Serum Progesterone Profile Across the Mid and Late Luteal Phase in Artificial Cycles Is Associated With Pregnancy Outcome

Elena Labarta, Cristina Rodríguez-Varela, Giulia Mariani, Ernesto Bosch, Elena Labarta, Cristina Rodríguez-Varela, Giulia Mariani, Ernesto Bosch

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that low serum progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer (ET) are associated with poorer pregnancy outcome in hormonal replacement therapy cycles. It is of interest to know if serum progesterone levels during late luteal phase (following days after ET) are also related with the chances of ongoing pregnancy.

Objective: To evaluate the luteal phase endocrine profile through measurements of serum progesterone and estradiol on days ET+4, ET+7 and ET+11, to test their predictive value in relation to pregnancy outcome.

Setting: Private infertility center, Valencia, Spain.

Materials and methods: Prospective cohort study performed between June 2017 and August 2018. Eligible patients were aged between 18-42 years, with a normal uterus, and being transferred 1-2 good quality blastocysts in a frozen ET cycle after an artificial endometrial preparation with estradiol valerate and vaginal micronized progesterone (400 mg/12 hours).

Results: A total of 127 patients were included. Mean age = 38.0 ± 3.9 years; BMI = 23.6 ± 3.6 kg/m2; endometrial thickness = 9.1 ± 1.6mm. Overall ongoing pregnancy rate = 47.2% (95%CI:38.3-56.3). Significantly higher levels of serum progesterone were observed on ET+4 (13.6 ± 6.0 vs. 11.1 ± 4.6ng/ml, p = 0.03) and ET+11 (15.7 ± 1.2 vs. 10.3 ± 0.6ng/ml, respectively; p = 0.000) in ongoing pregnancies versus negative β-hCG (β-human chorionic gonadotrophin) cases. On ET+7, ongoing pregnancies also had higher serum progesterone levels (14.2 ± 0.9 vs. 11.7 ± 0.8ng/ml, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Serum estradiol levels were not related with pregnancy outcome at any moment of the luteal phase (p > 0.05). On days ET+4, +7 and +11, the ROC analysis showed that serum progesterone levels were predictive of ongoing pregnancy, and Pearson's coefficient showed a significant association (p<0.05) of serum β-hCG levels with serum progesterone.

Conclusions: In hormonal replacement therapy cycles, serum progesterone levels across luteal phase days are associated with pregnancy outcome. Ongoing pregnancies were associated with a higher exposure to progesterone in comparison with pregnancy losses or negative β-hCG. Therefore, serum progesterone might be playing an important role not only during implantation, but also in pregnancy maintenance. It remains unknown if the variability in serum progesterone levels among patients, after receiving the exact same progesterone dose for luteal phase support, is the cause or just a consequence of pregnancy results.

Keywords: artificial cycle; endocrine profile; luteal phase support; ongoing pregnancy; progesterone.

Conflict of interest statement

EB has received honoraria from Ferring B.V., Gedeon Richter, Merck and Roche; acted as a paid consultant for Ferring B.V., Merck, Gedeon Richter, Roche and Abbott; and reports research cooperation with Gedeon Richter. EL serves on the speaker bureau for Ferring B.V., Merck, MSD, IBSA and Gedeon Richter. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Labarta, Rodríguez-Varela, Mariani and Bosch.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Univariate analysis (A) and linear regression model (B) of serum P levels (ng/ml) according to pregnancy outcome and the day after ET.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Univariate analysis (A) and linear regression model (B) of serum estradiol levels (pg/ml) according to pregnancy outcome and the day after ET.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Linear regression model of serum P levels throughout the late luteal phase, comparing ongoing pregnancies (green) and negative β-hCG cases (orange).
Figure 4
Figure 4
ROC curve of serum P levels on day 4 (A), 7 (B) and 11 (C) after ET. The orange dot points out the cut-off value calculated yielding the best sensitivity and specificity.

References

    1. Yovich JL, Conceicao JL, Stanger JD, Hinchliffe PM, Keane KN. Mid-Luteal Serum Progesterone Concentrations Govern Implantation Rates for Cryopreserved Embryo Transfers Conducted Under Hormone Replacement. Reprod BioMed Online (2015) 31:180–91. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.005
    1. Gaggiotti-Marre S, Martinez F, Coll L, Garcia S, Álvarez M, Parriego M, et al. . Low Serum Progesterone the Day Prior to Frozen Embryo Transfer of Euploid Embryos is Associated With Significant Reduction in Live Birth Rates. Gynecol Endocrinol (2019) 35:439–42. 10.1080/09513590.2018.1534952
    1. Alsbjerg B, Thomsen L, Elbaek HO, Laursen R, Povlsen BB, Haahr T, et al. . Progesterone Levels on Pregnancy Test Day After Hormone Replacement Therapy-Cryopreserved Embryo Transfer Cycles and Related Reproductive Outcomes. Reprod BioMed Online (2018) 37:641–7. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.08.022
    1. Cédrin-Durnerin I, Isnard T, Mahdjoub S, Sonigo C, Seroka A, Comtet M, et al. . Serum Progesterone Concentration and Live Birth Rate in Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfers With Hormonally Prepared Endometrium. Reprod BioMed Online (2019) 38:472–80. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.026
    1. Labarta E, Mariani G, Holtmann N, Celada P, Remohí J, Bosch E. Low Serum Progesterone on the Day of Embryo Transfer is Associated With a Diminished Ongoing Pregnancy Rate in Oocyte Donation Cycles After Artificial Endometrial Preparation: A Prospective Study. Hum Reprod (2017) 32:2437–42. 10.1093/humrep/dex316
    1. Labarta E, Mariani G, Paolelli S, Rodriguez-Varela C, Vidal C, Giles J, et al. . Impact of Low Serum Progesterone Levels on the Day of Embryo Transfer on Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Cohort Study in Artificial Cycles With Vaginal Progesterone. Hum Reprod (2021) 36:683–92. 10.1093/humrep/deaa322
    1. Kawachiya S, Bodri D, Hirosawa T, Yao J, Kuwahara A, Irahara M. Endogenous Progesterone Levels Could Predict Reproductive Outcome in Frozen Embryo Replacement Cycles Supplemented With Synthetic Progestogens: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Reprod Med Biol (2019) 18:91–6. 10.1002/rmb2.12254
    1. Kim YJ, Shin JH, Hur JY, Kim H, Ku S, Suh S. Predictive Value of Serum Progesterone Level on β -hCG Check Day in Women With Previous Repeated Miscarriages After In Vitro Fertilization. PLoS One (2017) 12:1–13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0181229
    1. Ioannidis G, Sacks G, Reddy N, Seyani L, Margara R, Lavery S, et al. . Day 14 Maternal Serum Progesterone Levels Predict Pregnancy Outcome in IVF / ICSI Treatment Cycles: A Prospective Study. Hum Reprod (2018) 20:741–6. 10.1093/humrep/deh644
    1. Petersen J, Andersen A, Klein B, Helmgaard L, Arce J. Luteal Phase Progesterone and Oestradiol After Ovarian Stimulation: Relation to Response and Prediction of Pregnancy. Reprod BioMed Online (2018) 36:427–34. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.12.019
    1. Vuong LN, Ho TM, Pham TD, Ho VNA, Andersen CY, Humaidan P. The Early Luteal Hormonal Profile in IVF Patients Triggered With Hcg. Hum Reprod (2020) 35:157–66. 10.1093/humrep/dez235
    1. Thomsen LH, Kesmodel US, Andersen CY, Humaidan P. Daytime Variation in Serum Progesterone During the Mid-Luteal Phase in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2018) 9:92. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00092
    1. Thomsen LH, Humaidan P, Erb K, Overgaard M, Andersen CY, Kesmodel US. Mid-Luteal 17-Oh Progesterone Levels in 614 Women Undergoing IVF-Treatment and Fresh Embryo Transfer—Daytime Variation and Impact on Live Birth Rates. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2018) 9:690. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00690
    1. Thomsen LH, Kesmodel US, Erb K, Bungum L, Pedersen D, Hauge B, et al. . The Impact of Luteal Serum Progesterone Levels on Live Birth Rates-a Prospective Study of 602 IVF/ICSI Cycles. Hum Reprod (2018) 33:1506–16. 10.1093/humrep/dey226
    1. Kuo PJ, Lee CL, Wang JH, Hsieh SY, Huang SC, Lam CF. Inhalation of Volatile Anesthetics Via a Laryngeal Mask is Associated With Lower Incidence of Intraoperative Awareness in non-Critically Ill Patients. PLoS One (2017) 12. 10.1371/journal.pone.0186337
    1. Csapo A. The Luteo-Placental Shift, the Guardian of Pre-Natal Life. Postgrad Med J (1969) 45:57–64. 10.1136/pgmj.45.519.57
    1. Levy T, Yairi Y, Bar-Hava I, Shalev J, Orvieto R, Ben-Rafael Z. Pharmacokinetics of the Progesterone-Containing Vaginal Tablet and its Use in Assisted Reproduction. Steroids (Elsevier) (2000) 65(10–11):645–9. 10.1016/S0039-128X(00)00121-5
    1. Neumann K, Depenbusch M, Schultze-Mosgau A, Griesinger G. Characterization of Early Pregnancy Placental Progesterone Production by Use of Dydrogesterone in Programmed Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. Reprod BioMed Online (2020) 40:743–51. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.01.019
    1. Scott R, Navot D, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z. A Human In Vivo Model for the Luteoplacental Shift. Fertil Steril (1991) 56:481–4. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54544-0
    1. Florêncio R de S, Meira MSB, da Cunha MV, Camarço MNCR, Castro EC, Finotti MCCF, et al. . Plasmatic Estradiol Concentration in the Mid-Luteal Phase is a Good Prognostic Factor for Clinical and Ongoing Pregnancies, During Stimulated Cycles of In Vitro Fertilization. J Bras Reprod Assist (2017) 22:8–14. 10.5935/1518-0557.20180005

Source: PubMed

3
订阅