New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations

Matthias A Zumstein, Philippe Schiessl, Benedikt Ambuehl, Lilianna Bolliger, Johannes Weihs, Martin H Maurer, Beat K Moor, Michael Schaer, Sumit Raniga, Matthias A Zumstein, Philippe Schiessl, Benedikt Ambuehl, Lilianna Bolliger, Johannes Weihs, Martin H Maurer, Beat K Moor, Michael Schaer, Sumit Raniga

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the most accurate and reliable quantitative radiographic parameters for assessing vertical and horizontal instability in different Rockwood grades of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations. Furthermore, the effect of projectional variation on these parameters was investigated in obtaining lateral Alexander view radiographs.

Methods: A Sawbone model of a scapula with clavicle was mounted on a holding device, and acromioclavicular dislocations as per the Rockwood classification system were simulated with the addition of horizontal posterior displacement. Projectional variations for each injury type were performed by tilting/rotating the Sawbone construct in the coronal, sagittal or axial plane. Radiographic imaging in the form of an anterior-posterior Zanca view and a lateral Alexander view were taken for each injury type and each projectional variation. Five newly defined radiographic parameters for assessing horizontal and vertical displacement as well as commonly used coracoclavicular distance view were measured. Reliability, validity and the effect of projectional variation were investigated for these radiographic measurements.

Results: All radiographic parameters showed excellent intra- and interobserver reliability. The validity was excellent for the acromial centre line to dorsal clavicle (AC-DC) in vertical displacement and for the glenoid centre line to posterior clavicle (GC-PC) in horizontal displacement, whilst the remaining measurements showed moderate validity. For AC-DC and GC-PC, convergent validity expressed strong correlation to the effective distance and discriminant validity demonstrated its ability to differentiate between various grades of ACJ dislocations. The effect of projectional variation increased with the degree of deviation and was maximal (3 mm) for AC-DC in 20° anteverted malpositioning and for GC-PC in 20° retroverted malpositioning.

Conclusions: AC-DC and the GC-PC are two novel quantitative radiographic parameters of vertical and horizontal instability in ACJ dislocations that demonstrate excellent reliability and validity with reasonable inertness to malpositioning. The use of AC-DC for assessing vertical displacement and GC-PC for assessing horizontal displacement in a single Alexander view is recommended to guide the appropriate management of ACJ dislocations. A better appreciation of the degree of horizontal instability, especially in lower Rockwood grades (II, III) of ACJ dislocations, may improve management of these controversial injuries.

Keywords: AC joint; AC joint separation; AC–DC; Acromioclavicular joint; Dislocation; GC–PC; Horizontal instability; Instability; Intra- and interobserver reliability; Radiographic parameters; Rockwood classification; Validity; Vertical instability.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

No grant was received for this study.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sawbone modelling. Specially designed holding device where a Sawbone Model was mounted. This model allows to simulate different ACJ dislocation as well as navigation in axial, sagittal and coronal direction according to measurement protocol
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of the radiographic imaging. First, an anterior–posterior Zanca view radiograph was taken with the standardized technique and second, a lateral Alexander view radiograph with an angle of 10° cranial tilt of the beam
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Illustration of the six performed radiographic measurements. On the anterior–posterior Zanca view, coracoclavicular distance (CC) was measured for vertical displacement. On the Alexander view, acromial centre line to dorsal clavicle (AC–DC) and centre cranialization (CCran) were measured for vertical displacement and Maximal Overlap (OL), Lateral Extension (LE) and glenoid centre line to posterior clavicle (GC–PC) for horizontal displacement
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effect of projectional variation for each type of injury. Mean and 95%CI are presented for each ACJ dislocation group depending of the amount of projectional variations included (neutral n = 7, 10 degrees n = 49 and 20 degrees n = 91). AC–DC is represented in aleft, GC–PC in bmiddle and CC in cleft
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effect of projectional variation relating to the malposition. Mean deviations of the projectional variations (±10°, ±20°) are shown for AC–DC (a) and GC–PC (b) compared to neutral. Mean values are calculated including the different injuries. Lower values indicate underestimation, higher values overestimation. Axial variations are shown in dotted, sagittal variations dot dashed and coronal variation dashed

References

    1. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J. Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(2):316–329. doi: 10.1177/0363546506298022.
    1. Saccomanno MF, DEI C, Milano G. Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation. Joints. 2014;2(2):87–92. doi: 10.11138/jts/2014.2.2.087.
    1. Tauber M. Acromioclavicular injuries in professional athletes. Orthopade. 2014;43(3):249–255. doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2148-3.
    1. Rockwood CA., Jr . Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, editors. Fractures in adults, Vol. 1. 2. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1984. pp. 860–910.
    1. Hedtmann A, Fett H, Ludwig J. Management of old neglected posttraumatic acromioclavicular joint instability and arthrosis. Orthopade. 1998;27(8):556–566.
    1. Metzlaff S, Rosslenbroich S, Forkel PH, Schliemann B, Arshad H, Raschke M, Petersen W. Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(6):1972–1978. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3294-9.
    1. Scheibel M, Droschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1507–1516. doi: 10.1177/0363546511399379.
    1. Cisneros LN, Reiriz JS. Prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries surgically managed. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(3):323–333. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1898-0.
    1. Schneider MM, Balke M, Koenen P, Frohlich M, Wafaisade A, Bouillon B, Banerjee M. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(7):2192–2196. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3436-0.
    1. Tauber M, Koller H, Hitzl W, Resch H. Dynamic radiologic evaluation of horizontal instability in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(6):1188–1195. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361951.
    1. Rahm S, Wieser K, Spross C, Vich M, Gerber C, Meyer DC. Standard axillary radiographs of the shoulder may mimic posterior subluxation of the lateral end of the clavicle. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(11):622–626. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31828f912c.
    1. Wellmann M, da Silva G, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P. Instability pattern of acromioclavicular joint dislocations type Rockwood III: relevance of horizontal instability. Orthopade. 2013;42(4):271–277. doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2085-1.
    1. Alexander OM. Radiography of the acromioclavicular articulation. Med Radiogr Photogr. 1954;30(2):34–39.
    1. Zanca P. Shoulder pain: involvement of the acromioclavicular joint. (Analysis of 1,000 cases) Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971;112(3):493–506. doi: 10.2214/ajr.112.3.493.
    1. Minkus M, Hann C, Scheibel M, Kraus N. Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017
    1. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
    1. Munro BH. Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 5. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. pp. 243–249.
    1. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17(1):101–110. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>;2-E.
    1. Dawson PA, Adamson GJ, Pink MM, Kornswiet M, Lin S, Shankwiler JA, Lee TQ. Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(2):237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.08.003.
    1. Jari R, Costic RS, Rodosky MW, Debski RE. Biomechanical function of surgical procedures for acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(3):237–245. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.011.
    1. Simovitch R, Sanders B, Ozbaydar M, Lavery K, Warner JJ. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(4):207–219. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200904000-00002.
    1. Alexander OM. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Radiography. 1949;15(179):260.
    1. Waldrop JI, Norwood LA, Alvarez RG. Lateral roentgenographic projections of the acromioclavicular joint. Am J Sports Med. 1981;9(5):337–341. doi: 10.1177/036354658100900511.
    1. Tossy JD, Mead NC, Sigmond HM. Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963;28:111–119.
    1. Cho CH, Hwang I, Seo JS, Choi CH, Ko SH, Park HB, Dan J. Reliability of the classification and treatment of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(5):665–670. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.005.
    1. Kraeutler MJ, Williams GR, Jr, Cohen SB, Ciccotti MG, Tucker BS, Dines JS, Altchek DW, Dodson CC. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations. Orthopedics. 2012;35(10):e1483–e1487. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-16.
    1. Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Crevoisier X, Farron A. Grade I and II acromioclavicular dislocations: results of conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):599–602. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00215-5.
    1. Schlegel TF, Burks RT, Marcus RL, Dunn HK. A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):699–703. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290060401.
    1. Nemec U, Oberleitner G, Nemec SF, Gruber M, Weber M, Czerny C, Krestan CR. MRI versus radiography of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(4):968–973. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6378.
    1. Schaefer FK, Schaefer PJ, Brossmann J, Hilgert RE, Heller M, Jahnke T. Experimental and clinical evaluation of acromioclavicular joint structures with new scan orientations in MRI. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(7):1488–1493. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0093-1.
    1. Cadenat FM. The treatment of dislocations and fractures of the outer end of the clavicle. Int Clin. 1917;1:145–169.
    1. Costic RS, Labriola JE, Rodosky MW, Debski RE. Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1929–1936. doi: 10.1177/0363546504264637.
    1. Debski RE, Parsons IM, 3rd, Fenwick J, Vangura A. Ligament mechanics during three degree-of-freedom motion at the acromioclavicular joint. Ann Biomed Eng. 2000;28(6):612–618. doi: 10.1114/1.1304848.
    1. Luis GE, Yong CK, Singh DA, Sengupta S, Choon DS. Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models. J Orthop Surg Res. 2007;2:22. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-22.
    1. Beitzel K, Mazzocca AD, Bak K, Itoi E, Kibler WB, Mirzayan R, Imhoff AB, Calvo E, Arce G, Shea K, Upper Extremity Committee of ISAKOS ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(2):271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.005.
    1. Korsten K, Gunning AC, Leenen LP. Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature. Int Orthop. 2014;38(4):831–838. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2143-7.
    1. Smith TO, Chester R, Pearse EO, Hing CB. Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011;12(1):19–27. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0127-1.
    1. Gastaud O, Raynier JL, Duparc F, Baverel L, Andrieu K, Tarissi N, Barth J. Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(8 Suppl):S291–S295. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.010.
    1. Barth J, Duparc F, Baverel L, Bahurel J, Toussaint B, Bertiaux S, Clavert P, Gastaud O, Brassart N, Beaudouin E, De Mourgues P, Berne D, Duport M, Najihi N, Boyer P, Faivre B, Meyer A, Nourissat G, Poulain S, Bruchou F, Menard JF, dA Francaise Societe. Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(8 Suppl):S305–S311. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.002.
    1. Bernageau J, Patte D. The radiographic diagnosis of posterior dislocation of the shoulder (author’s transl) Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1979;65(2):101–107.
    1. Rokous JR, Feagin JA, Abbott HG. Modified axillary roentgenogram. A useful adjunct in the diagnosis of recurrent instability of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;82:84–86. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197201000-00012.
    1. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(5):848–850.
    1. Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Rizzello G, Mannering N, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Surgical versus conservative management of Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2017
    1. Tauber M. Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(7):985–995. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1748-z.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅