Development and testing of a measure designed to assess the quality of care transitions

Eric A Coleman, Jodi D Smith, Janet C Frank, Theresa B Eilertsen, Jill N Thiare, Andrew M Kramer, Eric A Coleman, Jodi D Smith, Janet C Frank, Theresa B Eilertsen, Jill N Thiare, Andrew M Kramer

Abstract

Background: To improve the quality of care delivered to older persons receiving care across multiple settings, interventions are needed. However, the absence of a patient-centred measure specifically designed to assess this care has constrained innovation.

Objective: To develop a rigorously designed and tested measure, the Care Transition Measure (CTM).

Setting: A large, integrated managed care organisation in Colorado with approximately 55,000 members over the age of 65 years.

Participants: Patients 65 years and older who were recently discharged from hospital and received subsequent skilled nursing care in a facility or in the home.

Methods: Six focus groups of older persons and their caregivers (n=49) were established. Standard qualitative analytic techniques were applied to written transcripts and four key domains were identified: (1) information transfer; (2) patient and caregiver preparation; (3) self-management support; and (4) empowerment to assert preferences. Specific CTM items were developed, pilot tested, and refined. Psychometric testing, conducted in a different population but selected using the same entry criteria (n=60), included content and construct validity, intra-item variation, and floor/ceiling properties.

Results: Older patients and clinicians found the measure to be highly relevant and comprehensive (i.e. content validity). Construct validity was assessed by comparing items from the CTM to selected items from a measure developed by Hendriks and colleagues (Medical Care 2001; 39(3): 270-283). Inter-item Spearman correlations ranged 0.388-0.594. No significant floor or ceiling effects were detected.

Conclusions: The CTM was developed with substantial input from older patients and their caregivers. Psychometric testing suggested that the measure was valid. The CTM may serve to fill an important gap in health system performance evaluation by measuring the quality of care delivered across settings.

References

    1. Coleman E, Besdine R. Integrating quality assurance across sites of geriatric care. In: Calkins E, Wagner EH, Boult C, Pacala JT, editors. New ways to care for older people. New York: Springer; 1999. pp. 185–95.
    1. Boult C, Pacala J. Integrating care. In: Calkins E, Boult C, Wagner E, Pacala J, editors. New ways to care for older people: building systems based on evidence. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1999. pp. 196–209.
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system of the 21st century. Committee on quality of health care in America, editor. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
    1. Agency for Health Care Quality Research. Medical errors: the scope of the problem. Rockville: MD; 2000. pp. 1–4.
    1. Corrigan J, Martin J. Identification of factors associated with hospital readmission and development of a predictive model. Health Services Research. 1992;27(1):81–101.
    1. Weissman JS, Ayanian JZ, Chasan-Taber S, Sherwood MJ, Roth C, Epstein AM. Hospital readmissions and quality of care. Medical Care. 1999;37(5):490–501.
    1. Roblin D, Juhn P, Preston B, Della Penna R, Feitelberg S, Khoury A, et al. A low-cost approach to prospective identification of impending high cost outcomes. Medical Care. 1999;37(11):1155–63.
    1. Flocke S. Measuring attributes of primary care: development of a new instrument. Journal of Family Practice. 1998;45(1):64–74.
    1. Safran D, Kosinski M, Tarlov A, Rogers W, Taira D, Lieberman N, et al. The primary care assessment survey. Medical Care. 1998;36(5):728–39.
    1. Steinwachs D. Measuring provider continuity in ambulatory care. Medical Care. 1979;17(6):551–565.
    1. Eriksson E, Mattsson L. Quantitative measurement of continuity of care. Measures in use and an alternative approach. Medical Care. 1983;21(9):858–75.
    1. Godkin M. A measure of continuity of care for physicians in practice. Family Medicine. 1984;16(4):136–140.
    1. Zinn J, Lavizzo-Mourey R, Taylor L. Measuring satisfaction with care in the nursing home setting: the nursing home resident satisfaction scale. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 1999;12(4):452–65.
    1. Heinemann A, Bode R, Cichowski K, Kan E. Measuring patient satisfaction with medical rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measures. 1997;1(4):52–65.
    1. Breslau N, Mortimer E. Seeing the same doctor: determinants of satisfaction with specialty care for disabled children. Medical Care. 1981;19(7):741–3.
    1. Cleary P, McNeil B. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988;25(1):25–36.
    1. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL, editors. Through the patient's eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
    1. National Chronic Care Consortium. Self-assessment for system integration tool. SASI. 1998.
    1. Morgan DL, Krueger RA, editors. The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
    1. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users guide to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care. Are the results of the study valid? Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284(3):357–62.
    1. Hendriks AAJ, Vrielink MR, Smets EMA, van Es SQ, De Haes JCJM. Improving the assessment of (in) patients' satisfaction with hospital care. Medical Care. 2001;39:270–83.
    1. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1975;23:433–41.
    1. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1987.
    1. McDowell I, Newell C. The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurement. In: McDowell I, Newell C, editors. Measuring Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. pp. 10–46.
    1. Levine C. Rough crossings: family caregivers odysseys through the health care system. New York: United Hospital Fund of New York; 1998. pp. 1–31.
    1. Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams VSL, Lubalin JS, Harris-Kohetin LD, Sweeny SF, et al. Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Medical Care. 1999;37(3 suppl):MS 22–MS 31.
    1. Marcantonio ER, Simon SE, Bergmann MA. Delirium and partial delirium affect nearly two-thirds of admissions to post-acute facilities (Abstract P84) Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2001;49(4):S41.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅