Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Cognitive Training and Transfer Effects in Stroke Patients

Eliane C Miotto, Paulo R Bazán, Alana X Batista, Adriana B Conforto, Eberval G Figueiredo, Maria da Graça M Martin, Isabella B Avolio, Edson Amaro Jr, Manoel J Teixeira, Eliane C Miotto, Paulo R Bazán, Alana X Batista, Adriana B Conforto, Eberval G Figueiredo, Maria da Graça M Martin, Isabella B Avolio, Edson Amaro Jr, Manoel J Teixeira

Abstract

Stroke lesions are frequently followed by cognitive impairments. Cognitive training is a non-pharmacological intervention that can promote neural compensation mechanisms and strategies to remediate cognitive impairments. The aims of this study were: (1) To investigate the cognitive performance, generalization effects, and neural correlates of semantic organization strategy training (SOST) in patients with chronic left frontoparietal stroke and healthy controls (HC); and (2) to compare the behavioral effects and neural correlates of SOST with an active control psychoeducation intervention (PI). In this randomized controlled study, all participants were randomly allocated into two groups, one group received SOST, and the other received PI intervention. Participants underwent two fMRI sessions, one prior and the other, after intervention. In each fMRI session, images were obtained during memory encoding task using a list of semantically related words. We found improved post-intervention memory performance in participants that received SOST (both patients and controls), indicated by number of words recalled, word clustering scores, and performance in a generalization task. The fMRI analysis revealed negative correlation between task performance and regions of the default-mode network. These results suggest that cognitive training using semantic organization strategy can improve episodic memory performance and promote potential functional neuroplasticity in patients with ischemic stroke lesions. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03644290.

Keywords: cognitive training; episodic memory; fMRI; semantic organization strategies; stroke.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2020 Miotto, Bazán, Batista, Conforto, Figueiredo, Martin, Avolio, Amaro and Teixeira.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lesion Maps. Superposition of patients' lesions represented by the number of subjects that had lesions in each voxel. Left hemisphere lesion maps are presented separately for each group: patients that received Semantic Organization Strategy Training (SOST; n = 7; top); and patients that received Psychoeducation Intervention (PI; n = 6; bottom). Images in neurological orientation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT flowchart of the recruitment and selection of the study participants. SP, Stroke patients; HC, Healthy Controls; fMRI, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging; SOST, Semantic Organization Strategy Training; PI, Psychoeducational Intervention.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Word-List Learning Paradigm (WLLP). Schematic representation of WLLP showing the structure of each task block (top): Semantically related (SR) block; and non-words (NW) block. The words presented in the image are only illustrations. The experiments were performed with words in Portuguese. The fMRI block sequence is also presented (bottom) showing an example with SR block (participants were randomly assigned to start with SR block or with NW block).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plots of the Post vs. pre intervention average differences, with standard error bars, according to group (Healthy Controls; Stroke patients) and intervention (SOST, Semantic Organization Strategy Training; PI, Psychoeducation Intervention), for each of the 6 dependent variables evaluated: Word-List Learning Paradigm (WLLP) recall; WLLP clustering score; Supermarket Generalization Task (SGT) recall; SGT clustering score; brief metamemory questionnaire (BMQ) strategy use; and BMQ capacity.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average BOLD responses in SR task block for each group in each run (Pre and Post-intervention) presented as Z-values (neurological orientation). Voxel threshold of Z > 2.3 and cluster corrected threshold of p < 0.05. PI, Psychoeducation Intervention; SOST, Semantic Organization Strategy Training; HC, Healthy Controls; SP, Stroke Patients.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Stroke patient ANOVA results, showing significant interaction effects between run, and intervention presented as Z-values (neurological orientation). Voxel threshold of Z > 2.3 and cluster corrected threshold of p < 0.05.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Plots of the semantically related (SR) task block BOLD response (beta-values from first-level GLM analyses) in pre and post-intervention runs in frontal cluster of default-mode network (DMN) found in the ANOVA with stroke patients (SP), showing changes for each subject, in each group. PI, Psychoeducation Intervention; SOST, Semantic Organization Strategy Training; HC, Healthy Controls; SP, Stroke Patients.

References

    1. Patel MD, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clin Rehabil. (2003) 17:158–66. 10.1191/0269215503cr596oa
    1. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Palk M, Sano M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1994) 57:202–7. 10.1136/jnnp.57.2.202
    1. Schouten EA, Schiemanck SK, Brand N, Post MW. Long-term deficits in episodic memory after ischemic stroke: evaluation and prediction of verbal and visual memory performance based on lesion characteristics. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2009) 18:128–38. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2008.09.017
    1. Middleton LE, Lam B, Fahmi H, Black SE, McIlroy WE, Stuss DT, et al. . Frequency of domain-specific cognitive impairment in sub-acute and chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. (2014) 34:305–12. 10.3233/NRE-131030
    1. Tulving E. Episodic memory: from mind to brain. Annu Rev Psychol. (2002) 53:1–25. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114
    1. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, et al. . Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2011) 92:519–30. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015
    1. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. . Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2016) 47:e98–169. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
    1. das Nair R, Cogger H, Worthington E, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. (2016) 9:CD002293. 10.1002/14651858.CD002293.pub3
    1. Batista AX, Bazán PR, Conforto AB, Martin MDGM, Simon S, Hampstead B, et al. . Effects of mnemonic strategy training on brain activity and cognitive functioning of left-hemisphere ischemic stroke patients. Neural Plast. (2019) 2019:1–16. 10.1155/2019/4172569
    1. Stamenova V, Jennings JM, Cook SP, Gao F, Walker LAS, Smith AM, et al. . Repetition-lag memory training is feasible in patients with chronic stroke, including those with memory problems. Brain Inj. (2017) 31:57–67. 10.1080/02699052.2016.1222081
    1. De Luca R, Leonardi S, Spadaro L, Russo M, Aragona B, Torrisi M, et al. . Improving cognitive function in patients with stroke: can computerized training be the future? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2018) 27:1055–60. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.11.008
    1. Lawson D, Stolwyk R, Ponsford J, McKenzie D, Downing M, Wong D. Telehealth delivery of memory rehabilitation following stroke. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. (2020) 26:58–71. 10.1017/S1355617719000651
    1. Savage CR, Deckersbach T, Heckers S, Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Alpert NM, et al. . Prefrontal regions supporting spontaneous and directed application of verbal learning strategies: evidence from PET. Brain. (2001) 124:219–31. 10.1093/brain/124.1.219
    1. Miotto EC, Savage CR, Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Martins MG, Iaki S, et al. . Bilateral activation of the prefrontal cortex after strategic semantic cognitive training. Hum Brain Mapp. (2006) 27:288–95. 10.1002/hbm.20184
    1. Miotto EC, Balardin JB, Vieira G, Sato JR, Martin MGM, Scaff M, et al. . Right Inferior frontal gyrus activation is associated with memory improvement in patients with left frontal low-grade glioma resection. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e105987. 10.1371/journal.pone.0105987
    1. Balardin JB, Batistuzzo MC, Martin Mda G, Sato JR, Smid J, Porto C, et al. . Differences in prefrontal cortex activation and deactivation during strategic episodic verbal memory encoding in mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. (2015) 7:147. 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00147
    1. Chen AJ, Abrams GM, D'Esposito M. Functional reintegration of prefrontal neural networks for enhancing recovery after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. (2006) 21:107–18. 10.1097/00001199-200603000-00004
    1. Kim Y, Yoo W, Ko M, Park C, Kin ST, Na DL. Plasticity of the attentional network after brain injury and cognitive rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2009) 23:468–77. 10.1177/1545968308328728
    1. Chen AJ, Novakovic-Agopian T, Nycum TJ, Song S, Turner GR, Hills NK. Training of goal-directed attention regulation enhances control over neural processing for individuals with brain injury. Brain. (2011) 134:1541–54. 10.1093/brain/awr067
    1. Han K, Chapman SB, Krawczyk DC. Neuroplasticity of cognitive control networks following cognitive training for chronic traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. (2018) 18:262–78. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.030
    1. Lin ZC, Tao J, Gao YL, Yin DZ, Chen AZ, Chen LD. Analysis of central mechanism of cognitive training on cognitive impairment after stroke: resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Int Med Res. (2014) 42:659–68. 10.1177/0300060513505809
    1. Schulz KF, Moher D, Altman DG. Consort 2010 comments. Lancet. (2010) 376:1222–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61879-X
    1. Ringe WK, Saine KC, Lacritz LH, Hynan LS, Cullum CM. Dyadic short forms of the wechsler adult intelligence scale-III. Assessment. (2002) 9:254–60. 10.1177/1073191102009003004
    1. Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I. The spot-the-word test: a robust estimate of verbal intelligence based on lexical decision. Br J Clin Psychol. (1993) 32:55–65. 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1993.tb01027.x
    1. JASP Team . JASP (Version 0.12.2) [Computer software] (2020).
    1. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; (2019). Available online at: (accessed August 31, 2020).
    1. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. (2004) 23:208–19. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
    1. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J. Spatial normalization of brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Neuroimage. (2001) 14:486–500. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0845
    1. Woolrich MW, Behrens TEJ, Beckmann CF, Jenkinson M, Smith SM. Multi-level linear modeling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference. Neuroimage. (2004) 21:1732–47. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023
    1. Miotto EC, Savage CR, Evans JJ, Wilson BA, Martin MG, Balardin JB, et al. . Semantic strategy training increases memory performance and brain activity in patients with prefrontal cortex lesions. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2013) 115:309–16. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.05.024
    1. Sambataro F, Murty VP, Callicott JH, Tan HY, Das S, Weinberger DR, et al. . Age-related alterations in default mode network: impact on working memory performance. Neurobiol Aging. (2010) 31:839–52. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.05.022
    1. Sala-Llonch R, Peña-Gómez C, Arenaza-Urquijo EM, Vidal-Piñero D, Bargalló N, Junqué C, et al. . Brain connectivity during resting state and subsequent working memory task predicts behavioural performance. Cortex. (2012) 48:1187–96. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.07.006
    1. Davey CG, Pujol J, Harrison BJ. Mapping the self in the brain's default mode network. Neuroimage. (2016) 132:390–7. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.022
    1. Whitney C, Kirk M, O'Sullivan J, Ralph MAL, Jefferies E. Executive semantic processing is underpinned by a large-scale neural network: revealing the contribution of left prefrontal, posterior temporal, and parietal cortex to controlled retrieval and selection using TMS. J Cogn Neurosci. (2012) 24:133–47. 10.1162/jocn_a_00123

Source: PubMed

3
订阅