Structured antenatal milk expression education for nulliparous pregnant people: results of a pilot, randomized controlled trial in the United States

Jill R Demirci, Melissa Glasser, Katherine P Himes, Susan M Sereika, Jill R Demirci, Melissa Glasser, Katherine P Himes, Susan M Sereika

Abstract

Background: Hand-expression, collection, and storage of breast milk during pregnancy (i.e., antenatal milk expression or AME) is a safe, potentially effective practice to reduce early, undesired infant formula supplementation among women with diabetes. The feasibility and potential impact of AME on lactation outcomes in the United States (U.S.) and among non-diabetic birthing people is unknown.

Methods: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of a structured AME intervention among nulliparous birthing people in the United States. We recruited 45 low-risk, nulliparous individuals at 34-366/7 weeks of gestation from a hospital-based midwife practice. Participants were randomized to AME or a control group receiving lactation education handouts. Interventions were delivered at weekly visits at 37-40 weeks of pregnancy. The AME intervention involved technique demonstration and feedback from a lactation consultant and daily independent practice. Lactation outcomes were assessed during the postpartum hospitalization, 1-2 weeks postpartum, and 3-4 months postpartum.

Results: Between December 2016 and February 2018, 63 individuals were approached and screened for eligibility, and 45 enrolled into the study (71%). Of 22 participants assigned to AME, 18 completed at least one AME study visit. Participants reported practicing AME on at least 60% of days prior to their infant's birth. Most were able to express milk antenatally (15/18), more than half collected and froze antenatal milk (11/18), and 39% (7/18) supplemented their infants with antenatal milk after birth. No major problems were reported with AME. Perinatal and lactation outcomes, including infant gestational age at birth, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, delayed onset of lactogenesis II, and use of infant formula were similar between AME and control groups. Among participants in both groups who were feeding any breast milk at each assessment, breastfeeding self-efficacy increased and perceptions of insufficient milk decreased over the postpartum course.

Conclusions: In a small group of nulliparous birthing people in the U.S., AME education and independent practice beginning at 37 weeks of pregnancy was feasible. In some cases, AME provided a back-up supply of milk when supplementation was indicated or desired. The relationship between AME and lactation outcomes requires further study with adequately powered samples.

Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 11, 2021 under the following registration ID: NCT04929301. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04929301 .

Keywords: Antenatal colostrum expression; Antenatal milk expression; Breastfeeding; Human milk; Milk expression; Pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort flow diagram. *withdrawal also did not receive intervention, withdrawal occurred after postpartum hospital study visit
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Box and whisker plot of average individual milk volume (mL) expressed per AME episode from gestational weeks 37 to 40 (37 weeks: n = 15, 38 weeks: n = 18, 39 weeks: n = 14, 40 weeks: n = 7). Horizontal lines in shaded area represent medians across individual participant averages

References

    1. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, Franca GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
    1. Hamner HC, Beauregard JL, Li R, Nelson JM, Perrine CG. Meeting breastfeeding intentions differ by race/ethnicity, infant and toddler feeding practices study-2. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17:e13093. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13093.
    1. Perrine CG, Scanlon KS, Li R, Odom E, Grummer-Strawn LM. Baby-Friendly Hospital practices and meeting exclusive breastfeeding intention. Pediatrics. 2012;130:54–60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3633.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding among U.S. children born 2011–2018, CDC National Immunization Survey. Available from: . Accessed 10 Dec 2021
    1. Colaizy TT, Saftlas AF, Morriss FH., Jr Maternal intention to breast-feed and breast-feeding outcomes in term and preterm infants: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2000–2003. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:702–710. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002229.
    1. Odom E, Ruowei L, Scanlon KS, Perrine CG, Grummer-Strawn L. Reasons for earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e726–e732. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1295.
    1. Boban M, Zakarija-Grković I. In-hospital formula supplementation of healthy newborns: practices, reasons, and their medical justification. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:448–454. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0039.
    1. Temple Newhook J, Newhook LA, Midodzi WK, Murphy Goodridge J, Burrage L, Gill N, et al. Determinants of nonmedically indicated in-hospital supplementation of infants whose birthing parents intended to exclusively breastfeed. J Hum Lact. 2017;33:278–284. doi: 10.1177/0890334417695204.
    1. Chantry CJ, Dewey KG, Peerson JM, Wagner EA, Nommsen-Rivers LA. In-hospital formula use increases early breastfeeding cessation among first-time mothers intending to exclusively breastfeed. J Pediatr. 2014;164:1339–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.12.035.
    1. Nilsson IMS, Kronborg H, Rahbek K, Strandberg-Larsen K. The significance of early breastfeeding experiences on breastfeeding self-efficacy one week postpartum. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16:e12986. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12986.
    1. Otsuka K, Dennis CL, Tatsuoka H, Jimba M. The relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy and perceived insufficient milk among Japanese mothers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37:546–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00277.x.
    1. Huang L, Xu S, Chen X, Li Q, Lin L, Zhang Y, et al. Delayed lactogenesis is associated with suboptimal breastfeeding practices: a prospective cohort study. J Nutr. 2020;150:894–900. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz311.
    1. Brownell E, Howard CR, Lawrence RA, Dozier AM. Delayed onset lactogenesis II predicts the cessation of any or exclusive breastfeeding. J Pediatr. 2012;16:608–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.03.035.
    1. Wagner EA, Chantry CJ, Dewey KG, Nommsen-Rivers LA. Breastfeeding concerns at 3 and 7 days postpartum and feeding status at 2 months. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e865–e875. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0724.
    1. Foudil-Bey I, Murphy MSQ, Dunn S, Keely EJ, El-Chaâr D. Evaluating antenatal breastmilk expression outcomes: a scoping review. Int Breastfeed J. 2021;16:25. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00371-7.
    1. Chapman T, Pincombe J, Harris M, Fereday J. Antenatal breast expression: exploration and extent of teaching practices amongst International Board Certified Lactation Consultant midwives across Australia. Women Birth. 2013;26:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.01.001.
    1. Fair FJ, Watson H, Gardner R, Soltani H. Women's perspectives on antenatal breast expression: a cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health. 2018;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0497-4.
    1. Moorhead AM, Amir LH, Forster DA, Crawford SB. 'Is there any point in me doing this?' Views and experiences of women in the Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing (DAME) trial. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;e13307. 10.1111/mcn.13307
    1. Demirci JR, Glasser M, Fichner J, Caplan E, Himes KP. "It gave me so much confidence": First-time U.S. mothers' experiences with antenatal milk expression. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15:e12824. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12824.
    1. Forster DA, Moorhead AM, Jacobs SE, Davis PG, Walker SP, McEgan KM, et al. Advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breastmilk in late pregnancy (Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing [DAME]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2204–2213. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31373-9.
    1. Casey JRR, Banks J, Braniff K, Buettner P, Heal C. The effects of expressing antenatal colostrum in women with diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:811–818. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12966.
    1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. What are the risk factors for preterm labor and birth?. Available from: . Accessed 5 April 2016
    1. Laria-Rosello, P. Breast milk hand expression-breast time of life. Available from: . Accessed 9 Feb 2022.
    1. Morbacher N, Stock J. The Breastfeeding Answer Book. 3rd ed. Raleigh: La Leche League International; 2003.
    1. Forster DA, Jacobs S, Amir LH, Davis P, Walker SP, McEgan K, et al. Safety and efficacy of antenatal milk expressing for women with diabetes in pregnancy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006571.
    1. Lactation Education Resources. Parent handouts. Available from: . Accessed 18 March 2018
    1. de la Mora A, Russell DW, Dungy CI, Losch M, Dusdieker L. The Iowa infant feeding attitude scale: analysis of reliability and validity. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;29:2362–2380. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00115.x.
    1. Dennis C-L. The breastfeeding self-efficacy scale: psychometric assessment of the short form. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32:734–744. doi: 10.1177/0884217503258459.
    1. Dennis CL, Heaman M, Mossman M. Psychometric testing of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale-short form among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2011;49:265–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.12.015.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404.
    1. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Anxiety. Available from: . Accessed 21 Dec 2020
    1. O'Hara MW, Stuart S, Watson D, Dietz PM, Farr SL, D'Angelo D. Brief scales to detect postpartum depression and anxiety symptoms. J Womens Health. 2012;21:1237–1243. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3612.
    1. Forster DA, McEgan K, Ford R, Moorhead A, Opie G, Walker S, et al. Diabetes and antenatal milk expressing: a pilot project to inform the development of a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2011;27:209–214. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.05.009.
    1. Hill PD, Humenick SS. Development of the H & H Lactation Scale. Nurs Res. 1996;45:136–140. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199605000-00003.
    1. Rocha BO, Machado MP, Bastos LL, Barbosa Silva L, Santos AP, Santos LC, et al. Risk factors for delayed onset of lactogenesis II among primiparous mothers from a Brazilian Baby-Friendly hospital. J Hum Lact. 2020;36:146–156. doi: 10.1177/0890334419835174.
    1. Pérez-Escamilla R, Chapman DJ. Validity and public health implications of maternal perception of the onset of lactation: an international analytical overview. J Nutr. 2001;131:3021s–s3024. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.11.3021S.
    1. Chapman DJ, Pérez-Escamilla R. Maternal perception of the onset of lactation is a valid, public health indicator of lactogenesis stage II. J Nutr. 2000;130:2972–2980. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.12.2972.
    1. Rietveld CE. Antenatal colostrum harvesting for pregnant women with diabetes in preparation for breastfeeding. Dunedin: Otago Polytechnic; 2011.
    1. Soltani H, Scott AM. Antenatal breast expression in women with diabetes: outcomes from a retrospective cohort study. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-7-18.
    1. East CE, Dolan WJ, Forster DA. Antenatal breast milk expression by women with diabetes for improving infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;7:CD010408.
    1. Kellams A, Harrel C, Omage S, Gregory C, Rosen-Carole C. ABM clinical protocol #3: supplementary feedings in the healthy term breastfed neonate, revised 2017. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12:188–198. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.29038.ajk.
    1. Parker LA, Sullivan S, Krueger C, Kelechi T, Mueller M. Effect of early breast milk expression on milk volume and timing of lactogenesis stage II among mothers of very low birth weight infants: a pilot study. J Perinatol. 2012;32:205–209. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.78.
    1. Parker LA, Sullivan S, Krueger C, Mueller M. Association of timing of initiation of breastmilk expression on milk volume and timing of lactogenesis stage II among mothers of very low-birth-weight infants. Breastfeed Med. 2015;10:84–91. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0089.
    1. Wambach K, Watson GC. Anatomy and physiology of lactation. In: Wambach K, Riordan J, editors. Breastfeeding and Human Lactation. 5. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2016. pp. 79–120.
    1. Lamba S, Chopra S, Negi M. Effect of antenatal breast milk expression at term pregnancy to improve post natal lactational performance. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66:30–34. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0648-7.
    1. Singh G, Chouhan R, Sidhu K. Effect of antenatal expression of breast milk at term in reducing breast feeding failures. Med J Armed Forces India. 2011;65:131–133. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80125-1.
    1. O'Sullivan TA, Cooke J, McCafferty C, Giglia R. Online video instruction on hand expression of colostrum in pregnancy is an effective educational tool. Nutrients. 2019;11:883. doi: 10.3390/nu11040883.
    1. U.S. National Library of Medicine, U.S. National Institutes of Health, and Clinical . PRenatal Video-Based Education and PostPARtum Effects (PREPARE). Available from: . Accessed 10 Feb 2021

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅