Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol

Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, Shari Mackens, Herman Tournaye, Christophe Blockeel, Dominic Stoop, Samuel Santos-Ribeiro, Shari Mackens, Herman Tournaye, Christophe Blockeel, Dominic Stoop

Abstract

Study question: Does intentional endometrial injury (i.e. endometrial scratching) during ART enhance pregnancy rates?

Summary answer: We propose a randomized controlled clinical trial in women performing ART in which the intervention group will undergo an additional endometrial biopsy during exogenous ovarian stimulation.

What is known already: Although endometrial receptivity has been extensively studied, the mechanisms behind the implantation of an embryo remain largely a mystery. Intentional endometrial injury has been put forward by many researchers as an inexpensive clinical tool capable of enhancing endometrial receptivity. However, despite its widespread use, the benefit of endometrial scratching is still a contentious and unresolved issue.

Study design size duration: Pragmatic two-arm randomized, single-centre, controlled open-label trial in women undergoing exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation for ART followed by a fresh embryo transfer in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppressed cycle. The trial will include 360 women in total with a 1:1 allocation ratio and an expected total duration of up to 45 months.

Participants/materials setting methods: Subjects in the intervention group will undergo an endometrial biopsy during the follicular phase, on the sixth to eighth day of exogenous stimulation. Furthermore, nested within this clinical trial, we will also evaluate whether the transcriptomic signatures of the material collected during the biopsy may accurately distinguish women who become pregnant from those who do not. These endometrial transcriptomic signatures will be assessed both immediately after the biopsy and following in-vitro decidualization.

Main results and the role of chance: Our primary objective is to assess the effect of endometrial injury during exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation on clinical pregnancy rates after ART. Secondary efficacy and safety outcomes include: live-birth delivery after 24 weeks, the endometrial transcriptomic profile among women in the intervention group, short-term safety (e.g. procedure intolerance due to pain, post-procedure bleeding) and long-term safety (e.g. cancelled transfers, miscarriage) outcomes.

Limitations reasons for caution: Owing to its pragmatic design, this study may have limited power to determine one or more of our secondary outcomes and whether there are specific subgroups of women who may benefit significantly from performing endometrial scratching and endometrial transcriptomic profiling.

Wider implications of the findings: Despite the weak biological plausibility, heterogeneity in the existing randomized controlled trials and lack of evaluation of any potential risks associated with endometrial scratching, this procedure is still widely applied in current clinical practice. This clinical trial aims to pragmatically assess the potential benefits and harms of the generalized use of this strategy.

Study funding/competing interests: this study has received a grant from the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO, 1524417N). This organization has no further role in the study, namely with regards to protocol development, study conduction and evaluation of results.

Trial registration number: NCT02061228.

Trial registration date: 10 February 2014.

Date of first patient’s enrolment: 3 April 2014.

Protocol version: 2.0.

Keywords: assisted reproduction; endometrial receptivity; endometrial scratching; follicular-phase endometrial injury; ovarian stimulation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and flowchart. SD1-8, stimulation Days 1–8; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; OR, oocyte retrieval; ET, embryo transfer; CP, clinical pregnancy.

References

    1. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2015;31:166–169.
    1. Connolly MP, Hoorens S, Chambers GM. The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:603–613.
    1. Diaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martinez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alama P, Pellicer A, Simon C. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril 2011;95:50–60.
    1. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 2013;29:15–21.
    1. Dunne C, Taylor B. Does endometrial injury improve implantation of frozen-thawed embryos? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:575–579.
    1. El-Khayat W, Elsadek M, Saber W. Comparing the effect of office hysteroscopy with endometrial scratch versus office hysteroscopy on intrauterine insemination outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;194:96–100.
    1. El-Toukhy T, Sunkara S, Khalaf Y. Local endometrial injury and IVF outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:345–354.
    1. Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B. Implantation in assisted reproduction: a look at endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:530–538.
    1. Finn CA, Martin L. Endocrine control of the timing of endometrial sensitivity to a decidual stimulus. Biol Reprod 1972;7:82–86.
    1. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Rediological Health Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff: Medical Device Reporting for Manufacturers. Maryland: Food and Drug Administration, 2016.
    1. Gibreel A, El-Adawi N, Elgindy E, Al-Inany H, Allakany N, Tournaye H. Endometrial scratching for women with previous IVF failure undergoing IVF treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015;31:313–316.
    1. Granot I, Gnainsky Y, Dekel N. Endometrial inflammation and effect on implantation improvement and pregnancy outcome. Reproduction 2012;144:661–668.
    1. Hart SN, Therneau TM, Zhang Y, Poland GA, Kocher JP. Calculating sample size estimates for RNA sequencing data. J Comput Biol 2013;20:970–978.
    1. Hoos PC, Hoffman LH. Effect of histamine receptor antagonists and indomethacin on implantation in the rabbit. Biol Reprod 1983;29:833–840.
    1. Huang SY, Wang CJ, Soong YK, Wang HS, Wang ML, Lin CY, Chang CL. Site-specific endometrial injury improves implantation and pregnancy in patients with repeated implantation failures. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2011;9:140.
    1. Humphrey KW. Interactions between oestradiol 3, 17 beta and progesterone on the induction and growth of deciduomata in ovariectomized mice. Aust J Biol Sci 1969;22:689–699.
    1. Koot YE, van Hooff SR, Boomsma CM, van Leenen D, Groot Koerkamp MJ, Goddijn M, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC, Holstege FC, Macklon NS. An endometrial gene expression signature accurately predicts recurrent implantation failure after IVF. Sci Rep 2016;6:19411.
    1. Lensen S, Sadler L, Farquhar C. Endometrial scratching for subfertility: everyone’s doing it. Hum Reprod 2016;31:1241–1244.
    1. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078–2079.
    1. Loeb L. Ueber die experimentelle Erzeugung von Knoten von Deciduagewebe in dem Uterus des Meerschweinchens nach stattgefunder copulation. Zbt für Allg Path Path Anat 1907;18:563–565.
    1. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550.
    1. Nastri CO, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Maheshwari A, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;7:CD009517.
    1. Nastri CO, Lensen SF, Gibreel A, Raine-Fenning N, Ferriani RA, Bhattacharya S, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD009517 .
    1. Okonechnikov K, Conesa A, Garcia-Alcalde F. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2016;32:292–294.
    1. Potdar N, Gelbaya T, Nardo LG. Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:561–571.
    1. Ramirez F, Dundar F, Diehl S, Gruning BA, Manke T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:W187–W191.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Group C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Br Med J 2010;340:c332.
    1. Simon C, Bellver J. Scratching beneath ‘The Scratching Case’: systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the back door for evidence-based medicine. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1618–1621.
    1. Teklenburg G, Salker M, Molokhia M, Lavery S, Trew G, Aojanepong T, Mardon HJ, Lokugamage AU, Rai R, Landles C et al. . Natural selection of human embryos: decidualizing endometrial stromal cells serve as sensors of embryo quality upon implantation. PLoS One 2010;5:e10258.
    1. van Hoogenhuijze NE, Torrance HL, Mol F, Laven JSE, Scheenjes E, Traas MAF, Janssen C, Cohlen B, Teklenburg G, de Bruin JP et al. . Endometrial scratching in women with implantation failure after a first IVF/ICSI cycle; does it lead to a higher live birth rate? The SCRaTCH study: a randomized controlled trial (NTR 5342). BMC Women’s Health 2017;17:47.
    1. van Wely M. The good, the bad and the ugly: meta-analyses. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1622–1626.
    1. Weimar CH, Kavelaars A, Brosens JJ, Gellersen B, de Vreeden-Elbertse JM, Heijnen CJ, Macklon NS. Endometrial stromal cells of women with recurrent miscarriage fail to discriminate between high- and low-quality human embryos. PLoS One 2012;7:e41424.
    1. Yeung TW, Chai J, Li RH, Lee VC, Ho PC, Ng EH. The effect of endometrial injury on ongoing pregnancy rate in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014;29:2474–2481.
    1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, Vanderpoel S, International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive T, World Health O . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520–1524.
    1. Zhang XH, Liu ZZ, Tang MX, Zhang YH, Hu L, Liao AH. Morphological changes and expression of cytokine after local endometrial injury in a mouse model. Reprod Sci 2015;22:1377–1386.
    1. Zhou L, Li R, Wang R, Huang HX, Zhong K. Local injury to the endometrium in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles improves implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1166–1176.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅