Six-month follow-up of a booster dose of CoronaVac in two single-centre phase 2 clinical trials

Qianqian Xin, Qianhui Wu, Xinhua Chen, Bihua Han, Kai Chu, Yan Song, Hui Jin, Panpan Chen, Wanying Lu, Tuantuan Yang, Minjie Li, Yuliang Zhao, Hongxing Pan, Hongjie Yu, Lin Wang, Qianqian Xin, Qianhui Wu, Xinhua Chen, Bihua Han, Kai Chu, Yan Song, Hui Jin, Panpan Chen, Wanying Lu, Tuantuan Yang, Minjie Li, Yuliang Zhao, Hongxing Pan, Hongjie Yu, Lin Wang

Abstract

Determining the duration of immunity induced by booster doses of CoronaVac is crucial for informing recommendations for booster regimens and adjusting immunization strategies. In two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials, immunogenicity and safety of four immunization regimens are assessed in adults aged 18 to 59 years and one immunization regimen in adults aged 60 years and older, respectively. Serious adverse events occurring within 6 months after booster doses are recorded as pre-specified secondary endpoints, geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralising antibodies one year after the 3-dose schedule immunization and 6 months after the booster doses are assessed as pre-specified exploratory endpoints, GMT fold-decreases in neutralization titres are assessed as post-hoc analyses. Neutralising antibody titres decline approximately 4-fold and 2.5-fold from day 28 to day 180 after third doses in adults aged 18-59 years of age and in adults aged 60 years and older, respectively. No safety concerns are identified during the follow-up period. There are increases in the magnitude and duration of humoral response with homologous booster doses of CoronaVac given 8 months after a primary two-dose immunization series, which could prolong protection and contribute to building our wall of population immunity. Trial number: NCT04352608 and NCT04383574.

Conflict of interest statement

H.Y. has received research funding from Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, Yichang HEC Changjiang Pharmaceutical Company, and Shanghai Roche Pharmaceutical Company. None of those research funding is related to the development of COVID-19 vaccines. Q.X. and T.Y. were the employees of Sinovac Biotech Ltd., L.W. was an employee of Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Neutralising antibody levels to ancestral…
Fig. 1. Neutralising antibody levels to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 in cohort 2b-28d-8m (adults aged 18–59 years old).
The number of participants for each group (placebo group, pink; 3 μg group, green; 6 μg group, blue) at each visit included in the analysis is provided below the bars. Dots are reciprocal neutralising antibody titres for individuals in the per-protocol population. Numbers above the bars are geometric mean titres (GMTs), and error bars indicate 95% CIs. GMTs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated on the basis of standard normal distributions of log-transformed antibody titres. Numbers above the short horizontal lines are p values for comparisons between 3 μg group and 6 μg group using group t tests with log-transformation (two-sided). Titres lower than the limit of detection (1:4) are presented as half the limit of detection. The dotted horizontal line represents the protective threshold (1:33).
Fig. 2. Neutralising antibody levels to ancestral…
Fig. 2. Neutralising antibody levels to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 in cohort 3-28d-8m (adults aged 60 years and older).
The number of participants for each group (placebo group, pink; 1.5 μg group, yellow; 3 μg group, green; 6 μg group, blue) at each visit included in the analysis is provided below the bars. Dots are reciprocal neutralising antibody titres for individuals in the per-protocol population. Numbers above the bars are geometric mean titres (GMTs), and error bars indicate 95% CIs. GMTs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated on the basis of standard normal distributions of log-transformed antibody titres. Numbers above the short horizontal lines are p values for comparisons between the 1.5 μg group, the 3 μg group and the 6 μg group using ANOVA models with log-transformation. Bonferroni correction done as a post hoc test if the variance was significant. Only P values indicating significant differences are marked. Titres lower than the limit of detection (1:4) are presented as half the limit of detection. The dotted horizontal line represents the protective threshold (1:33).
Fig. 3. Decline in neutralising antibodies to…
Fig. 3. Decline in neutralising antibodies to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 in 3 μg groups in cohort 2b-28d-8m and cohort 3-28d-8m.
The number of participants with paired samples for adults aged 18–59 (green) and adults aged 60 and over (blue) was 49 and 29, respectively. Numbers above the bars are geometric mean titres (GMTs), and error bars indicate the 95% CIs. The dotted horizontal line represents the protective threshold (1:33). Numbers above the short horizontal lines are pairwise fold-change values. GMTs and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated on the basis of standard normal distributions of log-transformed antibody titres. GMT fold decreases in neutralisation titre were calculated as ratios of paired sera at two visits. Comparisons between groups were conducted by group t tests with log-transformation (two-sided). P values of pairwise comparisons were P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0187, from left to right, respectively.

References

    1. Levin, E. G. et al. Waning immune humoral response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine over 6 months. N. Engl. J. Med.385, e84 (2021).
    1. Chemaitelly, H. et al. Waning of BNT162b2 vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in Qatar. N. Engl. J. Med.385, e83 (2021).
    1. Cohn, B. A., Cirillo, P. M., Murphy, C. C., Krigbaum, N. Y. & Wallace, A. W. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protection and deaths among US veterans during 2021. Science375, 331–336 (2021).
    1. Falsey AR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralization with BNT162b2 vaccine dose 3. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:1627–1629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2113468.
    1. Flaxman, A. et al. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity after a late second dose or a third dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in the UK: a substudy of two randomised controlled trials (COV001 and COV002). Lancet398 981–990 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01699-8 (2021).
    1. World Health Organization. Highlights from the Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization. (2021).
    1. Barda N, et al. Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study. Lancet. 2021;398:2093–100.. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2.
    1. Bar-On, Y. M. et al. Protection of BNT162b2 vaccine booster against Covid-19 in Israel. N. Engl. J. Med.385, 1393–1400 (2021).
    1. Cromer, D. et al. Neutralising antibody titres as predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the impact of boosting: a meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe3, e52–e61 (2021).
    1. Khoury DS, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Med. 2021;27:1205–11.. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8.
    1. Zeng, G. et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose of CoronaVac, and immune persistence of a two-dose schedule, in healthy adults: interim results from two single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trials. Lancet Infect. Dis.22, 483–495 (2021).
    1. Zhang Y, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021;21:181–92.. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4.
    1. Wu, Z. et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet Infect. Dis21, 803–812 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30987-7 (2021).
    1. Ciabattini A, et al. Vaccination in the elderly: the challenge of immune changes with aging. Semin Immunol. 2018;40:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2018.10.010.
    1. Pegu, A. et al. Durability of mRNA-1273 vaccine–induced antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science373, 1372–1377 (2021).
    1. Lau EHY, et al. Neutralizing antibody titres in SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:63. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20247-4.
    1. Chen, X. et al. Neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants induced by natural infection or vaccination: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis,74, 734–742 10.1093/cid/ciab646 (2022).
    1. Cao, Y. et al. Humoral immunogenicity and reactogenicity of CoronaVac or ZF2001 booster after two doses of inactivated vaccine. Cell Res. 32, 107–109 (2021).
    1. Pfizer and BioNTech provide update on omicron variant. (2021).
    1. Cele, S. et al. Omicron extensively but incompletely escapes Pfizer BNT162b2 neutralization. Nature602, 654–656 10.1038/s41586-021-04387-1 (2022).
    1. Krause, P. R. et al. Considerations in boosting COVID-19 vaccine immune responses. Lancet398, 1377–1380 (2021).
    1. Andrews, N. et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of concern. N Engl J Med. 386, 1532–1546 10.1056/NEJMoa2119451 (2022).
    1. Chiu NC, et al. To mix or not to mix? A rapid systematic review of heterologous prime-boost covid-19 vaccination. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2021;20:1211–1220. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1971522.
    1. Reynolds, C. J. et al. Heterologous infection and vaccination shapes immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science375, eabm0811 (2021).
    1. Li, J et al. Heterologous AD5-nCOV plus CoronaVac versus homologous CoronaVac vaccination: a randomized phase 4 trial. Nat Med. 28, 401–409 10.1038/s41591-021-01677-z (2022).
    1. Payne RP, et al. Immunogenicity of standard and extended dosing intervals of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Cell. 2021;184:5699–714 e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.011.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅