Physician survey of a laboratory medicine interpretive service and evaluation of the influence of interpretations on laboratory test ordering

Martha E Laposata, Michael Laposata, Elizabeth M Van Cott, Dion S Buchner, Mohammed S Kashalo, Anand S Dighe, Martha E Laposata, Michael Laposata, Elizabeth M Van Cott, Dion S Buchner, Mohammed S Kashalo, Anand S Dighe

Abstract

Context: Complex coagulation test panels ordered by clinicians are typically reported to clinicians without a patient-specific interpretive paragraph.

Objectives: To survey clinicians regarding pathologist-generated interpretations of complex laboratory testing panels and to assess the ability of the interpretations to educate test orderers.

Design: Surveys were conducted of physicians ordering complex coagulation laboratory testing that included narrative interpretation. Evaluation of order requisitions was performed to assess the interpretation's influence on ordering practices.

Setting: Physicians ordering coagulation testing at a large academic medical center hospital in Boston, Mass, and physicians from outside hospitals using the academic medical center as a reference laboratory for coagulation testing.

Outcome measures: Physician surveys and evaluation of laboratory requisition slips.

Results: In nearly 80% of responses, the ordering clinicians perceived that the interpretive comments saved them time and improved the diagnostic process. Moreover, the interpretations were perceived by ordering clinicians to help prevent a misdiagnosis or otherwise impact the differential diagnosis in approximately 70% of responses. In addition, interpretations appeared to be able to train the ordering clinicians as to the standard ordering practices.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate physician satisfaction with an innovative information delivery approach that provides laboratory diagnostic interpretation and test-ordering education to clinicians in the context of their daily workflow.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅