Evaluation of the Potential Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Vixotrigine and an Oral Contraceptive

Yuan Zhao, Mark Versavel, Beth Tidemann-Miller, Romy Christmann, Himanshu Naik, Yuan Zhao, Mark Versavel, Beth Tidemann-Miller, Romy Christmann, Himanshu Naik

Abstract

Background and objective: Vixotrigine is a voltage- and use-dependent sodium channel blocker in development for neuropathic pain management. This study evaluated the effect of coadministration of vixotrigine (metabolized primarily via uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases) and an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol (uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase inducer) and levonorgestrel on the pharmacokinetics and safety of all three compounds.

Methods: In this phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence, multiple-dose study, 36 healthy women received oral vixotrigine 150 mg three times daily for 6 days and once on day 7. This was followed by a washout period, days 8-11. The oral contraceptive was administered alone on days 12-25 and with vixotrigine 150 mg three times daily on days 26-32. Serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety was assessed.

Results: The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for the area under the concentration-time curve over 8 h and maximum concentration of vixotrigine co-administered with an oral contraceptive vs vixotrigine alone were 0.85 (0.82-0.89) and 0.91 (0.87-0.96), respectively. The geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h and maximum concentration of ethinyl estradiol with vixotrigine vs ethinyl estradiol alone were 0.94 (0.91-0.97) and 0.89 (0.84-0.94), respectively; the ratios for levonorgestrel with vixotrigine vs levonorgestrel alone were 1.06 (0.98-1.16) and 1.05 (0.98-1.13), respectively. No adverse events occurring with vixotrigine alone were deemed related to the study drug by the investigators.

Conclusions: Coadministration of vixotrigine and an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel had no clinically relevant effect on exposure of all three compounds.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03324685 (registered 25 October, 2017).

Conflict of interest statement

Yuan Zhao, Beth Tidemann-Miller, Romy Christmann, and Himanshu Naik are employees of and own stock/stock options in Biogen. Mark Versavel was a consultant for Biogen during this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. h hours, OC oral contraceptive, PK pharmacokinetics, QD once daily, TID three times daily. aVixotrigine 150 mg once in the morning of day 7
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Arithmetic mean (± standard deviation) plasma concentration profiles of a vixotrigine, b metabolite M13, c metabolite M14, and d metabolite M16 when vixotrigine was administered alone and with coadministration of an oral contraceptive (OC)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Arithmetic mean (± standard deviation) plasma concentration profiles of a ethinyl estradiol and b levonorgestrel when the combination of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel was administered alone and with coadministration of vixotrigine. OC oral contraceptive. Dotted black lines in (a) and (b) indicate the lower limit of quantification for ethinyl estradiol (0.0075 ng/mL) and levonorgestrel (0.15 ng/mL), respectively

References

    1. Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994.
    1. van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain. 2014;155:654–662. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.013.
    1. De Toledo IP, Conti Réus J, Fernandes M, et al. Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(570):576.e2.
    1. Maarbjerg S, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Trigeminal neuralgia—a prospective systematic study of clinical characteristics in 158 patients. Headache. 2014;54:1574–1582. doi: 10.1111/head.12441.
    1. Cruccu G. Trigeminal neuralgia. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2017;23:396–420.
    1. Cruccu G, Gronseth G, Alksne J, American Academy of Neurology Society; European Federation of Neurological Society et al. AAN-EFNS guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15:1013–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02185.x.
    1. Zakrzewska JM, Linskey ME. Trigeminal neuralgia. BMJ Clin Evid. 2014;2014:1207.
    1. Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, Kalso EA. Carbamazepine for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD005451.
    1. Wieshmann UC, Baker G. Efficacy and tolerability of anti-epileptic drugs-an internet study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135:533–539. doi: 10.1111/ane.12698.
    1. Meador KJ, Gevins A, Loring DW, et al. Neuropsychological and neurophysiologic effects of carbamazepine and levetiracetam. Neurology. 2007;69:2076–2084. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000281104.55418.60.
    1. Di Stefano G, La Cesa S, Truini A, Cruccu G. Natural history and outcome of 200 outpatients with classical trigeminal neuralgia treated with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in a tertiary centre for neuropathic pain. J Headache Pain. 2014;15:34. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-34.
    1. Besi E, Boniface DR, Cregg R, Zakrzewska JM. Comparison of tolerability and adverse symptoms in oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia and neuralgiform headaches using the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (AEP) J Headache Pain. 2015;16:563. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0563-z.
    1. Zakrzewska JM, Palmer J, Morisset V, for the Study Investigators et al. Safety and efficacy of a Nav1.7 selective sodium channel blocker in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 2a trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:291–300. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30005-4.
    1. Dunbar J, Versavel M, Zhao Y, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the voltage- and use-dependent Nav1.7 channel blocker vixotrigine and carbamazepine in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020;9:62–73. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.739.
    1. Naik H, Dunbar J, Layton G, Palmer J, Versavel M. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of BIIB074, a Nav1.7-selective sodium channel blocker in adult and elderly male and female volunteers [poster PI-123]. Presented at the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT) 119th Annual Meeting; 21–24 March, 2018; Orlando (FL).
    1. Woodward C, Naik H, Versavel M, et al. Phase 1 study to evaluate the absorption, metabolism and excretion of the NAV1.7-selective sodium channel blocker BIIB074 [poster 162]. Presented at the International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics (ISSX) 21st North American Meeting; 24–28 September, 2017; Providence (RI).
    1. Naik H, Steiner D, Versavel M, Palmer J, Fong R. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of repeat doses of the Nav1.7-selective sodium channel blocker vixotrigine in healthy subjects [poster PII-003]. Presented at the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT) 119th Annual Meeting; 21–24 March, 2018; Orlando (FL).
    1. Naik H, Steiner D, Versavel M, Palmer J, Fong R. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of the Nav1.7-selective sodium channel blocker BIIB074 in healthy subjects [poster PII-004]. Presented at the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT) 119th Annual Meeting; 21–24 March, 2018; Orlando (FL).
    1. Naik H, Versavel M, Zhao Y, Miao X, Dunbar J. Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of the Nav1.7-specific sodium channel blocker BIIB074 in healthy subjects [poster P081]. Presented at the American College of Clinical Pharmacology (ACCP) Annual Meeting; 17–19 September, 2017; San Diego (CA).
    1. Fong R, Ballow CH, Naik H, Steiner D, Palmer J, White WB. Effects of a state- and use-dependent Nav1.7 channel blocker on ambulatory blood pressure: a randomized, controlled crossover study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;59:90–97. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1298.
    1. Naik H, Versavel M, Dunbar J. Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of vixotrigine in healthy Japanese and caucasian volunteers [poster PII-079]. Presented at the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (ASCPT) 120th Annual Meeting; 13–16 March, 2019; Washington, DC.
    1. Daniels K, Abma JC. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–49: United States, 2015–2017. NCHS data brief no. 327. 2018. . Accessed 24 Sept 2019.
    1. Bezemer ID, Verhamme KM, Gini R, et al. Use of oral contraceptives in three European countries: a population-based multi-database study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21:81–87. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1102220.
    1. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2010;15(Suppl. 2):S42–S53. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2010.533002.
    1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No 110: Noncontraceptive uses of hormonal contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:206–218. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cb50b5.
    1. Koopman JS, Dieleman JP, Huygen FJ, de Mos M, Martin CG, Sturkenboom MC. Incidence of facial pain in the general population. Pain. 2009;147:122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.08.023.
    1. Hall GC, Carroll D, Parry D, McQuay HJ. Epidemiology and treatment of neuropathic pain: the UK primary care perspective. Pain. 2006;122:156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.030.
    1. Sabers A. Pharmacokinetic interactions between contraceptives and antiepileptic drugs. Seizure. 2008;17:141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2007.11.012.
    1. Zhang H, Cui D, Wang B, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving 17alpha-ethinylestradiol: a new look at an old drug. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46:133–157. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200746020-00003.
    1. Nordette®-28 (levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets, 0.15 mg/0.03 mg) [product insert]. North Wales (PA): Teva Pharmaceuticals; 2017.
    1. Alesse® 28 tablets (levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol tablets) [product label]. Philadelphia (PA): Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.; 2017.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence. 2002. . Accessed 14 Nov 2019.
    1. Walle T, Fagan TC, Walle UK, Topmiller MJ. Stimulatory as well as inhibitory effects of ethinyloestradiol on the metabolic clearances of propranolol in young women. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996;41:305–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1996.03097.x.
    1. Reimers A, Helde G, Brodtkorb E. Ethinyl estradiol, not progestogens, reduces lamotrigine serum concentrations. Epilepsia. 2005;46:1414–1417. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.10105.x.
    1. Sidhu J, Job S, Singh S, Philipson R. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of the co-administration of lamotrigine and a combined oral contraceptive in healthy female subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61:191–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02539.x.
    1. Jusko WJ. Perspectives on variability in pharmacokinetics of an oral contraceptive product. Contraception. 2017;95:5–9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.019.
    1. Colloca L, Ludman T, Bouhassira D, et al. Neuropathic pain. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17002. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.2.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅