Effect of manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation on cough flow of normal subjects, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and patients with respiratory muscle weakness

P Sivasothy, L Brown, I E Smith, J M Shneerson, P Sivasothy, L Brown, I E Smith, J M Shneerson

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that cough effectiveness can be improved by assisted techniques. The effects of manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation on cough flow physiology are reported in this study.

Methods: The physiological actions and patient self-assessment of manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation were investigated in 29 subjects (nine normal subjects, eight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), four subjects with respiratory muscle weakness (RMW) with scoliosis, and eight subjects with RMW without scoliosis).

Results: The peak cough expiratory flow rate and cough expiratory volume were not improved by manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation alone or in combination in normal subjects. The median increase in peak cough expiratory flow in subjects with RMW without scoliosis with manually assisted cough alone or in combination with mechanical insufflation of 84 l/min (95% confidence interval (CI) 19 to 122) and 144 l/min (95% CI 14 to 195), respectively, reflects improvement in the expulsive phase of coughing by these techniques. Manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation in combination raised peak expiratory flow rate more than either technique alone in this group. The abnormal chest shape in scoliotic subjects and the fixed inspiratory pressure used made effective manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation difficult in this group and no improvements were found. In patients with COPD manually assisted cough alone and in combination with mechanical insufflation decreased peak expiratory flow rate by 144 l/min (95% CI 25 to 259) and 135 l/min (95% CI 30 to 312), respectively.

Conclusions: Manually assisted cough and mechanical insufflation should be considered to assist expectoration of secretions in patients with RMW without scoliosis but not in those with scoliosis.

References

    1. Am J Med Sci. 1966 Feb;251(2):211-4
    1. J Chronic Dis. 1958 Nov;8(5):629-36
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1966 Nov;47(11):705-10
    1. Thorax. 1967 Jan;22(1):88-96
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1967 Oct;96(4):666-77
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1974 Jun;36(6):653-67
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Aug;51(2):494-8
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1983 Sep;58(9):597-602
    1. Thorax. 1984 Jul;39(7):535-8
    1. Chest. 1987 Jun;91(6):859-64
    1. Respir Med. 1991 Jan;85 Suppl A:23-6
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Feb;74(2):170-7
    1. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993 Oct;102(10):743-7
    1. Chest. 1993 Nov;104(5):1553-62
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Mar;72(3):298-301
    1. Chest. 1994 May;105(5):1538-44
    1. Respir Care. 1994 May;39(5):532-45; discussion 545-9
    1. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Apr;19(2):117-9
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Sep;76(9):828-32
    1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jul-Aug;76(4):338-9
    1. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1996 Jun;2(2):323-45
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):95-8
    1. Am J Med Sci. 1953 Sep;226(3):241-9
    1. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1954 May;93(5):698-704
    1. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1954 Jun;93(6):825-41

Source: PubMed

3
订阅