Controlling false discovery rates in factorial experiments with between-subjects and within-subjects tests

Eric D Schoen, Carina M Rubingh, Suzan Wopereis, Marjan van Erk, Eric D Schoen, Carina M Rubingh, Suzan Wopereis, Marjan van Erk

Abstract

Background: The False Discovery Rate (FDR) controls the expected number of false positives among the positive test results. It is not straightforward how to conduct a FDR controlling procedure in experiments with a factorial structure, while at the same time there are between-subjects and within-subjects factors. This is because there are P-values for different tests in one and the same response along with P-values for the same test and different responses.

Findings: We propose a procedure resulting in a single P-value per response, calculated over the tests of all the factorial effects. FDR control can then be based on the set of single P-values.

Conclusions: The proposed procedure is very easy to apply and is recommended for all designs with factors applied at different levels of the randomization, such as cross-over designs with added between-subjects factors.

Trial registration: NCT00959790.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
P-values for 21 oxylipids. Each circle represents an overal P-value for a particular oxylipid, summarizing the results of 7 statistical tests.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rejections for two FDR procedures.P-values below lower line: rejected by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure [2]; P-values below upper line: rejected by the Storey-Tibshirani procedure [3].

References

    1. Hochberg Y, Tamhane A. Multiple comparison procedures. New York: Wiley; 1987.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2003;100:9440–9445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100.
    1. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika. 1959;24:95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02289823.
    1. McLean RA, Sanders WL, Stroup WW. A unified approach to mixed linear models. Am Statistician. 1991;45:54–64.
    1. Bailey RA. Design of comparative experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
    1. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver and Boyd; 1935.
    1. Fang Y, Wit E. In: Advanced Data Mining and Applications Volume 5139 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Tang C, Ling C, Zhou X, Cercone N, Li X, editor. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2008. Test the overall significance of p-values by using joint tail probability of ordered p-values as test statistic; pp. 435–443.
    1. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1165–1188. doi: 10.1214/aos/1013699998.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅