Walking and Daily Affect Among Sedentary Older Adults Measured Using the StepMATE App: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Alycia N Bisson, Victoria Sorrentino, Margie E Lachman, Alycia N Bisson, Victoria Sorrentino, Margie E Lachman

Abstract

Background: Although fitness technology can track and encourage increases in physical activity, few smartphone apps are based on behavior change theories. Apps that do include behavioral components tend to be costly and often do not include strategies to help those who are unsure of how to increase their physical activity.

Objective: The aim of this pilot study is to test the efficacy of a new app, StepMATE, for increasing daily walking in a sample of inactive adults and to examine daily relationships between walking and self-reported mood and energy.

Methods: The participants were middle-aged and older adults aged ≥50 years (mean 61.64, SD 7.67 years). They were randomly assigned to receive either a basic, pedometer-like version of the app or a version with supports to help them determine where, when, and with whom to walk. Of the 96 participants randomized to 1 of 2 conditions, 87 (91%) completed pretest assessments and 81 (84%) successfully downloaded the app. Upon downloading the app, step data from the week prior were automatically recorded. The participants in both groups were asked to set a daily walking goal, which they could change at any point during the intervention. They were asked to use the app as much as possible over the next 4 weeks. Twice per day, pop-up notifications assessed mood and energy levels.

Results: Although one group had access to additional app features, both groups used the app in a similar way, mainly using just the walk-tracking feature. Multilevel models revealed that both groups took significantly more steps during the 4-week study than during the week before downloading the app (γ=0.24; P<.001). During the study, the participants in both groups averaged 5248 steps per day compared with an average of 3753 steps per day during the baseline week. Contrary to predictions, there were no differences in step increases between the two conditions. Cognition significantly improved from pre- to posttest (γ=0.17; P=.02). Across conditions, on days in which the participants took more steps than average, they reported better mood and higher energy levels on the same day and better mood on the subsequent day. Daily associations among walking, mood, and energy were significant for women but not for men and were stronger for older participants (those aged ≥62 years) than for the younger participants.

Conclusions: Both groups increased their steps to a similar extent, suggesting that setting and monitoring daily walking goals was sufficient for an initial increase and maintenance of steps. Across conditions, walking had benefits for positive mood and energy levels, particularly for women and older participants. Further investigations should identify other motivating factors that could lead to greater and more sustained increases in physical activity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03124537; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03124537.

Keywords: aging; behavioral science; fitness technology; intervention; mobile phone; physical activity.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Alycia N Bisson, Victoria Sorrentino, Margie E Lachman. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 01.12.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshots of the StepMATE app. (A) The home screen for the control group. (B) The home screen for the treatment group members, who had access to the additional features shown in the screenshots on the right.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Weekly step averages by condition. The error bars refer to SE of the mean. There was a significant positive main effect of week; however, time×condition interactions were not significant.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Within-person relationships between daily steps and mood by sex. A score of 0 denotes within-person average daily steps. Shaded areas represent 95% CIs.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Within-person relationships between daily steps and mood by age group. A score of 0 denotes within-person average daily steps. Shaded areas represent 95% CIs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Within-person relationships between daily steps and energy by sex. A score of 0 denotes within-person average daily steps. Shaded areas represent 95% CIs.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Within-person relationships between daily steps and energy by age. A score of 0 denotes within-person average daily steps. Shaded areas represent 95% CIs.

References

    1. Rhodes RE, Janssen I, Bredin SS, Warburton DE, Bauman A. Physical activity: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health. 2017 Aug;32(8):942–75. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1325486.
    1. Ward B, Clarke T, Nugent C, Schiller J. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. 2016. [2021-10-17]. .
    1. Hillman CH, Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Be smart, exercise your heart: exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jan;9(1):58–65. doi: 10.1038/nrn2298.nrn2298
    1. Clarke T, Norris T, Schiller J. Early release of selected estimates based on data from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. 2017. [2021-10-17]. .
    1. Ringeval M, Wagner G, Denford J, Paré G, Kitsiou S. Fitbit-based interventions for healthy lifestyle outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e23954. doi: 10.2196/23954. v22i10e23954
    1. McGarrigle L, Todd C. Promotion of physical activity in older people using mHealth and eHealth technologies: Rapid review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 29;22(12):e22201. doi: 10.2196/22201. v22i12e22201
    1. Sullivan AN, Lachman ME. Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: a review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Front Public Health. 2017 Jan 11;4:289. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00289. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00289.
    1. D'Addario M, Baretta D, Zanatta F, Greco A, Steca P. Engagement features in physical activity smartphone apps: focus group study with sedentary people. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 16;8(11):e20460. doi: 10.2196/20460. v8i11e20460
    1. Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol. 1999;54(7):493–503. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493.
    1. Gollwitzer P, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;38:69–119. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2601(06)38002-1.
    1. Bélanger-Gravel A, Godin G, Amireault S. A meta-analytic review of the effect of implementation intentions on physical activity. Health Psychol Rev. 2013 Mar;7(1):23–54. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2011.560095.
    1. Carraro N, Gaudreau P. Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: a meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013 Mar;14(2):228–48. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.004.
    1. Robinson SA, Bisson AN, Hughes ML, Ebert J, Lachman ME. Time for change: using implementation intentions to promote physical activity in a randomised pilot trial. Psychol Health. 2019 Feb;34(2):232–54. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1539487.
    1. Basso JC, Suzuki WA. The effects of acute exercise on mood, cognition, neurophysiology, and neurochemical pathways: a review. Brain Plast. 2017 Mar 28;2(2):127–52. doi: 10.3233/BPL-160040. BPL160040
    1. Hogan CL, Mata J, Carstensen LL. Exercise holds immediate benefits for affect and cognition in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging. 2013 Jun;28(2):587–94. doi: 10.1037/a0032634. 2013-21685-007
    1. Ensari I, Sandroff BM, Motl RW. Effects of single bouts of walking exercise and yoga on acute mood symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2016;18(1):1–8. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2014-104.
    1. Parschau L, Fleig L, Warner LM, Pomp S, Barz M, Knoll N, Schwarzer R, Lippke S. Positive exercise experience facilitates behavior change via self-efficacy. Health Educ Behav. 2014 Aug;41(4):414–22. doi: 10.1177/1090198114529132.1090198114529132
    1. Lathia N, Sandstrom GM, Mascolo C, Rentfrow PJ. Happier people live more active lives: using smartphones to link happiness and physical activity. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 4;12(1):e0160589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160589. PONE-D-15-41895
    1. Liao Y, Shonkoff ET, Dunton GF. The acute relationships between affect, physical feeling states, and physical activity in daily life: a review of current evidence. Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 23;6:1975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01975.
    1. McDowell CP, Campbell MJ, Herring MP. Sex-related differences in mood responses to acute aerobic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1798–802. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000969.
    1. Kredlow MA, Capozzoli MC, Hearon BA, Calkins AW, Otto MW. The effects of physical activity on sleep: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med. 2015 Jun;38(3):427–49. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9617-6.
    1. Sullivan Bisson AN, Robinson SA, Lachman ME. Walk to a better night of sleep: testing the relationship between physical activity and sleep. Sleep Health. 2019 Oct;5(5):487–94. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.06.003. S2352-7218(19)30105-6
    1. Kishida M, Elavsky S. An intensive longitudinal examination of daily physical activity and sleep in midlife women. Sleep Health. 2016 Mar;2(1):42–8. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2015.12.001.S2352-7218(15)00189-8
    1. Master L, Nye RT, Lee S, Nahmod NG, Mariani S, Hale L, Buxton OM. Bidirectional, daily temporal associations between sleep and physical activity in adolescents. Sci Rep. 2019 May 22;9(1):7732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44059-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44059-9.10.1038/s41598-019-44059-9
    1. Hartescu I, Morgan K, Stevinson CD. Increased physical activity improves sleep and mood outcomes in inactive people with insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. J Sleep Res. 2015 Oct;24(5):526–34. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12297. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12297.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. [2021-10-17].
    1. Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1975 Oct;23(10):433–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1975.tb00927.x.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175–91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
    1. Lubben J. Assessing social networks among elderly populations. Fam Community Health. 1988 Nov;11(3):42–52. doi: 10.1097/00003727-198811000-00008. doi: 10.1097/00003727-198811000-00008.
    1. Neupert SD, Lachman ME, Whitbourne SB. Exercise self-efficacy and control beliefs: effects on exercise behavior after an exercise intervention for older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2009 Jan;17(1):1–16. doi: 10.1123/japa.17.1.1.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Worth Publishers; 1997.
    1. Lachman ME, Agrigoroaei S, Tun PA, Weaver SL. Monitoring cognitive functioning: psychometric properties of the brief test of adult cognition by telephone. Assessment. 2014 Aug;21(4):404–17. doi: 10.1177/1073191113508807. 1073191113508807
    1. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.0165-1781(89)90047-4
    1. Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, Bell RC, Croteau KA, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Ewald B, Gardner AW, Hatano Y, Lutes LD, Matsudo SM, Ramirez-Marrero FA, Rogers LQ, Rowe DA, Schmidt MD, Tully MA, Blair SN. How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Jul 28;8:80. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-80. 1479-5868-8-80
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–83.
    1. RSTUDIO CONNECT 2021.09. RStudio. [2021-10-17]. .
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Ime4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
    1. Sng E, Frith E, Loprinzi PD. Temporal effects of acute walking exercise on learning and memory function. Am J Health Promot. 2018 Sep;32(7):1518–25. doi: 10.1177/0890117117749476.
    1. Schmidt-Kassow M, Zink N, Mock J, Thiel C, Vogt L, Abel C, Kaiser J. Treadmill walking during vocabulary encoding improves verbal long-term memory. Behav Brain Funct. 2014 Jul 12;10:24. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-24. 1744-9081-10-24
    1. Kilpatrick MW, Greeley SJ, Collins LH. The impact of continuous and interval cycle exercise on affect and enjoyment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2015;86(3):244–51. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2015.1015673.
    1. Pennebaker JW. The Psychology of Physical Symptoms. New York: Springer; 1982.
    1. Lachman M, Lipsitz L, Lubben J, Castaneda-Sceppa C, Jette A. When adults don't exercise: behavioral strategies to increase physical activity in sedentary middle-aged and older adults. Innov Aging. 2018 Jan;2(1):igy007. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igy007. igy007
    1. Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Center. 2021. [2021-10-17].
    1. Demographics of mobile device ownership and adoption in the United States. Renalis. 2019. [2021-10-17]. .
    1. Bort-Roig J, Gilson ND, Puig-Ribera A, Contreras RS, Trost SG. Measuring and influencing physical activity with smartphone technology: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2014 May;44(5):671–86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0142-5.
    1. Wu W, Dasgupta S, Ramirez EE, Peterson C, Norman GJ. Classification accuracies of physical activities using smartphone motion sensors. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Oct 05;14(5):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2208. v14i5e130
    1. Amagasa S, Kamada M, Sasai H, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H, Lee I, Inoue S. How well iPhones measure steps in free-living conditions: cross-sectional validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 09;7(1):e10418. doi: 10.2196/10418. v7i1e10418
    1. Nugent NR, Pendse SR, Schatten HT, Armey MF. Innovations in technology and mechanisms of change in behavioral interventions. Behav Modif. 2019 Apr 29;:145445519845603. doi: 10.1177/0145445519845603. (forthcoming)

Source: PubMed

3
订阅