Does an emergency access button increase the patients' satisfaction and feeling of safety with the out-of-hours health services? A randomised controlled trial in Denmark

Jonas Fynboe Ebert, L Huibers, Bo Christensen, Helle Collatz Christensen, Morten Bondo Christensen, Jonas Fynboe Ebert, L Huibers, Bo Christensen, Helle Collatz Christensen, Morten Bondo Christensen

Abstract

Objective: To investigate if the option to bypass the telephone queue can increase satisfaction and feeling of safety in callers.

Design: Randomised controlled parallel superiority trial. Data from questionnaire survey.

Setting: Two out-of-hours (OOH) services in Denmark.

Participants: 217 510 citizens who called the OOH services between 4 September 2017 and 30 November 2017.

Randomisation: Two-faze study period: First half with randomisation of participants based on their date of birth; even date randomised to intervention, uneven date randomised to control group. Second half with all participants included in intervention group.

Intervention: Providing randomised callers (intervention group n=146 355) with the option to bypass the telephone waiting line through an emergency access button (EAB), while the rest got the normal service (control group n=71 155). All EAB users were invited to a questionnaire survey as well as random participants who did not use the EAB (of whom approximately 50% did not have the EAB option).

Main outcome measures: Satisfaction and feeling of safety in callers.

Results: 2208 of 6704 (32.9%) invited callers answered the questionnaire (intervention group n=1415 (users n=621, non-users n=794); control group n=793). The OR for answering in the two categories with highest satisfaction when provided with the EAB option was 1.34 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.68) for satisfaction with the waiting time, 1.21 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.60) for overall satisfaction and 1.46 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.89) for feeling of safety. Approximately 72% (441/621) of EAB users reported that the EAB option increased their feeling of safety with the OOH services 'to a high degree' compared with 25% (197/794) of callers who had the EAB option without using it.

Conclusions: The EAB can provide fast access to OOH telephone advice in case of severe illness. It favours citizens perceived in most need of urgent healthcare and significantly increases both feeling of safety and patient satisfaction.

Trial registration details: NCT02572115 (5 October 2015).

Keywords: health & safety; organisation of health services; primary care; public health.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of participants (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). EAB, emergency access button; GPC, general practitioner cooperative; MH-1813, medicalhelpline 1813; OOH; out-of-hours.

References

    1. Grol R, Giesen P, van Uden C. After-Hours care in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and the Netherlands: new models. Health Aff 2006;25:1733–7. 10.1377/hlthaff.25.6.1733
    1. Huibers L, Giesen P, Wensing M, et al. . Out-Of-Hours care in Western countries: assessment of different organizational models. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:105-6963-9-105. 10.1186/1472-6963-9-105
    1. Christensen MB, Olesen F. Out of hours service in Denmark: evaluation five years after reform. BMJ 1998;316:1502–5. 10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1502
    1. Keizer E, Smits M, Peters Y, et al. . Contacts with out-of-hours primary care for nonurgent problems: patients’ beliefs or deficiencies in healthcare? BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:157-015-0376-9 10.1186/s12875-015-0376-9
    1. Poole R, Gamper A, Porter A, et al. . Exploring patients' self-reported experiences of out-of-hours primary care and their suggestions for improvement: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2011;28:210–9. 10.1093/fampra/cmq090
    1. Moth G, Flarup L, Christensen MB. Kontakt- og sygdomsmønsteret i lægevagten LV-KOS 2011 [Survey on reasons for encounters and disease patterns in OOH primary care LV-KOS 2011. Aarhus: Forskningsenheden for Almen Praksis (Research Unit for General Practice); 2012.
    1. Moth G, Huibers L, Christensen MB, et al. . Out-Of-Hours primary care: a population-based study of the diagnostic scope of telephone contacts. Fam Pract 2016;33:504–9. 10.1093/fampra/cmw048
    1. Zakariassen E, Hansen E, Hunskaar S. Incidence of emergency contacts (red responses) to Norwegian emergency primary healthcare services in 2007 – a prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009;17:30-7241-17-30 10.1186/1757-7241-17-30
    1. Plat FM, Peters YAS, Loots FJ, et al. . Ambulance dispatch versus general practitioner home visit for highly urgent out-of-hours primary care. Fam Pract 2018;35:440–5. 10.1093/fampra/cmx121
    1. Hugenholtz M, Bröer C, van Daalen R. Apprehensive parents: a qualitative study of parents seeking immediate primary care for their children. Br J Gen Pract 2009;59:173–9. 10.3399/bjgp09X394996
    1. Kallestrup P, Bro F. Parents' beliefs and expectations when presenting with a febrile child at an out-of-hours general practice clinic. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53:43–4.
    1. Smits M, Huibers L, Oude Bos A, et al. . Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours GP cooperatives: a longitudinal study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2012;30:206–13. 10.3109/02813432.2012.735553
    1. Kelly M, Egbunike JN, Kinnersley P, et al. . Delays in response and triage times reduce patient satisfaction and enablement after using out-of-hours services. Fam Pract 2010;27:652–63. 10.1093/fampra/cmq057
    1. Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, et al. . Giving callers the option to bypass the telephone waiting line in out-of-hours services: a comparative intervention study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2019:1–8.
    1. Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, et al. . Do callers to out-of-hours care misuse an option to jump the phone queue? Scand J Prim Health Care 2019;37:207–17. 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608067
    1. Carr-Bains S, Nightingale AL, Ballard KD. Patients' experiences and satisfaction with out-of-hours GP home visiting provided by a GP cooperative. Fam Pract 2011;28:88–92. 10.1093/fampra/cmq071
    1. Howard M, Goertzen J, Hutchison B, et al. . Patient satisfaction with care for urgent health problems: a survey of family practice patients. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:419–24. 10.1370/afm.704
    1. Danielsen K, Bjertnaes OA, Garratt A, et al. . The association between demographic factors, user reported experiences and user satisfaction: results from three casualty clinics in Norway. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11:73. 10.1186/1471-2296-11-73
    1. Lovink MH, Kars MC, de Man-van Ginkel JM, et al. . Patients' experiences of safety during haemodialysis treatment--a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2015;71:2374–83. 10.1111/jan.12690
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, et al. . Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:317–25. 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The mos 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473–83.
    1. Ebert JF, Huibers L, Lippert FK, et al. . Development and evaluation of an “emergency access button” in Danish out-of-hours primary care: a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:379-017-2308-y 10.1186/s12913-017-2308-y
    1. Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, et al. . Paper- or web-based questionnaire invitations as a method for data collection: cross-sectional comparative study of differences in response rate, completeness of data, and financial cost. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e24. 10.2196/jmir.8353
    1. Statistics D Statistics Denmark, 2018. Available:
    1. Unesco International standard classification of education ISCED 2011, 2011. Available:
    1. JNK R, Cott AJ. On Chi-Squared tests for Multiway contingency tables with cell proportions estimated from survey data. Ann Statist 1984;12:46–60.
    1. Campbell JL, Dickens A, Richards SH, et al. . Capturing users' experience of UK out-of-hours primary medical care: piloting and psychometric properties of the out-of-hours patient questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:462–8. 10.1136/qshc.2006.020172
    1. Garratt AM, Danielsen K, Hunskaar S. Patient satisfaction questionnaires for primary care out-of-hours services: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2007;57:741–7.
    1. Allemann Iseli M, Kunz R, Blozik E. Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2014;8:893–907.
    1. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, et al. . The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess 2002;6:1–244. 10.3310/hta6320
    1. van Uden CJT, Ament AJHA, Hobma SO, et al. . Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands. BMC Health Serv Res 2005;5:6. 10.1186/1472-6963-5-6
    1. Vedsted P, Christensen MB. Frequent attenders in general practice care: a literature review with special reference to methodological considerations. Public Health 2005;119:118–37. 10.1016/j.puhe.2004.03.007
    1. Greenfield G, Ignatowicz A, Gnani S, et al. . Staff perceptions on patient motives for attending GP-led urgent care centres in London: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e007683. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007683
    1. Gamst-Jensen H, Huibers L, Pedersen K, et al. . Self-Rated worry in acute care telephone triage: a mixed-methods study. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68:e197–203. 10.3399/bjgp18X695021
    1. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016;9:211–7. 10.2147/JMDH.S104807

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅