Assessing cancer patients' quality of life and supportive care needs: Translation-revalidation of the CARES in Flemish and exhaustive evaluation of concurrent validity

Bojoura Schouten, Elke Van Hoof, Patrick Vankrunkelsven, Ward Schrooten, Paul Bulens, Frank Buntinx, Jeroen Mebis, Dominique Vandijck, Irina Cleemput, Johan Hellings, Bojoura Schouten, Elke Van Hoof, Patrick Vankrunkelsven, Ward Schrooten, Paul Bulens, Frank Buntinx, Jeroen Mebis, Dominique Vandijck, Irina Cleemput, Johan Hellings

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of cancer increases every year, leading to a growing population of patients and survivors in need for care. To achieve good quality care, a patient-centered approach is essential. Correct and timely detection of needs throughout the different stages of the care trajectory is crucial and can be supported by the use of screening and assessment in a stepped-care approach. The Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) is a valuable and comprehensive quality of life and needs assessment instrument. For use in Flemish research and clinical practice, the CARES tool was translated for the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium (Flanders) from its original English format. This protocol paper describes the translation and revalidation of this Flemish CARES version.

Methods: After forward-backward translation of the CARES into Flemish we aim to recruit 150 adult cancer patients with a primary cancer diagnosis (stage I, II or III) for validation. In this study with a combination of qualitative and a quantitative approach, qualitative data will be collected through focus groups and supplemented by two phases of quantitative data collection: i) an initial patient survey containing questions on socio-demographic and medical data, the CARES and seven concurrent instruments; and ii) a second survey administered after 1 week containing the CARES and supplementary questions to explore their impressions on the content and the feasibility of the CARES.

Discussion: With this extensive data collection process, psychometric validity of the Flemish CARES can be tested thoroughly using classical test theory. Internal consistency of summary scales, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, concurrent validity and feasibility of the instrument will be examined. If the Flemish CARES version is found reliable, valid and feasible, it will be used in future research and clinical practice. Comprehensive assessment with the CARES in a stepped-care approach can facilitate timely identification of cancer patients' psychosocial concerns and care needs so it can contribute to efficient provision of patient-centered quality care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02282696 (July 16, 2014).

Keywords: Cancer; Distress; Needs assessment; Psychosocial; Quality of life; Supportive care; Validation.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study procedure

References

    1. Allen JD, Savadatti S, Levy AG. The transition from breast cancer 'patient' to 'survivor'. Psychooncology. 2009;18(1):71–8. doi: 10.1002/pon.1380.
    1. Armes J, Crowe M, Colbourne L, Morgan H, Murrells T, Oakley C, Palmer N, Ream E, Young A, Richardson A. Patients' supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6172–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.5151.
    1. Boyes AW, Girgis A, D'Este C, Zucca AC. Prevalence and correlates of cancer survivors' supportive care needs 6 months after diagnosis: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-150.
    1. Parry C, Lomax JB, Morningstar EA, Fairclough DL. Identification and correlates of unmet service needs in adult leukemia and lymphoma survivors after treatment. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(5):e135–41. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000464.
    1. Knobf MT, Ferrucci LM, Cartmel B, Jones BA, Stevens D, Smith M, Salner A, Mowad L. Needs assessment of cancer survivors in Connecticut. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(1):1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0198-2.
    1. Brix C, Schleussner C, Fuller J, Roehrig B, Wendt TG, Strauss B. The need for psychosocial support and its determinants in a sample of patients undergoing radiooncological treatment of cancer. J Psychosom Res. 2008;65(6):541–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.05.010.
    1. Browne S, Dowie A, Mitchell L, Wyke S, Ziebland S, Campbell N, Macleod U. Patients' needs following colorectal cancer diagnosis: where does primary care fit in? Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(592):e692–9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X606582.
    1. Mikkelsen T, Sondergaard J, Jensen AB, Olesen F. Cancer rehabilitation: Psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):216–21. doi: 10.1080/02813430802295610.
    1. Carlson LE, Bultz BD. Cancer distress screening. Needs, models, and methods. J Psychosom Res. 2003;55(5):403–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00514-2.
    1. Carlson LE, Groff SL, Maciejewski O, Bultz BD. Screening for Distress in Lung and Breast Cancer Outpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(33):4884–91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3698.
    1. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001;10(1):19–28. doi: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::AID-PON501>;2-6.
    1. Maurer J, Schafer C, Maurer O, Kolbl O. Anxiety and depression in cancer patients during the course of radiotherapy treatment. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012;188(10):940–5. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0143-y.
    1. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC. Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005;103(7):1494–502. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20940.
    1. Io M. Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008.
    1. Braeken AP, Kempen GI, Eekers DB, Houben RM, van Gils FC, Ambergen T, Lechner L. Psychosocial screening effects on health-related outcomes in patients receiving radiotherapy. A cluster randomised controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2013;22(12):2736–46. doi: 10.1002/pon.3340.
    1. Mitchell AJ. Screening for cancer-related distress: when is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful? Acta Oncol. 2013;52(2):216–24. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.745949.
    1. Zabora JR, Macmurray L. The history of psychosocial screening among cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012;30(6):625–35. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2012.721491.
    1. Bauwens S, Baillon C, Distelmans W, Theuns P. Systematic screening for distress in oncology practice using the Distress Barometer: the impact on referrals to psychosocial care. Psychooncology. 2014;23(7):8004–844. doi: 10.1002/pon.3484.
    1. Aaronson NK, Sprangers MA. Measuring quality of life in every oncological patient. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(45):A3749.
    1. Donovan KA, Grassi L, McGinty HL, Jacobsen PB. Validation of the Distress Thermometer worldwide: state of the science. Psychooncology. 2014;23(3):241–50. doi: 10.1002/pon.3430.
    1. Mitchell AJ, Vahabzadeh A, Magruder K. Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research. Psychooncology. 2011;20(6):572–84. doi: 10.1002/pon.1943.
    1. Bidstrup PE, Johansen C, Mitchell AJ. Screening for cancer-related distress: Summary of evidence from tools to programmes. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(2):194–204. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.533192.
    1. Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Boyes A, Bonevski B, Burton L, Cook P. The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer. 2000;88(1):226–37. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<226::AID-CNCR30>;2-P.
    1. Merckaert I, Libert Y, Messin S, Milani M, Slachmuylder JL, Razavi D. Cancer patients' desire for psychological support: prevalence and implications for screening patients' psychological needs. Psychooncology. 2010;19(2):141–9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1568.
    1. Institute of Medicine CoHCiA . Crossing the quality chasm: a New health system for the 21th century. Washington, DC: National Acadamy Press; 2001.
    1. Breitbart W, Bultz BD, Dunn J, Grassi L, Watson M. 2012 President's Plenary International Psycho-Oncology Society: future directions in psycho-oncology. Psychooncology. 2013;22(7):1439–43. doi: 10.1002/pon.3332.
    1. European Union. Council conclusions on reducing the burden of cancer. Luxembourg, 10 June 2008 [].
    1. Wen KY, Gustafson DH. Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-11.
    1. Richardson A, Medina J, Brown V, Sitzia J. Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15(10):1125–44. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0205-8.
    1. Carlson LE, Waller A, Mitchell AJ. Screening for Distress and Unmet Needs in Patients With Cancer: Review and Recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1160–77. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.5509.
    1. Ganz PA, Schag CC, Heinrich RL. The psychosocial impact of cancer on the elderly: a comparison with younger patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33(6):429–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1985.tb07154.x.
    1. Ganz PA, Schag CA, Cheng HL. Assessing the quality of life--a study in newly-diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(1):75–86. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90059-X.
    1. Heinrich RL, Schag CC, Ganz PA. Living with cancer: the Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations. J Clin Psychol. 1984;40(4):972–80. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198407)40:4<972::AID-JCLP2270400417>;2-W.
    1. Schag CA, Heinrich RL, Aadland RL, Ganz PA. Assessing problems of cancer patients: psychometric properties of the cancer inventory of problem situations. Health Psychol. 1990;9(1):83–102. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.9.1.83.
    1. Schag CA, Heinrich RL. Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES) Manual, ed. 1. CARES Consultants: Los Angeles; 1989.
    1. Schag CA, Heinrich RL. Development of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES. Oncology (Williston Park) 1990;4(5):135–8.
    1. Meyerowitz BE, Heinrich RL, Schag CC. A competency- based approach to coping with cancer. In: Bradley L, Burish TG, editors. Coping with Chronic Disease: Research and Applications. New York: Academic; 1983.
    1. Saevarsdottir T, Fridriksdottir N, Gunnarsdottir S. Quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression of patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: longitudinal study. Cancer Nurs. 2010;33(1):E1–10. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181b4adb5.
    1. Parker PA, Alba F, Fellman B, Urbauer DL, Li Y, Karam JA, Tannir N, Jonasch E, Wood CG, Matin SF. Illness uncertainty and quality of life of patients with small renal tumors undergoing watchful waiting: a 2-year prospective study. Eur Urol. 2013;63(6):1122–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.034.
    1. Libert Y, Merckaert I, Slachmuylder JL, Razavi D. The ability of informal primary caregivers to accurately report cancer patients' difficulties. Psychooncology. 2013;22(12):2840–7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3362.
    1. Khan F, Amatya B. Factors associated with long-term functional outcomes, psychological sequelae and quality of life in persons after primary brain tumour. J Neurooncol. 2013;111(3):355–66. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-1024-z.
    1. Zimmermann C, Swami N, Krzyzanowska M, Hannon B, Leighl N, Oza A, Moore M, Rydall A, Rodin G, Tannock I, et al. Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1721–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62416-2.
    1. Rosenberg SM, Tamimi RM, Gelber S, Ruddy KJ, Bober SL, Kereakoglow S, Borges VF, Come SE, Schapira L, Partridge AH. Treatment-related amenorrhea and sexual functioning in young breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2014;120(15):2264–71. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28738.
    1. Borstelmann NA, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Gelber S, Schapira L, Come S, Borges V, Morgan E, Partridge AH. Partner support and anxiety in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. Psychooncology. 2015;24(12):1679–85. doi: 10.1002/pon.3780.
    1. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. The Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations: An instrument for assessing cancer patients' rehabilitation needs. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1983;1(4):11–24.
    1. Deragotis LR. SCL-90-R. Manual-I. Baltimore: MD: John Hopkins University School of Medicine; 1977.
    1. Spanier GB. Measuring dyadic adjustment. New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam. 1976;38:15–28.
    1. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2(3):187–93.
    1. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, editor. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic. Agents. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949.
    1. Gough IR, Furnival CM, Schilder L, Grove W. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983;19(8):1161–5. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(83)90042-1.
    1. te Velde A, Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK. Feasibility, psychometric performance, and stability across modes of administration of the CARES-SF. Ann Oncol. 1996;7(4):381–90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010605.
    1. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(24):3186–91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
    1. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
    1. Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris JN, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984;53(9):2002–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<2002::AID-CNCR2820530933>;2-W.
    1. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, editor. Evaluation ofchemotherapeutic agents. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949. pp. 191–205.
    1. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27(2):363–70. doi: 10.1017/S0033291796004382.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
    1. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3.
    1. van Sonderen E. The measurement of social support with the Social Support List-Interactions (SSL-I) and the Social Support List-Discrepancies (SSL –D). Dutch manual. Groningen, the Netherlands: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken; 1993.
    1. Bridges KR, Sanderman R, van Sonderen E. An English language version of the social support list: preliminary reliability. Psychol Rep. 2002;90(3 Pt 1):1055–8. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3.1055.
    1. van Sonderen E. Het meten van sociale steun met de Sociale Steun Lijst - Interacties (SSL-I) en Sociale Steun Lijst - Discrepanties (SSL-D): een handleiding. Tweede herziene druk. Groningen, The Netherlands: UMCG/Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Research Institute SHARE; 2012.
    1. Arrindell WA, Boelens W, Lambert H. On the psychometric properties of the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ): Evaluation of self-ratings in distressed and ‘normal’ volunteer couples based on the Dutch version. Pers Individ Dif. 1983;4(3):293–306. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(83)90151-4.
    1. Arrindell WA, Schaap C. The Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ): an extension of its construct validity. Br J Psychiatry. 1985;147:295–9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.147.3.295.
    1. Orathinkal J, Vansteenwegen A, Enright RD, Stroobants R. Further validation of the Dutch version of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory. Community Ment Health J. 2007;43(2):109–28. doi: 10.1007/s10597-006-9065-4.
    1. Joseph O, Alfons V, Rob S. Further validation of the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire (MMQ) Psychol Health Med. 2007;12(3):346–52. doi: 10.1080/13548500600855481.
    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
    1. Tuinman MA, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Hoekstra-Weebers JE. Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer. 2008;113(4):870–8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23622.
    1. Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, Dabrowski M, Dudley MM, Fleishman S, Foley GV, Fulcher C, Greenberg DB, Greiner CB, et al. Distress management. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007;5(1):66–98.
    1. Bauwens S, Baillon C, Distelmans W, Theuns P. The 'Distress Barometer': validation of method of combining the Distress Thermometer with a rated complaint scale. Psychooncology. 2009;18(5):534–42. doi: 10.1002/pon.1425.
    1. Pauwels EE, Charlier C, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Lechner L, Van Hoof E. Care needs after primary breast cancer treatment. Survivors' associated sociodemographic and medical characteristics. Psychooncology. 2013;22(1):125–32. doi: 10.1002/pon.2069.
    1. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
    1. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(4):349–62. doi: 10.1023/A:1023499322593.
    1. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3.
    1. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research. 4. US: WB. Saunders Philadelphia; 2001.
    1. Boyes A, Girgis A, Lecathelinais C. Brief assessment of adult cancer patients' perceived needs: development and validation of the 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):602–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01057.x.
    1. Bonevski B, Sanson-Fisher R, Girgis A, Burton L, Cook P, Boyes A. Evaluation of an instrument to assess the needs of patients with cancer. Supportive Care Review Group. Cancer. 2000;88(1):217–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<217::AID-CNCR29>;2-Y.
    1. Hulbert-Williams NJ, Hulbert-Williams L, Morrison V, Neal RD, Wilkinson C. The mini-mental adjustment to cancer scale: re-analysis of its psychometric properties in a sample of 160 mixed cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2012;21(7):792–7. doi: 10.1002/pon.1994.
    1. Lowery AE, Greenberg MA, Foster SL, Clark K, Casden DR, Loscalzo M, Bardwell WA. Validation of a needs-based biopsychosocial distress instrument for cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2012;21(10):1099–106. doi: 10.1002/pon.2008.
    1. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, Sprangers MA, te Velde A, Verrips E. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1055–68. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00097-3.
    1. Braeken AP, Kempen GI, Watson M, Houben RM, Gils FC, Lechner L. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Mental Adjustment to Cancer scale in Dutch cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2010;19(7):742–9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1628.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅