.1007/BF01654635.
    1. Waugh E. Lateral epicondylalgia or epicondylitis: what’s in a name? Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:200–202. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2005.0104.
    1. Boyer MI, Hastings H 2ND. Lateral tennis elbow: “is there any science out there?”. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 1999;8:481–491. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90081-2.
    1. Stasinopoulos D, Johnson MI. ‘Lateral elbow tendinopathy’ is the most appropriate diagnostic term for the condition commonly referred-to as lateral epicondylitis. Med Hypotheses. 2006;67:1400–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.05.048.
    1. Jaen-Diaz JI, Cerezo-Lopez E, Lopez-De Castro F, Mata-Castrillo M, Barcelo-Galindez JP, De La Fuente J, Balius-Mata R. Sonographic findings for the common extensor tendon of the elbow in the general population. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1717–1724.
    1. Kamien M. A rational management of tennis elbow. Sports Med. 1990;9:173–191. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199009030-00005.
    1. Muehlberger T, Buschmann A, Ottomann C, Toman N. Aetiology and treatment of a previously denervated “tennis” elbow. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43:50–53. doi: 10.1080/02844310802489830.
    1. Lebrun C. In: Evidence-based Orthopaedics: the Best Answers to Clinical Questions. Wright JG, editor. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. What are the best diagnostic criteria for lateral epicondylitis? pp. 148–157.
    1. Palmer K, Walker-Bone K, Linaker C, Reading I, Kellingray S, Coggon D, Cooper C. The Southampton examination schedule for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59:5–11. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.1.5.
    1. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Cervini C. Sonographic imaging of tendons. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:969–976. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<969::AID-ANR2>;2-4.
    1. Gibbon WW. Musculoskeletal ultrasound. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1996;10:561–588. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3579(96)80052-5.
    1. Bianchi S, Martinoli C. Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. pp. 605–614.
    1. Robinson P. Sonography of common tendon injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:607–618. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2808.
    1. Hamper UM, Dejong MR, Caskey CI, Sheth S. Power doppler imaging: clinical experience and correlation with color doppler US and other imaging modalities. Radiographics. 1997;17:499–513. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.17.2.9084086.
    1. De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke W, Bellmann-Weiler R, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:180–185. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2020.
    1. Khoury V, Cardinal E. “Tenomalacia”: a new sonographic sign of tendinopathy? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:144–146. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1112-9.
    1. Noh KH, Moon YL, Jacir AM, Kim KH, Gorthi V. Sonographic probe- induced tenderness for lateral epicondylitis: an accurate technique to confirm the location of the lesion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:836–839. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-1037-0.
    1. Coleman K, Norris S, Weston A, Grimmer-Somers K, Hillier S, Merlin T, Middleton P, Tooher R, Salisbury J. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines STAGE 2 CONSULTATION Early 2008-end June 2009, viewed 26 March 2011, .
    1. Fontela PS, Pant Pai N, Schiller I, Dendukuri N, Ramsay A, Pai M. Quality and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in TB, HIV and malaria: evaluation using QUADAS and STARD standards. PloS One. 2009;4:e7753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007753.
    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25.
    1. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Croat Med J. 2003;44:635–638.
    1. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-31.
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–1558. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186.
    1. Struijs PA, Spruyt M, Assendelft WJ, van Dijk CN. The predictive value of diagnostic sonography for the effectiveness of conservative treatment of tennis elbow. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1113–1118. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.0656.
    1. Obradov M, Anderson PG. Ultrasonographic findings for chronic lateral epicondylitis. JBR-BTR. 2012;95:66–70.
    1. Toprak U, Baskan B, Ustuner E, Oten E, Altin L, Karademir MA, Bodur H. Common extensor tendon thickness measurements at the radiocapitellar region in diagnosis of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18:566–570.
    1. Lee MH, Cha JG, Jin W, Kim BS, Park JS, Lee HK, Hong HS. Utility of sonographic measurement of the common tensor tendon in patients with lateral epicondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1363–1367. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5769.
    1. Zeisig E, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Extensor origin vascularity related to pain in patients with tennis elbow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:659–663. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0060-7.
    1. Connell D, Burke F, Coombes P, Mcnealy S, Freeman D, Pryde D, Hoy G. Sonographic examination of lateral epicondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:777–782. doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760777.
    1. du Toit C, Stieler M, Saunders R, Bisset L, Vicenzino B. Diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasound in patients with chronic tennis elbow. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:872–876.
    1. Levin D, Nazarian LN, Miller TT, O’kane PL, Feld RI, Parker L, Mcshane JM. Lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: US findings. Radiology. 2005;237:230–234. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2371040784.
    1. Lin J, Fessell D, Jacobson J, Weadock W, Hayes C. An illustrated tutorial of musculoskeletal ultrasonography: part 1, introduction and general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:637–645. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750637.
    1. Miller TT, Shapiro MA, Schultz E, Kalish PE. Comparison of sonography and MRI for diagnosing epicondylitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:193–202. doi: 10.1002/jcu.10063.
    1. Zeisig E, Fahlstrom M, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. A two-year sonographic follow-up after intratendinous injection therapy in patients with tennis elbow. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:584–587. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.049874.
    1. Tarhan S, Unlu S, Ovali Z, Pabuscu Y. Value of ultrasonography on diagnosis and assessment of pain and grip strength in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Turk J Rheumatol. 2009;24:123–130.
    1. Maffulli N, Khan KM, Puddu G. Overuse tendon conditions: time to change a confusing terminology. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:840–843. doi: 10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70021-0.
    1. Chard MD, Cawston TE, Riley GP, Gresham GA, Hazleman BL. Rotator cuff degeneration and lateral epicondylitis: a comparative histological study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1994;53:30–34. doi: 10.1136/ard.53.1.30.
    1. Yuill EA, Lum G. Lateral epicondylosis and calcific tendonitis in a golfer: a case report and literature review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011;55:325–332.
    1. Bales CP, Placzek JD, Malone KJ, Vaupel Z, Arnoczky SP. Microvascular supply of the lateral epicondyle and common extensor origin. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:497–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.08.006.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅