Transradial approach for acute stroke intervention: technical procedure and clinical outcomes

Omaditya Khanna, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Ahmad Sweid, Nohra Chalouhi, Ritam Ghosh, Fadi Al Saiegh, Michael R Gooch, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Robert H Rosenwasser, Victor Romo, Pascal Jabbour, Omaditya Khanna, Nikolaos Mouchtouris, Ahmad Sweid, Nohra Chalouhi, Ritam Ghosh, Fadi Al Saiegh, Michael R Gooch, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Robert H Rosenwasser, Victor Romo, Pascal Jabbour

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radial artery catheterisation is an alternate route of access that has recently started to gain more widespread use for neuroendovascular procedures, including acute stroke intervention. In this small case series, we present our institution's outcomes in patients undergoing acute stroke interventions via transradial access.

Materials and methods: We present a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent acute stroke intervention via radial artery access. We analyse these patients' periprocedural and clinical outcomes after undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

Results: A total of 15 consecutive patients were included in the study (9 males and 6 females), and all patients were able to successfully undergo mechanical thrombectomy via radial artery access. The mean time of arterial puncture to reperfusion was 50±28 min (range: 15-104). A TICI 2b/3 revascularisation was achieved in 13/15 patients (87%); a TICI 1 and TICI 2a outcome was achieved on the other two patients. One patient incurred an iatrogenic vessel dissection during the procedure. Eight of out 15 patients (53%) had favourable mRS (0-3) at the time of discharge from the hospital.

Conclusion: Radial artery catheterisation is technically feasible for performing acute stroke interventions with favourable time to revascularisation and good overall clinical outcomes.

Keywords: angiography; stroke; technique; thrombectomy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PJ is a consultant for Medtronic and MicroVention. ST is a consultant for Stryker.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radial artery access is achieved via ultrasound guidance, using a counter-puncture technique, and a fluoroscopic image is taken to delineate arterial anatomy of the right arm (A). Using transradial access, all vessels of the aortic arch, with various configurations, are able to be catheterized safely and effectively, en route to the desired intracranial vasculature (B). A compression device is applied to the wrist at the conclusion of the procedure for 1 hour, and is gradually deflated as haemostasis is achieved (C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
When excluding two patients who were deceased (both made comfort care per family discussion), patients who survived their hospitalisation stay had significantly improved NIHSS post-op (mean 5.31±4.09) compared with at the time of presentation (mean 13.3±7.3) (A). The mRS scores of n=15 patients at the time of discharge from the hospital after undergoing transradial mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke (B). NIHSS, NIH stroke scale.

References

    1. Khanna O, Sweid A, Mouchtouris N, et al. . Radial artery catheterization for neuroendovascular procedures. Stroke 2019;50:2587–90. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025811
    1. Chen SH, Snelling BM, Shah SS, et al. . Transradial approach for flow diversion treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:796–800. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014620
    1. Tavakol M, Ashraf S, Brener SJ. Risks and complications of coronary angiography: a comprehensive review. Glob J Health Sci 2012;4:65–93.
    1. Fifi JT, Meyers PM, Lavine SD, et al. . Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:442–7. 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.01.012
    1. Hibbert B, Simard T, Wilson KR, et al. . Transradial versus Transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:819–26. 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.009
    1. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. . Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (rival): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011;377:1409–20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2
    1. Ando G, Capodanno D. Radial versus femoral access in Invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:932–40.
    1. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. . Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:2490–9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.050
    1. Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS, et al. . Transradial cerebral angiography: techniques and outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:874–81. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013584
    1. Chen SH, Snelling BM, Sur S, et al. . Transradial versus Transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 2019.
    1. Levy EI, Boulos AS, Fessler RD, et al. . Transradial cerebral angiography: an alternative route. Neurosurgery 2002;51:335–42. discussion 40-2 10.1097/00006123-200208000-00007
    1. Pancholy SB, Sanghvi KA, Patel TM. Radial artery access technique evaluation trial: randomized comparison of Seldinger versus modified Seldinger technique for arterial access for transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;80:288–91. 10.1002/ccd.23445
    1. Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS, et al. . Transradial approach for complex anterior and posterior circulation interventions: technical nuances and feasibility of using current devices. Operative Neurosurgery 2019;17:293–302. 10.1093/ons/opy352
    1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. . 2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
    1. Matsumoto Y, Hongo K, Toriyama T, et al. . Transradial approach for diagnostic selective cerebral angiography: results of a consecutive series of 166 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:704–8.
    1. Hess CN, Peterson ED, Neely ML, et al. . The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National cardiovascular data registry. Circulation 2014;129:2277–86. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006356
    1. Alawieh A, Vargas J, Fargen KM, et al. . Impact of Procedure Time on Outcomes of Thrombectomy for Stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:879–90. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.052
    1. Spiotta AM, Vargas J, Turner R, et al. . The golden hour of stroke intervention: effect of thrombectomy procedural time in acute ischemic stroke on outcome. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:511–6. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010726
    1. Rosenwasser RH, Lang M, Tjoumakaris S, et al. . Disruptive innovation in neurovascular disease. Neurosurgery 2017;64:78–82.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅