Permeation and block of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor channels by divalent cations in mouse cultured central neurones

M L Mayer, G L Westbrook, M L Mayer, G L Westbrook

Abstract

1. Spinal cord and hippocampal neurones in cell culture were voltage clamped using the tight-seal, whole-cell recording technique. The concentration of sodium and a series of divalent cations in the extracellular media was varied to study permeation through excitatory amino acid receptor channels activated by the selective agonists N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA), kainic acid and quisqualic acid. 2. On raising the extracellular calcium concentration, with [Na+]o held constant at 105 mM, the reversal potential of responses to NMDA shifted in the depolarizing direction. This shift was adequately described by the extended constant-field equation over the range 0.3-50 mM-calcium. Using ionic activity coefficients we calculate a value of PCa/PNa = 10.6. Under the same experimental conditions the reversal potential of responses to kainic and quisqualic acids was much less affected by raising the calcium concentration, such that PCa/PNa = 0.15. A depolarizing shift of the NMDA reversal potential was also recorded during application of 20 mM-barium, strontium or manganese, suggesting permeation of these ions. The permeability sequence was Ca2+ greater than Ba2+ greater than Sr2+ much greater than Mn2+. No depolarizing shift of the NMDA reversal potential occurred during application of 20 mM-cobalt, magnesium or nickel. 3. In experiments in which the extracellular Na+ concentration was varied the extended constant-field equation was adequate in predicting shifts of the NMDA reversal potential recorded on varying [Na+]o over the range 50-150 mM, but failed to accurately predict the reversal potential of responses to NMDA with 10 mM-[Ca2+]o and only 10 or 20 mM-[Na+]o. These results imply an apparent increase in PCa/PNa on lowering [Na+]o and may result from interaction of permeant ions within the channel. 4. Barium and to a lesser extent calcium, but not strontium (all 20 mM), reduced the slope conductance of responses to NMDA recorded within +/- 15 mV of the reversal potential; over this limited range of membrane potential the current-voltage relationship remained linear in the presence of each of these ions. In contrast manganese produced a strong, voltage-dependent block of responses to NMDA, similar to that produced by magnesium, such that even close to the reversal potential the NMDA current-voltage relationship was highly non-linear. Thus manganese both permeates and blocks the NMDA receptor channel. 5. Raising the extracellular calcium concentration, from 0.1 to 5 mM, had two effects on the conductance mechanism activated by NMDA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

References

    1. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Aug;391(2):85-100
    1. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1982 Mar;60(3):282-96
    1. Nature. 1984 May 31-Jun 6;309(5967):453-6
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 May 2;466(3):461-73
    1. J Physiol. 1983 Sep;342:615-32
    1. Experientia. 1973 Oct 15;29(10):1244-7
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1986 Sep;88(3):293-319
    1. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1986;203:439-47
    1. Nature. 1984 May 17-23;309(5965):261-3
    1. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):449-72
    1. J Physiol. 1982 Apr;325:317-31
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1983 Jan 31;35(1):79-84
    1. Mol Biol Biochem Biophys. 1977;24:84-106
    1. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28(3):197-276
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(19):6110-3
    1. J Physiol. 1984 Aug;353:565-83
    1. Nature. 1987 Feb 5-11;325(6104):525-8
    1. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:417-33
    1. J Physiol. 1986 Mar;372:169-90
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1982 Nov;80(5):713-31
    1. J Physiol. 1984 Sep;354:253-72
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1985 May;85(5):669-98
    1. J Physiol. 1984 Jun;351:327-42
    1. Neuroscience. 1985 Mar;14(3):921-7
    1. J Physiol. 1980 Oct;307:413-28
    1. J Physiol. 1983 Aug;341:105-25
    1. J Physiol. 1984 Sep;354:29-53
    1. Nature. 1984 Feb 2-8;307(5950):462-5
    1. Nature. 1983 Oct 27-Nov 2;305(5937):805-8
    1. J Physiol. 1976 Oct;262(1):215-36
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):493-510
    1. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):462-4
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jun;59(6):637-58
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1983 Aug;50(2):487-507
    1. Nature. 1987 Feb 5-11;325(6104):522-5
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1984 Aug;84(2):157-86
    1. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:417-45
    1. J Physiol. 1984 Aug;353:585-608
    1. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1984 Jan;62(1):109-15
    1. Biophys J. 1984 Aug;46(2):277-83
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jun;61(6):687-708
    1. J Physiol. 1985 Apr;361:65-90
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1979 Jun;73(6):839-54
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Dec;70(6):707-24
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1986 Sep;88(3):321-47
    1. Annu Rev Physiol. 1969;31:581-646
    1. Neurosci Lett. 1983 Mar 28;36(1):75-80
    1. Brain Res. 1983 Apr 25;266(1):169-73
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Jan;53(1):1-16
    1. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Apr;71(4):397-410
    1. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(4):788-820
    1. Pflugers Arch. 1983 Feb;396(2):154-62
    1. Nature. 1986 May 29-Jun 4;321(6069):519-22

Source: PubMed

3
订阅