Development and validation of the online social support for smokers scale

Amanda L Graham, George D Papandonatos, Hakmook Kang, Jose L Moreno, David B Abrams, Amanda L Graham, George D Papandonatos, Hakmook Kang, Jose L Moreno, David B Abrams

Abstract

Background: Social networks play an important role in smoking. Provision of social support during cessation is a cornerstone of treatment. Online social networks for cessation are ubiquitous and represent a promising modality for smokers to receive and provide the support necessary for cessation. There are no existing measures specific to online social support for smoking cessation.

Objective: The objective was to develop a measure of social support to be used in online smoking cessation treatment research.

Methods: Initial items for the Online Social Support for Smokers Scale (OS4) were based on existing theory and scales delineated in various taxonomies. Preliminary field analysis (N = 73) was conducted on 23 initial items to optimize the scale. Further development was conducted on a refined 15-item scale in the context of a large randomized trial of Internet and telephone cessation treatment with follow-ups at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. In all, 1326 participants were randomized to an enhanced Internet arm that included a large online social network; psychometric analyses employed 3-month follow-up data from those reporting use of the enhanced Internet intervention at least once (n = 873). Items were subjected to a factor analysis, and the internal consistency reliability of the scale was examined along with construct and criterion validity. Other measures used in the study included demographics, nicotine dependence, partner support for cessation, general social support, social integration, stress, depression, health status, online community use, Internet use behaviors, intervention satisfaction, and 30-day point prevalence abstinence.

Results: The final 12-item OS4 scale demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alphas .86-.89) across demographic and smoking strata of interest. The OS4 also demonstrated good construct and criterion validity, with the directionality of the observed associations providing support for most a priori hypotheses. Significant Pearson correlations were observed between the OS4 and the Partner Interaction Questionnaire (PIQ) Positive subscale (ρ = .24, P < .001). As hypothesized, participants with the highest OS4 scores were more likely to have actively participated in the enhanced Internet community and to have high levels of satisfaction with the enhanced Internet intervention. In logistic regression analyses, the OS4 was highly predictive of 30-day point-prevalence abstinence at 6, 12, and 18 months (all P values <.001). The odds of abstinence at 6 months rose by 48% for each standard unit increase in online social support (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.71), dropping only slightly to 37% at 12 and 18 months (95% CI 1.17-1.59).

Conclusions: The OS4 is a brief, reliable, and valid instrument for measuring online social support for smoking cessation. Results should be replicated and extended, but this study suggests the OS4 can be used to advance theory, understand mechanisms, and potentially help to improve the tailoring of Internet-based smoking cessation treatments. It can also inspire development of similar measures for other online health-related intervention research.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00282009; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00282009 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/60XNj3xM6).

Conflict of interest statement

None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Biplot of Covariance Matrix.

References

    1. Cohen S, Williamson GM. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, editors. The Social Psychology of Health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1988. pp. 31–67.
    1. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E. Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Jun;58(3):304–9.
    1. Coppotelli HC, Orleans CT. Partner support and other determinants of smoking cessation maintenance among women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985 Aug;53(4):455–60.
    1. Mermelstein R, Cohen S, Lichtenstein E, Baer JS, Kamarck T. Social support and smoking cessation and maintenance. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Aug;54(4):447–53.
    1. Roski J, Schmid LA, Lando HA. Long-term associations of helpful and harmful spousal behaviors with smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 1996;21(2):173–85.0306-4603(95)00047-X
    1. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2249–58. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0706154. 358/21/2249
    1. Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel‚ Liaisons‚ and Staff A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158–76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009.S0749-3797(08)00332-2
    1. Burri M, Baujard V, Etter JF. A qualitative analysis of an internet discussion forum for recent ex-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S13–9.
    1. Etter JF. Internet-based smoking cessation programs. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Jan;75(1):110–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.06.014.S1386-5056(05)00144-9
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Abrams DB. Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1282–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165449.AJPH.2009.165449
    1. Cobb NK, Graham AL, Bock BC, Papandonatos G, Abrams DB. Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Apr;7(2):207–16. doi: 10.1080/14622200500055319.M751036L54TH3674
    1. Vallone DM, Duke JC, Cullen J, McCausland KL, Allen JA. Evaluation of EX: a national mass media smoking cessation campaign. Am J Public Health. 2011 Feb;101(2):302–9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.190454.AJPH.2009.190454
    1. An LC, Schillo BA, Saul JE, Wendling AH, Klatt CM, Berg CJ, Ahulwalia JS, Kavanaugh AM, Christenson M, Luxenberg MG. Utilization of smoking cessation informational, interactive, and online community resources as predictors of abstinence: cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1018. v10i5e55
    1. Zbikowski SM, Hapgood J, Smucker Barnwell S, McAfee T. Phone and web-based tobacco cessation treatment: real-world utilization patterns and outcomes for 11,000 tobacco users. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.999. v10i5e41
    1. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.
    1. Graham AL, Papandonatos GD, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Baskin-Sommers A, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Internet- vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S49–57.
    1. Cohen S, Mermelstein R, Kamarck T, Hoberman H. Measuring the functional components of social support. In: Sarason IG, Sarason BR, editors. Social Support: Theory, Research, and Application. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff; 1985. pp. 73–94.
    1. Cohen S. Social supports and physical health: Symptoms, health behaviors and infectious disease. In: Cummings EM, Greene AL, Karraker KH, editors. Life-span Developmental Psychology: Perspectives on Stress and Coping. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates; 1991. pp. 213–234.
    1. Graham AL, Bock BC, Cobb NK, Niaura R, Abrams DB. Characteristics of smokers reached and recruited to an internet smoking cessation trial: a case of denominators. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S43–8.
    1. Graham AL, Cobb NK, Papandonatos GD, Moreno JL, Kang H, Tinkelman DG, Bock BC, Niaura RS, Abrams DB. A randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jan 10;171(1):46–53. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.451.171/1/46
    1. Wills TA, Shinar O. Measuring perceived and received social support. In: Cohen S, Underwood LG, Gottlieb BH, editors. Social Support Measurement and Intervention: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 86–135.
    1. House JS, Kahn RL. Measures and concepts of social support. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, editors. Social Support and Health. Orlando, FL.: Academic Press; 1985. pp. 83–108.
    1. Wills TA. Supportive functions of interpersonal relationships. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, editors. Social Support and Health. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1985. pp. 61–82.
    1. Argyle M. Benefits produced by supportive social relationships. In: Veiel HOF, Baumann U, editors. The Meaning and Measurement of Social Support. New York, NY: Hemisphere; 1992. pp. 13–32.
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119–27.
    1. McMahon SD, Jason LA. Social support in a worksite smoking intervention. A test of theoretical models. Behav Modif. 2000 Apr;24(2):184–201.
    1. Gruder CL, Mermelstein RJ, Kirkendol S, Hedeker D, Wong SC, Schreckengost J, Warnecke RB, Burzette R, Miller TQ. Effects of social support and relapse prevention training as adjuncts to a televised smoking-cessation intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;61(1):113–20.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385–96.
    1. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77–84.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–83.
    1. Gabriel KR. The biplot graphical display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika. 1971;58:453–467. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.453.
    1. Gower JD, Hand J. Biplots. London, England: Chapman & Hall; 2006.
    1. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
    1. Salgado JF. VALCOR: A program for estimating standard error, confidence intervals, and probability of corrected validity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 1997;29(3):464–467. doi: 10.3758/BF03200601.
    1. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE, Urry VW. Statistical power in criterion-related validated studies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976;61(4):473–485. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.61.4.473.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.
    1. May S, West R, Hajek P, McEwen A, McRobbie H. Randomized controlled trial of a social support ('buddy') intervention for smoking cessation. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Dec;64(1-3):235–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.02.008.S0738-3991(06)00061-9
    1. Lichtenstein E, Glasgow RE, Abrams DB. Social support in smoking cessation: In search of effective interventions. Behavior Therapy. 1986;17(5):607–619. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80098-3.
    1. Lichtenstein E, Glasgow RE. Smoking cessation: what have we learned over the past decade? J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Aug;60(4):518–27.
    1. Park EW, Schultz JK, Tudiver F, Campbell T, Becker L. Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD002928. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002928.pub2.
    1. Lichtenstein E, Hollis J. Patient referral to a smoking cessation program: who follows through? J Fam Pract. 1992 Jun;34(6):739–44.
    1. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa066082. NEJMsa066082

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅