Features of hepatic and skeletal muscle insulin resistance unique to type 1 diabetes

Bryan C Bergman, David Howard, Irene E Schauer, David M Maahs, Janet K Snell-Bergeon, Robert H Eckel, Leigh Perreault, Marian Rewers, Bryan C Bergman, David Howard, Irene E Schauer, David M Maahs, Janet K Snell-Bergeon, Robert H Eckel, Leigh Perreault, Marian Rewers

Abstract

Context: Type 1 diabetes is known to be a state of insulin resistance; however, the tissues involved in whole-body insulin resistance are less well known. It is unclear whether insulin resistance is due to glucose toxicity in the post-Diabetes Control and Complications Trial era of tighter glucose control.

Objective: We performed this study to determine muscle and liver insulin sensitivity individuals with type 1 diabetes after overnight insulin infusion to lower fasting glucose concentration.

Design, patients, and methods: Fifty subjects [25 controls without and 25 individuals with type 1 diabetes (diabetes duration 22.9 ± 1.7 yr, without known end organ damage] were frequency matched on age and body mass index by group and studied. After 3 d of dietary control and overnight insulin infusion to normalize glucose, we performed a three-stage hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp infusing insulin at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m(2) · min. Glucose metabolism was quantified using an infusion of [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose. Hepatic insulin sensitivity was measured using the insulin IC(50) for glucose rate of appearance (Ra), whereas muscle insulin sensitivity was measured using the glucose rate of disappearance during the highest insulin dose.

Results: Throughout the study, glucose Ra was significantly greater in individuals compared with those without type 1 diabetes. The concentration of insulin required for 50% suppression of glucose Ra was 2-fold higher in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Glucose rate of disappearance was significantly lower in individuals with type 1 diabetes during the 8- and 40-mU/m(2) · min stages.

Conclusion: Insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle was a significant feature in type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, the etiology of insulin resistance was not explained by body mass index, percentage fat, plasma lipids, visceral fat, and physical activity and was also not fully explained by hyperglycemia.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Glucose concentration (A), enrichment (B), and insulin concentration (C) during basal and hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses in control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes. Values are means ± sem.¥, Significantly different from control (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) during basal period and hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses in control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes. Values are means ± sem. §, Significantly different from basal (P < 0.05); ¥, significantly different from control (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Glucose Ra (A) during basal and hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses in control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes. The concentration of insulin required for IC50 of hepatic glucose production in both groups (B). Values are means ± sem. §, Significantly different from basal (P < 0.05); ¥, significantly different from control (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Glucose Rd (A), MCR (B), and MCR normalized to insulin concentration (C) for control subjects and individuals with type 1 diabetes during a hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp at 4, 8, and 40 mU/m2 · min insulin doses and nonoxidative glucose disposal during the 40-mU/m2 · min insulin dose (D). §, Significantly different from basal (P < 0.05); ¥, significantly different from control (P < 0.05).

Source: PubMed

3
订阅