Everolimus and early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal: 3-year results from a randomized trial in liver transplantation

M Sterneck, G M Kaiser, N Heyne, N Richter, F Rauchfuss, A Pascher, P Schemmer, L Fischer, C G Klein, S Nadalin, F Lehner, U Settmacher, P Neuhaus, D Gotthardt, M Loss, S Ladenburger, E M Paulus, M Mertens, H J Schlitt, M Sterneck, G M Kaiser, N Heyne, N Richter, F Rauchfuss, A Pascher, P Schemmer, L Fischer, C G Klein, S Nadalin, F Lehner, U Settmacher, P Neuhaus, D Gotthardt, M Loss, S Ladenburger, E M Paulus, M Mertens, H J Schlitt

Abstract

The feasibility of de novo everolimus without calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy following liver transplantation was assessed in a multicenter, prospective, open-label trial. Liver transplant patients were randomized at 4 weeks to start everolimus and discontinue CNI, or continue their current CNI-based regimen. The primary endpoint was adjusted estimated GFR (eGFR; Cockcroft-Gault) at month 11 post randomization. A 24-month extension phase followed 81/114 (71.1%) of eligible patients to month 35 post randomization. The adjusted mean eGFR benefit from randomization to month 35 was 10.1 mL/min (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.3, 21.5 mL/min, p = 0.082) in favor of CNI-free versus CNI using Cockcroft-Gault, 9.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% CI -0.4, 18.9, p = 0.053) with Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (four-variable) and 9.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% CI -1.1, 17.9, p = 0.028) using Nankivell. The difference in favor of the CNI-free regimen increased gradually over time due to a small progressive decline in eGFR in the CNI cohort despite a reduction in CNI exposure. Biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss and death were similar between groups. Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in five CNI-free patients and five CNI patients (12.2% vs. 12.5%, p = 1.000) during the extension phase. Everolimus-based CNI-free immunosuppression is feasible following liver transplantation and patients benefit from sustained preservation of renal function versus patients on CNI for at least 3 years.

Keywords: Calcineurin inhibitor; everolimus; liver transplantation; long-term; withdrawal.

© 2014 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
eGFR from the time of randomization to month 35 after randomization according to (A) Cockcroft-Gault, (B) Nankivell and (C) MDRD4 formulae in patients randomized to everolimus or CNI therapy. Values are shown as mean (SD). CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; eGFR, estimated GFR; MDRD4, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (four-variable).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean change in adjusted estimated GFR (eGFR) from baseline to months 11, 23 and 35 postrandomization according to (A) Cockcroft-Gault, (B) Nankivell and (C) MDRD4 formulae in patients randomized to everolimus or CNI therapy. The between-group differences in the adjusted change from baseline at each time point are indicated above the bars. p-Values refer to the comparison between groups. Values below the graphs show mean trough (C0) concentrations of everolimus in the everolimus group and tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CsA) in the CNI cohort at each time point. CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; MDRD4, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (four-variable).

References

    1. Ojo AO, Held PJ, Port FK, et al. Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:931–940.
    1. Lamattina JC, Mezrich JD, Fernandez LA, et al. Native kidney function following liver transplantation using calcineurin inhibitors: Single-center analysis with 20 years of follow-up. Clin Transplant. 2013;27:193–202.
    1. Lee JP, Heo NJ, Joo KW, et al. Risk factors for consequent kidney impairment and differential impact of liver transplantation on renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:2772–2785.
    1. Herlenius G, Fistouris J, Olausson M, Felldin M, Bäckman L, Friman S. Early renal function post-liver transplantation is predictive of progressive chronic kidney disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:344–349.
    1. Garces G, Contreras G, Carvalho D, et al. Chronic kidney disease after orthotopic liver transplantation in recipients receiving tacrolimus. Clin Nephrol. 2011;75:150–157.
    1. Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P, Messa P. Chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation: Recent evidence. Int J Artif Organs. 2010;33:803–811.
    1. De Simone P, Metselaar HJ, Fischer L, et al. Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus therapy in maintenance liver transplant recipients: A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1262–1269.
    1. Abdelmalek MF, Humar A, Stickel F, et al. Sirolimus conversion regimen versus continued calcineurin inhibitors in liver allograft recipients: A randomized trial. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:694–705.
    1. Masetti M, Montalti R, Rompianesi G, et al. Early withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors and everolimus monotherapy in de novo liver transplant recipients preserves renal function. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:2252–2262.
    1. De Simone P, Nevens F, De Carlis L, et al. Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:3008–3020.
    1. Schena FP, Pascoe MD, Alberu J, et al. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-Month efficacy and safety results from the CONVERT trial. Transplantation. 2009;87:233–242.
    1. Holdaas H, Rostaing L, Serón D, et al. Conversion of long-term kidney transplant recipients from calcineurin inhibitor therapy to everolimus: A randomized, multicenter, 24-month study. Transplantation. 2011;92:410–418.
    1. Fischer L, Klempnauer J, Beckebaum S, et al. A randomized, controlled study to assess the conversion from calcineurin-inhibitors to everolimus after liver transplantation—PROTECT. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1855–1865.
    1. Burra P, Senzolo M, Masier A, et al. Factors influencing renal function after liver transplantation. Results from the MOST, an international observational study. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:350–356.
    1. Cantarovich M, Tchervenkov J, Paraskevas S, et al. Early changes in kidney function predict long-term chronic kidney disease and mortality in patients after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2011;92:1358–1363.
    1. Everson GT. Everolimus and mTOR inhibitors in liver transplantation: Opening the “box. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1571–1573.
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41.
    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470.
    1. Nankivell BJ, Gruenewald SM, Allen R, Chapman JR. Predicting glomerular filtration rate after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;59:1683–1689.
    1. Sanchez EQ, Melton LB, Chinnakotla S, et al. Predicting renal failure after liver transplantation from measure glomerular filtration rate: Review of up to 15 years of follow-up. Transplantation. 2010;89:232–235.
    1. Pawarode A, Fine DM, Thuluvath PJ. Independent risk factors and natural history of renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:741–747.
    1. Nashan B. Is acute rejection the key predictor for long-term outcomes after renal transplantation when comparing calcineurin inhibitors. Transplant Rev. 2009;23:47–52.
    1. Shihab FS, Cibrik D, Chan L, et al. Association of clinical events with everolimus exposure in kidney transplant patients receiving reduced cyclosporine. Clin Transplant. 2013;27:217–226.
    1. Vallin M, Guillaud O, Morard I, et al. Tolerability of everolimus-based immunosuppression in maintenance liver transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2011;25:660–669.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅