Value of ultrasonography as a marker of early response to abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results from the APPRAISE study

Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Richard J Wakefield, Hilde Berner-Hammer, Olivier Vittecoq, Georgios Filippou, Peter Balint, Ingrid Möller, Annamaria Iagnocco, Esperanza Naredo, Mikkel Østergaard, Maarten Boers, Corine Gaillez, Karina Van Holder, Manuela Le Bars, OMERACT-EULAR-Ultrasound Task Force, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Richard J Wakefield, Hilde Berner-Hammer, Olivier Vittecoq, Georgios Filippou, Peter Balint, Ingrid Möller, Annamaria Iagnocco, Esperanza Naredo, Mikkel Østergaard, Maarten Boers, Corine Gaillez, Karina Van Holder, Manuela Le Bars, OMERACT-EULAR-Ultrasound Task Force

Abstract

Objectives: To study the responsiveness of a combined power Doppler and greyscale ultrasound (PDUS) score for assessing synovitis in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX).

Methods: In this open-label, multicentre, single-arm study, patients with RA (MTX inadequate responders) received intravenous abatacept (∼10 mg/kg) plus MTX for 24 weeks. A composite PDUS synovitis score, developed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (OMERACT-EULAR)-Ultrasound Task Force, was used to evaluate individual joints. The maximal score of each joint was added into a Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS) for bilateral metacarpophalangeal joints (MCPs) 2-5 (primary objective). The value of GLOESS containing other joint sets was explored, along with clinical efficacy.

Results: Eighty-nine patients completed the 24-week treatment period. The earliest PDUS sign of improvement in synovitis was at week 1 (mean change in GLOESS (MCPs 2-5): -0.7 (95% CIs -1.2 to -0.1)), with continuous improvement to week 24. Early improvement was observed in the component scores (power Doppler signal at week 1, synovial hyperplasia at week 2, joint effusion at week 4). Comparable changes were observed for 22 paired joints and minimal joint subsets. Mean Disease Activity Score 28 (C reactive protein) was significantly reduced from weeks 1 to 24, reaching clinical meaningful improvement (change ≥1.2) at week 8.

Conclusions: In this first international prospective study, the composite PDUS score is responsive to abatacept. GLOESS demonstrated the rapid onset of action of abatacept, regardless of the number of joints examined. Ultrasound is an objective tool to monitor patients with RA under treatment.

Trial registration number: NCT00767325.

Keywords: DMARDs (biologic); Disease Activity; Rheumatoid Arthritis; Ultrasonography.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug (N=104). Owing to compliance issues (major deviation due to the lack of participation in training), patients from one site (n=8) were excluded before power Doppler and greyscale ultrasound analyses were performed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean change in (A) GLOESS and the component scores for metacarpophalangeal joints 2–5, (B) GLOESS for the 22-paired joint set, (C) GLOESS for the reduced (nine-paired) joint set and (D) DAS28 (CRP) >24 weeks of treatment with abatacept plus methotrexate. Error bars represent 95% CIs. Data are for patients with baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment, with last observation carried forward. PDUS analyses were completed for 96 of the 104 patients, as patients from one site (n=8) were excluded due to compliance issues. (A) CI did not cross zero from week 1 for GLOESS: −0.7 (−1.2 to −0.1) or power Doppler: −0.9 (−1.5 to −0.3); CI did not cross zero from week 2 for synovial hyperplasia: −1.0 (−1.6 to −0.4); CI did not cross zero from week 4 for joint effusion: −0.8 (−1.4 to −0.3). (B) CI did not cross zero from week 1 −1.7 (−3.4 to −0.1). (C) CI did not cross zero from week 2 −1.5 (−2.4 to −0.6). (D) CI did not cross zero from week 1 −0.5 (−0.7 to −0.4). CMI, clinically meaningful improvement (ie, improvement from baseline in DAS28 score of ≥1.2); CRP, C reactive protein; DAS, disease activity score; GLOESS, Global OMERACT–EULAR (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology–European League Against Rheumatism) Synovitis Score; PDUS, power Doppler and greyscale ultrasound.

References

    1. Conaghan PG, O'Connor P, McGonagle D, et al. . Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:64–71. 10.1002/art.10747
    1. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:492–509. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573
    1. Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, et al. . 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:625–39. 10.1002/acr.21641
    1. Grassi W, Salaffi F, Filippucci E. Ultrasound in rheumatology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2005;19:467–85. 10.1016/j.berh.2005.01.002
    1. Kane D, Grassi W, Sturrock R, et al. . Musculoskeletal ultrasound--a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 2: clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:829–38.
    1. Lopez-Ben R, Bernreuter WK, Moreland LW, et al. . Ultrasound detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison to routine radiographs of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:80–4. 10.1007/s00256-003-0693-2
    1. Østergaard M, Szkudlarek M. Ultrasonography: a valid method for assessing rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:681–6. 10.1002/art.20940
    1. Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, et al. . The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2762–70. 10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2762::AID-ANR16>;2-#
    1. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, et al. . Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2018–23. 10.1002/1529-0131(200109)44:9<2018::AID-ART350>;2-C
    1. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Savnik A, et al. . Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of synovial inflammation of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2434–41. 10.1002/art.11245
    1. Mandl P, Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, et al. . A systematic literature review analysis of ultrasound joint count and scoring systems to assess synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis according to the OMERACT filter. J Rheumatol 2011;38:2055–62. 10.3899/jrheum.110424
    1. Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. . The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1163–9. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201397
    1. Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J, et al. . Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1107–16. 10.1002/art.20123
    1. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Qvistgaard E, et al. . Effects of treatment with etanercept (Enbrel, TNRF:Fc) on rheumatoid arthritis evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:178–81. 10.1136/ard.62.2.178
    1. Iagnocco A, Filippucci E, Perella C, et al. . Clinical and ultrasonographic monitoring of response to adalimumab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2008;35:35–40.
    1. Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, Salaffi F, et al. . Power Doppler sonography monitoring of synovial perfusion at the wrist joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:1433–7. 10.1136/ard.2005.044628
    1. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, et al. . Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum 2007;57:116–24. 10.1002/art.22461
    1. D'Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, Berner Hammer H, et al. . THU0095 early response to abatacept plus MTX in MTX-IR RA patients using power Doppler ultrasonography: an open-label study. Ann Rheum Dis 2012;71(Suppl 3):186 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.2060
    1. Naredo E, Möller I, Cruz A, et al. . Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:2248–56. 10.1002/art.23682
    1. Naredo E, Gamero F, Bonilla G, et al. . Ultrasonographic assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of extended versus reduced joint evaluation. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23:881–4.
    1. Wakefield RJ, D'Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, et al. . The OMERACT Ultrasound Group: status of current activities and research directions. J Rheumatol 2007;34:848–51.
    1. Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, et al. . American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:404–13. 10.1136/ard.2011.149765
    1. Al-Kandari NM, Jolliffe IT. Variable selection and interpretation in correlation principal components. Environmetrics 2005;16:659–72. 10.1002/env.728
    1. Naredo E, Rodríguez M, Campos C, et al. . Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:515–22. 10.1002/art.23529
    1. Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. . Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61:1194–201. 10.1002/art.24646
    1. Joshua F, de Carle R, Rayment M, et al. . Power Doppler ‘blanching’ after the application of transducer pressure. Australas Radiol 2005;49:218–21. 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2005.01435.x
    1. Zayat AS, Freeston JE, Conaghan PG, et al. . Does joint position affect US findings in inflammatory arthritis? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:921–5. 10.1093/rheumatology/ker383
    1. Conaghan PG, Durez P, Alten RE, et al. . Impact of intravenous abatacept on synovitis, osteitis and structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: the ASSET randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1287–94. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201611
    1. Weinblatt ME, Schiff M, Valente R, et al. . Head-to-head comparison of subcutaneous abatacept versus adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis: findings of a phase IIIb, multinational, prospective, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:28–38. 10.1002/art.37711
    1. Weinblatt ME, Moreland LW, Westhovens R, et al. . Safety of abatacept administered intravenously in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analyses of up to 8 years of treatment from the abatacept clinical trial program. J Rheumatol 2013;40:787–97. 10.3899/jrheum.120906

Source: PubMed

3
订阅